Introducing the Google Chrome OS

Well, it's official. Google will take on Windows, not with some based on Android (which is dumb, and curious, in my opinion), but with yet another OS based on the Chrome browser. Here's the full announcement. The bolded bits are my work, as I think those are the core bits.

It's been an exciting nine months since we launched the Google Chrome browser. Already, over 30 million people use it regularly. We designed Google Chrome for people who live on the web — searching for information, checking email, catching up on the news, shopping or just staying in touch with friends. However, the operating systems that browsers run on were designed in an era where there was no web. So today, we're announcing a new project that's a natural extension of Google Chrome — the Google Chrome Operating System. It's our attempt to re-think what operating systems should be.

Google Chrome OS is an open source, lightweight operating system that will initially be targeted at netbooks. Later this year we will open-source its code, and netbooks running Google Chrome OS will be available for consumers in the second half of 2010. Because we're already talking to partners about the project, and we'll soon be working with the open source community, we wanted to share our vision now so everyone understands what we are trying to achieve.

Speed, simplicity and security are the key aspects of Google Chrome OS. We're designing the OS to be fast and lightweight, to start up and get you onto the web in a few seconds. The user interface is minimal to stay out of your way, and most of the user experience takes place on the web. And as we did for the Google Chrome browser, we are going back to the basics and completely redesigning the underlying security architecture of the OS so that users don't have to deal with viruses, malware and security updates. It should just work.

Google Chrome OS will run on both x86 as well as ARM chips and we are working with multiple OEMs to bring a number of netbooks to market next year. The software architecture is simple — Google Chrome running within a new windowing system on top of a Linux kernel. For application developers, the web is the platform. All web-based applications will automatically work and new applications can be written using your favorite web technologies. And of course, these apps will run not only on Google Chrome OS, but on any standards-based browser on Windows, Mac and Linux thereby giving developers the largest user base of any platform.

Google Chrome OS is a new project, separate from Android. Android was designed from the beginning to work across a variety of devices from phones to set-top boxes to netbooks. Google Chrome OS is being created for people who spend most of their time on the web, and is being designed to power computers ranging from small netbooks to full-size desktop systems. While there are areas where Google Chrome OS and Android overlap, we believe choice will drive innovation for the benefit of everyone, including Google.

We hear a lot from our users and their message is clear — computers need to get better. People want to get to their email instantly, without wasting time waiting for their computers to boot and browsers to start up. They want their computers to always run as fast as when they first bought them. They want their data to be accessible to them wherever they are and not have to worry about losing their computer or forgetting to back up files. Even more importantly, they don't want to spend hours configuring their computers to work with every new piece of hardware, or have to worry about constant software updates. And any time our users have a better computing experience, Google benefits as well by having happier users who are more likely to spend time on the Internet.

We have a lot of work to do, and we're definitely going to need a lot of help from the open source community to accomplish this vision. We're excited for what's to come and we hope you are too. Stay tuned for more updates in the fall and have a great summer.

Posted by Sundar Pichai, VP Product Management and Linus Upson, Engineering Director

I'll have a news story up about this shortly...

Discuss this Article 87

tayme
on Jul 8, 2009
@mikegalos - Your second, third, and part of the fifth paragraphs hit the nail on the head...the rest of your post was just you being the "anti-anything that is not Microsoft partisan" that we all know that you are. --tayme
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
"You've been running a master course on classlessness since you first popped your ugly head out of the soil on this site." LOL! You never fail to impress us with your lack of wit. I'd rather have see more of robertsjoe on here than you. @Lindy: You still suck at IT.
Ocean
on Jul 8, 2009
Mike, as Ars said: >>Chrome also occupies a relatively small niche, but it has helped change perceptions of what a browser should do in terms of sandboxing processes and isolating plugins. If the Chrome OS can help change consumer perceptions about the utility of online applications and cloud storage, it could be a big success for Google, even without wide adoption.<<
tayme
on Jul 8, 2009
I wonder...will Google have anti-trust problems? MS did when they integrated IE into the OS...what about an OS that only boots to the Chrome browser? I would think that is a problem. --tayme
Ocean
on Jul 8, 2009
And then theres this: >>Blogger Robert Scoble has posted a message on his FriendFeed account, hinting at a Microsoft announcement next Monday, related to Google's OS. In the posting, Scoble notes "why did Google announce Chrome OS this week? Well, of course, Microsoft has a big announcement coming on Monday (I'm embargoed)".<<
Ocean
on Jul 8, 2009
mikegalos@msn.com
on Jul 8, 2009
For those who are interested in history (and why you should start thinking about shorting your Google stock) here's a little background... In television shows there almost inevitably comes a time when the show decides that they are sufficiently popular or important to give up on their premise and start catering not to their audience but to either a new audience they want to attract or to the egos of their key performers. The mark of this is "very special episodes" or episodes where a cast member "has to" sing or when they have a cast member do a water ski jump over a shark tank. In the computer industry there are two equivalents. For application vendors it comes when one or more of their founders decides that they want to kill off Office by building or more frequently acquiring additional applications to build their own suite. The results are predictable. WordPerfect tried it. Anybody here use WordPerfect as their word processor lately? Ashton-Tate tried it. The results can be seen in what market share is left for the formerly dominent dBase franchise. Lotus tried it. The company that owned spreadsheets is now a minor division of another ghost of its former self, IBM. And that particular shark jumping was even tried by a systems house, Novell. I guess that proves you can even have hubris so massive you can cross the systems/applications boundary. On the systems side of the industry the shark jumping moment comes not by saying "let's build an OS to compete with Windows" because that's actually very difficult (IBM, Apple and SUN have all tried multiple times and failed miserably multiple times). The way systems houses jump the shark is to say, "There's no need for an operating system any more. We're going to make Windows irrelevant by moving the programming layer above the OS". This is tied to their odd belief that people (not people like them but people they hold in some contempt like their end users) don't want an OS, they'd really prefer a variant of the old terminal model. And so they launch a "new" product line which will move these "users" over to something better suited to their percieved lack of skills. IBM was built on it and fell back on it by crippling their PC line when it began to kill the System/3x family. SUN tried multiple times (most famously with SUNray terminals) Oracle decided that users didn't need an OS and pushed a line of processors that ran Java natively (and a mini-OS to go with them) Netscape renamed their LiveScript to JavaScript, teamed up with SUN and started raising prices on their browser as the first step in replacing native apps and the underlying OS. In each case, the company (IBM, SUN, Oracle, Netscape) never recovered. So, in short, today Google announced their plans to move into the arena of shark jumping. And, I'd bet there are people dancing and popping champagne in the executive offices at the Microsoft campus.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Jul 8, 2009
Ocean The rumors of what's being announced early next week are all over the Internet. (Scoble doesn't exactly have an exclusive here) Let's just say that the terminal/server model will be dealt a big blow next week yet again.
Ocean
on Jul 8, 2009
Boy you don't just blow hot air, it's sizzlin' red-star type fusion. Again: >>If the Chrome OS can help change consumer perceptions about the utility of online applications and cloud storage, it could be a big success for Google, even without wide adoption.<< Just like Chrome...
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
@tayme: Google would need monopoly power for it to be an issue, at which point they would likely be required to offer alternative browsers to have connections into the OS similar to how the Chrome web browser would. Google wouldn't like that very much because they lose control of all of their extra background information collection opportunities, as well as their search defaults. Of course, it's probably in Google's better interest that they don't achieve critical mass in the market. It'll never happen anyway. By the time Google even has the opportunity to achieve a modest amount of marketshare, Microsoft will already have their own web-based operating system platform available, and businesses (the major chunk of the market) will have embraced theirs instead.
tayme
on Jul 8, 2009
As mikegalos says...what harm was done to the consumer in the MS case? I agree with him on that point and think that Google would be treading on thin ice with this...plus, another point that I agree with mikegalos on is that dumb terminals are a thing of the past...not the future. People want control of their apps and especially their data...and I'll say it again...it will be a long time before regulated industries are even remotely allowed to look at something like this...unless of course, the current administration at any given time, has been bought and paid for by the darling company at any give time... --tayme
lotsamystuff
on Jul 8, 2009
"Of course not "losta". Not under your current login that is." I only have one login, "waethorn", and it's the same one I've always had. Once again, you're wrong. No surprise there.
lotsamystuff
on Jul 8, 2009
"By the time Google even has the opportunity to achieve a modest amount of marketshare, Microsoft will already have their own web-based operating system platform available, and businesses (the major chunk of the market) will have embraced theirs instead." You forgot the next paragraph: "And partisans like Me and Mikey will embrace it as the greatest thing since sliced bread, conveniently forgetting how they pooh-poohed the concept when it didn't carry the Microsoft brand."
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
"I only have one login, "waethorn", and it's the same one I've always had." Oh so you do have DID then.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Jul 8, 2009
Lotsa I'd suggest you look up the difference between Microsoft's S+S (Software plus Serivces) model and the "let everybody use a terminal" SaaS (Software as a Service) model espoused by Google and other centralized computing companies. If you don't understand the difference you'll be very confused over the next couple of years.
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
@losta: You're just as much as a$$ as always. Businesses don't trust Google. It's as simple as that. If anybody can get over the issues of "cloud computing" in the business world, it'll be Microsoft. They already have their hooks into business processes, so if anybody understands business, it's them. Google? No - they do what they want, and businesses don't trust them. Apple? Definitely no. Sun and IBM? Somewhat, but they aren't what they claim to be, nor are they what they used to be. Microsoft knows business more than any other software maker. Try to wrap your mind around that losta. Go ahead and cry a little if it makes you feel better, I really don't care what you think one way or another.
chuckb84
on Jul 8, 2009
"OT: A Pro-Bing Article: www.nytimes.com/.../09pogue.html" Yep, and it's currently "above the fold" on the NYT web page. Of course, Pogue is a charter member of the iCabal, an Apple suckup, total shill, hates Microsoft, etc. Or....maybe not. Maybe Paul is the one who sees the world through distorted lenses.
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
http://www.thinkgos.com/cloud/ "Cloud" is a failure. They haven't had any major vendors sign on to it, and it hasn't been released yet. If you want to see another reason for a failure, it's in the icon set in the screenshots - they still have a launch point for Windows. I guess that proves the point - if you can't beat 'em, join 'em. If you can't replace Windows, embrace it (Boot Camp, anyone). Google's Chrome OS will be the same.
EricoF3
on Jul 8, 2009
Dop! Here's another Linux based OS... Is there somebody that can do real OS here?? - Apple don't write their OS anymore, They do a Unix(FreeBNC) UI Shell. - Ubuntu, gOS, Android, and all these variant are Linux Shell... - And now Google Chrome OS... Another Linux UI Shell.. And based on a Web Browser !!! Dop!!! Is there a company that really do new OS here?? Is there only Microsoft that do real OS from A to Z?? Also, Waethorn is right!! Cloud computing will be a failure... Do you know a lot of people that want to let transite all there secrete personal document stuff on a foreign company server?? Not me!!! Never!! Sorry but, I NEVER want my Computer OS to be not "designed in an era where there was no web"... My OS is a thing and the Web is the outside and I want it like this ... There is a life out off the Web... don't forget this... Based an OS on a Web browser... What we can ear... I think I will begin to develop my own OS based on a Toaster... Imagine browsing the web with the sweet smell of toasting bread.... hmmmm ... Rediculus...
rr0de74@live.com
on Jul 8, 2009
"Let's just say that the terminal/server model will be dealt a big blow next week yet again" Really? How so Mike? We are nothing but VDI or TS for 98% of our users. All of them have Wyse terminals. No way we are going to go back to PC's.
Joe05
on Jul 8, 2009
I think that there's merit in what Google's doing only in the sense that competition is good for everybody. But yes..it will become very apparent next week that Microsoft hasn't been standing still.
CompactDstrxion
on Jul 8, 2009
If GNU/Linux is free software and meets their requirements then why the hell are people bashing them for wanting to use it? That's like saying every bus operating company has to build separate roads for their buses. Their success will be determined by the usefulness of the product they make, so let them make it however they want to make it and see what comes out at the end.
Waethorn
on Jul 8, 2009
"If GNU/Linux is free software and meets their requirements then why the hell are people bashing them for wanting to use it?" I can hear people saying "this is the year of Linux" referring to Google's Chrome OS next year. In 2011 people will forget that they said that (I'll be happy to remind them >:) ), and the world will have moved on.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Jul 8, 2009
EricoF3 Unfortunately your analysis is correct. Virtually nobody produces new operating systems anymore. Microsoft's Windows NT is the newest architecture out there and it's 20 years old. (Luckily it was pretty much state of the art 20 years ago) Pretty much everybody else stopped bothering when they tried to write a modern operating system and failed (Apple, IBM, AIM Alliance) or didn't bother and fell back on licensing ancient tech like Unix or Unix clones. That's one of the real tragedies right now. If you are a systems level software architect coming out of a graduate program these days and want to work in operating systems you either work for Microsoft or you end up tweaking yet another patch on top of an OS core design that was written when your parents were in elementary school and a 10 character/second teletype was hot technology. (And, no, this is NOT a place where old and established are good) Very sad for an industry that prides itself on being nimble and being able to create a new generation of products every 3 years or so.
shark47
on Jul 8, 2009
So, what's up with Apple fans touting the number of iPhone apps on one hand and the lack of apps on a cloud OS like Chrome on the other?
RaaJ
on Jul 8, 2009
It's obvious Shark.. It's the pathological loathing of anything to do with Microsoft.
robertsjoe
on Jul 8, 2009
History lessons by @miguelgalos is like taking a history lesson from Holocaust deniers. It's fictional, and only in their small, sad little world.
robertsjoe
on Jul 8, 2009
@tayme: "I wonder...will Google have anti-trust problems? MS did when they integrated IE into the OS...what about an OS that only boots to the Chrome browser? I would think that is a problem." They won't have any trouble. They are not evil, unlike Microsoft. Besides, I'm sure if Microsoft wanted to include IE in Chrome OS, they could (that's a joke for all your humourless Microsoft drones)
EricoF3
on Jul 8, 2009
Yeah sure... This is the Linux year!!!! there is 12 persons that use Linux in the World.... But this is the Linux years... Fine... The problem is not these companies don't do good software!! Apple does an amazing Unix UI shell(MacOS X)... Ubuntu does an amazing Linux UI Shell (Ubunto)... Google does an amazing Linux UI micro shell (Android) and they will do an amazing Linux UI shell (Chrome OS) ... But they are not doing OSs!!! This is the same thing if you decided to put a bran new body design to replace the old body on a 1971 Dodge Charger !!! This is great for you... But you are not doing chars!! You just doing car bodies!! And you cannot expect to do concurrence with the real car companies... Don`t forget ... YOU ARE JUST DOING BODIES... NOT CARS... And Mike Galos is right, Linux and Unix are really Old stuff.... Really Really really old stuff... We need new technologies here... Moon calling the earth... Somebody...
EricoF3
on Jul 8, 2009
Dooooop!! robertsjoe is right here!!!! If Microsoft had problem with antitrust about integrating there browser in there OS... What about basing an OS on a browser... There's a problem here... In french we are saying "Ce qui est bon pour pitou est bon pour minou"... Finally... How a serious company like Google can expect getting more popularity with another Linux UI shell then all other companies add.... Google have to stop wasting there time with this kind of shit and write a real OS... Maybe they are stoked ... May be they are still trying to disentangle how to implement virtual memory, like apple... lolololol
shark47
on Jul 8, 2009
Even though most people will hate to admit it, Google now competes with Apple in one more area. Does Eric Schmidt (and the other guy, I guess) leave the room when they talk about Chrome, OS X, or the iPhone? Maybe he stays back for discussions about the iPod. This is like Microsoft having two members on the IBM board.
shark47
on Jul 8, 2009
"Maybe he stays back for discussions about the iPod. " Oh, and Microsoft bashing. Of course.
robertsjoe
on Jul 8, 2009
I love it when you drones get all worked up about the press Google and Apple get. Like I've said before, people don't give a toss about Microsoft. They are the new IBM.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Jul 8, 2009
shark "Does Eric Schmidt (and the other guy, I guess) leave the room when they talk about Chrome, OS X, or the iPhone? " Well, according to Fake Steve Jobs really, really good article at http://fakesteve.blogspot.com/2009/07/lets-all-take-deep-breath-and-get-... , "Chrome. It's a joke. I mean, literally, we laugh about it, except when Eric is around. But as soon as he leaves the room we all go "Chrome!" and just burst out laughing. "
Backup77
on Jul 8, 2009
I know I wouldn't feel comfortable having my data sitting on google's servers, what about privacy & security issues for starters.
lotsamystuff
on Jul 9, 2009
Ladies and Gentlemen, this comment sponsored by the Canadian Educational System: "Oh so you do have DID then." WTF are you talking about, "waethorn"?
Dipsh t Admin
on Jul 9, 2009
"They won't have any trouble. They are not evil" That sounds like a great defense in a courtroom. Judge: "How do you plead on the monopoly practices charge" Google's lawyer RJ: "Not guilty your honor. My client is not evil, unlike Microsoft." Judge: "How did you make this determination?" RJ: "Steve Jobs told me. He has my liver, you know?" Judge: "OK, given the evidence presented to me, case dismissed!"

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use