How to fix Windows Mobile

This is an interesting if misguided article and, coincidentally, I met with the Windows Mobile folks just this week, so it’s good timing as well:

In recent months, Microsoft's mobile strategy has hit a rough patch. In the third quarter, iPhone maker Apple shipped more smartphones than all 56 device makers that make Windows Mobile phones combined, according to research firm Canalys. As a result, Windows Mobile slid from its position as the world's second-most popular mobile operating system a year ago to the No. 4 spot, behind Nokia's Symbian, Apple's OS X, and Research In Motion's BlackBerry.

Windows Mobile's share may drop to 11% this year from 12% in 2007, says Chris Ambrosio, an executive director for wireless at research firm Strategy Analytics. "On the important issues, they are chasing the market," Ambrosio says. "And they've got to chase much faster" to ensure continued carrier and handset makers' support, he adds.

To keep partners and developers on board, analysts say Microsoft needs to adapt Windows Mobile software for use with touch interface. However, a major update may not hit the market until 2010.

Yep. This is bad. Microsoft is working on a number of things before that major update, Windows Mobile 7. These include a new version of the WM version of IE, called Internet Explorer 6, and a new Windows Mobile platform called Zune Mobile that includes Zune functionality. But it’s not happening quickly enough.

Microsoft also should also follow Google's and Apple's lead in the area of wireless cloud-computing services.

Um. I assume that’s a joke. Apple does not “lead” in cloud computing services, and if anything, Microsoft’s presence in this market gives it a breadth and depth that is unavailable anywhere else, including Google. Windows Mobile has many problems. This is not one of them.

What Microsoft does need is a single, integrated online store for Windows Mobile applications and services. This is arguably the biggest innovation of the iPhone, and not its trendy and most-likely over-hyped touch interface.

In December, Microsoft also announced it's working with Blockbuster to deliver movies to cell phones. Eventually the service will let consumers start watching a movie on one device—say, a TV—and continue watching it on a cell phone while on the go. Microsoft is also beefing up mobile services through its acquisitions last year of Musiwave, which provides music services for cell phones, and TellMe, offering voice-based mobile search services.

One step Microsoft should avoid, analysts say, is building its own branded phone, as has been rumored. Such a phone would damage the behemoth's existing relationships with handset makers.

Well. They are going to do that, sorry. I’d argue that Microsoft’s relationships with handset makers is, in fact, its biggest weakness in the mobile market. In fact, in looking over this article, I see lots of interesting information about Windows Mobile, but precious little in the way of good advice. Yes, Microsoft needs an online store. Duh. But no, they already get cloud computing, so that’s a silly non-starter. Microsoft needs to take control of its future in the smart phone market and it can’t do that unless it makes its own devices or its partner make serious, Apple-like concessions. Guess which one is more likely?

As I noted previously, I did meet with Windows Mobile this week. They’re good people, smart people, and they seem to understand the issues. They also seem to value the business market more than the consumer market, but that might only be because that’s what they pretty much offer at this point. I will be writing more formally about Windows Mobile by the end of the year, but I wanted to at least mention one thing I found vaguely alarming. When asked about the success of the iPhone and how that impacts Windows Mobile, I was told that the iPhone “validated” Microsoft’s approach. That’s some weird combination of revisionism, wishful thinking and, perhaps, delusion.

I think Microsoft needs to be much more aggressive in this market. And that’s pretty much the only advice I can really give.

Discuss this Article 143

lotsamystuff
on Dec 12, 2008
"The Japanese, Korean and German auto makers in the south have gotten more government money than Detroit's asking for. Take a look at their various tax exemptions and "enterprise funding" breaks, etc." "You might want to pay attention to the fact that it's a Senator from Alabama (where the biggest industry is foreign auto plants) leading the opposition to the Detroit bailout. It's not about philosophy of government, it's about lobbying for the big foreign competitors to Detroit that are in his state." For once "mikegalos" is absolutely correct.
animositysomina
on Dec 12, 2008
Wae, "good" Canadian health care is a legend perpetuated by commies and socialists. Try to wait for several months in line like I did (I'm Canadian BTW) and then speak for "good" Canadian healthcare. It's all looking bright from the south side of the border, sure. Not so on the other side, mind you.
lotsamystuff
on Dec 12, 2008
"Wae, "good" Canadian health care is a legend ... try to wait for several months in line like I did (I'm Canadian BTW) and then speak for "good" Canadian healthcare. It's all looking bright from the south side of the border, sure. Not so on the other side, mind you." A-freaking-men.
lotsamystuff
on Dec 12, 2008
"You guys are hypocrites." And you're sexist. ;-)
Lindy
on Dec 12, 2008
Canadian health care (which is certainly much better than US health care mind you)." I work with a Canadian contractor and he says the exact opposite. His sister fractured her ankle and could not get into the "government provided" Dr. Office/hospital right away, so she had to pay a private doctor to help her. He regularly says we Americans dont know how bad it can be. He is dreading having to go back after his year is up. Not that I think the US health care system is great, it works, it just cost a lot.
Lindy
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - Can you provide factual evidence of that?" I would wager the answer to that is a big fat NO!
beaker
on Dec 12, 2008
What does "over-hyped touch interface" mean? How can it be over-hyped when everyone out there is copying it? Look at all of the new phones - they are copying the design of the iPhone. You said it yourself on a recent Windows Weekly. I don't know what over-hyped means when everyone is trying to catch up to it.
animositysomina
on Dec 12, 2008
Lindy, usually legend perpetuators like Wae stop telling fairy tales about Canadian healthcare the moment they got here. I saw one such American myself, my former manager. It was pretty funny to hear her confessions about how she went to a local doctor here and was told to wait in line for some test for a few months. She was like "WHAT???" :))) Yeah, those delusions die hard. Wae won't stop telling commie fairy tales until he starts living in Canada. Good for him being American and all that. I'll move south the moment I get an opprtunity (couldn't do it for family reasons, having a baby and stuff)
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
"Wae won't stop telling commie fairy tales until he starts living in Canada." You do know that Wae lives in Canada and Lindy, in the US, right? :-)
robertsjoe
on Dec 12, 2008
IE6 for mobile? You'd think that something so hated and awful as Internet Explorer 6 (for the desktop) is something you'd avoid naming on your mobile OS. IE6 is only slightly less of a tarnished brand than Vista.
robertsjoe
on Dec 12, 2008
A story about someone being trapped in a Windows world. http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/12/epilogue-austin-scho.html There is no other word for using Windows than being trapped. You're paying the Windows tax for life.
animositysomina
on Dec 12, 2008
robertsjoe, maybe YOU pay this tax, but it's YOUR personal problem, not others' shark47, then Wae should live in US for some time and learn the difference between socialist "free" healthcare and the real one.
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
Getting back on topic, lotsa, if you ignore all the snark and personal attacks, does make a good point. Apple did change the game by making a consumer focused smartphone, which caught most other companies unawares. It's been over 2 years since the iPhone was announced. Microsoft, instead of trying to sell a business focused OS to consumers, could've spent this time working on building a consumer centric OS from the scratch. If the Zune is anything to go by, I think MS would've done a great job of this. The company's current efforts are nothing more than "putting lipstick on a pig".
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
"You guys are hypocrites." "And you're sexist. ;-)" I think "guys" here was gender neutral.
anonymous
on Dec 12, 2008
Microsoft officials (finally) denied this week that the company will be rolling out a Zune phone at the
lotsamystuff
on Dec 12, 2008
"@mikegalos - Can you provide factual evidence of that?" I would wager the answer to that is a big fat NO!" Ten f*scking seconds of research: http://tinyurl.com/56tqmn
robertsjoe
on Dec 12, 2008
Great iPod web ad. http://games.yahoo.com/ Something else for Zune and Windows Mobile to copy.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@"lotsamystuff" - "Ten f*scking seconds of research:" You do realize that the link that you posted did absolutely nothing to prove mikegalos' point, right? In fact, it came closer to proving mine....that the dollars were from state and local governments. Not only that, but $3.6 Billion is nowhere near the $14 Billion that the big 3 are now asking for...another point that mikegalos was wrong on. Thanks! --tayme
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@robertsjoe - No school for a couple of days...you gotta be loving that!!! --tayme
lotsamystuff
on Dec 12, 2008
"the dollars were from state and local governments. Not only that, but $3.6 Billion is nowhere near the $14 Billion" • The government cheese tastes the same from different pantries • That number is an estimate, and doesn't include suppliers • Those numbers represent grants and giveaways, not loans • 1/3 of the amount the Big 3 are asking for is substantial. Bottom line: Government is and has been subsidizing this industry. Period.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
While everybody can, I'm sure, come up with anecdotes to justify why their position must be right, the facts are that the US health care system is worse than Canada's. There are two numbers that are typically used to measure health care; Average Lifespan and Infant Mortality. Average Lifespan has the advantage of showing the effect of a whole life of medical factors but has the downside of also showing the health costs of poverty and war. Still, it's a good measure even with those factors when you're comparing countries inside similar groups (say, Western Industrials with each other or Sub-Saharan African countries with each other) So where is the US? This bastion of "Our healthcare may be expensive but it's the best in the world"? Macau is at number 1 at 84.33 years Canada is at number 8 at 81.16 years The USA is at number 46 at 78.14 years OK. There are admitted flaws in using life expectancy. (I admitted them myself) Let's look at infant mortality. This is considered the default number for measuring health care since most societies do their best to provide good health care to pregnant women and newborn infants no matter what. The best place to be born is Singapore with only 2.30 deaths per live birth Canada is #23 with 5.08 deaths per live birth which is over twice Singapore's infant mortality rate And the US is at #32 with 6.30 deaths per live birth So, there are the actual facts. You can now go back to meaningless anecdotal discussions about your Aunt having to wait two years for bunion surgery. (Facts from the US Central Intellegence Agency's World Fact Book - 2008 edition)
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
lotsa Another big factor is that those numbers weren't inflation adjusted.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@"lotsamystuff" - I agree with your points totally. But mikegalos loves to post "facts" without backing them up...and this is a perfect example of that. What you posted does show that various government entities at the state and local levels have been subsidizing the auto industry, it fails to show that "The Japanese, Korean and German auto makers in the south have gotten more government money than Detroit's asking for." Remember, the FEDERAL government already bailed out Chrysler once back in 1979 or so. You, mikegalos, and I all know that and the current situation is different than offering incentives to entice a company to locate in and employ citizens of an area. I don't like either idea. In the mean time, I'll keep driving my Honda...because I know that it will run for at least another 100,000 miles. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
Oh, and if anybody want an example of a company that successfully transition from making horse drawn buggys to making cars, I'd suggest you look at Studebaker.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
tayme Government funds are fungible. Alabama takes in more Federal funds than they pay so Federal money subsidizes Alabama State government spending without even the benefit of Federal oversight.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - You might actually earn some respect if you would stick to the facts and not mix in your pompous comments lie "You can now go back to meaningless anecdotal discussions about your Aunt having to wait two years for bunion surgery." That is the kind of comment that has earned you a$$hole status. --tayme
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - The sky is blue. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
My. Some people get downright testy when facts show up to hurt their justifications.
Master3
on Dec 12, 2008
This whole thread has become a cluster freak. Seriously it's almost as bad as the comment section on YouTube videos.
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
So, what exactly are the alternatives to a bailout? Let GM and probably Ford and Chrysler fail? Let millions of people lose jobs? Let the economy go further into recession? I wouldn't support this at any other time --bailouts like this promote mediocrity-- but if a few billion dollars might prevent the economic situation from deteriorating further, why not? Of course, there's a likelihood of this amount not being enough, in which case, things will only get worse.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - We would also need to adjust for inflation of the earlier bailout of Chrysler and then factor in and adjust for inflation the various subsidies made to dealerships, part manufacturers, labor unions, and various other entities. In the end, I still would guess that that, along with the ~$30 Billion that the Big 3 asked for a few weeks ago and probably even the $14 Billion that they are now asking for is more than what has been paid to the US based "foreign" auto manufacturers. They, like most of the rest of North America and the EU have been living on excess for years, and it looks like its time for adjustment. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
shark The current plan isn't meant to be enough. It's a short-term bridge loan meant to keep GM and Chrysler afloat until a long-term plan can be negotiated under the new Administration and new Congress. (Ford has stated they don't need the short term bridge loan) That's why it has only a little more oversight than the unsupervised gift to Wall Street that's paying for staff bonuses rather than rebuilding the housing market. Now, the real question is why a $14B loan is seen as horrible by the same people who had no problems with a $700B giveaway.
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
"so, there are the actual facts. You can now go back to meaningless anecdotal discussions about your Aunt having to wait two years for bunion surgery." Those facts are meaningless.I mean, I could use this data to prove my hypothesis that Canadians are in general healthier than Americans or even eat better, maybe. Maybe there are fewer gun related deaths in Canada. There are so many factors that affect life expectancy. I don't think this is a good measure for comparing the health care systems of US and Canada.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - "Some people get downright testy when facts show up to hurt their justifications." Sorry, but you are wrong. I am able to separate my discussion of the Big 3 bailout and your pompous comment made to another poster regarding another subject. They are unrelated...you are still a pompous a$$hole. You'll notice that I said that you should stick to facts...which you did in your post regarding the healthcare of the US vs Canada. You have yet to provide a fact, other than saying that numbers need to be adjusted for inflation, for your statement "The Japanese, Korean and German auto makers in the south have gotten more government money than Detroit's asking for." I agree with that fact...we do need to adjust for inflation, including the $1.5 Billion that bailed out Chrysler in 1979-1980 and the moneys given by various state and local entities to entice the auto manufacturers to open a factory, dealership, etc. in their area. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
Tayme What they're asking for (and you seem to be ignoring) is a loan. That means the cost is the interest on the money. The subsidies for the foreign manufacturers were in the form of grants and exemptions. Or, to put it simply, you're saying that loaning somebody $200 for six months with interest is more of a gift than giving them $100 cash.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - "Now, the real question is why a $14B loan is seen as horrible by the same people who had no problems with a $700B giveaway." I am one person that had a problem with both. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
shark Feel free to present less "meaningless" facts. You won't find any but feel free to look. These are the measures used worldwide to guage quality of health and healthcare in a society and were taken from a reputable and non-partisan source. Feel free to use WHO numbers if you like - they're basically the same.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - "What they're asking for (and you seem to be ignoring) is a loan." I am fully aware that it is a loan. But, I am against making bad loans, and I feel this would be a bad loan. What industry is next...hell, they should all line up and ask for these loans. The money would be better spent on improving the dismal state of the education system in this country, or providing loans to people that actually need them...not to companies that in my opinion have no intentions of changing past actions that got them into the state they are currently in. "you're saying that loaning somebody $200 for six months with interest is more of a gift than giving them $100 cash." As you would most likely say...do not put words in my mouth. I did not say this at any given point. Please retract. --tayme
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
"I am one person that had a problem with both" What were the alternatives, though? Let everything collapse? Whose fault was it? People blamed greed on the Wall Street. but Wall Street has always been and will continue to be greedy. It's like asking a car salesman to try to minimize his commission from sales. CEOs answer to shareholders. I think Dipsh posted a 9 year old article about how FNM's shareholders were after the company to increase profits. GM and Ford were actually trying hard to turn things around. It's not entirely their fault that this happened.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - Those "meaningless anecdotal discussions about your Aunt..." mean more to most people than any statistics that you can provide. It is called emotion and real world experience...both things that you appear to have a lack of. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
tayme I'm not sure why we should include the $1.5B loan guarantee to Chrysler in 1979 as an expense in the same way as the grants, free infrastructure improvements and tax exemptions given to the Japanese and German automakers. Care to explain how our providing a loan guarantee 30 years ago cost us money? Or how it still does? A loan guarantee doesn't actually cost anything if the company doesn't default on their loans. And Chrysler didn't. It's the same as if you have bad credit and asked me to cosign a loan with you. As long as you pay back the loan properly, it didn't cost me anything to guarantee your loan.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
tayme No need to retract. You're citing the principal of the loan as the money given to the companies rather than the interest on the loans. Now, feel free to tell us again how the interest on $14B costs the taxpayers so much more than the grant money given to Toyota or Daimler.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@shark47 - There may be no alternatives other than a collapse or a major adjustment. You do realize that most low to middle income North Americans and EU countries live much better than the low to middle income folks in the rest of the world, right? I think that the time has come for an awakening...we live in great excess. That is what needs adjusted. I got on an elevator today and it vocally announced every floor that it stopped on...I saw a van today on the interstate that had, not 1...but 2 ceiling mounted DVD players, each showing a differnt video. Do we really need that? The Big 3 and the labor unions have been leading an existence very similar to that...excessive. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
tayme Yes, when the facts say you're wrong, bring out a sob story anecdote and you can fool some people into ignoring the facts. Now who was it who kept insisting on facts? Oh, yeah, it was you.
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - "grants, free infrastructure improvements and tax exemptions given to the Japanese and German automakers." You do realize that the Big 3 have had much more of those things over the years...right? --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
Tayme You realize that corporate executives in the US make 47x as much as their equivalents in Japan, right? (Date from The Economist) And you realize that if our blue collar wages were as wildly out of line as you claim that Japan and Germany wouldn't be offshoring their assembly line jobs TO the US for a source of cheap labor. So, care to provide some FACTS?
tayme
on Dec 12, 2008
@mikegalos - "You're citing the principal of the loan as the money given to the companies rather than the interest on the loans. " Show me where I said that...please. But take your time. I am out for now. Have a good weekend. --tayme
shark47
on Dec 12, 2008
"nt. You do realize that most low to middle income North Americans and EU countries live much better than the low to middle income folks in the rest of the world, right?" Of course I do. I've spent half of my life in such a country. Those are long term solutions and I agree with you. Fiscal conservatism is the way to go, in my opinion. The goal should not only be to cut down wasteful Government expenditure, but also to encourage people to save money. Mike, you may be right about those facts. I don't think life expectancy depends only on the healthcare system. By the way, maybe we need to consider how many people from Canada come down to the US for treatment of life threatening ailments.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
Another fact to offset tayme's emotional stories. Executive vs worker pay by country: Country - Executive take home pay relative to factory floor workers pay Japan - 11x Germany - 12x France - 15x Italy - 20x Canada - 20x South Africa - 21x Britain - 22x Hong Kong - 41x Mexico - 47x Venezuela - 50x USA - 475x Data from The Economist as reported on PBS' NOW website
mikegalos@msn.com
on Dec 12, 2008
Another fact to offset tayme's "emotional anecdotes" In 1951 the average fulltime worker in the US made 79.8% of the national median household income In 2000 the average fulltime worker in the US made 53.3% of the national median household income. That's a decrease of 1/3 of their income for the same hours worked after adjusting for inflation. Source of data: Office of Management and Budget

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use