And the Silliest Blog Post of the Year is...

... Why does Microsoft fear OpenOffice.org? by Preston Gralla, who, by the way, seems like a knowledgeable enough guy, so let's not construe this as anything other than having a little fun.

But seriously. Talk about building something up.

Here's the set up.

Microsoft appears to be extremely worried that an unlikely source may be a major threat as well --- OpenOffice.org. At least that's what a recent job posting at Microsoft shows.

Glyn Moody of Computerworld UK uncovered a job posting for "Linux and Open Office Compete Lead, US Subsidiary (CSI Lead)". CSI stands for Commercial Software Initiative and according to the job posting, CSI's primary mission "is to win share against Linux and OpenOffice.org."

The job posting itself is so filled with pointless jargon that it's almost a parody of business-speak. But Moody points out this interesting fact --- there are now 13 "district Linux & Open Office Compete Leads" whose sole jobs are to target Linux and OpenOffice.org.

Um.

So there are 13 people working for Microsoft tasked with competing against Linux and OpenOffice.org? You do know that Microsoft has over 93,000 employees, right?

There's another part of this post that frightens me. He claims that OpenOffice.org is somehow installed on 12 percent of PCs.

It's hard to gauge the accuracy of that number, but even if OpenOffice.org had half that market share on Windows PCs, it would represent a very large chunk of revenue.

I doubt it's one-tenth of that number. But as he notes, it's hard to gauge. Still, it might just be the silliest claim I've heard all year, and this came during a year when a non-existent Apple tablet was somehow going to change the world. Good stuff.

Discuss this Article 17

Dr. Daniel Jackson
on Dec 29, 2009
I use Open office on several linux and windows machines, I find it's feature set to be just fine for light duty and the ui is not that different than 2003, I still prefer office though and I think 2010 is great
Ocean
on Dec 29, 2009
I like OO. It just works works in our home environment. I'm not enough of a hardcore excel or word user to say if it can replace them in the most extreme circumstances though.
rr0de74@live.com
on Dec 29, 2009
I think his article, minus those numbers is dead on. Some facts before I add my opinion.... MS office dominates market share and will for a long time. MS office is more feature rich office package compared to everything else. That said I will use the IBM analogy that you are fond of. MS office market share has peaked and has no where but DOWN to go. Not only is MS office being attacked by the likes of OpenOffice but many cloud based solutions as well, all of which are free. Death of a thousand pin pricks? I personally dont know anyone that pays for MS Office anymore. If they do its $10 through work, or $15 because because they have a kid in college that gets a student discount. Or sadly its probably the most pirated software around. I will say that recently I have been shocked to hear a few Joe Users stories. A few weeks ago I was at a Christmas party, about 10 couples, kids and all. One of the discussions I was listening to o was a guy talking about how he was getting his wife a new notebook $400 something notebook he got on sale from BB with Windows 7 on it for Christmas. He said, to my surprise, that he was going to load up OpenOffice on it after she opened it up. He asked me (i am in IT) if I knew if OO worked on Windows 7. I asked him how he even knew about OpenOffice, he said he and most of his family have been using it for a few years at home. He as a salesman had even installed it on his work laptop. I was seriously surprised. Next my boy is in cubscouts and its pine wood derby time, or close to it. I volunteered to help with the events and went to a event planning meeting. In the meeting they showed us how the races are recorded, via a laptop and a serial cable to the track and its sensors. To my surprise the program is nothing more than an Excel spread sheet with VBA stuff to update each race. They were running it on OpenOffice! I asked the guy where he got the program and he showed me a boyscout web site that had the .xls stuff on it for download. I then asked him if it ran fine in OpenOffice and he said they have been using OpenOffice for a while now. 90% of MS users use 10% of its features. More and more people are moving to free options. MS Office will be a strong money maker for MS for some time but it peaked a few years ago and its all down hill from here. Don't believe that? They why is MS coming out with a free, stripped down web version of Office 2010?
robertsjoe
on Dec 29, 2009
I guess that when you nominated for the silliest blog post of the year you excluded this blog? The top 10 nominees could easily be garnered from this blog.
Waethorn
on Dec 29, 2009
"I guess that when you nominated for the silliest blog post of the year you excluded this blog? The top 10 nominees could easily be garnered from this blog." ...but unfortunately for you, they exclude blog comments.
bdegrande
on Dec 29, 2009
I have Office 2007, and the 2010 beta and I still find myself using Open Office quite often, primarily because of Microsoft's licensing scheme. I don't want to have to bother calling them every time I create a new virtual machine,. While I prefer Office's interface, OpenOffice is good enough, it does have all of the features that I actually use.
rr0de74@live.com
on Dec 29, 2009
@bdegrande imagine if MS made it difficult to "activate" Office, more difficult than say Vista or 7. It would cut down on the pirating drastically. Not totally but a lot. I bet you would see the rise of OpenOffice is a big way. I bet 30+% of MS Office market share is from pirating.
whiplash55
on Dec 29, 2009
Open Office is great for students but when you can get a 3 license Home and Student version of Office for under 80 bucks like you often can, its well worth the minor expense for my family. On the enterprise level I don't see any huge move away from Office, their are hundreds of supporting applications and special need situations that are coded for Office only. Open Office, despite being around for ages is hardly known at all outside of blogs like this.
anonymous
on Dec 29, 2009
This post was mentioned on Twitter by desiibond: Lol rofl RT @thurrott: And the Silliest Blog Post of the Year is...: ... Why does Microsoft fear OpenOffice.org?. http://bit.ly/4qAKJp
Waethorn
on Dec 30, 2009
"On the enterprise level I don't see any huge move away from Office, their are hundreds of supporting applications and special need situations that are coded for Office only." Part of that has to do with Visual Basic for Applications (VBA), which makes it dead simple to create integrated applications and business solutions. The other part I would credit to the relative ease of use of Microsoft Access and the easy data migration paths to SQL Server and the connections to IIS and ASP.Net. MySQL and Apache aren't even close to offering that level of integration IMO, and there aren't any good database applications in FOSS that allow you start from a desktop database and move up to a server-based one, like you can do with Access.
rr0de74@live.com
on Dec 30, 2009
"On the enterprise level I don't see any huge move away from Office, their are hundreds of supporting applications and special need situations that are coded for Office only." I would agree that does exist. However I am seeing, at least our apps, that when the application in question gets upgraded, especially to a web based application then that need goes away. People soft is a great example. To get reports out of the old versions it was tied to Excel VBA stuff. The newer web based versions will spit out a report, email it to you, in many formats.
jecouch66
on Dec 30, 2009
I agree with rr0de74 that there doesn't seem to be much of an area for improvement. But then I don't think home usage accounts for most of the business for office. Isn't the enterprise where they make the most money with office? I seem to remember reading that somewhere, but don't know for sure. I've tried OpenOffice myself, but I always end up going back to office (but, to be fair, both are free to me since my laptop is corporate and we have a VL for office). It's always some little thing that doesn't work the same. I'm not sure if I would have stuck with it if I had to pay though. The other problem I have with most of the Open Source software is the quality control. I read a lot of Linux blogs and magazines and they talk about the quality differences. But I'm not seeing it. Which is to say both Closed and Open source lack in those areas.
RunTimeError
on Dec 30, 2009
"and this came during a year when a non-existent Apple tablet was somehow going to change the world." I can't believe that I'm actually agreeing with one of your Apple jabs. It's probably because it's not Apple you're jabbing at, but rather the damn rumour sites. I'm so freakin' sick of hearing about the supposed Apple tablet. For gods sake people, it doesn't exist!! Shut up already! If there is one thing you can say about the Zune is that, love it or hate it, it's a real product.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 30, 2009
And I can't believe that I'm actually agreeing with one of RunTimeError's agreements with one of Paul's Apple jabs... Just wanted to point out a history of Apple Tablet rumors that Ed Bott mentioned yesterday (http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=2712) . It was done by MacLife, starts in 2001, goes through this Summer and can be found at http://www.maclife.com/article/feature/history_apple_tablet_rumor
rr0de74@live.com
on Dec 30, 2009
With the success of the iphone/itouch and all of the lower power CPU stuff we have now, wireless networks, longer battery life etc, an Apple tablet is not being held back by lack of technology. Had the iPhone/iTouch and its touch interface been a failure then I would say Apple would be shelving it. However its the complete opposite with massive success. Its very easy to see a lager iTouch type device. Add to that things like the Kindle, plus lots of other vendors promising tablets in 2010, running Android OS. The "Cloud" becoming more and more of a player in all of this, so that apps dont need a powerful piece of hardware. Netbooks are helping pave the road for a tablet device because of their small size, use of lower power components and reliance on many apps NOT being on the device but in the cloud. Way to many rumors of book companies being approached, comic books, magazines, mass orders of 10inch or 7inch screens, pattens for tablet technology, Apple owning domain names like iSlate etc. Very recent rumors of App store vendors being asked to make larger versions of their applications to show off at an up coming event. My gut tells me Apple will release one. I never thought it would be this year. That said Steve Jobs could eat something that gives him gas and cancel the whole thing just like that. We could no more on Jan 26th.
Waethorn
on Dec 30, 2009
"Had the iPhone/iTouch and its touch interface been a failure then I would say Apple would be shelving it." "Netbooks are helping pave the road for a tablet device because of their small size, use of lower power components and reliance on many apps NOT being on the device but in the cloud." The problem is, if Apple can't price it out competitively, it won't be a large success, and it'll fall into a sub-niche marketspace just like their regular computers. The number of people looking for a tablet is slim. If Apple slaps a $1000 price tag on theirs, that's a very small slice of the overall computing pie and it'll fall into the same bottom-of-the-barrel niche as the Apple TV. If they could take an expensive device like that and heavily subsidize it with a 3G carrier contract to make it seem like it's cheaper (even though anybody with any sense knows better), then it may have a chance. "That said Steve Jobs could eat something that gives him gas and cancel the whole thing just like that." Or he could just fall back on his previous statement and repeat the words: "Nobody wants a tablet computer".
rr0de74@live.com
on Dec 30, 2009
I agree price is important. Take the most expensive Kindle and add Apple Tax and that is probably what it will cost. $600-$800? Anything more will kill it.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use