Ahead of PDC, Microsoft Begins Internal Test of Windows 7

I put this up on WinInfo this evening, but in case you missed it:

While Microsoft is busy trying to overcome consumer opinions of its current operating system, Windows Vista, the software giant is also undergoing an internal effort to beta test the next version, called Windows 7. Last week, the company began testing an internal version of the software that it hopes to ship to attendees of its Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in late October. This build has shipped to Microsoft employees and, reportedly, close partners of the company.

The build, which is referred to internally as M3 for "milestone 3," reveals a product that is very much like Windows Vista both visually and functionally. Microsoft has ported the "ribbon" user interface from Office 2007 to a number of bundled applications. As previously reported, Microsoft has tasked the team that created the ribbon UI with updating the Windows shell as well.

External reports have suggested that Microsoft will begin de-bundling certain applications--like Windows Mail and Windows Movie Maker--from Windows 7 and will instead make them available as separate downloads from Windows Live. Also, some have suggested that Microsoft will ship a Beta 1 version of Windows 7 by the end of the year.

I can't confirm those rumors. But I have talked to people with access to the M3 build, or build 6780, and they've reported that this version of Windows 7 is surprisingly stable and usable, and well ahead of where Windows Vista was at this point in its development cycle.

More information as it comes in.

And so it begins.  :) I'm guessing we're going to see a deluge of build 6780 info in the days ahead, if not the hours.

Discuss this Article 12

mikegalos@msn.com
on Sep 14, 2008
I know I'll be sending mail to a bunch of people inside Microsoft tomorrow to try and get an M3 install disc. (If I succeed, you'll know because I will join Paul in being surprisingly quiet about speculating on which rumors are likely true or false) :-)
systemwolf
on Sep 14, 2008
Would this be a sign that they aren't sticking to the release schedule or does this seem right on time?
sharp65
on Sep 14, 2008
I'm glad they are de-bundling some products like movie maker, hopefully that means they can release updates to those more often than having to wait 3-4 years for a windows release.
daveinla
on Sep 14, 2008
Being as usable as Vista is the least you can expect from it, as it is a mere SP of it. The major change coming from the bundling of services and softs that come with it...
subzerohitman721
on Sep 14, 2008
I believe Seven much further along than Vista, because most of the base and intermediate OS construction was achieved in Vista. Now Microsoft has the opportunity to really flesh out a better vision of what Vista was supposed to look like. I also believe Microsoft is in a better position to exceed that vision. Keep in mind that they had to restart Vista because of everything that was happening with XP, IE6, Office, and 2000. They really had no choice but to stabilize and improve the security situations as much as possible. SP 2 for XP was critical and Microsoft had major success in stabilizing a core part of the business. At the very same time, Microsoft was working on I.E 7 because I.E 6 was a security nightmare. With Vista, they managed to create the most secure OS on the market plus make I.E 7 way more secure than I.E. 6. Microsoft did such a good job, that it pushed OS-X from being the most secure to the most insecure OS on the market. Thats a major accomplisment. Now that I.E 8 is on the road to completion, Live Mesh beta going very well, security situation a lot more stable, Microsoft is fully focused on Seven. Seven has the potential to really blossom not only to meet the original longhorn ideas, but to expand them to what 2010 computing will offer us. If anything, Apple needs to borrow a page from Microsoft. They should put Snow Leopard on hold to redo and renovate Quicktime, iTunes, Mobile Me, Safari, and improve security in both Leopard/Tiger. @daveinla.- You're right about the services and software bundles, but I think M3 of Seven is much further along than Longhorn M3 ever was. The Vista codebase is holding up unlike the original longhorn code as far as anything I've read. The old XP code had to be reset in Longhorn's development. It was reset to Windows Server 2003 SP1 codebase and that ended up being Vista. Since all the base and intermediate coding was done in Vista, now its improving that base and streamlining what was done. I'd say its like going from the old from the old WWII F4F Wildcat fighter to the F6F Hellcat fighter that won the Pacific Theatre.
Anthony Cook
on Sep 14, 2008
I like the idea of using the ribbon in Windows 7, would be nice to see a Beta this year too. Even though i was happy just after Vista went gold, i missed testing out the Betas.....ok maybe not Beta 2. :D
Waethorn
on Sep 15, 2008
@subzero: It wasn't so much IE6 that was a security nightmare - most of it was pre-SP2. SP2 added the download blocker and ActiveX double-confirmation to IE6. Automatic Updates after that included many security updates, but spyware and drive-by downloads were prevented just by installing SP2, mostly because drive-by downloads could bypass the normal ActiveX certificate confirmation screen. By adding a "block-by-default" ActiveX bar to SP2's version of IE6, drive-by downloads would now prompt the user for installation. IE7 added a more revised codebase but also added phishing notification. Of course, IE7 also added more standards support, but security, not so much. It was decoupled from the shell in XP, so malware couldn't cripple Windows as easily. Unsuspecting users would still be as prone to getting malware installed as in IE6. So to summarize: IE6 pre-SP2 = drive-by downloads (the major source of spyware infections at the time, excluding P2P software of course) IE6 SP2 = no more drive-by downloads (must be allowed by unsuspecting user) IE7 = new features, decoupled from Windows Explorer (malware allowed by the user can no longer easily cripple all of Windows) IE7 Protected mode in Windows Vista = malware allowed by user is further restricted to IE sandbox (hopefully security software picks up the rest)
deepfry
on Sep 15, 2008
I'm interested to see the ribbon in some of the native apps. I know a few people who absolutely detest the ribbon. We haven't upgraded to office 2007 in my office yet and I don't know if we will anytime soon - it would require a lot of training for our users (similar to our switch from wordperfect to word earlier this decade) and I would estimate that many of them would not like it. I am also interested in seeing if MS can live up to its goal of "streamlining" the code in 7 so that it runs more efficiently...
subzerohitman721
on Sep 15, 2008
Wae, I have to disagree with you to a small degree. Many people considered IE 6 such a nightmare. Many business institutions locked down IE 6 access like it was Fort Knox to prevent access to the Internet. It would run intranet and nothing more. Infact, DISD had us put Deep Freeze on every library computer, specifically because of IE 6. As soon as IE 7 got to public beta, I switch my XP machine as fast as possible. Post SP2, I would agree that it was tons better.
Waethorn
on Sep 15, 2008
"I have to disagree with you to a small degree. Many people considered IE 6 such a nightmare." Perception and reality are two totally different things though. IE7 included the breakup from Windows Explorer, and the new version number was heralded as a big leap for IE progress, after Microsoft claimed "they wouldn't need to update IE as frequently", but the biggest new security feature(s) came first from IE6 SP2 - most of that was the fact that drive-by downloads became a thing of the past, due to what people called "extra nagging" (which I won't say is one of the primary reasons why Vista is much more secure too - oops! ;) ). The new UI and phishing alerts in IE7 just sealed the deal for users. Kept up to date, IE6 SP2 can be just as secure as IE7 in XP in terms of attack entrypoints - it IS still supported, after all. The fact that IE7 isn't linked to the shell means that the damage to Windows caused by malware requires several extra steps in coding, and is prevented by IE7's lack of endpoint connections. Security entrypoints are about the same between the two browser versions though, as Microsoft still actively creates security updates for IE6 SP2. I still recommend users get IE7 though because you can never be too cautious about users clicking on untrusted links. The area of potential damage is just lessened with IE7.
anonymous
on Sep 20, 2008
Der neue Windows Media Center kommt vielleicht schneller als gedacht in deutsche Wohnzimmern! Der im neuen Windows Se7en erwartete überarbeitete Windows Media Center könnte bereits Ende 2009 veröffentlicht sein. Paul Thurrott berichtet bereits vom dr
anonymous
on Oct 3, 2008
最近有些MS员工测试Windows 7 M3版,其中系统自带Office2007 Ribbon界面,并被应用

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use