Some Early Thoughts About Apple's Textbook Announcements

Apple today announced what it calls a reinvention of the school textbook, a digital initiative involving its popular iPad devices, a new version of its iBooks ebook reader app that's optimized for iBooks textbooks, and a new iTunes U app that provides educators and students with everything they need to teach and take entire courses, respectively, using, of course, Apple's devices. I'm very curious to watch the forthcoming video of the announcement, but would like to offer up a few early observations based on the company's press releases (here and here).

First of all, this is smart: Education was and still is a key and core market for Apple. And its devices, especially the iPad, are both popular with young people/students and provide an excellent canvas for interactive books. There is some evidence that digital books, at least for now, provide an incentive for reading, especially among those not normally inclined to do so. But there is also evidence that Apple's partners' factories are doing more to harm the environment than the traditional, paper-based book industry ever did. But if anyone can fix that latter issue while delighting a core market, it's Apple. So let's just look at what was announced.

iBooks 2. The latest version of Apple's iBooks app for iPad (and iPhone and iPod touch) features iBooks textbooks, which Apple describes as "an entirely new kind of textbook that's dynamic, engaging and truly interactive." Compared to regular paper books, iBooks are interactive, colorful, can include videos, and can be updated again and again. They don't weigh down a backpack as do heavy, normal books. (This is something I can attest to; I can't believe how many books my young kids cart back and forth to school each day.)

Leading educational publishers including Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, McGraw-Hill and Pearson have pledged to deliver textbooks and other educational titles to the iBookstore, with most costing $14.99 or less. This, too, is an improvement over traditional textbooks, as any student or parent of a student can tell you: There's a huge market for used textbooks specifically for this reason.

The new iBooks 2 app is free and available today from the iTunes App Store.

iBooks Author. Apple is additionally offering a free Mac application, from its Mac App Store, called iBooks Author. This allows you to create your own iBooks "textbooks, cookbooks, history books, picture books and more," according to Apple, and then publish them to the iBookstore. It's unclear at this time whether this will entail the same overly-strict and non-transparent policies as does the App Store, however. And I'm not yet sure how this is better/worse than similar self-publishing services from companies like Amazon.com.

iTunes U app. For the past few years, I've been talking up and recommending Apple's unique iTunes U service on the Windows Weekly podcast. There's simply nothing like it on rival devices, and if you're interested in essentially taking college classes for free--yes, really--you need to check it out. But now all of this content is available through a new iTunes U app--for iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch--which is interesting. Looking at iTunes, i can see that the iTunes U content is still available normally--similarly to the way it provides podcasts--but I wonder if this is the first step in "locking" the iTunes content to iDevices. (Today, you can download an iTunes U audio or video class from iTunes but play it back on an Android or Windows Phone device if you want.)

According to Apple, the new app "lets teachers create and manage courses including essential components such as lectures, assignments, books, quizzes and syllabuses," assuming of course all their students have iOS devices. Students, meanwhile, can "access new books right from within the app, and any notes taken in iBooks are consolidated for easy reviewing. In addition to reading books, viewing presentations, lectures and assignment lists, students can receive push notifications so they always have the latest class information."

Given this, I'd have to guess that the iTunes U app is for students actually taking the class, whereas the iTunes U service, through iTunes, is for anyone outside the school who wishes to enjoy the class separately. Hopefully that doesn't change.

Interesting stuff regardless.

Discuss this Article 14

davepermen
on Jan 19, 2012
I'm kinda scared seeing universities not caring about openness at all here. They should dismiss the apple solutions completely in favour of open standards. And I'm not even an open source promoter. But books that can only be read on apple devices? No thanks. They better set them up as html5 or what ever (even docx), instead. Not the future I hope to see for schools... - davepermen
yoshipod (not verified)
on Jan 19, 2012
"But there is also evidence that Apple's partners' factories are doing more to harm the environment than the traditional, paper-based book industry ever did." This is a perfect example of Paul's biased writing. This is not really relevant to the discussion, however, since it makes Apple looks bad, he finds a way to interject it. Yet somehow, when he discusses how Android is beating the iPhone in market share, or how Windows 8 tablets will change the game, or how 95% of world still buys PCs, he never makes a mention of the environmental harm or other problems that are caused by the manufacturing of those products. Case in point, he did not mention the mass suicide threat at the Foxconn plant that built the Xbox 360 last week, despite writing about how successful that product was this past year.
BXP
on Jan 19, 2012
@David I agree. When schools and businesses say they are exploring the use of tablets, they really mean iPads and could be locking themselves--and users--into device- and platform-specific solutions. If people have these devices and want to use them for work, that's great; it's even better if organizations are finding *real* use cases for them. But while the iPad may be the most viable solution currently, these tablet initiatives should be more forward looking so that the message isn't "we'll support any tablet you have as long as it's an iPad." Organizations leveraging certain line-of-business or industry-specific iPad apps should pressure these app vendors into developing for Android and other platforms.
ModernDislocation
on Jan 19, 2012
David brings up a good point. It would be better if Apple supported some open standards like PDF or .txt with it's iBooks Author and let you distribute as you see fit......Oh wait a second, they do.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Jan 19, 2012
@BXP & David. Were you as vocal and concerned when schools and companies standardized on the Windows platform? Were you encouraging software vendors to write their applications for other operating systems then? Or that schools adopt and support other operating systems as well? What about using open formats rather than proprietary MS Office formats? Or does Vendor / platform lock in only become an issue when its Apple?
MSTAYLOR
on Jan 19, 2012
Intriguing stuff. Big play by Apple to get back into the edu scene. It's also a good thing for students of all ages.
SandmanX82
on Jan 19, 2012
@yoshipod Are you this vocal about all perceived internet injustices you come across? Or does this only become an issue when it's about Apple on Paul's blog?
Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2012
Did they get rid of the inane page flip animations? If not, it's as much a success as their replacement for newspapers and magazines.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Jan 19, 2012
@SandmanX82 Nope, I am just curious about those who are complaining about vendor lock in, because when that vendor is not Apple, it does not seem to be a problem. Vendor lock in is a real issue to consider, but that goes for all vendors. Don't you agree? As for Apple and Paul, I'll repeat what I alway say. I will continue to point out his hypocrisy. Its entertaining to do so, because he does it while thinking he is not biased.
SandmanX82
on Jan 19, 2012
@yoshipod "I will continue to point out his hypocrisy. Its entertaining to do so" You need to get out more if that's entertaining to you. You're like Windows fanboys that hang out at every single post made by MacRumors or AppleInsider. Sad. I'm honestly curious about whether you think Paul cares whether "yoshipod" believes he's biased? I don't imagine he does. My guess is that most people here don't...yet you continue to waste your time saying it in nearly every post. (Nevermind, it's not a "waste" of time for you because apparently that constitutes your entertainment). I'm also curious about whether you show such faux rage for sites that are biased against Microsoft. Oh, who am I kidding, I'm not curious. I already know the answer to that one.
jagosilver
on Jan 20, 2012
I find the comments on lock-in in intriguing. I'm in the UK and here an awful lot of schools have for years been pretty much forced to use (Windows) computers supplied by a company called RM. They fill them full of appallingly bad software running on underpowered hardware and charge a premium for it. I would imagine that the far more user-friendly, useful and usable iPad and software would be a huge and welcome change for a lot of UK schools and the fact they can't install incompatible software from another operating system (or have to deal with a bewildering array of hardware - I'm looking at you Android) would not be an issue at all... Also, why shouldn't the schools be able to choose the best hardware/software configuration for their needs rather than be forced to use some poorly integrated software/hardware just because it's "open"...?
Mustang17
on Jan 20, 2012
The issue that what replaces paper books is a valid one, it doesn't matter either who makes an electronic book reader. However if a company claims that there product is going to make paper books redundant then surely there is no harm in looking at consequencies of such actions. To do otherwise would be to sweep it under the carpet. Always amazes me how some have such a hair trigger reaction to anybody daring to be negative towards the sainted Apple. Its not just Foxconn employees that are suffering either. We proudly boast about how many billions of electronic gizmos or whatever our favourite companies can produce compared with the other guy, in fact we rate their success on this. But these devices have got to come from somewhere and ulitmately we have to dispose of them as well. Don't put on the rose coloured glasses thinking they are all recycled cleanly either. They cause misery when manufactured and most leave a poisoned legacy behind them, usually in a third world country too. But please, don't have nightmares. Vendor lock in is an issue when its Apple as not everybody can afford an ipad, therefore pricing people out. An utopian dream for some. PC's are different as you can pick up a cheap one anywhere.
pthurrott
on Jan 20, 2012
I'm curious what part of this blog post you find "biased". By making a mountain out of not just a molehill but of nothing at all, you are indeed pointing out bias. But it's YOUR bias, not mine. I write about Apple because they're important. And I've done so since the mid-1990s, even when everyone else thought they were no longer relevant because of their near-bankruptcy. But I've been more realistic and less emotional about it, generally, than virtually any other members of the press. That's not bias, it's just common sense. You know, IMHO.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Jan 20, 2012
The basis is the mention of the harm that Foxconn and others do while making these products. Is it true? Of course, I don't think anyone is denying it. The bias comes in because you only seem to mention this when it comes to Apple. Furthermore, it does not really have a part regarding this announcement. I don't recall seeing similar issues raised in your other posts. You wrote a nice piece about the Xbox a few days ago, just a day after the report of the mass suicide threat at the Foxconn plant that makes those. But no mention of it there. Was this issue raised in any of your reports about all the new ultra books and tablets that debuted at CES? When you wrote about how MS is still selling 20M copies of Windows 7 each month yesterday in reporting their earnings, did you mention the harm to the environment that is done by the manufacturers of the hardware that run them? When you wrote about how many millions of Kindle fires Amazon sold, was the issue of manufacturing brought up? How about in the articles about Android phones being the market share leader, anything then with the millions of devices per month being manufactured and how that hurts the environment? But Apple makes an announcement about textbooks and your early thoughts run right to this issue. If you add up all the PCs, phones, tablets, mp3 players, electronics, etc., that are made at these type of manufacturing facilities, Apple probably represents a small fraction of it. Yet, the only time you seem to mention this is when talking about Apple. Just last month when news about the A5 being made in Texas instead of oversee broke, your response was how Apple would cart in illegal aliens to exploit them.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use