Apple offers up evolutionary iPod updates, Jobs at music event

Today’s 9/9/9 Apple event was surprisingly light on surprises. Steve Jobs returned to the stage after almost a year’s absence and got a nice standing ovation. But Apple’s announcements were mostly lukewarm, and had been telegraphed weeks in advance. Among the key announcements are:

Big numbers. Apple highlighted why the company is desperately in need of antirust oversight. It has sold over 30 million iPhones in two years. It’s users have downloaded 1.8 billion apps from the iPhone Apps Store. It’s iTunes Store is the number one music retailer in the world. Apple has sold over 8.5 billion songs. It has over 100,000,000 users who have provided the company with their credit card numbers. Apple has sold over 225 million iPods (including over 20 million iPod touches and 100 million iPod nanos) and has 74 percent market share. This is all simply amazing stuff.

iPhone 3.1 firmware. A free incremental update for all iPhone models (and, I believe, all iPod Touch models), iPhone 3.1 appears to deliver some nice features across the board. I’m surprised Apple didn’t call it “iPhone’s Snow Leopard.” The addition of 30,000 ringtones at $1.29 a pop doesn’t do much for me, but could be a big deal for many.

iTunes 9 for PC/Mac. Anyone hoping for a sweeping overhaul of the bloated and slow iTunes application will be disappointed, but iTunes 9 does have some interesting new features, including an improved Genius, much better content syncing (a huge weakness previously), and a neat visual way to sync the layout of app icons on the iPhone screen using iTunes. Best of all, though is a new PC-to-PC content sharing feature that appears to be modeled on Windows 7’s HomeGroup functionality (albeit with old-school-style logons). I’m eager to see that in action. And the iTunes Store has gotten a much needed makeover, with some interesting Zune-like Artists and content pages. An iTunes LP feature combines a digital album with other rich content, but I’m not sure how valuable this really is: Who listens to music while staring at the iTunes PC app?

iPod touch. The late 2009 iPod touch devices are mostly simple upgrades of last year’s models, with the same form factor and underlying hardware (except for the 32 and 64 GB units, apparently, which have the faster, 3GS-style underpinnings). (Apple made an interesting point about iPod touch gaming, though it’s unrelated to new models: It already has far more games than do the Nintendo DS or Sony PSP, and those games are far less expensive. This makes the iPod touch/iPhone platform far more valuable.) Prices are down and capacities are up, as you expect: $199 for 8 GB, $229 for 16 GB, $299 for 32 GB, 64 GB for $399. (Note again that the 32 & 64 GB models have the faster processor and OpenGL|ES capabilities.) Note: Originally, I had written that only the 64 GB version had the more advanced hardware.

iPod classic. Curiously, Apple is keeping the iPod classic but not providing any notable updates. It still costs $249 but the HDD goes from 120 GB to 160 GB.

iPod shuffle. The ridiculous iPod shuffle continues forward, but Apple has finally done the obvious: They’re making an adapter so you can use any headphones you want. Duh. Prices are down, capacities are up: $59 for 2 GB, $79 for 4 GB, and $99 for 4GB “Special Edition.” There are new colors.

iPod nano. As we’ve known for weeks, the iPod nano picks up a video camera, microphone, and speaker. It’s also getting CoverFlow and, like the Zune from three years ago, an FM radio. Pricing: $149 for 8 GB and $179 for 16 GB.

What wasn’t discussed. Apple completely ignored the Apple TV, again. There was no discussion of a much-rumored Apple tablet. No Beatles catalog on iTunes. No truly new hardware or software.

I’ll need to watch the streaming version of the event, but for now, I don’t see anything hugely dramatic. I’ll provide write-ups for iTunes 9, the iPod touch, and iPod nano next week.

Discuss this Article 107

meason
on Sep 9, 2009
I think apple is making a huge mistake by having touches/iphones not using the same underlying hardware. you have now really two touch platforms, GS based and NON GS based, which sooner or later will be an issue.
nutmac
on Sep 9, 2009
Regarding iPod touch, both 32 GB and 64 GB gets 3GS-style update, with faster processor, Open GL ES, and voice control (and earphone with mic and volume). 8 GB model is last year's clear out model, just like 8 GB iPhone 3G. And regarding iPod nano, I find it interesting that it is not capable of taking photos. Only video.
chipwinter
on Sep 9, 2009
It looks like everything that is on the Zune is an improvement, and everything that isn't was a disappointment. Apple has to be thankful they have Microsoft to copy.
MattJames
on Sep 9, 2009
Paul, the 32 GB and the 64 GB version of the Touch will receive the 3Gs underpinnings. From Apple.com: "The new 32GB and 64GB iPod touch models feature improved performance and support for OpenGL ES Version 2.0, which lets developers create games with superior graphics. So games launch noticeably faster, and you experience richer, more lifelike textures and detail."
Webdev511
on Sep 9, 2009
I'm interested to see how the iTunes 9 sharing works out as compared to Zune. Well that and if you can record/timeshift FM on the Nano. I think MS should take a hit from Apple and keep a couple of the Zune 3.0 models around. One with 160GB drive and an 8GB Flash. Bookend capacities as they may be.
RunTimeError
on Sep 9, 2009
Nice to see that you're predicable as always Paul. chipwinter: "Apple has to be thankful they have Microsoft to copy." Riiigghhhttttttt... because NOTHING on the Zune is a direct copy of various iPod technology (except maybe that "squirting" thing that everyone raves about).
meason
on Sep 9, 2009
@BladRnr ever consider that your argument against ZUNE could be said almost exactly about the mac?
gfryesc1
on Sep 9, 2009
I guess paul was too busy hanging around the zune display at the colorado Best Buy to draw the obvious conclusion: who is going to want to buy a zuneHD after this? I mean, seriously, that product is as DOA to market as any I've ever heard of.
RunTimeError
on Sep 9, 2009
BladRnr: "And what was the Zune's share of the MP3 market? 1.1% Really? No disclaimers? No latest market statistics claiming otherwise? 1.1%????? Even Sandisk got 7.2%! Geesh. MSFT can't even compete with them?" What's funny is that every time an Apple fan comes into one of Paul's Apple posts (and, to be fair, Microsoft posts) and starts going on about how much they like Apple and Macs, the WinFans start throwing around Microsoft's huge PC market share. Yet the Zune is a revolutionary device that simply destroys the iPod; Even though no one actually owns one...
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"The new 32GB and 64GB iPod touch models feature improved performance and support for OpenGL ES Version 2.0, which lets developers create games with superior graphics." I have yet to see any games in iPod touch that use "advanced" texture filtering techniques like the PSP does (basic stuff like AF). The iPod touch and iPhone have a long way to go to try and compete with the quality of games available on the PSP, but somehow the Apple mantra of quality over quantity seems to be lost on the Apple entertainment division. The PSPgo is a better gaming platform, and the quality of games for PSP is one of a higher caliber. "games launch noticeably faster" "....because we're compensating for the speed of the flash RAM we used on the original model" "and you experience richer, more lifelike textures and detail" "....because the previous method sucked, so now we'll segregate the market into 2 iPhone OS developer platforms"
meason
on Sep 9, 2009
@Weathorn, I loved the game counts.... how many of the iGames are just tic-tac-toe? just like how many apps are tip calculators ...
Lindy
on Sep 9, 2009
Excellent, unbiased, just the facts review, (with no snide comments about competitors) of the Apple hardware event at the Winsupersite!!!! There is a reason David Pogue writes for NYT and sells 10x the books you do. Its called "maturity". You should try it once.
evgenij
on Sep 9, 2009
Anyone has the problem with iTunes 9 for Windows described here: http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=782921 If this is true then I won't download it.
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Meason, I can't wait to see the Zune App store....how many tip calculators do you think there will be? What is it they say about glass houses and stones?
yoshipod
on Sep 9, 2009
Why all the ranting about anti-trust oversight. Please name one thing that Apple does to lock out competition through a monopoly.
planetarian
on Sep 9, 2009
"who is going to want to buy a zuneHD after this? I mean, seriously, that product is as DOA to market as any I've ever heard of." Honestly, I don't know what you're getting at. The only thing that made me even think of considering an alternative to the Zune HD was the mention of a 64GB model Touch. I recall reading that the Zune team was considering a 64GB model as well at some point, but the ambiguity is somewhat of a dilemma -- I'd rather wait for a 64GB model if we know one is coming, but we don't. Regardless, as of this event I am absolutely positive I'll be going with the ZHD. None of the announcements today garnered any interest in the new devices at all in me.
meason
on Sep 9, 2009
@Panache1023 I would be critical in the exact same way if there were a Zune Store. but they did not compare to a zune store did they? they compared to DS and PSP......
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Meason, 1) I did not mention anything regarding the games, just the tip calculators. 2) Is it just me, or isn't there talk about a Zune App Store (maybe not called that, but the same idea). Do you really think *EVERY* app that is available there is going to be an incredible app, or do you think there will be some useless apps too? Maybe if you answer #2 with "yeah, there probably will be useless apps", then you should leave those ridiculous comments at the door instead of trying to team up with Waethorn to stir the shit on this board. Believe me, the shit gets stirred enough with stupid comments like the one you made earlier.
gfryesc1
on Sep 9, 2009
why do you want a zuneHD, planetarian? It has no cost advantage now, has no app store, has no native mail client, has no 3rd party accessories, etc. If you get one, you'll be nearly the only one, will enjoy it for a couple of years until Microsoft decides it's too big a money sink for them and get out of it.
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
@meason: Not every PSP game is a "hit" either, but if you want an immersive, enduring game, they don't have those on the iPhone. Mind you, they still have many good casual games. Many are available as cross-overs from the PS3. I'd like to see a PSP version of Flower. That'd be incredible. The touch thing is a flakey way of doing a game UI though. I'd much rather have a standard analog stick and buttons and maybe a tilt-axis feature in there. Wireless network controller speeds will still be a limiting factor towards game development too. The PSP wireless is slow. Not just Wireless-B slow, but even worse than the standard 11Mbps you can crank out of 802.11b. The next revision should have N, and it should support Bluetooth transfers from the PS3, when the PS3 is used for initial game storage. The PS3 wireless is also slow for being 802.11g also. That needs to be fixed. With Sony introducing a flash RAM-only model PSP (the PSPgo), it changes options for delivery methods. Starting in October, PSP developers need to make their applications downloadable. A developer might start to think that having a larger game will hamper its adoption because of download times (the PSP can't multitask either, so if you download something, you can't do anything else at the same time). I fear that they may be treading down a path that might ultimately affect the quality of games, even if it results in more individual game sales, as it does with the iPhone OS platform. This is what worries me about online distribution, and quite frankly, I don't want the PSP to have 21,000 whatever so-called "games" on it. That'd just turn it into a big developer joke, like the iPhone.
Satchmo Bevins
on Sep 9, 2009
Soooo, just to clarify: Which player makes music sound really good? Assume default headphones. thnx.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Sep 9, 2009
Wow. That really MUST be a non-event press event when even the Mac Fanatics don't want to talk about iPods and quickly jump off topic to how much they want the Zune to fail.
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"Please name one thing that Apple does to lock out competition through a monopoly." Tiered pricing ala universal iTunes+ is not available outside the US. So in response to that, I would say that iTunes, being the largest online music retailer, is charging more to customers using non-Apple branded PMP players. Added to that, that they hold a monopoly in the MP3 player market, they are stifling competition by discouraging outside hardware by way of increasing prices of their online service, such as charging a $0.30 premium per song for compatibility with said outside hardware.
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
MikeGalos, You may need to clarify your statement. The Zune currently already is a failure. You probably meant to say something like, "...when even the Mac Fanatics don't want to talk about iPods and quickly jump off topic to how much they want the new Zune HD to continue the line of Zune failures."
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Waethorn, Are you sure it's Apple's fault that the tiered pricing is not available outside the US, and maybe not the record companies? I'm not sure, are you? Also, are you suggesting that I am unable to go to the iTunes Music Store, buy a track, and play it on a Zune? When you buy a song from the iTunes Music store, does it say, "$0.99 if you own an iPod, $1.29 if you own other PMP hardware"? Wasn't that $0.30 charge to (remove) DRM to non-DRM versions? Aren't all non-DRM tracks now the same price? I'm not sure because I don't use the iTunes music store.
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Waethorn, Does Apple prevent a user from buying a track from Amazon, or the Zune Pass and play it on the iPod?
robertsjoe
on Sep 9, 2009
This blog gets getting worse by the day. So much Microsoft shilling. Such jealousy and bitterness in every post.
lotsamystuff
on Sep 9, 2009
Microsoft's been busy too! http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=4217&tag=nl.e550 "Wow. That really MUST be a non-event press event when even the Mac Fanatics don't want to talk about iPods and quickly jump off topic to how much they want the Zune to fail." You're stretching, Mikey. It's so sad that this is the best you can do today.
robertsjoe
on Sep 9, 2009
" I’ll provide write-ups for iTunes 9, the iPod touch, and iPod nano next week." Waiting for direction from Microsoft....
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"Are you sure it's Apple's fault that the tiered pricing is not available outside the US, and maybe not the record companies? I'm not sure, are you?" I know that there already is a Canadian MP3 (not AAC or some other pseudo "standard") store that has tiered pricing, but Apple doesn't have theirs like that in Canada. "Also, are you suggesting that I am unable to go to the iTunes Music Store, buy a track, and play it on a Zune? When you buy a song from the iTunes Music store, does it say, "$0.99 if you own an iPod, $1.29 if you own other PMP hardware"?" That's right. Although they don't say it in so many words (more than that actually). It's $0.99 for "iTunes music" which has Fairplay DRM. Fairplay is only supported on iPods because Apple won't license the technology out (Microsoft never had a problem licensing out PlaysForSure). If you don't want Fairplay DRM (ie. want the music for a non-iPod), then you pay $0.30 extra per track. That is the way it was before the US iTunes store went to a tiered pricing scheme, but still the way it is in every other country that iTunes sells to AFAIK. "Aren't all non-DRM tracks now the same price?" No. They charge anywhere from $0.69 to $1.29 per track.
lotsamystuff
on Sep 9, 2009
"I would say that iTunes, being the largest online music retailer, is charging more to customers using non-Apple branded PMP players." "Waethorn", it's absolutely unbelievable that you can be so wrong so often. Here's the truth, poutain-boy: A customer buying a song from Apple can play that song on virtually any "PMP player", and pays no more for the "privilege" of using in on, say, a Sansa player or a Zune (assuming you can find one) than they do on any flavour of iPod. Seriously, you are so off the rails lately. Where do you get your information? Has "helper cat" been whispering in your ear at night? Or are you just a product of the Canadian educational system?
robertsjoe
on Sep 9, 2009
You can tell how much desperation Microsoft and their fanboys are feeling by looking at the posts on this blog.
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"Does Apple prevent a user from buying a track from Amazon, or the Zune Pass and play it on the iPod?" As you like to point out about Microsoft, the rest don't matter, because Apple is the one with the massive monopoly in the online music business (in the US, it's all retail music sales), so they are the ones to look at when it comes to competitive behaviour.
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Waethorn, It's weird that you can't answer the question. But let me point out a difference... When I want an OS and I go to Dell, the only really viable choice is MS. And when it comes to a browser, the EU (for whatever reason) wanted them to unbundle...and I completely disagree with that. Regarding iTunes Music Store. They may be the biggest, but unless they are FORCING competition to change how they sell their product, or some other illegal means, you can't just say, "they are the monopoly so they are where you look". They haven't been convicted yet of doing anything illegal with that monopoly power. To make the point clear, if Apple prevented songs bought from Amazon to be played on an iPod, you would have a very real point. But you don't. What you have is some weird hatred toward Apple and when they are successful, you can't stand it. It's really quite unhealthy. In fact, you should be HAPPY the iPods have been so successful otherwise there (almost certainly) wouldn't be a Zune!
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"are you just a product of the Canadian educational system?" If by that, you mean by reading Apple Canada's website, then so be it. I am only as retarded as Apple. (Apple is an American company after all) " A customer buying a song from Apple can play that song on virtually any "PMP player", and pays no more for the "privilege" of using in on, say, a Sansa player or a Zune (assuming you can find one) than they do on any flavour of iPod." Wrong. Read my post. Universal DRM-free music on iTunes is only available in the US. The rest of the world still has the $0.30 premium to pay per song to get it DRM free, otherwise they have to use an iPod. Having the monopoly in online music sales means that's anti-competitive behaviour.
WebGuy3000
on Sep 9, 2009
"iTunes-purchased songs now account for 25 percent of the overall music market--both physical and digital--in the U.S., says an NPD Group report released Tuesday. However, CDs are still the most popular format for music lovers, winning a 65 percent slice of the market for the first half of 2009." http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-10311907-37.html Doesn't sound like a monopoly to me.
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
Waethorn, Unless Apple does not have the rights to distribute those tracks DRM-Free outside of the US. It is possible that the record labels let other companies do it and not Apple in an attempt to not let Apple become too big of a player. Then who would you blame?
panache1023
on Sep 9, 2009
WebGuy3000, On this site, if your products are better known / more well liked / have a larger market share / etc than MS's competing products, you have a monopoly in that market. Now do you understand?
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"When I want an OS and I go to Dell, the only really viable choice is MS" It's not the ONLY choice though. Dell offers systems with Ubuntu and Red Hat Linux too. "the EU (for whatever reason) wanted them to unbundle" That's not correct. Microsoft offered to unbundle it after facing pressure from Opera, albeit indirectly through the EU. The EU never issued an order forcing them to unbundle it whatsoever. "They may be the biggest, but unless they are FORCING competition to change how they sell their product, or some other illegal means, you can't just say, "they are the monopoly so they are where you look"." In countries outside of the US, that is exactly the case. Whether or not countries outside of the US will judge Apple based on US antitrust laws, or similar laws remains to be seen, but Apple is walking a tight rope in Europe right now. "To make the point clear, if Apple prevented songs bought from Amazon to be played on an iPod, you would have a very real point." The issue is not consumer protection, it's business protection, similar to what Microsoft is facing with Opera. What Opera is proposing is that consumers are not offered a good choice because the monopolist is using "unfair" advantages to stifle competition. In Apple's case, there is a fact that they charge consumers $0.30 extra for the premium to play music on non-iPod MP3 players, which stifles competition from other MP3 player manufacturers. The difference between the cases is that Firefox is a noteworthy competitor to Internet Explorer, and Google will leverage their online brand to leverage their own web platform. In the MP3 player market, Apple is using predatory pricing with their online services to lure customers to their hardware (and as you like to state: they are a HARDWARE company, not a software company). As you also like to state, the rest of the MP3 player market outside of Apple is in the single digit percentages. The Apple iPod/iTunes division is becoming Microsoft from 10+ years ago. iTunes = monopoly other online music sales = single digit percentage = no major competition iTunes music works on iPod only non-iPods also not competitor iTunes+ music costs consumers $0.30 extra, only option that works on competitor devices = anticompetitive anticompetitive + monopoly = antitrust What part of this don't you understand?
RunTimeError
on Sep 9, 2009
"but if you want an immersive, enduring game, they don't have those on the iPhone" Spoken like someone who has never owned, used an iPhone/iPod touch. As for me, I'm loving Assassins Creed, Wolfenstein 3D, and Doom Resurrection. I'm also considering Brothers In Arms, but I figure I'll get done with the first three before I go buying more.
Waethorn
on Sep 9, 2009
"It is possible that the record labels let other companies do it and not Apple in an attempt to not let Apple become too big of a player." In Canada, there's basically iTunes, Puretracks.com, and Napster going dead. Puretracks leverages partnerships to expand their base, while Apple uses their brand. Puretracks still isn't nearly as big as iTunes though, and their MP3 store was made through their partnership with Bell Canada, which is also hemhorraging money left and right.
BXP
on Sep 9, 2009
I don't know if I'd call it a monopoly, but I think the iPhone and App Store's success should call for more scrutiny in general. I think there's a cause for concern when a closed, proprietary platform like the iPhone is so quickly adopted and actually becomes a cultural/social phenomena. For those who say that the 30 million iPhones are a only a sliver of the cell phone market share, I don't see developers and companies clamoring to support those other devices like they are for the iPhone. Having an "app for that" is the cool thing to do, even if just for marketing purposes. But the last thing I want is to be shoehorned into the iPhone because, say, a certain business app becomes widely used within my company, and that app is only on the iPhone. While iTunes is somewhat proprietary, it's not as proprietary as the iPhone, in which apps are tied to a particular device...
lotsamystuff
on Sep 9, 2009
"Doesn't sound like a monopoly to me." Of course not. Regardless, as "Waethorn" would likely point out (if the conversation were about Microsoft) being a monopoly is not illegal in and of itself. But then, facts never mattered to "Waethorn", only blind ideology. "Universal DRM-free music on iTunes is only available in the US. " I'm sorry, "Waethorn". You're under the mistaken impression that Canada matters. Besides, if you have a problem with DRM restrictions, talk to the labels, not Apple. That ship has sailed. "95 percent of the music downloaded globally is pirated, a percentage that was unchanged from a year earlier." http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/15/technology/15iht-digital.4-408839.html Oddly enough, that's roughly the same percentage of Windows users worldwide. Care to draw a correlation, Wae?
dallasmay
on Sep 9, 2009
@Mason "ever consider that your argument against ZUNE could be said almost exactly about the mac?" No, because every Mac Apple sells makes money. On the other hand, Most Zunes sold have been at bargain bin prices. And, no one is proud of their Zune, but just walk into any Starbucks and you'll see prominent Apple Logos everywhere.
techdribble
on Sep 9, 2009
Actually I would struggle to find a DRM'd track on the Australian Itunes haven't come across 1 in ages it helps that biggest ISP has their own music store that sells MP3s and there download program automatically updates itunes. My purchases are split 50/50 between both stores.
SPiotr
on Sep 9, 2009
@waethorn "anticompetitive + monopoly = antitrust What part of this don't you understand?" Try this: Go buy an iPod. Sync it with your PC. Buy a track from the iTunes Store. Go buy a Zune. Sync it WITH THE SAME PC. Buy a track from the Marketplace. What part of anticompetitive do you not understand? I posed an idea on a previous thread: What if there had never been an iPod Touch? And what if Microsoft had release their Zune HD a couple of years ago? It would have been a big seller. Probably the best device in the PMP market. Hell even a few Mac fanboys might have bought it! Zune would have a much larger market share..... and there would be nothing Apple's music 'monopolies' could have done to stop it. It's called competition. Build a better mousetrap.
Grannyville
on Sep 9, 2009
In my opinion, I doubt having a camera in the iPod Nano would be a feature that would attract someone to the device considering every mobile phone comes with a camera built in. However, I do like the live pausing, rewinding and tagging feature of the FM radio. That is a very nice touch. Is anyone aware of an MP3 player that comes with an FM radio with similar capabilities?
winlonghorn
on Sep 9, 2009
@gfryesc1 What the heck do you mean that the Zune HD doesn't have a price advantage? It is only $20 more for the 32 GB model of the Zune HD and it has an OLED screen despite that low cost! What isn't to like? LOL.
winlonghorn
on Sep 9, 2009
@mikegalos I know it! That was a fairly lame excuse for a conference this time! :) Zune HD FTW! Btw, I am not a fanboy. I enjoy my current Ipod touch, but I see no compelling reason to cancel my Zune HD preorder and get the Ipod touch this time. :)
winlonghorn
on Sep 9, 2009
@robertsjoe Nice assumption, but umm no Paul is not waiting for guidance from Microsoft to post a review lol! Ever heard of a person being busy and living their lives outside of work too? ;)

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use