SuperSite Blog Daily Update: September 27, 2010

New gear alert: I received a notification that my Apple TV has shipped this morning. I guess those rumors about October were incorrect, if just barely: It should be here by Wednesday, September 30.

Looks like Ed Bott tried and ultimately rejected the DROID X I enthused over last week. Why Ed is shopping for phones the month before Windows Phone ships is unclear, but his rationale for rejecting the DROID X is very clear: Too big, too hot, battery life, committee-based design. These are all valid complaints, though I like the form factor personally. But yeah, when this thing dies, it dies: Forget to charge it one night and you'll wake up to a brick.

Numerous blogs and other questionable web destinations are reporting that Microsoft will launch Windows Phone 7 in Europe on October 21. I don't know anything about that. But I do know that Microsoft plans to launch Windows Phone 7 in the US on November 8. That October 11 date that's been tossed around, as I mentioned previously, is unrelated to the Windows Phone 7 launch.

I'm late on this--I mean, who cares?--but Microsoft recently finalized Office 2011 for Mac. I guess I'll look at it, but I have gotten a lot of questions about whether this release would appear on the TechNet or MSDN subscriptions. I don't know, but they never have in the past.

I gave Microsoft a lot of flak for helping the Russian government crack down on dissidents. Here's an interesting take on this story from the Russian press.

"the inevitable result is a barrage of news stories that produce more heat than light. It also creates a widespread sense that the software leviathan has once again done something reprehensible, albeit legal."

I wonder if it's a state-sponsored periodical. :) According to Wikipedia, the arbiter of all knowledge, The Moscow Times is "based in the old headquarters of Pravda [and] was the first Western daily to be published in Russia." It is, apparently, biased toward the Russian government.

Give Rob Enderle some credit for knowing how to craft an eye-grabbing headline: Microsoft's Secret Plan to Take Over the World. I love the central thesis: Microsoft's decade-long funk was really just the software giant lulling its competition into complacency. LOL. It's more likely that Microsoft, like so many other aging supergiants, simply became complacent itself, woke up, and then started fighting back. Less dramatic. But more likely.

Just to beat this to death: The IE 9 home button is still in the wrong place, way over on the right side of the screen. And I still keep mousing over to the left to find it. You know, where it should be. Please, Microsoft. Fix this.

Over 20 million people are using Office Web Apps already.

Here's the problem with TV/movie delivery services in a nutshell, using the recent movie "Robin Hood" (which was "eh" at best) as an example: It's all over the map. Netflix won't get it until October 19. Zune has it now, but in typical Microsoft fashion it's confusing: You can stream it instantly over the Xbox 360, but if you want to buy it, it's available only in SD ($17). Renters can choose between SD ($4) and HD ($6). iTunes doesn't support streaming (yet; Apple TV is on the way) but it does have Robin Hood for both purchase ($15) and rent ($4), but only in SD. If you want to rent it in HD, you have to initiate that from an iPad or Apple TV ($5) only. Amazon Video on Demand? Same problems: You can rent for $4 or buy for $15, but it's SD only. You can stream to Roku and elsewhere.

Microsoft reconfirms no SteadyState for Windows 7 but offers a workaround.

Discuss this Article 4

de Silentio
on Sep 27, 2010
I've found that it is more work to get to the tabs than previously. Sure, I only move my mouse a few more inches, but it seems like more work (must be familiarity or something).
Waethorn
on Sep 27, 2010
I get the opinion that Microsoft doesn't care for tech reviewers, testers, and deployers to be evaluating software on the Mac, for obvious reasons. Software Assurance customers get access to Mac downloads though, but they are corporate paying customers. I suppose that if you were a deployer or consultant for a company, whether employed (ie. on payroll, as opposed to a vendor or contracted) by them or not, and you set up their SA contract (or Open Value, or EA) and have access to their downloads, you could make recommendations on whether or not to move to the Mac after they already purchased licensing. Office client licenses aren't version specific. Volume license customer gets access to the most current version at the time of purchase and one version less on Windows and only the latest one on Mac systems. Whether you deploy the latest version and/or the Mac version doesn't matter. Software Assurance customers also get the latest versions within their contract term. So if you purchased during the 2010 timeframe and had SA, you'd get 2010. No SA, no 2010. Windows works the same way: purchase a "Windows client" license and it's for 7 (or whatever is the latest one), but you can downgrade to Vista or XP, although lately Microsoft has been pulling Vista download links for some reason.... I dunno why. Windows 7 doesn't fall under the category of "mature", which is a major issue for enterprises. Vista is though. Some companies started deploying Vista when 7 launched because it had gone through 2 major service packs and is as mature as it will get as XP was by its SP2. "And I still keep mousing over to the left to find it." Why? You had all of IE7 and 8 to get used to it by now! Cry baby whiner.
zcrater
on Sep 27, 2010
Paul, as an IT manager in education and libraries I used the Microsoft Shared Computer Toolkit for Windows XP (http://www.microsoft.com/presspass/newsroom/winxp/SharedToolkitFS.mspx) and was delighted when Microsoft brought out Steady State for XP and Vista. Steady State is a great tool and libraries, education, and other public locations have grown to rely on Steady State to keep Windows running in public locations. Our IT colleagues need this functionality with disk protection and a simple GUI. The white papers and GPOs are old news and were offered to us back in October 2009 as a "replacement" for Steady State for Windows 7 at launch. They do not duplicate or even come close to the functionality of Steady State. In my opinion Steady State or a fuller featured follow on should have been available from Microsoft when Windows 7 shipped last October. You yourself have said many times that Windows 7 is basically Vista with lipstick so it appears that the failure to update Steady State to work on Windows 7 is a purposeful decision by Microsoft not to support using Windows in public spaces like education, libraries, Internet cafes, etc... I am an IT professional who uses Steady State on XP in mission critical applications. I need a GUI, easy to use Steady State with disk protection for Windows 7. Please help Microsoft understand that no Steady State for Windows 7 means no Windows 7 for my users.
chuckb84
on Sep 27, 2010

Rob Enderle? He's still around? And anyone is listening? He lost me forever with this gem,

"It is interesting to note, that few seem to remember that Microsoft wrote the first MacOS under contract to Apple nearly two decades ago but, like most Apple partnerships, this one also ended badly." - Rob Enderle, September 26th, 2005

Basically, when Rob says something, just assume the opposite is true...

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use