Apple's 2010 Music Event: Meh

Apple held it's annual music event this week, introducing as expected evolutionary new versions of its iPods, Apple TV, and iTunes. Nothing dramatic, nothing unexpected, and quite a bit less than the rumor mills suggested, as always. In fact, these annual events are getting downright uninteresting in way, since they're so telegraphed in advance.

Note: This isn't getting a lot of play (ahem) for some reason, but it's interesting to me how much of what Apple announced this week isn't actually available, or won't be made available, as expected. For example, iTunes 10 was supposed to be available "immediately" but there's a "Coming Soon" note on the web site now. And even the most delayed of the offerings, the new Apple TV, won't ship with all of its announced features whenever it does turn up: The streaming functionality from iPad that was shown off is "Coming Soon" too. This is curious because Apple's annual music event happens at the same time every year, so Apple knew this stuff was coming and still couldn't get it ready in time. Curious.

Another note: Apple didn't reveal new iPad sales figures as expected. When you combine this with the sudden immediate availability of the devices, you have to assume that means that sales have dropped off significantly. Apple isn't shy about crowing when products are doing well. But they do get curiously silent when things aren't going their way.

So. What did Apple announce? Not much, not if we're being honest about it.

New iPods. Apple didn't actually update its entire product line as advertised, the iPod classic soldiers along, again, with no changes. The iPod shuffle from 2007 is being relaunched as the new version of the iPod shuffle, which is funny when you think about. (But not unprecedented; when Apple disapointed iPod nano fans with the "fat boy" model one in 2007, it went back to the old design a year later too.) This is good news, as the UI-less iPod shuffle from last year was functionally retarded. (I gave it one-star in my mini-review.) The iPad nano picks up an interesting multi-touch display, but is not iOS, which is just weird, and an indication of how Apple's miniaturization at any cost maxims really get in the way. It seems more like an iPod shuffle with a screen, but I'll test it and see what it's like in real life. The iPod touch, as expected, picks up many of the iPhone 4 features that actually work, like the "retina display," Facetime video calling, HD video recording, and so on. This one continues to look strong and, thanks to the App Store support, is still the portable player to beat. It will also ship with Apple's Xbox LIVE ripoff, dubbed Games Center. The new iPods ship next week for some reason.

iTunes 10. Anyone hoping for the very necessary and long overdue iTunes overhaul will be disappointed to see that iTunes 10 is just the same old iTunes with very few additional features, none that look particularly interesting. Several years after Microsoft created the Zune Social (endlessly mocked by Apple fans), Apple is copying them with something called Ping, a "a new music-oriented social network for following your favorite artists and friends to discover what music they’re talking about, listening to and downloading." How innovative. (And I'm sure Apple fans will trip all over themselves telling each other what a great idea this is.) This isn't really an iTunes 10 feature, but Apple is finally switching to a streaming rather than downloading model for video content with TV show rentals (really one-time views) that are much less expensive than typical purchases. (But are only coming from ABC, Fox, and BBC America right now.) Also, AirTunes is being renamed to AirPlay because it now supports the streaming of non-music content, which is required for the new Apple TV (see below). Apple's press release notes that "iTunes 10 is available immediately as a free download at www.itunes.com." Which of course it is not.

Apple TV. I've always been a huge fan of the Apple TV and this version may make a big difference in the market. First, at $99, it's cheap, super cheap, compared to the previous version. It gets there by dropping on-device storage and non-HDMI connectivity, and by moving to a completely streaming-based model. I'm A-OK with that: I mostly stream to the current Apple TV anyway. One thing that would make a huge difference is not requiring iTunes to be running on a PC for this to work, as is the case currently, but I'd be surprised if they went there. The Apple TV won't ship until late this month, which is Apple-speak for "October."

Put simply, none of the crazy rumor stuff (Apps on Apple TV with some weird remote-based touch experience, a streaming iTunes service, etc.) was announced. What was announced is just the basic, evolutionary stuff one should expect given how mature these products are. Interesting, because the Apple stuff is both popular and usually pretty good. But not particularly exciting.

I've ordered one of everything for review purposes. The only one I'm really curious about is the new Apple TV. This product has always been excellent but underappreciated.

Discuss this Article 28

resplendent
on Sep 1, 2010
Once again the iPod touch update is somewhat of a disappointment. The camera's still photo resolution is literally antique and the 16GB version has yet to make a reappearance. While I acknowledge (as you have) that this is a mature product line not apt to receive many stunning features, this once again feels like the absolute minimum they could've added to the touch. In comparison my 16GB 2g still looks just fine. A compelling upgrade for me would've been at least getting the same camera and dual LED flashes that the iPhone 4 has, along with a capacity bump and perhaps GPS (seeing how many apps rely on location these days). I guess I can wait until next year!
johnbaxter
on Sep 1, 2010
Presumably Ping provides proper parameterizing. That is, an Off state.
Keleko
on Sep 1, 2010
I think most of this wasn't very exciting, either. However, I was surprised to see that that iPod Touch has outsold both the DS and PSP combined. That's pretty impressive and says a lot for the new Games Center's potential. And, Apple isn't charging for Games Center. I'm disappointed with the new Nano. I much prefer my 5th gen's capabilities compared to the 6th gen. I'll keep my video camera, video playback, bigger screen, and play/pause/skip without looking, thanks. However, it is pretty obvious that the iPod Touch is where you go for all those goodies now. And the Touch is better at all of them than the nano 5th gen was.
subzerohitman721
on Sep 1, 2010
A lot of people who were watching the TWiT livestream and chatroom also walked away with the "Meh" feeling. New iPods were expected and the new iPod Touch is definitely compelling. Definitely sad that Apple didn't up the storage because anyone can fill 64 GB's of mixed content these days in the Terabyte era. As I expected, no new iPad's. Not the way Apple does business. But I think the Apple TV thing is way overblown. 99 cents sounds cheap. If I add local sales tax(Dallas, TX sales tax rate of 8.25%), that's $1.07 USD. Take that $1.07 and multiply that times the hours of TV you watch (4.35 hours according to Nielsen Research Group) then multiply that by 30 days, and you've got the equivalent of a cable bill. In our household's case, the cable bill is cheaper than this. So adding up this ala carte rental service isn't the cable killer people believes much like the iPad didn't kill the Kindle. In fact Kindle 3 looks very attractive by price and functionality. As for the new Nano, I can buy 16GB's of storage for my Android device for 30 bucks. Most folks with smartphones can retain their 3.5 to 4.3" screen size. Dragg and drop any content directly into the microSD in Windows. No iTunes or doubleTwist necessary. Winamp can get the job done if you need playlists & content management. Even more laughable was removing the gorgeous screen on the previous version along with the camera. It seems like the Nano de-evolved. Too bad. Meh is just about right. Maybe next year they might generate some excitement.
rr0de74@live.com
on Sep 1, 2010
As apple events go this one was a total dud. As the for the new Apple TV, the price is good and that is it. With no hard drive I imagine its going to be harder to hack (boxee) and expand it. That $99 could go to a PS3 or Xbox 360 and get way more out of it.
DRWAM
on Sep 1, 2010
I don't read or follow the rumors, but I may have considered the TV if it at least had a browser. While h.264 is good for Apple, I still like DviX and XviD since I have two DVD players that are DivX certified and very nice to use with a USB 2 external drive.I'm still wondering how well HD will stream, but we will definitely know in a month or so. I do think that the nano and Touch iPods were kinda nice, but remember that Facetime only works with WiFi [but I read about Fring, an app that may do the same OTA]. Well, at least Steve look healthier this year. One interesting comment was that the number 1 portable game machine was the iPod. I'm wondering if my kids would prefer it over a PSP or DSi. Buy a iTunes game app once and everyone uses it, but the other vendors require that each unit has it's own game cartridge, making it cost more. Maybe that would make up for the price difference, and add a few more features too.
Rasken
on Sep 1, 2010

I WAS all gung-ho on the new 32GB iPod Touch butI found this while investigating if it does stills from the rear camera:

Video recording, HD (720p) up to 30 frames per second with audio; still photos (960 x 720) with back camera

960 x 720 is less than 1MP.  This camera is essentially double the resolution of the absolute crap Nintendo DSi cameras.   I have no idea what Apple was thinking here.

Ocean
on Sep 1, 2010
He did mention the iPad when he mentioned 230K activations daily. But this was a music event...so expect the big numbers at the next event. I wouldn't prematurely count Apple out of anything.
ModernDislocation
on Sep 1, 2010
I think it is interesting that a number of features were dropped from the iPod nano. The video camera, video playback (iTunes movies and tv shows), calendar, notes and contacts are all gone. I don't imagine most were ever used but still interesting that they were punted. I assume it is to get more people to the iPod touch. It is pretty clear that the halcyon days of the legacy iPods are over. The majority of the announcements were actually iOS related. Versions 4.1 and 4.2 were announced (inexplicably not covered by Paul), iPod touch, and the Apple TV took up the majority of the time. iOS device sales were also discussed. Apple said they were activating 230,000 a day. That comes out to just under 21 million devices sold split between iPhones, iPod touch and iPad. I am curious what he thinks is driving that sales since he has declared the iPhone 4 the "titanic" and now iPad sales have "dropped off significantly". If two of the three are failing I guess it is iPod touches? Odd since Apple sells between 8 - 10 million iPods and only some of those are touches. Sales for those must have just exploded :)
xpxp2009
on Sep 1, 2010
Apple TV is still a joke compared to Roku. Roku is preparing to do 1080p via a firmware update. I don't believe that Apple announced any plans to put 1080p support in the new Apple TV regardless of whether it ships with it or comes in a future update. And the Roku box is also $99. iEverything is getting old and consumers are eventually going to get tired of paying a premium price for what is no longer a premium product, but a competitively equal product. iBelieve it's time "iThink different" and stick with the better alternatives, whether they be Microsoft ones or not.
Waethorn
on Sep 1, 2010
iPod touch as a game platform? Don't make me laugh. Also, AirTunes is still incredibly crippled - you still can't stream from your PC (where, let's face it, your media library likely resides) to iOS devices. Streaming from the iPad to the Apple TV is just dumb. Who downloads multiple gigs of video on an iPad alone anyway? You should be streaming where your media library spends most of it's time, and that's the device with the most storage - your computer. Purchased video should be streamable to the iPad, iPod touch, and iPhone equally as well as it is to the Apple TV. Apple just won't give up with the ball and chain that is iTunes on the computer for syncing. When they break the restriction of cabled media sync, the devices will truly stand on their own. iOS will continue to be an OS that requires another OS to function. Windows Mobile devices never had that requirement of their desktop counterpart.
Waethorn
on Sep 1, 2010
@Rasken Good find! So the iPod touch isn't really the iPhone 4 without the phone after all.
Waethorn
on Sep 1, 2010
"AirPlay" = reusing old trademarks and dropping the first letter "Ping" = reusing someone elses trademark and changing the first letter
yoshipod
on Sep 1, 2010
xpxp2009 Does the Roku box play videos you already own? I looked on their website and could not find that. It looks like it only streams from services, or did I miss something?
rr0de74@live.com
on Sep 1, 2010
What happened to all of the iLife rumors that John-get a life-Grubber was talking about??:) The iHype that Apple likes so much is starting to back fire. The real events are so much less and only the nut-job fanboys can turn this into something positive. One thing is for sure, 2010 is NOT the year of OS X and the Mac. In fact I looked at NetApplications and Mac OS share is dropping, while iOS is growing....so much for that halo effect. http://www.netmarketshare.com/os-market-share.aspx?qprid=9
FlyerMike
on Sep 1, 2010
Super lame that Apple won't be updating those of us that own an Apple TV unit. The software basically looks the same, so you can't tell me it's not possible to upgrade the current units. Will not be buying another one.
Backup77
on Sep 1, 2010
I really don't much like the new Nano, but the new iPod Touch looks good. Have downloaded and installed iTunes 10 nothing to rave about here. Meh about sums it up!!!!!!!!!
Grannyville
on Sep 1, 2010
No support for Windows 7 Libraries. Dang. :(
Grannyville
on Sep 1, 2010
Also, I dislike how iTunes always creates a separate folder in the Start Menu to place the iTunes icon in instead of just putting it at the root of the Start Menu.
Nickelgreen
on Sep 1, 2010
Let's remember that for $99 you get a device which has only expensive rentals (you won't own anything) at 720p and 30 fps. Too few to justify even 30$ for whatever device that is only a mere portal. I think that, in US (here in Italy none of this is still available), the best choice is Hulu. Watch from a PC and just plug with your hdmi cable to your full hd tv or, like some samsung device with windows 7, through wireless if you wish to watch full hd hulu content. Still, Apple is illuding people with common services just to sell you a useless device. Same old story, nothing new.
chuckb84
on Sep 1, 2010
The new iPods don't profoundly change much, but they do show that Apple is willing, again, to "Burn the boats". This started when they discontinued the best-selling iPod mini and replaced it with the even more successful Nano. The Nano has gone from tall skinny format to the "fatty", back to tall/skinny and now to screenless. And they've also acknowledged that the buttonless shuffle was a bad idea. Now I can get a shuffle for the gym to replace the 2nd gen that I lost a few months ago. (Or get a screenless nano and wear it like a watch with the clock showing most of the time :) ) This experimentation with form factor changes is courageous when you have 70% of the market. Glad to see them do it, even though some of them are clear failures. There just isn't much left to do in this space of tiny media players. That's why the biggest changes were in the Touch. They make the most money there and have the strongest differentiation from their competitors. The Apple TV seems like something half finished. It's great that it is so cheap, and you all caught the "Oh, just a coincidence" price drop from Roku hours before the Apple event? However, the Apple TV, like all these living room boxes, lives or dies by content, content, content, and in that area, Apple doesn't really stand out from the pack. It seemed clear that they hoped to announce more media company deals, but don't have them concluded yet. The TV/movie companies have clearly learned from the record companies experience and Apple will NOT get anything close to their music dominance in the video/TV/movies market. At least, not yet. I'm still wondering about the full scope of that $1B NC data center...
Keleko
on Sep 2, 2010
iPod Nano - They're changing the market for this device. It is now a "premium" shuffle. I think they should have reduced the price at the same time, though. $119 and $149 would have been better price points to make up for the lost features compared to the last version. iPod Touch - Those of you wanting a camera similar to the iPhone 4 (5MP or greater) instead of video are missing a very important engineering reason. Video camera hardware is thinner than still camera. The iPod Touch is too thin to hold a still camera CCD of the same quality as the iPhone 4. That's also why the 5th gen iPod Nano had video but not a high resolution still camera. Apple wants the iPod Touch to be thin, and they made it thinner this time. So there won't be a nice still camera in the iPod Touch until the hardware gets a lot smaller. Apple TV - it is streaming only. Odds are you can't stream 1080p reliably, so there's no reason to support it right now. All iTunes video content is 720p streaming now, too. Roku may support 1080p soon, but what content are you going to get at that resolution? No TV shows are that resolution. I can't reliably stream 1080p from YouTube right now, and I suspect it is YouTube's bandwidth and not just mine that matters. When 1080p really matters, Apple will update the Apple TV to support it.
dmccall
on Sep 2, 2010
If you can't deliver live, HD sports, you blew it. Nobody is going to cut the cord for this device, so it really stands as an Apple cash machine for you to buy content a second time. The only kind of device that really is going to change a game is one that acknowledges both the cable box and streaming. Google is poised to do that, but we'll see if they can execute it. What is the point of AppleTV's small size? You aren't going to take it anywhere. Paul you missed Apple's rip-off of PlayTo. Does anyone in the Windows community push content with this feature? I don't. I think people want to pull content, so Apple's feature is just a showy one that has no real functionality. Funny how none of the fanboys has acknowledge the lack of HULU on the AppleTV. Windows Media Center dodged another bullet. The question is whether or not Microsoft is even interested in connecting a few dots and being the dominant offering of an inexpensive, easy, SmartHome solution. It seems all of their CE energy is going toward Windows Phone 7, an ecosystem that has very little chance at being a dominant player.
DRWAM
on Sep 2, 2010
It looks like iTunes 10 is now available for Mac and Win
dmccall
on Sep 2, 2010
One more thing... I sure hope that the video streams that people are going to be paying for are smoother than that which came out of the press conference yesterday. It was so choppy at times, Jobs sounded like a traffic reporter.
rr0de74@live.com
on Sep 2, 2010
Fanboy statement if there was ever one.... "This experimentation with form factor changes is courageous when you have 70% of the market." Is there a Steve Jobs book of positive adjectives you must use as a Apple Fanboy?
jeffsters
on Sep 2, 2010
@dmccall, can't we be adult and discuss varied points of view without using terms like "fanboy" especially when you come of the same? As for Hulu I suspect they have their own business model and have to get their own house in order and long term strategy defined before they can enter into those kinds of agreements and Apple isn't going to pull in Hulu until that happens. This isn't my dream device but I understand what Apple is saying here. Once again, like smartphones before the iPhone, there is a HUGE market, the REAL market, NOT US, that hasn't bought into these devices. They don't want to sync, they may not own a computer, they don't want to manage storage, I think my 68 year old mom. They do want to rent movies with the ease of Red Box from their chair. Is that enough? No idea....I've counted out Apple on things where they've won, and been excited by things that have had less than stellar success.
helio99
on Sep 2, 2010
It is funny to me that you are such a fan of Apple TV. It is clearly their least ambitious product and the new one is simply a blatant rip off of the roku box after their failed local-storage based version. And a lesser one at that since now the roku is not only cheaper but, incredibly, given the power of iOS, more extensible. Plus it will soon do 1080 which Apple apologists are predictably twisting themselves in knots over defending the lack of in the new itv. You have weird tastes.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use