Paul Thurrott's SuperSite for Windows
Home > Mobile > Mobile devices > Over 70 Percent of All Android Devices Now Covered by Microsoft Patents

Over 70 Percent of All Android Devices Now Covered by Microsoft Patents

Jan. 12, 2012 Paul Thurrott | Paul Thurrott's Supersite for Windows
Microsoft announced today that it has signed LG Electronics to its growing list of Android patent licensees, bringing the total number of licensees to 11. More important, this addition means that over 70 percent of all Android devices sold today now come with a Microsoft licensing fee, a further indication of the software giant's successes in getting these companies to pay up for using Android, a product Microsoft says infringes on its patents.

Some estimate that Microsoft now earns between $5 and $10 per Android device sold.

"We are pleased to have built upon our longstanding relationship with LG to reach a mutually beneficial agreement," Microsoft announced. "Together with our 10 previous agreements with Android and Chrome OS device manufacturers, including HTC, Samsung and Acer, this agreement with LG means that more than 70 percent of all Android smartphones sold in the US are now receiving coverage under Microsoft'/s patent portfolio.
 
"We are proud of the continued success of our program in resolving the IP issues surrounding Android and Chrome OS," Microsoft corporate vice president Horacio Gutierrez said.

Microsoft and LG had a previous patent licensing agreement in place and the companies note that this week's announcement amounts to an expansion of that. And here's a figure for you to ponder: Since launching its IP licensing program in December 2003, Microsoft has entered into over 1,100 licensing agreements. 1,100!

Discuss this Article 2

JimmyFal
on Jan 12, 2012
"I will spend my last dying breath if I need to, and I will spend every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank, to right this wrong... I'm going to destroy Android, because it's a stolen product. I'm willing to go thermonuclear war on this." The clearest possible contrast that any person could look at between the two original CEO's. IMO.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Jan 12, 2012
@JimmyFal It really is and it also shows the differences the approaches each company takes. MS is all about licensing and "Sells" very few products. You could argue they are just a massive IP licensing company. They don't really sell to end users, but to OEMs who resell licenses and such. Apple sells products, Hardware, etc. They sell directly to the end user. Apple does not really license their IP to anyone. MS basically says, use our IP and pay us for it. Apple says you can't use our IP, develop your own. Each way has worked well for each company.

Please or Register to post comments.

Related Articles

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use
Apr. 18, 2013
Article

What I Use: On the Road 21

Every so often, I publish an updated version of my “What I Use” document, which details the technology products and services I actually use day-to-day. Since I’m currently on my third business trip in five weeks, this is perhaps an ideal time to discuss the technology products I rely on when I travel and a few related points....More
Mar. 6, 2013
Article

What I Use: March 2013 35

Lots of changes since November, including a new PC-based home server running Windows 8, several new smart phones, new PCs and tablets, new cloud backup, Office 365 Home Premium and a nice doubling of my Internet speeds courtesy of Verizon FIOS....More
WinSuperSite.com
Related Penton Sites
Copyright © 2013 Penton Media, Inc