HP Acquires Palm

As I just revealed on the This Week in Google podcast, HP is purchasing Palm. More info soon.

Update: The purchase price is $1.2 billion. Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein is expected to remain with the company.

Update 2: Here's the press release:

PALO ALTO, Calif. & SUNNYVALE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--HP (NYSE: HPQ - News) and Palm, Inc. (NASDAQ: PALM - News) today announced that they have entered into a definitive agreement under which HP will purchase Palm, a provider of smartphones powered by the Palm webOS mobile operating system, at a price of $5.70 per share of Palm common stock in cash or an enterprise value of approximately $1.2 billion. The transaction has been approved by the HP and Palm boards of directors.

The combination of HP's global scale and financial strength with Palm's unparalleled webOS platform will enhance HP's ability to participate more aggressively in the fast-growing, highly profitable smartphone and connected mobile device markets. Palm's unique webOS will allow HP to take advantage of features such as true multitasking and always up-to-date information sharing across applications.

"Palm's innovative operating system provides an ideal platform to expand HP's mobility strategy and create a unique HP experience spanning multiple mobile connected devices," said Todd Bradley, executive vice president, Personal Systems Group, HP. "And, Palm possesses significant IP assets and has a highly skilled team. The smartphone market is large, profitable and rapidly growing, and companies that can provide an integrated device and experience command a higher share. Advances in mobility are offering significant opportunities, and HP intends to be a leader in this market."

"We're thrilled by HP's vote of confidence in Palm's technological leadership, which delivered Palm webOS and iconic products such as the Palm Pre. HP's longstanding culture of innovation, scale and global operating resources make it the perfect partner to rapidly accelerate the growth of webOS," said Jon Rubinstein, chairman and chief executive officer, Palm. "We look forward to working with HP to continue to deliver industry-leading mobile experiences to our customers and business partners."

Under the terms of the merger agreement, Palm stockholders will receive $5.70 in cash for each share of Palm common stock that they hold at the closing of the merger. The merger consideration takes into account the updated guidance and other financial information being released by Palm this afternoon. The acquisition is subject to customary closing conditions, including the receipt of domestic and foreign regulatory approvals and the approval of Palm's stockholders. The transaction is expected to close during HP's third fiscal quarter ending July 31, 2010.

I hope this is successful. Palm has a great smart phone platform, and HP could have enough market reach to make it work. Still ... $1.2 billion. Yikes.

Discuss this Article 17

chuckb84
on Apr 28, 2010

That's $1.2B down the drain. Windows Phone will be getting in line behind iPhone, Android and Blackberry, and Palm will be behind that. I just don't see much room for ANY players beyond iPhone, Android and Blackberry.

I suppose it is possible that Windows Phone and BB will split the business market and Android and iPhone will split the consumer market. However, I don't see any scenarios where there is much left for Palm.

yoshipod
on Apr 28, 2010
I could possible see them trying to turn the Palm OS into a Tablet PC OS as Apple did with the iphone. That may actually work well.
vedichymn
on Apr 28, 2010
I think the key line here is: "And, Palm possesses significant IP assets" I don't think Palm as it stands now is probably worth that, but they do have a nice patent portfolio.
tayme
on Apr 28, 2010
WebOS would make an awesome tablet OS...real multi-tasking, etc. This is where I see HP taking them. Remember, HP is one of the worlds largest tech companies...and Palm Pilot *was* the most successful PDA. I think my Pre is a great little smart phone, so that may be skewing my opinion, though. --tayme
rr0de74@live.com
on Apr 28, 2010

I agree with Chuck, total waste of money.  I remember my iPaq, with Pocket PC, that is the last time I thought about owning a HP hand held device.

To many players, to many good players, now.  Security freakish corporations will stick with BB.  Exchange corporations Windows Phone, BB or iPhone, and Android once they get more solid Exchange support.  Consumers iPhone/Android/Windows Phone in that order.

HP just lost a lot of money.

USArcher
on Apr 28, 2010

Umm...they might make money in 2 years but I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.  

I'm just glad to see Dell jump in the game and their Windows 7 Phone looks absolutely stunning.

Chris_Wiley
on Apr 28, 2010

The mobile game is still young and there are lots of room for different devices and OS's.  Palm has a strong platform and is clearly in competition with the others out there.  Palm has good Exchange support, great PIM tools which are getting better with each update.  It is a polished UI and great UX.  Easy to develope apps for or port them from other existing apps, (ie. iPhone and Android apps) in very short time period.

Also, WebOS has a top notch "homebrew" base which is helping push webOS to its limit.

With the capital that HP has and its reach, is what Palm needs to put it's webOS back into the game.  

I have used the iPhone, BB, WMP, and Android before, while they are good at what they do, from my experience webOS just does it better.

subzerohitman721
on Apr 28, 2010

I would not be so hesitant to dismiss WebOS or HP. While I do agree that the phone competition is tight, there are literally billions of people who do not have a mobile phone. I think there's room for Palm, but it will comedown to a couple of factors.

1. Can the new HP WebOS differentiate itself from iPhone, Android, Blackberry, WP7, & Symbian enough that can draw people?

2. Marketing? HP will have a chance to market WebOS way differently than Palm. HP's commercials are on major networks across broadcast, cable, & satellite. HP also advertises in newspapers, the net, & magazines. That's a valuable card in HP's favor.

3. Can HP bring the hardware quality that the Palm Pre & Pixi lacked?

4. Can HP hold on to the WebOS developers & attract new ones?

5. Will HP issue a better SDK?

I do agree that WebOS would be ideal with some work for tablet's. This could really challenge Apple much in the way Android is becoming a clear and present threat to the iPhone. Android on a tablet will also be a big threat. WebOS has the potential.

HP's been in the computer business long before Apple & probably long after Apple ceases to exist. If they've stood the test of time so far, don't count them out. Just as I'm rooting for Android, I'm rooting for HP with WebOS. Competition is great because it serves as a check & balance to others. I'm hoping HP will make all the right moves to both the smartphone, mediaphone, & other parts of the mobile device market.

Dr. Daniel Jackson
on Apr 28, 2010

“HP’s longstanding culture of innovation, scale and global operating resources make it the perfect partner to rapidly accelerate the growth of webOS,”  --Jon Rubinstein,

"WebOS would make an awesome tablet OS...real multi-tasking, etc." -- tayme

A HP Slate running WebOS(or dual booting with Windows 7), combined with the MiFi of the Pre + would make a pretty interesting device and a pretty good contender against the iPad.

DRWAM
on Apr 28, 2010

I like Yoshipod's idea. But hey, maybe HP was looking for a tax write-off!

rr0de74@live.com
on Apr 28, 2010

The Patents are probably nice, but 1.2 billion nice?  A tablet OS, to compete with Win7 on the slate?

If they bought for the OS to make a tablet then they should ditch Win7 and go all in with Web OS on slate.  Web OS would probably work better on that slate hardware.

whiplash55
on Apr 28, 2010

Damn this is great news!  The WebOS works great Windows Mobile doesn't, not yet at least. This is great news for consumers, a tablet based on the WebOS will be very competitive, anyone who's used a Pre can see it will have great scalability to a tablet form.

I can't wait to see the kinds of devices HP will come up with using the WebOS.

I admit being a bit of a fanboy since buying my Pre, a decision based on network and features more than the phone itself. After using it a while it has all the apps I need and the WIFI hotspot feature now for no additional data make it a very useful device.

wlow3
on Apr 28, 2010

"Apple's iPad team doesn't have to worry about the HP Slate tablet for a while, if it ever did, anyway," Jay Yarow writes for The Business Insider.

Yarow continues, "During a call with analysts to explain its purchase of Palm, HP was evasive about whether or not it will still release its Microsoft Windows-based Slate."

Good God. Can Microsoft afford any more vaporware?  (Posting this using a tablet device that actually exists — an iPad.)

stimshady
on Apr 29, 2010
@chuckb84: one word - Nokia.
Dipsh t Admin
on Apr 29, 2010
Great move. When you look at the total phone market, smartphones only account for less than a quarter of all phones. There is PLENTY of room for more platforms. With the backing of a powerhouse like HP, potential buyers of WebOS devices now don't need to worry about the fate of the company, and developers can now feel confident choosing the platform. There was a huge negative aura that was affecting them. Given that the reach of HP is huge, I can see them deploying WebOS in many other areas, particularly expanding their server management line.
Waethorn
on Apr 29, 2010

I'm thinking this is just another move for HP to expand offerings with their Ipaq line, which have been lagging as of late.  HP has been slow to offer smartphones, and their choices were limited to stock-only versions of Windows Mobile on enterprise communications devices.  WebOS is likely seen as a move to implement an alternate platform that they can heavily proprietize and will be their way of confronting not only Apple, but also Android, by leveraging the huge HP brand.

Here's a question for discussion:  Is WebOS fully open source?  Who wants to bet that HP won't license it out to other OEM's?

duanewatson
on Apr 29, 2010

I think the whole "the phone market is tight" is a bit of a straw man.  There is still a lot of growth left to do in the smartphone market, and more competition is definitely better for innovation.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use