Cloud Computing: So You Don’t Have to Stand Still

The New York Times tries to explain the inevitability of cloud computing, though I don't agree with the notion that this movement is the "jargon of the moment," unless of course the contention is that the phrase cloud computing will simply be replaced by "computing." That, I feel, is accurate. In any event...

What, you may be thinking, is cloud computing? Basically, it means obtaining computing resources — processing, storage, messaging, databases and so on — from someplace outside your own four walls, and paying only for what you use.

It’s a mushy term that is being applied loosely to many things on the Web. Salesforce.com is now called a cloud application — after all, companies let it store their sales data, rather than running it on their own systems. Facebook, too, is a cloud platform, because software developers write applications for it and distribute them on it.

Then there’s the infrastructure cloud, where companies offer up their servers, storage and other technology to anyone who can pay. Previously, that was called grid or utility computing, because you tap into it as you need it, as you would with the power grid, and pay only for what you use. In the early days of computing, it was called time-sharing.

What looks to be new is the way high-speed Internet access and almost limitless supplies of storage and processing power can now be pulled together.

In fact, cloud computing is poised to do for technology what the electrical grid did for power, says Nicholas Carr, author of "The Big Switch," which compares the rise of the cloud to the rise of electric utilities. The electrical grid streamlined operations for companies; when every home had cheap power and outlets, "you had incredible innovation in how to put all that cheap power to use," Mr. Carr says. He thinks that cloud computing will prompt a similar cycle over the next decade.

Exactly.

The "technical problems" with cloud computing are overblown--this article cites a two hour outage at Amazon S3 as evidence of "thunderheads" in the clouds. Baloney. Pervasive Internet access is getting faster, more reliable, and more common, and will only become more so in the years ago. One imagines a farmer lighting candles each night 100 years ago and making similar dreadful claims about electric lighting. Time marches on, with or without you.

Of course, this is high tech we're talking about here, and things are still happening quickly. So it's important to move forward gingerly. As long as you're simply moving forward.

Discuss this Article 4

DRWAM
on May 25, 2008
Agreed. All, or at least most hospitals have servers that are located elsewhere. Backup systems are mandatory, so there is rarely a lack of service, except maybe when a major upgrade occurs. Even then, it maybe only one service. As I stated before, i can access anything, and soon, when hospital go fully or close to fully digital, I can not only view the results of labs, imaging and reports, I will be able to order them from home. There is even a new service that allows a neurologist to communicate via video, to interview a patient or instruct someone such as an ER doc to examine the patient while the neurologist watches. This is done to help areas that don't have subspecialists [at least neurologist] to help them treat patients without shipping them out, which wastes time to start treatment. I have seen it and it works. The medical cloud has been arouond for years, but we just don't realize it until we talk to IT.
Suraky
on May 25, 2008
Cloud Computing .... Just another meaningless buzzword. It used to be called the Thin Client or dumb workstation etc. It may be useful for the ignorant masses, give them a super cheap client, say at a loss like cell phones, then overcharge them to subscribe to the mainframe (or whatever buzzword you want to use in place of data center). Don't get sucked in by the hype. Remember when everyone hated and dispised Javascript? No one in their right mind would ever have it enabled in their browser? ... no problem, just call it AJAX! Buzzwords fix everything! Right? Not for cloud computing. It goes totally against Intel and AMD's needs ... to sell as many chips of every type to as many people as possible to make the most profit. Cloud computing with highly virtualized environments for each user is entirely opposite of this.
Flenser
on May 26, 2008
"It goes totally against Intel and AMD's needs ... to sell as many chips of every type to as many people as possible to make the most profit. Cloud computing with highly virtualized environments for each user is entirely opposite of this." The computation still has to be done somewhere. I doubt Intel or AMD care where. In fact it doubles their business. They get to sell small, low heat, low power ships to the users for all the laptop and portable devices we'll be using, and then big number crunching chips to the data centres.
kellymjones
on May 26, 2008
@suraky: While I agree Cloud Computing is a buzzword and doesn't have an exact definition, it definitely points to a trend of distributed computing where programs run on both the client and server. In fact, the trend is that programs run completely on the client via javascript and the browser while the data is kept in sync to allow for both connected and disconnected operations. Look at Flash, Silverlight, JavaFX, etc.. These technologies are all oriented toward making the client more useful than the traditional dumb terminal and think client trend. For instance, games and 3D apps. I seriously doubt AMD or Intel are forecasting reduced demand for processors because everyone will be using an underpowered thin client. I see Microsoft's efforts with Live Mesh as an attempt to make the location of data and programs completely transparent with regard to location and the type of device (and OS) while still keeping people within the Microsoft picket fences. It's a good idea. Will every single Mesh application be able to run on a cell phone? Of course not, but just as I don't try (and can't) to run a modern 3D game on an integrated graphics chipset, doesn't mean I don't get plenty of use from my computer. As an aside, I don't think people hated javascript so much as they hated the early useless applications and compatibility problems. Ajax didn't make us love Javascript, it was term coined to distinguish a particular form of browser based technologies. What's the big deal? New words are created, some are discarded, hype comes and goes, and technology marches on.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use