It's Time to Acknowledge Apple as a Force in the PC Industry

Back when Windows 95 was still known by its codename Chicago and Apple Computer was busy cranking out horrible Performa computers and obliterating any technical lead it had over Microsoft, I started a little email newsletter called WinInfo. The newsletter was originally aimed at keeping administrators and technical instructors at Scottsdale Community College up to speed with the goings-on in the IT world. I called it WinInfo because Windows was, and is, the dominant computing platform, but one of the fundamental precepts behind the newsletter was that readers shouldn't have tunnel vision about a single platform: Windows did, and does, coexist in an environment that includes other companies, platforms, and technologies, and from day one, I wrote about these non-Windows entities when I felt the topics were important.

Apple has been part of that mix from the beginning, as have such topics as UNIX and Linux, Sun Microsystems and Oracle, Palm and mobile computing, video games, digital media, and much more. And while my coverage of Apple over the years has adapted to the degree of hyperbole coming out of Cupertino since Steve Jobs returned, one thing has remained constant: Apple is important and worth discussing. They're relevant.

What's amazing is that it's now truer than ever. In the past decade, Apple rebounded, stabilized and then surged. While there was no evidence at all of the so-called iPod halo effect for quite some time--Apple's market share struggled to get above 2 percent for several years--it's clearly in full swing now. In the most recent several quarters, Apple has shown steady and regular gains, both worldwide and in the US. And now that Apple is the uncontested third largest seller of PCs in the US behind (well, significantly behind) Dell and HP, I think it's time to recognize a simple fact: Apple is a force to be reckoned with.

While I do wonder if the company will hit a wall at some point and just plateau in the PC market, I welcome the alternative. Sure, Apple is a brazen even dishonest company when it comes to the marketing of its products, but my goodness, look at those products. Apple's PCs and operating systems are high quality and beautifully designed for the most part, and should be an inspiration both to potential users on the Windows side and to those who are currently selling products to this majority. A world in which Apple dominates may not be welcome--just look at its behavior in the digital media space for an obvious example--but I look forward to even more significant market share gains on the Mac's part in the years ahead. This is good for the industry, and good for customers.

People have occasionally asked me why I cover Apple so frequently both in WinInfo and in more recent years on the SuperSite, and of course the Mac weenies have asked me to stop for completely different reasons. The reason is simple, and it's never changed: Apple matters. I've never been blind to other technologies, especially those that influence (and are influenced by) Windows and its users, and I don't believe you should be either. Even if you never buy an Apple product, you should at least be aware of what's happening there. Apple is a fascinating and dynamic company. No, I don't always agree with them, but that's part of what makes it interesting.

There's also a related issue here that I think many of us old-timers forget: While we may be stuck in whatever technological rut we think makes sense, we should never forget that an entire generation of students today is using technology solutions that might be unfamiliar to traditional Microsoft guys. They manage their email, schedules, and lives on the Web. They buy Macbooks, iPods, and iPhones. These people will be running the show in a few years, and they aren't necessarily tied emotionally or logistically to Outlook, Windows, or other Microsoft technologies. This isn't just a potential threat to your way of life, it's a threat to Microsoft's very existence, and it's why I place such an emphasis on their Windows Live services here and wonder aloud, a bit too frequently, why Microsoft isn't doing more to address this coming change.

Anyway. Look at Apple. Just look at them just kicking butt. And realize that for all its faults, and the weakness of its reliance on a single person to guide the way, this is a company that truly matters. I love this industry.

Discuss this Article 12

cesjr
on Oct 23, 2007
"Apple is a brazen even dishonest company when it comes to the marketing of its products" And Ballmer wasn't bald-faced lying when he said the Zune had 20 percent market share. And when he said the iPhone was the most expensive phone ever. http://www.ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/microsoft-ceo-claims-new-... Paul has a severe double standard problem when it comes to Apple and MS
fivepoint
on Oct 23, 2007
Good post Paul. I enjoyed reading it, and I think you are exactly right. Apple IS a good thing to have around. As it sits right now, in my opinion, Apple is far ahead of Microsoft in terms of usability, logic, and functionality of the OS. Beyond that, there are no viruses, compatibility problems (because the same company that built the OS built the computer, and only 1 version of the OS! No need to check your system requirement... anything built in the last 5 years runs Leopard perfectly!
pthurrott
on Oct 23, 2007
cesjr: Hardly. I call Microsoft on the BS too. But let's not change the argument. This is a discussion about Apple not Microsoft.
JWA66
on Oct 23, 2007
Great post Paul, Like youi I think that Apple is a great company that makes great products...that isn't above being critized for the distortion of the facts. The whole Windows VS Mac argument is so old. I love the Mac platform, but the Zealots are hard to take.
brandon.pope
on Oct 23, 2007
Well said Paul. I completely agree. While I would never give up my windows live, media center externder, xbox 360, and so on compatability and user experience, I do realize that Apple makes a good product and they are as much worth mentioning in blogs, articles, so on, as Microsoft. Windows is right for me, but that doesn't mean that Apple is irrelevant. (I have an iPhone, iPod, and so on)
Hansii
on Oct 23, 2007
brandon.pope: I am in the exact same situation, love my windows life, could not be any happier with Vista, but i still own an iPhone and follow every move Apple makes. Great post by the way
cesjr
on Oct 23, 2007
"Hardly. I call Microsoft on the BS too." You don't treat them the same. When was the last time you were writing a generally positive piece about MS, and then you stuck in claim from left field that MS are big liars. When you go after MS for marketing exaggerations, you basically make a joke about it. It's never "MS are dishonest liars" Yet, Ballmer is one of the biggest BS blowers out there. Gates too - the mac hacked every day? That's an outright false statement. Windows first with parental controls - another knowingly wrong statement. I don't think it's a big deal. All companies do this. The problem is you go after Apple for it in a fundamentally different way.
gredo
on Oct 23, 2007
cesjr, Just like Mac pundits go after Microsoft in a fundamentally different way? Go check out roughlydrafted.com or macdailynews.com if you need some examples.
db
on Oct 23, 2007
I think Paul is generally a bit more mature than Daniel Eran of RoughlyDrafted, though I agree with cesjr that his criticism varies per company. But... so what? Companies are different. They deserve different sorts of criticism, and Paul handles that nicely - for the most part, anyway. This from the viewpoint of a strong Apple supporter.
cesjr
on Oct 23, 2007
Paul doesn't claim to be a MS pundit. He purports to be objective. Not sure how he can claim that when he's constantly calling Apple a liar and dishonest, but at the same time let's Ballmer and Gates off with a wrist slap at best when they get loose with the facts. He's certainly never called either a liar. And both of them lie regularly. Also, mac pundits tend to go after MS's actions, not their words. Really, who cares about marketing-speak.
DRWAM
on Oct 23, 2007
I am not in IT as I am an MD, although I sit on IT committees. I use Windows at work and Mac OS at home, for the most part. If one of the companies disappeared, I would use the left over. Everyone has a choice. However, choice are tough out there, and I rely on Paul for reviews targeted at the every day user. Out of all the iPhone and his blog report on Apple TV, he helped me the most. He did not discourage me, but gave me the user facts, then I decided. I have friends that own the iPhone and iTV [Windows users ony] but those products just don't have the features that I need, yet. I sort of side on the Mac computers, but I also need the marriage with MS as Office [especially Entourage] does many of my daily chores. I would like to see Apple news stay here. Paul, please keep helping me and others like me. We are MS/Mac hybrids, and you help us stay current [or in the game at all]. I do own a 3 Sansa's and 2 iPods, all for the rest of the family as I just don't need one. They are for my kids and a real nice wife. Thanks for your help.
chole
on Oct 23, 2007
Whatever happened to Apple abandoning the Mac? They even changed their name... Remember? Anyway, this blog post is nothing short of buttering mac readers up before you post your highly negative review of Leopard.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use