Not So Fast

Like most of you, I'm sure, I understand the hamster-wheel nature of the business we're in and how the relentless march of technology brings with it both good and bad. I wrestle with this on a regular basis, and while I at least can claim not to be a gadget-of-the-moment-shilling-fool like some others, I can certainly be part of the problem when it comes to the technology-is-everything mentality. I try, but sometimes it's easy to forget that technology is a tool, or a means to an end, and not the end itself. Anyone who has been consumed by the need to always have the latest and greatest, indeed anyone who spends time on sites like this, owes it to themselves to read this Wall Street Journal commentary, which is excerpted from an upcoming book, The Tyranny of E-Mail, I'm quite interested in reading. All we can do is try...

Not So Fast by John Freeman

Sending and receiving at breakneck speed can make life queasy; a manifesto for slow communication

The boundlessness of the Internet always runs into the hard fact of our animal nature, our physical limits, the dimensions of our cognitive present, the overheated capacity of our minds. "My friend has just had his PC wired for broadband," writes the poet Don Paterson. "I meet him in the café; he looks terrible—his face puffy and pale, his eyes bloodshot. . . . He tells me he is now detained, night and day, in downloading every album he ever owned, lost, desired, or was casually intrigued by; he has now stopped even listening to them, and spends his time sleeplessly monitoring a progress bar. . . . He says it's like all my birthdays have come at once, by which I can see he means, precisely, that he feels he is going to die."

We will die, that much is certain; and everyone we have ever loved and cared about will die, too, sometimes—heartbreakingly—before us. Being someone else, traveling the world, making new friends gives us a temporary reprieve from this knowledge, which is spared most of the animal kingdom. Busyness—or the simulated busyness of email addiction—numbs the pain of this awareness, but it can never totally submerge it. Given that our days are limited, our hours precious, we have to decide what we want to do, what we want to say, what and who we care about, and how we want to allocate our time to these things within the limits that do not and cannot change. In short, we need to slow down.

Our society does not often tell us this. Progress, since the dawn of the Industrial Age, is supposed to be a linear upward progression; graphs with upward slopes are a good sign. Processing speeds are always getting faster; broadband now makes dial- up seem like traveling by horse and buggy. Growth is eternal. But only two things grow indefinitely or have indefinite growth firmly ensconced at the heart of their being: cancer and the corporation. For everything else, especially in nature, the consuming fires eventually come and force a starting over.

The ultimate form of progress, however, is learning to decide what is working and what is not; and working at this pace, emailing at this frantic rate, is pleasing very few of us. It is encroaching on parts of our lives that should be separate or sacred, altering our minds and our ability to know our world, encouraging a further distancing from our bodies and our natures and our communities. We can change this; we have to change it. Of course email is good for many things; that has never been in dispute. But we need to learn to use it far more sparingly, with far less dependency, if we are to gain control of our lives ...

Please be sure to read the full commentary.

Discuss this Article 34

mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
" Progress, since the dawn of the Industrial Age, is supposed to be a linear upward progression; graphs with upward slopes are a good sign. " While a linear upward progression may have been what we experienced in this society in the period from 1946-1978, it clearly has not been the case in the 30 year period since then. The levels of virtually every progress in society except those related to the personal computer have either stagnated or moved backward at levels unprecidented in the last three centuries. Neo-luddite authors, such as the authors Paul quotes, rail not against reality but against their feared inability to keep up with what has become a very slow moving target. That they cannot keep up even with that slow rate of progress reflects more on them than on some mythical level of continuing progress and whining about how unfair it is that the world didn't magically stop in its tracks at the precise point when they decided to stop learning is a sign of not wisdom but a lack of curiositiy and motivation that they chose to give up sometime in their past.
Webdev511
on Aug 23, 2009
All the author is really doing is a revised version of the old "No one ever said 'I wish I spent more time at the office.' on their deathbed." Mostly because the tech as all but removed the office/work from a fixed location on the map to every location on the map where one happens to be with the tech. I don't think that technology is what's being demonized, but how we've become over reliant on it. Remember two weeks ago when Twitter was down? Oh what a horror that was...for people that couldn't remember what we did pre-twitter. Sorry Mike, but I agree with the author more than I do with you. There's something to the practice of metering one's communication. On the contrary, dialing back on the frequency of checking your e-mail, texts or voice messages to every two or three hours during the day and ignoring them at night not only makes my day more productive, but also results in something along the lines of a life outside of my profession. If I learned anything during my ten years in the military, it was the ability to differentiate between genuine and fabricated sense of urgency. Unless one is a first responder or in national security, one is nearly always subject the latter and not the former.
Ocean
on Aug 23, 2009
This sounds like an interesting read. Thanks, I'll grab the sample off of Amazon to consider on my Kindle. Speaking of the Kindle, I resisted buying one for a long while, but I'm glad I finally jumped in. What a great device for voracious readers.
Ocean
on Aug 23, 2009
"rail not against reality but against their feared inability..." And thus the arguing begins. This is what trolling is.
Ocean
on Aug 23, 2009
This is from the article. Is it true or false? I say true. >>In the past two decades, we have witnessed one of the greatest breakdowns of the barrier between our work and per­sonal lives since the notion of leisure time emerged in Victorian Britain as a result of the Industrial Age. It has put us under great physical and mental strain, altering our brain chemistry and daily needs. It has isolated us from the people with whom we live, siphoning us away from real-world places where we gather. It has encouraged flotillas of unnecessary jabbering, making it difficult to tell signal from noise. It has made it more difficult to read slowly and enjoy it, hastening the already declining rates of literacy. It has made it harder to listen and mean it, to be idle and not fidget. This is not a sustainable way to live. <<
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
@Mike you are so far off its crazy. It boils down to a very simple concept, do people WASTE massive amounts of time on things like twitter and facebook when they could be doing something more meaningful? Its not about not wanting to learn but more about being addicted to meaningless crap. Obsessive texting is another example. Twitter = Digital Diarrhea of the mouth. Facebook is nothing but a semi-live version of classmates.com which is just a bunch of gossip/bs. Of course its an excellent way to harvest information for the owners of Facebook so they can sell it. Ocean I agree with you the Kindle is wonderful. This is a excellent use of technology, that moves us forward. Its an example where speed of technology is helping us. You need a or want a book or some other reading material and if its on the Kindle its in your hands in seconds. No waiting to drive some place and find it, no waiting for a book to come in the mail. It also helps the environment, in so many ways.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Ocean "And thus the arguing begins. This is what trolling is." No. Posting attacks without adding more content (as you did) is more arguing and trolling. Posting a comment with a differing opinion is a discussion which is the entire point of a discussion board.
Ocean
on Aug 23, 2009
>>@Mike you are so far off its crazy. << See Mike, this is what your posting style produces. I suspect you know it too.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
"No one ever said 'I wish I spent more time at the office.' on their deathbed." Of course, that often translates to, "I'm bitter that I have no career and spent my youth learning nothing and building nothing so I'll cope with my failures by having fantasies that people who actually have accomplished something with their lives are secretly even sadder and more bitter than I have become." It's as easy to say "No one ever said 'I wish I'd spent more time goofing off in my youth' on their deathbed."
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
It's interesting that we have replies saying: Jabbering with friends in person is the epitome of good Jabbering with friends via a computer is the epitome of bad So, what were those comments compaining about me calling the author a neo-luddite?
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Ocean "See Mike, this is what your posting style produces. " That may be the funniest thing you've posted here. You actually admit you're trolling but magically think that I made you do it. Where is Flip Wilson when you need him?
Ocean
on Aug 23, 2009
We should ignore those thinly disguised efforts to gin up some controversy. >>This is a excellent use of technology<< Agreed. It actually fits right in with the way I read, because I'm always reading 4 or 5 books at a time. I can't tell you how many times my lunch break came up and I had a hankering to read a few pages of book 'x' and didn't have it...because, of course, space in a messenger bag or a laptop case is finite. The samples are another win. I don't need to visit a bookstore to read the first 15 or 20 pages to see whether it's something that would hold my interest. The time saved means time for other pursuits. It's a win/win for me...which is of course the point of the 'manifesto'.
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Yes I can get Windows 7 secrets instantly when its available on the Kindle:)
RunTimeError
on Aug 23, 2009
"Jabbering with friends in person is the epitome of good Jabbering with friends via a computer is the epitome of bad" Yes. Yes. Yes. What you seem to be failing to grasp here Mikey, is that technology such as Twitter, Facebook and hell, even IM and email is taking away the physical contact that humans need. It's not just "freinds" we're talking about here. We're talking about *people in general*. Humans are a social creature. Yes, yes, we can be "social" over the internet, but how is babbling on in online forums and crackpot webapps any better for you that actually going out into the world and meeting people; looking them in the eye when they're speaking or shaking their hands when you meet them? In real life, you keep your stupid comments to yourself - and for good reason. One thing I have learned, especially in places like this shitshow of a blog, is that staying on the net to communicate has made people forget simple things like manners and respect. I mean, who cares what you say? You're sitting in front of a screen hundreds, if not thousands, of miles away from the people you are arguing with. Why should you back down? You don't actually know the people you are arguing with or against. I can tell you this, if the people I know in real life were to act like some of the douchebags you find on the Internet, it would come to blows quite quickly. That's where technology has failed us as far as I'm concerned.
Balthazar9
on Aug 23, 2009
“Neo-luddite authors, such as the authors Paul quotes….” Consider for a moment; you have 7000 (mostly sophistry) posts on this website in a typical week; I suspect you may greatly benefit from this book. “Of course, that often translates to, "I'm bitter that I have no career and spent my youth learning nothing and building nothing…” Or, perhaps highly successful careers and now desire to spend time with kids/grandkids while passing-on morals, ethics and real world experience to the next generation. In real life, outside your meager existential digital existence, you must be quite bland and boring.
hamiltonstallings
on Aug 23, 2009
Mike, "Of course, that often translates to, "I'm bitter that I have no career and spent my youth learning nothing and building nothing so I'll cope with my failures by having fantasies that people who actually have accomplished something with their lives are secretly even sadder and more bitter than I have become." Lol I couldn't agree more. Best post of the day, for sure!
richardfrisch
on Aug 23, 2009
Life is changing. So what? The author needs to get over it and on with it.
scoobyclub
on Aug 23, 2009
My take is this. Spend all your time trawling the internet, twittering, tweeting, facebooking etc. Fine. So long as you understand you are achieving nothing. Absolutely nothing. It's the easy thing to do because it takes so little effort, and achieving something worthwhile takes great effort. QED. Alternatively, you could study something, talk to people, get involved in the community or just sit and think and reflect in peace and you might just do something worthwhile. This road is hard work but much more meaningful. I use to read and post to this blog quite often and now only read it occasionally. Why? Apart from the fact my health is better I made a conscious decision to focus on worthwhile productive activities that might lead somewhere. Great things are happening due to advances in technology. Social networking is the collateral damage.
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
This sums up internet social networking or at least how I feel. Its funny as well. http://vodpod.com/watch/1437584-a-twitter-cartoon-to-mock-your-existence
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Looks like Mike and Hamilton are BFF's.
Backup77
on Aug 23, 2009
@runtimeerror You have hit the nail on the head. Online time wasters such as twitter, IM, facebook don't do anything to encourage human contact other than throwing hand grenades at people you don't know and making someone look bad for the most idiotic reasons. The youth of today have no respect or manners for people because they are too busy sending the next meaningless text or posting rubbish on facebook.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Again, amusing Chatting with people IN PERSON is productve Chatting with people ELECTRONICALLY is a waste of time Chatting with people IN PERSON is worthwhile Doing EXACTLY THE SAME online is pathetic People. Neither is inherently either. But those of you who think so should probably wonder what it is about "in person" that makes you think it has mysterious value and what that value really is. Of course, we had luddites say the same about the depersonalization of letters and the telephone (and then later talking about how the time of letters was "the good old days")
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 23, 2009
It's also amusing that so high a percentage of people insisting that in-person conversations are all important and prevent anti-social comments are the ones making electronic anti-social attacks as their response. Perhaps the answer is that they are the ones who condemn new technology because they've "mastered" how to hide their aggression in person by learning hierarchic social status cues and never really learned how to be social without them. They haven't learned how not to be anti-social in general but have a technique for letting some factor of in-person cues let them get away with their hidden social problems. Online they have a new set to learn and don't bother. Instead they condemn the medium to mask their inability to hide their flaws on it. For those people, feel free to hold off on commenting and wait until you run into me at a conference sometime.
robertsjoe
on Aug 23, 2009
"I at least can claim not to be a gadget-of-the-moment-shilling-fool like some others" That is true. Not of the moment. But more of a career Microsoft shill?
Backup77
on Aug 23, 2009
John Freeman's article is good reading a I look forward to getting a copy of the book. He makes some intelligent observations.
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Mike, simple question, where does the author say the technology is hard and therefore we should not use it? If you had a kid would you let that kid sit in front of a game console 8 hours a day on the weekend, and another 4-6 hours on twitter/facebook??? Or would you encourage them to do something productive and meaningful at least part of the time? Perhaps with a friend, outside of the house.
rr0de74@live.com
on Aug 23, 2009
Best quote in the article... "How many of our most joyful memories have been created in front of a screen?" Zero for me. I watch a very few that I was lucky enough to record.
subzerohitman721
on Aug 23, 2009
I actually have to agree with John Freeman to a point. There is a point where technology obsession does become too much. I have to admit when the net was rather new, I didn't know where the fine line was. It took quite a bit of time to find the right balance between checking out this world and balancing my real world responsibilities. So I do make it a point these days to unplug for awhile. My vacation for the most part was technology free. I spent more time in the Plumas National Forest, Bear Creek, the Feather River, and enjoying the scenic beauty of Northern California. There i had no bars, no internet connection, and just really embraced the location. It was probably the most relaxing time I've had in awhile. The hard part is balance. Most folks tend to be a lot obsessed with this stuff. While I didn't see any Kindle's on my trip, I did see plenty of iPhone's, iPod Touch's, and Blackberry's on my trip. I was surprised at how many Wi-Fi enabled venues from small cafe's, grocery stores, fast food establishments, airports, and even restaurants. We're talking an area where technology isn't as established, yet there was plenty of places to get access. I'd definitely want to read more about this. So for the moment, John Freeman has another buyer for his book.
tayme
on Aug 23, 2009
Effective and respectful communication is a good thing...electronically or in person. No waste of time in that. Not a lot of that here. One thing that I see happening is that today's youth have no interpersonal relationship skills. Most would rather be texting, Twittering, or otherwise remotely communication. Makes it tough for intimacy. For some on this board, the way of the Borg is how they prefer to live and for our species to evolve...me, I like touching and feeling and seeing and other emotional involvement. I guess you can count me as a neo-luddite. --tayme
scoobyclub
on Aug 23, 2009
Number six on the top ten jokes at this year's Edinburgh Festival. Marcus Brigstocke "To the people who've got iPhones: you just bought one, you didn't invent it!" Just thought I would share.
planetarian
on Aug 24, 2009
I really must agree with the notion that there's nothing wrong about online communication that is not also wrong with offline communication. I've had many, many very intelligent discussions in IRC channels and forums, and better yet, I can multitask while in the middle of them. Much of this is because the people I talk with are from completely different areas and a direct face-to-face conversation would thus be impossible -- and there's nobody around here that could possibly garner the same level of intelligent discussion as these people. Worse is that if we met up in person, we probably wouldn't have those discussions nearly to the same degree -- I get the feeling that much of our time would digress into playing video games or watching shows for hours on end. Not every part of the internet is a cesspool like the popular social networking sites (and this blog, even). I do feel that online communication is not always used to its full potential (and I've even witnessed very intelligent people reduced to AOL-speak and pointless chatter on the internet before), but if you find the right medium and location, it can be just as good as -- if not better than -- the offline equivalent. Being able to respect the medium and the people you're talking to is part of it. It seems that some people here see the medium as a poor one simply because that is how they -treat- it. There are those of us who know how to treat people respectfully no matter what the medium; those who don't become total jerkfaces just from the addition of anonymity, or feel the need to make inane conversation just for the sake of communication. For us, the internet as a communication medium is just fine.
planetarian
on Aug 24, 2009
It is perhaps worth noting that remote communication does not automatically imply a lack of interpersonal relationship skills. What can be said or discussed in person that can not also be done so online? You may not be able to punch someone in the face on the internet but you still have to work with people and deal with the circumstances of your actions, at least if you're an honest person. I find it ludicrous that one should require line of sight to form a connection with another human.
whiplash55
on Aug 24, 2009
Sounds like an intelligent observation about where to draw the limits between work and family or other important parts of life not devoted to making money or G.T.D. Not sure why this is controversial.
scoobyclub
on Aug 24, 2009
@Planeterian. I think you write quite eloquently on the subject therefore you probably are not the target of the writer's ire. I do disagree with you for the most part though. I think at least email/letter is required to make a connection but voice is better and in person best. I think the key is the amount of depth and thought that goes into the relationship or communication. With SMS, twitter, facebook that thought and depth has been reduced to the minimum resulting in a relationship or understanding that is also minimal.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use