Adobe prepping major Photoshop changes

In his blog, Photoshop senior product manager discusses major (and arguably overdue) changes coming to Adobe's flagship product:

Photoshop has been accreting power & users for the better part of two decades.  The once-little app has proven almost endlessly adaptable to new needs and workflows, but all that morphing has a price.  In many cases we've traded simplicity for power, and not all the pieces look like part of a cohesive whole.  In fact, I sometimes joke that looking at some parts of the app is like counting the rings in a tree: you can gauge when certain features arrived by the dimensions & style of the dialog.

This isn't exactly a news flash--far from it.  So, the question is, What exactly are we gonna do about it?  No one wants to work with--or work on--some shambling, bloated monster of a program.

The good news is that we've been plotting the solutions for a number of years, chipping away at the problem.  Good stuff comes to the surface in bits and pieces, but we haven't quite turned the corner--yet.  A few thoughts:

We must make Photoshop "everything you need, nothing you don't."   Presenting the same user experience to a photographer as we do to a radiologist, as to a Web designer, as to a prepress guy, is kind of absurd.

With this goal in mind, we must make Photoshop dramatically more configurable.  We've been chipping away for several cycles, enabling first workspaces, then customizable menus & shortcuts.  We need to be much bolder, though, and I've been dropping totally unsubtle hints about this for ages.

We can present solutions via task-oriented workspaces.

By leading people to best practices, we can start deprecating (and later removing) outmoded functionality.

So, why am I telling you all this, and why do I think it's worth reading?  I'm saying it because although we can't (and probably shouldn't) turn the whole battleship (or Caddy, if you like) on a dime, we get the need, and we're on the case.  We've been toiling away beneath the surface, setting the groundwork for change.  There are no magic bullets, but I feel that for the first time in my 5+ years working on this team, we're within striking distance of some big things--and everyone reading this will play a role in making things better. Just thought you should know. :-)

Discuss this Article 3

Waethorn
on Nov 7, 2007
Workspaces are good and all, but they're an old technique that is commonly not utilized by users and is just a cookie cutter solution. If they want to improve the user experience, they seriously need to go back to the drawing board and erase it. If they want to make the program better, they should take a good hard look at Office 2007 for ideas.
Mum
on Nov 7, 2007
Wow, "delete workspaces"? I don't know anyone who doesn't use workspaces.
Waethorn
on Nov 8, 2007
I'd say they would serve their customers better by allowing them to discover new features. Workspaces don't allow for that (they restrict features), but the Office Fluent UI does. They should design a UI that's more like that (live previews without dialog boxes are definitely needed there).

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use