Apple offers up evolutionary iPod updates, Jobs at music event

Today’s 9/9/9 Apple event was surprisingly light on surprises. Steve Jobs returned to the stage after almost a year’s absence and got a nice standing ovation. But Apple’s announcements were mostly lukewarm, and had been telegraphed weeks in advance. Among the key announcements are:

Big numbers. Apple highlighted why the company is desperately in need of antirust oversight. It has sold over 30 million iPhones in two years. It’s users have downloaded 1.8 billion apps from the iPhone Apps Store. It’s iTunes Store is the number one music retailer in the world. Apple has sold over 8.5 billion songs. It has over 100,000,000 users who have provided the company with their credit card numbers. Apple has sold over 225 million iPods (including over 20 million iPod touches and 100 million iPod nanos) and has 74 percent market share. This is all simply amazing stuff.

iPhone 3.1 firmware. A free incremental update for all iPhone models (and, I believe, all iPod Touch models), iPhone 3.1 appears to deliver some nice features across the board. I’m surprised Apple didn’t call it “iPhone’s Snow Leopard.” The addition of 30,000 ringtones at $1.29 a pop doesn’t do much for me, but could be a big deal for many.

iTunes 9 for PC/Mac. Anyone hoping for a sweeping overhaul of the bloated and slow iTunes application will be disappointed, but iTunes 9 does have some interesting new features, including an improved Genius, much better content syncing (a huge weakness previously), and a neat visual way to sync the layout of app icons on the iPhone screen using iTunes. Best of all, though is a new PC-to-PC content sharing feature that appears to be modeled on Windows 7’s HomeGroup functionality (albeit with old-school-style logons). I’m eager to see that in action. And the iTunes Store has gotten a much needed makeover, with some interesting Zune-like Artists and content pages. An iTunes LP feature combines a digital album with other rich content, but I’m not sure how valuable this really is: Who listens to music while staring at the iTunes PC app?

iPod touch. The late 2009 iPod touch devices are mostly simple upgrades of last year’s models, with the same form factor and underlying hardware (except for the 32 and 64 GB units, apparently, which have the faster, 3GS-style underpinnings). (Apple made an interesting point about iPod touch gaming, though it’s unrelated to new models: It already has far more games than do the Nintendo DS or Sony PSP, and those games are far less expensive. This makes the iPod touch/iPhone platform far more valuable.) Prices are down and capacities are up, as you expect: $199 for 8 GB, $229 for 16 GB, $299 for 32 GB, 64 GB for $399. (Note again that the 32 & 64 GB models have the faster processor and OpenGL|ES capabilities.) Note: Originally, I had written that only the 64 GB version had the more advanced hardware.

iPod classic. Curiously, Apple is keeping the iPod classic but not providing any notable updates. It still costs $249 but the HDD goes from 120 GB to 160 GB.

iPod shuffle. The ridiculous iPod shuffle continues forward, but Apple has finally done the obvious: They’re making an adapter so you can use any headphones you want. Duh. Prices are down, capacities are up: $59 for 2 GB, $79 for 4 GB, and $99 for 4GB “Special Edition.” There are new colors.

iPod nano. As we’ve known for weeks, the iPod nano picks up a video camera, microphone, and speaker. It’s also getting CoverFlow and, like the Zune from three years ago, an FM radio. Pricing: $149 for 8 GB and $179 for 16 GB.

What wasn’t discussed. Apple completely ignored the Apple TV, again. There was no discussion of a much-rumored Apple tablet. No Beatles catalog on iTunes. No truly new hardware or software.

I’ll need to watch the streaming version of the event, but for now, I don’t see anything hugely dramatic. I’ll provide write-ups for iTunes 9, the iPod touch, and iPod nano next week.

Discuss this Article 107

panache1023
on Sep 10, 2009
Shark, It's weird...I have repeatedly said I think that MS's inclusion of browser, especially in today's world, is normal, good, etc. And again, people on this board keep taking about vendor lock in with iPod...but you aren't explaining it. Yes, if I buy an Apple iPod, I am locked in to using that iPod....however, I can buy music from the iTunes music store and play it on any iPod...I can buy music from Amazon and play it on iPod...I don't think that is the definition of lock-in...do you?
gadfly10
on Sep 10, 2009
@shark47 You wrote: "Can you prove that he wasn't concerned before calling him names, gadfly?" Yes, the proof is simple enough: that you can't produce anything that indicates the contrary. Show me where and when Paul Thurrott called for antitrust oversight on Microsoft. I mean, he just called for it against Apple, right? So let's see how he's so fair and objective in his journalism. Show me. Come on now, should be easy for you right? Ya, thought so.
shark47
on Sep 10, 2009
"I don't think that is the definition of lock-in...do you?" Well, it is about as much of a lock in as (or maybe a little more than) bundling a browser with Windows. Irregardless of whether MS was justified or not, the fact is that the company was heavily penalized for it, and now, over ten years later, is still paying for it. I think the Justice Dept under Clinton was right in investigating and penalizing Microsoft. The European Commission, on the other hand, has gone too far and might actually be doing more harm than good. @gadfly, that is silly. You made the claim, the onus of proof is on you.
panache1023
on Sep 10, 2009
Shark, The issue with IE bundling wasn't lock-in, it was anti-competitive behavior. However, through "embrace-extend-extinguish", it was in some weird way, a lock-in attempt. Once the web no longer worked with a browser other than IE, what would have happened then? You buy music through iTunes, and then you decide you hate iPod and get Zune, your music will still work...not locked-in. Anyway man, this thread is really getting stale with unjustified accusations of anti-trust / anti-competitive behavior that doesn't exist being compared (in an ineffective way) to a company that has been convicted of anti-competitive behavior. I'm tired of this...Paul is a very biased individual who feels that everyone that beats MS should be penalized for it...it's really weird! On a final note....I agree the EU has gone too far with the browsers as I've stated multiple times....the times have changed and all the most popular / best browsers are free and included or whatever, so blah blah blah. See you on a different thread.
SPiotr
on Sep 10, 2009
@waethorn "Spiotr said: "Go buy an iPod. Sync it with your PC. Buy a track from the iTunes Store. Go buy a Zune. Sync it WITH THE SAME PC. Buy a track from the Marketplace." Waethorn said: "Again, Apple is the monopolist, so the law applies to them, not Microsoft here" You missed the point. I new you would! Yes "the law" probably does apply to Apple but despite Apple's "market power"..... Microsoft (for example) can release their own player, their own sync software and their own music store. What has Apple done to prevent that? Amazon has (only recently) opened a download store. By all accounts it's pretty good, It has cheaper prices, is easy to use and has proved popular. What has Apple done to prevent that? You want a radio on your PMP? You want a subscription music service? You want MP3 downloads and not AAC? All freely available from competitors offering COMPETITIVE products. Where is Sony in this space? They are the ones that lost out big-time to the iPod phenomenon. Why are they not pleading to the DOJ that Apple must be stopped? Could they prove that Apple is preventing them from selling their players to millions of music-thirsty Americans? Could they demonstrate that the "barrier to entry" into the PMP market is just too great... because Apple has made it so? The anti-trust laws are there to encourage competition... and ultimately to benefit the consumer. It's just bad luck for you and Paul et al, that the consumer has found Apple's solution to be the best... and that the likely competitors have previously fumbled the ball, Remember a couple of years ago,when every new MP3 player was dubbed an 'iPod Killer"? Well the fact is they COULD HAVE killed the iPod .... if more people have bought them. History is now repeating itself with the iPhone. I agree, in business, it might be nice if you could take your competitor to court because their product is more popular than yours .... but you need a better reason than that.
shark47
on Sep 10, 2009
"You buy music through iTunes, and then you decide you hate iPod and get Zune, your music will still work...not locked-in." You buy accessories for the iPod (like a charger, dock, etc.). Will they work on the Zune too? what about all the DRM-protected music that you bought? Can you use iTunes to sync media to the Zune? What about being able to connect that Zune (or any other player) to your BMW or Audi? Sorry, but replacing a digital media player is not the same as replacing a DVD player or a television. Once you're in, you're more or less in for life.
SPiotr
on Sep 10, 2009
@Waethorn " In the EU, anticompetitive acts are challenged by the Commissioner for Competition, presently Neelie Kroes, and yes, they are still actively investigating Apple's iTunes monopoly, and how they charge different prices in different nations (within the EU)." Ah so that's the EU Apple probe that you are going on about! The one that got Paul so 'hopeful' a couple of years ago. The one where even , your friend, 'Neelie Kroes said she was more interested in the Record Companies' strategy than Apple's. The one where it was said "the European Commission agreed to close its antitrust investigation into the company (Apple)" (Source arstechnica). The one that was over nearly TWO years ago. So that's the EU Apple case that you meant. I thought it was the other one. You know the one that doesn't exist.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use