More on the Windows Home Server data corruption issue

Eric Rux examines the problems plaguing Windows Home Server:

Nearly three months have passed since Microsoft announced that Windows Home Server (WHS) had a file-corruption problem. Microsoft has dutifully kept us in the loop as it learns more about the problem and has mentioned that we might see a fix in June (at the earliest)--a full 6 months after the company acknowledged the bug. You might be asking, “What the heck is taking so long!?”

When it comes to disks and disk management, Microsoft wanted to introduce a different paradigm than classic RAID. WHS needed to let users add additional hard disks and remove older, smaller disks, all while presenting to that user one set of network shares that appeared to grow and grow. WHS also needed a way for users to protect important files in case of a hard disk failure.

To accomplish this feat, Microsoft came up with a new technology called Windows Home Server Drive Extender. This technology takes care of the important “behind the scenes” work that happens when a user adds or removes an internal or external disk drive.

Check out the rest of the article for the dirty details. I recall my first meeting with the Windows Home Server guys back in December 2006, I believe (I later wrote a WHS preview article based on this encounter). There were a couple of technologies they had essentially implemented from scratch that seemed dicey to me at the time. The big one was the data duplication technology, where instead of implementing a RAID setup, the WHS folks had done their own thing. (Todd Headrick described RAID to me as "an insect spray" at the time.) I'm not sure if this is specifically what caused the current data corruption problems, but I am curious about how well this stuff was tested. I'm also (I hope, understandably) freaked by how long it's taking Microsoft to fix this issue.

Discuss this Article 5

TreyFrank-lin
on Mar 21, 2008
Hey I'm New Member (love the blog!) " I'm also (I hope, understandably) freaked by how long it's taking Microsoft to fix this issue." - Paul This statement gives me pause. How am I supposed to make sense of this?Let's see, you "hope" that your being "freaked" is "understandable"? This begs the question of by who? Your shadowy overlords at Microsoft. Are you afraid that if your freak out is not understood by them they'll cut you off from the astro-turff cart? In all honesty Paul... come on man. You being an apologist for Microsoft is completely understandable. Heck the name of yer site is "Supersite for Windows." But at least try to maintain the the illusion that you don't live in perpetual fear of being cut off of the gravy train by your vengeful overlords. It really does ruin the illusion for the rest of us when you break the "fourth wall." Love the site (seriously)
dugbug
on Mar 21, 2008
As I recall the bug, backups are unaffected. Its only accessing files directly from shared folders AND you have more than one drive installed.
pthurrott
on Mar 21, 2008
TreyFrank-lin... Thanks. But the "freaked" comment has nothing to do with Microsoft. It has to do with people who frequent this site. In other words, I hope it's understandable to visitors here why this freaks me out, even though my own use of WHS is unlikely to cause me any issues. (I don't edit WHS-based files from my desktop.) I couldn't care less what Microsoft thinks of my opinion of this. I just want them to fix it.
BrightrevCarl
on Mar 21, 2008
I think this data corruption problem has been underplayed, maybe because very few people have actually purchased a WHS. It's a serious problem that's gone on way, way too long. Corrupting data is just about the worst thing a backup device can do. WHS is currently a very *bad* thing, and I couldn't in good conscience recommend it to anyone.
TreyFrank-lin
on Mar 22, 2008
Dear Paul, Please...Id like to (respectfully) make a suggestion that I think would help out quite a bit with the success of the blog. As I pointed out in my first post, I think most people find it a bit "unsavory" when you beg your people at Microsoft for understanding prior to levying a criticism of a product. Look, the truth of the matter is that we don't read your blog for "objectivity." That would be completely ridiculous. As an IT professional (and I think I speak for the vast majority of your readers here). We understand the game. Obviously you are familiar with www.zunerama.com or www.zuneguy.com or www.zunester.com. Now while these three web sites are grievous and blatant examples of corporate astroturf. Its fairly clear that WInsupersite is part of the Microsoft Astroturff campaign. Id like to point out that THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG WITH THIS. That's precisely why we read your blog. When we want to hear Microsoft's opinion on an issue (say an apple product as an example) we turn to you. Your a darn good writer. Here's my big point. Look we're not stupid. We know that this is the scenario. It really only becomes problematic when you show fear. When you seem to be afraid that the corporate honcho's at Microsoft my be upset that you actually criticized a product. We all realize that this is how you make a living, but come on man. Your shadowy overlords understand the game and know that for the illusion to be complete you have to at least occasionally make a critical comment. It's all part of the game. Relax man, they aren't going to cut you off of the gravy train unless you actually(no REALLY) start critiquing there products. We enjoy your perspective... it's your occasional paranoia that is a little tiny bit of a turn off.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use