Microsoft updates WGA Notifications in XP to match experience in Vista

From Microsoft:

Microsoft will be releasing an update to WGA Notifications in Windows XP. The worldwide roll-out will begin this week and will continue over the next few months.

As you know, helping customers identify and buy genuine copies of Windows and avoid pirated software are top priorities for Microsoft. This update, which affects Windows XP Professional systems only, reconfigures the notifications experience to mirror notifications in Windows Vista SP1. Customers with non-genuine software can expect a black desktop to appear immediately, as well as a persistent desktop notification in the lower right corner indicating that the user may be a victim of software counterfeiting. For new notifications installations in Windows XP Pro, customers will also have a simple EULA to accept rather than an installation wizard. This EULA has been modified to allow the anti-piracy validation control to auto-update itself for future releases, reducing the number of interactions customers with genuine software will have with the tool, ultimately improving the user experience.

Microsoft is making these changes to simplify the installation process (making it easy for customers to stay up-to-date), to increase the effectiveness of these notifications, and to align experiences across Windows XP and Windows Vista.

More info on the WGA blog:

There are a couple of reasons we're doing this now. One is that in recent research, customers (particularly the ones using genuine software - or at least that think they are) have told us that they would prefer the simplest, shortest way of installing. Our research has clearly shown that customers value the ability of Windows to alert them when they may have software that is not genuine, but they also want the ability to stay up to date with the least effort required on their part. The other reason is that hundreds of millions of installs of WGA Notifications have already taken place, and most customers are already aware of what the program is and just want the fastest and most seamless way to install and stay up-to-date. For this reason, in this release we've also added the ability for future updates to WGA Notifications to have both the validation logic, as well as new forms of notifications, installed without additional steps. This will only be the case for those who install this latest version or future versions of WGA Notifications.

Another thing we're doing with this release is focusing on the product edition that is most often stolen. This will reduce the number of customers that will be offered the package. This release will be offered to the most pirated edition of Windows XP and therefore to users with the highest likelihood of having a non-genuine copy, those using Windows XP Pro.  We're also offering it to those using editions based on Pro code such as Tablet and Windows Media Center, but plan to narrow the offering to Pro in future releases.

From what I can see, this update actually goes a bit beyond what's available in Vista with SP1. For example, there's a persistent desktop watermark that you don't get in Vista:

Discuss this Article 18

Ocean
on Aug 26, 2008
I like the headline at Mary Jo Foley's site: >>Microsoft to target Windows XP Pro users with Genuine ‘nagware’ notifications<< Also note: >>Microsoft officials noted that WGA for XP never did default to “reduced functionality mode,” a k a, the kill switch, which was part of Windows Vista when it first shipped. “Windows XP did not contain the reduced functionality mode commonly referred to as the ‘kill switch,’ and it still doesn’t,” a spokeswoman said. “The update simply reconfigures the notifications experience to mirror notifications in Windows Vista SP1.”<<
Ocean
on Aug 26, 2008
Paul, the watermark isn't persistent per se. You can change it...but it will revert back after 60 minutes.
Ocean
on Aug 26, 2008
DRWAM
on Aug 27, 2008
"Our research has clearly shown that customers value the ability of Windows to alert them when they may have software that is not genuine, but they also want the ability to stay up to date with the least effort required on their part." While MS has every right to do this, the above statement is clearly a LIE. Sure, we customers want this!
Waethorn
on Aug 27, 2008
"While MS has every right to do this, the above statement is clearly a LIE. Sure, we customers want this!" I don't get that statement of yours. (sarcasm?) Anyway, I've dealt with a number of customers with computers bought from disreputable computer stores around me and were actually duped into believing that their preinstalled "Corp" copy of Windows was in fact genuine. It only takes a quick look to find that their home system with XP Pro and a xxxxx-64x-xxxxxxx-xxxxx Product ID is a pirated volume license key version. Nowadays, it's almost not even worth upgrading a 3+ year old desktop system to a genuine copy of Windows XP, since new systems with Windows Vista are a more worthwhile investment. Microsoft has a "Get Genuine" Windows XP Kit to upgrade to a legitimate license of XP Pro, but the user is faced with the hard decision of paying more for it over an OEM copy of Windows Vista, or just paying more for a new computer with Vista included. The "Get Genuine" kit is the only licensed way to legitimize a previously-pirated install of Windows, and OEM copies can only be sold on new computers....Most customers I've dealt with use this exact scenario as a sort-of excuse to just bite the bullet and buy a new computer. The couple of times where I haven't made a sale on a new computer because of this issue, the customers refused to pick up their machines within a respectable amount of time (30 days, which is the cutoff time in my service policy which they agree to), and they refuse to show up and pay for the diagnostic service fee too, so their machines end up being repossessed, stripped, and/or scrapped.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
DRWAM My experience says that statement's absolutely true. Users, first of all, do like "the ability to stay up to date with the least effort required on their part" but I'm guessing you don't dispute that part. The other part - the bit about users wanting to know whether their copy is genuine - is absolutely true as well. Remember that most consumers with a bootleg copy of Windows don't have it because they decided to steal the copy. This isn't the case of people buying a fake Rolex on a street corner and being shocked that it isn't real. This is more the case of people paying full retail at their local jeweler and getting a street corner fake. What seems to happens most are two scenarios: An unscrupulous vendor sells them a white box PC and puts a bogus copy on it (while, of course, charging them for a real one). Their "computer guy" that they hire to fix their PC makes "a little extra" by upgrading people's PCs without actually buying the software he's charging them for and installing. I've actually run into this latter one with extended family members who called me to find out why they were caught by WGA. They may not have been happy that they were conned but they were glad they found out that the guy the trusted with an ongoing business relationship was a thief before they got taken again.
Waethorn
on Aug 27, 2008
"Their "computer guy" that they hire to fix their PC makes "a little extra" by upgrading people's PCs without actually buying the software he's charging them for and installing." I've run into that exact scenario on more than one occasion! Sometimes it's just "the computer guy down the street" or whatever, but it's basically the same thing. Often it's something like "I had a virus so he reinstalled Windows for me" and they end up with a VLK copy. Of course, these are the same kinds of people that would recommend Limewire over Kazaa because Limewire is somehow "more secure" because it doesn't contain any known spyware or adware. Of course we all know that the Gnutella network that Limewire uses is flooded with viruses to the amount of somewhere in the neighbourhood of 90%. Ok, that's somewhat of a guess too, but it's at least more accurate than saying that Limewire is secure. Just the other day I was cleaning up a customer's system in which they "only used Limewire to download MP3 music". Turns out, their entire download folder was infected with one of those nasty ID3 tag trojans that infects....oh, yes....MP3's! ....the cleanup consisted of a backup (of documents and pictures only - no music whatsoever), a wipe and reinstall of Windows, and a good stern lesson over the legality and practicality of file-sharing systems to download illegal music. As a side note: Limewire actually used to include known spyware. Since version 3.something, they took it out, but can you honestly trust a company like that? Likewise, can you honestly trust the credentials of a supposed "computer guy" that recommends a company like that?
DRWAM
on Aug 27, 2008
Mike, you must understand that I am a little naive about such stuff, hence my ignorance. But a pirate will continue to find a work around, and the only loser would be an innocent victim that paid hard earned cash to buy a cheaper computer, while MS does not need their money. After a dozen or so WGA checks that I have passed, I think that I have had enough, and have never heard a single person state the above, except for current and former MS employees. This is not going to stop piracy, but it can punish innocent victims. The effect may turn off people to MS products, and it will not help MS in any way. It just gives them the Big Brother look. Don't get me wrong, as I stated that I think that MS has every right to protect it's wares, but this is just the wrong thing to do and I feel that the posted statement is a distortion of realty or a highly selected focus group, and certainly not the norm as most know it. Just check out the responses in MJ, site, which overwhelmingly agrees. MS needs more friendly news, not friendly fire. Even you have no idea how much they are helping unless you are following their medical news. Many free resources are being used. While many of you may argue that R&D benefits a company, I would argue that MS is so entrenched in hospitals that they really don't need to do so, which i have noticed from other companies that I deal with [sometimes begging or threatening other companies with demands]. But you have me thinking about a company right now, which I will PM you later, when I get a chance. Something seemed wrong, and now is making sense after your post, but I do not wish to incriminate.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
Waethorn, The real question is whether WGA is driving the worst of the unscrupulous white box OEMs and "consultants" out of the industry.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
DRWAM I know that when Microsoft first started WGA they often would comp the "Get Genuine" kit to consumers in exchange for a statement of who "sold" them the counterfeit copy. There were quite a few large prosecutions done as a result. The goal of WGA wasn't to go after "grandma who lives in Miami and likes getting pictures of the grandchildren on her computer from the internets". It was to go after the thieves that prey on her. Feel free to send me some mail about whatever the other item is.
DRWAM
on Aug 27, 2008
OK, now Wae is involved, but I can still add a story without the source. I recommended a company that I have used once, as well as another friend. The guy configures a $4,000 PC, but driver problems with Vista prevented dual monitor setup with the Samsung brand but not NEC, which he bought later and works fine]. He sought help from the company and MS, although he is very savvy, and got a recommendation to just reinstall Vista Ultimate and try different drivers with the Samsungs, but the install failed [error popped up]. The company [which has ads in ALL major PC mags. I know as I get a bunch] could not be reached that weekend, so he bought Vista Home Premium, which installed fine. The company finally got back to him much later claiming that a relocation prevented the promoted response, but it was too late as he purchased Vista home and now wanted reimbursed, which they refused. Why would the reinstall disc not work? Could it be pirated or or just a bad DVD burn? I will PM the name to Wae and Mike.
DRWAM
on Aug 27, 2008
Mike, I can't PM you, so PM me so that I can respond. Wae, the name was sent to you.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
DRWAM Send me email (The address is pretty obvious)
subzerohitman721
on Aug 27, 2008
I understand the need to combat piracy, but isn't this a year or two late? Shouldn't this have come out with SP3 or even a year ago? Customers really do not want WGA at all. There has to be a better way to combat piracy and not come off as kinda lame. I would rather err on the side of privacy. I strongly disagree with Microsoft on WGA. Granted its been defanged. However, I think the responsibility for all the piracy should fall on the governments of south east Asia, where it happens the most frequently. It just really bother's me. WGA just leaves a sour taste in people's mouths.
Waethorn
on Aug 28, 2008
"The real question is whether WGA is driving the worst of the unscrupulous white box OEMs and "consultants" out of the industry." I know at least 3 computer stores in a nearby town that were busted for piracy. One of which, two of my current customers had originally bought their computers from. @DRWAM: The only driver issues I could see are with the actual video card. If the video card drivers weren't installed correctly (or at all), Windows won't see multiple monitors. Likewise, if you use the in-box drivers (the ones that Windows includes on the disc, if it has them for the card), they also likely won't support multiple monitors. Sometimes drivers from Windows Update will, and the drivers from the graphics card manufacturer and/or chipset maker (NVIDIA/ATI) definitely will support multiple monitors. If he tried installing a driver from CD, I would almost bet that by the time he got that system, the CD was out of date. You don't need actual monitor drivers for multiple monitors either - Windows will use a generic or Plug-and-Play monitor driver. The question as to the DVD install is where it actually stopped. Windows DVD's are not allowed to be burned - they can only be replicated in a DVD stamping facility. Let me elaborate a bit on this: What you see on Newegg and other sites that's classified as "OEM Software" is actually "OEM System Builder" software. "OEM System Builders" are companies that buy through Microsoft Authorized Distributors. They don't have a direct contract with Microsoft, and have no purchase minimums. The OEM System Builder software is the generic, unbranded (apart from Microsoft) software. When you buy a PC with OEM System Builder software, it has to be preloaded, and the original, unmodified media, docs, and COA (product key sticker) has to be included. If any of those pieces is missing, Microsoft considers the license invalid. OEM System Builders can also provide a recovery partition on the hard drive, but they are NOT allowed to include any kind of modified DVD or CD for installation, regardless of whether or not the original disc is included. An example of an OEM System Builder is your local computer shop that builds PC's from off-the-shelf parts. Direct OEM's have large minimum purchase agreements with Microsoft, so they have to purchase on a predicted sales schedule. They're usually purchased on a royalty basis. They purchase licenses directly from Microsoft, but have to produce their own media and documentation. Microsoft offers reference materials on how to replicate them (essentially the same as the OEM System Builder stuff), but the OEM also has to have their own company name or logo on everything. Most OEM's design their own docs, and are allowed to produce their own method of reinstallation, from recovery partitions to clean reinstall DVD's. They are not required to provide DVD's though, so long as there is at least one way to reinstall, such as a recovery partition on the hard drive. To note: ALL OEM's (direct or SB) are require to affix a product key sticker (COA) to the computer. OEM System Builder COA's will say "OEM Software" or "OEM Product", whereas Direct OEM's will have their name on it. Any COA without text underneath the OS name is considered counterfeit. It will usually appear like this: Windows Vista Home Premium OEM Software <- if this is missing, it's counterfeit I'm not surprised that a company won't refund his money for a copy if it's already been activated. Most OEM System Builders (myself included) don't offer refunds on software if the EULA has been agreed to. My own EULA says words to the affect of "by agreeing to this EULA, you agree to the terms of no returns on opened software". If it's pirated, I'd be raising sh*t though. He can confirm some things by going here: www.microsoft.com/genuine Hope that helps. I'm gonna check my msgs now.
Waethorn
on Aug 28, 2008
"I think the responsibility for all the piracy should fall on the governments of south east Asia, where it happens the most frequently." The Pacific Mall in Markham, just north east of downtown Toronto (close to Scarborough) is the hub of all piracy in North America. It's a mall that's shaped like an enormous barn. The mall has 2 floors and each of the stores are small and reside in what can be described as 10-foot tall glass "cubicles". There are something like 6-8 computer shops there and they're just floor-to-ceiling of computer part boxes in a very confining space. Every 3-6 months, the RCMP raid the place and bust all of the computer shop owners for CD, DVD, video game, and software piracy. A few days later, they open back up again under a family member's name, piracy business as usual. You can go and get "screener" DVD's (movies that are still playing in theatres, and taped via camcorder off the wall in the projector room) for about $5. The quality is terrible. Many stores also sell region-free DVD players (which are illegal in Canada) in order to bypass the region coding of Japanese imports and CVD's (China Video Discs, which are similar to VCD's). It's a place I hope they honestly shut down for good some day. Hopefully the new copyright reform laws will have some say over it. At the risk of sounding racist, I should point out that it's called the "Pacific" Mall for a reason - that's a predominantly Asian area of the GTA ("Greater Toronto Area"). Like it or not, it's too much of a coincidence to dismiss the fact that it's related to the point that subzero made. Call it racial profiling or call it bullsh*t, but the truth hurts.
subzerohitman721
on Aug 28, 2008
In parts of Dallas, you'll find guys in the hood who do the same thing. Since the Triads are the big gang out here, they offer a supply of pirated movies and software. They hire guys in the worst parts of town to sell their pirated stuff. I've actually seen some of the pirated stuff from some people who bout the stuff. Some of the movies have near DVD level clarity with full menu and subtitles. Some of it is terrible, like someone just took a camcorder into a movie theatre. Copies of Windows and Hackintosh versions of OS-X I've seen. These are major crime syndicates taking advantage of the poor and using a Robin Hood mentality to make billions. I don't envy the job of breaking this up but it has to be done. The VCD ripoffs were popular down here a few years ago before DVD became common in PC's. Now its all pirated DVD's or badly made ones. Even knowing all this, I still don't like WGA. I hope someone else figures something out.
DRWAM
on Aug 29, 2008
Thanks Wae, I read the note. I posting here as he had no problem with dual monitor with NEC's, but even a replacement for one of the Samsungs did not hold the settings after one or two reboots. But the NEC monitors work fine with Vista. He updated everything and his BIOS were up to date as well, so were're assuming that the vid card did not like the Samsungs. The restore CD crapped out at the beginning, but I am unsure of the error. He must have has a legit COA as he successfully validated Vista. So we'll never know what actually happened with the restore/install disc. It's a shame since he paid for Ultimate, and now has Home Premium which he also purchased because the company did not respond for a few days, but he wanted a working computer stat. The question is could he use his Ultimate key with a different install disc? If it was the same version, wouldn't you assume that he could? Remember, it [his Ultimate key/COA] is not installed on any computer right now.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use