SuperSite Blog Daily Update: November 24, 2010

Good morning. And Happy Thanksgiving Eve. That should be a thing, don't you think?

--

There's been a lot of fallout over the Drive Extender cancellation as expected. I ended up writing about it in three different places, in yesterday's daily update, in a dedicated blog post, and then again in a news story this morning. Feedback about the decision has been universally negative, as I knew it would be. But what I didn't expect was that Microsoft wouldn't explain why it made this decision. Very odd.

A lot of my email involves what I think will happen to Windows Home Server, what I'll do, and what I think others should do. But as I've noted elsewhere, right now we just have to wait and see what WHS Vail looks like. There's a new beta coming in January. So I'll be holding tight. You should too.

One email suggested a bit of a disconnect, however. Microsoft isn't going to remove Drive Extender from the current version of WHS, and you won't get some Windows Update or whatever that removes data duplication and the single storage pool from your current product. This applies only to Vail and the next-gen "Colorado" servers.

--

As I noted here previously, I've had various pre-release versions of iOS 4.2 running on the iPad over the past few months. But it wasn't until last night that my Apple TV was upgraded with a software update that made the other half of AirPlay (i.e. video "send") work; previously, you could use the iPad to send audio only to the Apple TV because the Apple TV's version of AirPlay didn't work with video.

But now it does.

airplay_01

What you're looking at there is me playing "Aliens" on the iPad, but broadcasting it via AirPlay to my HDTV via the Apple TV. This is pretty powerful stuff, though arguably I'd be better off doing this from a PC or Mac. (Which also works.)

It's worth noting that what Apple has done with AirPlay is essentially re-invent DLNA "push," which is part of Windows 7, where it is called Play To. If you think about the ways in which you might get content from a device or PC to the TV, there are basically two: Pull (in which a connected TV device looks for content, over the network, that is stored on a PC or whatever) and Push (which is what this is; you send the content from the containing device to another device for output). Apple has always done the second of these pretty well. Now it does both pretty well. (Previously, you could only push audio using Apple's solutions, but you could pull audio and video.)

Anyway, it looks nice.

Discuss this Article 2

rr0de74@live.com
on Nov 24, 2010
Seriously who would use an iPad to push a movie to anything? First you have to get the movie on the iPad which is a pain. Dont you have to first get the movie into iTunes on a computer then sync it with the iPad? If its a iTunes rental, why not just rent right from the Apple TV and skip the iPad and computer? Also wont this drain the heck out of the iPad battery? It seems like a extra step which makes it a gimmick at best.
sttevo
on Nov 25, 2010
No this isn't a gimmick. It's actually quiet awesome. I've been using the beta version as well, and it's cool to sit back with my iPhone and stream music through our home theater. Tonight we downloaded an HD show and streamed it to the TV. Wife was asleep half way through the show, so I switched it off. Tomorrow I'll watch the rest on the bus on the way to work!

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use