Try the Windows Phone UI on Your iPhone or Android Handset

Attention, iPhone and Android users: Windows Phone is better than what you're using. But now you don't have to take my word for it, you can find out for yourself by trying a decent web-based Windows Phone simulator on your own phone. You're going to have a hard time going back.

Released with absolutely no fanfare--I guess the point was for this to spread by word of mouth--the Windows Phone demo site lets you run a reasonable approximation of Windows Phone inside of your phone's HTML 5-based web browser. This Windows Phone experience is pre-populated with data, so you can get the feel for how it works in the real world, and even supports taps and swipes.

wp_simulator_0

A good portion of Windows Phone is in there, including all the major hubs and apps, and you can view photos, listen to music, read email (which will make you want to shoot your own mobile email dead), and perform other Windows Phone goodness you've only dreamed of 'til now. There are even some handy tap hints so you can start thinking outside the box: Don't worry, Microsoft seems to be saying, we know your phone is lame, so you've forgotten how good this can be.

The only bad part of this demo is that you have to go back to your static grid of icons when you're done. Have fun with that.

Thanks to everyone that wrote in about this. You're right, it is pretty awesome.

Discuss this Article 19

mythulto
on Nov 29, 2011
Blind loyalty is soooo yesterday. This is a great way to compare and contrast, and then pick the one that suits you best.
mythulto
on Nov 29, 2011
Blind loyalty is so yesterday. Here's a great way to compare and contrast so you can make your own informed decision. Imagine that -- your OWN decision. Thanks for posting this, Paul.
pthurrott
on Nov 29, 2011
Weird. Two comments about "blind loyalty." To be fair, this is *not* a good way to judge Windows Phone at all. But it's a neat way to at least experience the basics. And I was just having fun with it. Obviously.
iburn319
on Nov 29, 2011
Thanks for the post. I had been wanting to try Windows Phone without locking myself in, I already did that to my wife and her brother and sister with the Kin. I'm definitely interested if my Zune subscription will work. Zune subscription + Google Music = a happy person.
bdegrande
on Nov 29, 2011
I have always liked Windows Phone. Unfortunately it looks like I will never get to use it. I don't use a phone enough to justify the monthly fees, so I use an iPod Touch and a couple of tablets. I think that not using Windows Phone as Microsoft's tablet OS, and thus guaranteeing that they will be too late to that market (the Zune had good hardware AND software and failed for this reason) will be the final mistake that Steve Ballmer is allowed to make.
mythulto
on Nov 29, 2011
My point was, I'm tired of people who discount or pan things they haven't tried. This is a good way to let iPhone and Android users experience the unique and innovative (and to me, very attractive) Windows Phone interface. Cool. [I mistakenly posted twice because I didn't see my first post appear right away.]
Mustang17
on Nov 30, 2011
Anybody else see the amazing Deadmau5 lightshow in the middle of London. Available on youtube. Promoting the Nokia Lumia 800, brilliantly done. I have a little app on my WP7 which allows me to simulate a few icon pages of an iphone. The icons do connect to some of windows phones apps. The screen design is now er.. iconic, but is feeling dated. Or is that 'retro'? :-) My dad and brother have android phones, and even my brother struggled for a while to get used to where things were. However for the windows phone interface for me it was easy to get a hang of. The only complaint I had was the podcast side of the Zune software, you kind of hit a wall with that.
John_Matthews
on Nov 30, 2011
It's pretty cool. Before this the nearest thing for Android users to get a slight feel for Windows Phone was `Launcher 7'. (http://grantbarker.com/android_launchers.html) Personally I'm excited about the future xpPhone by ITG. (Although I've never seen it in the flesh.)
fgeraci
on Nov 30, 2011
I tried this demo on my iPhone. To me the UI is a "grid of icons". Look at the screenshot in this article. I see a 2x8 grid. So what? I don't understand the dismissive attitude and distaste of the "grid of icons" UI on the iPhone and Android. It works. I don't see anything wrong with Windows Phone 7, and some people will probably like it a lot. Even if Microsoft is only able to attain is a single digit share in mobile, it can still be a profitable business. Profits matter more than market share anyway, a point that is often dismissed with regard to Apple.
pthurrott
on Nov 30, 2011
It's funny how one's experiences shape how they see the world. Of course it looks like a grid of icons to you. That's what you're used to. In the real world, these icons are dynamic, and of variable sizes and displays, and not a static grid of icons, as on the iPhone. A couple of seconds in an emulator can't possibly give you a real world look at what it's like using this thing. But your iPhone experience absolutely colors how you view this.
BananaJr
on Nov 30, 2011
Interesting how the top sellers over the past weekend were the Xbox, Kindle Fire and iPad. All closed system, OS tied to specific hardware attached to robust ecosystem devices. While Windows Phone seems to show a much smaller bump. Android has broken through selling an OS to multiple hardware companies but the most succesful such as Nokia, RIM and Apple all used an OS tied to their own hardware. I tried the demo and have played with a Trophy when it was brought on site. Microsoft certainly has a competive UI that is definitely not a "me too" OS. At this point Microsoft should look towards a more focused strategy and drop all the other hardware outlets and focus on using Nokia exclusively once they penetrate the US market. Samsung has 40 or so phones of which only a few are Windows Phone. There is no way for Microsoft to seperate from the crowd when the hardware they run is dominated by Android. Yes it's an "all in" for both Microsoft and Nokia but at 1% share right now there's not much to lose.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Nov 30, 2011
I tried this out an it is certainly a change from the iOS UI. I do like the live tiles for the most part on the home screen. I am not sure if this is just a by product of the emulator, but the dynamically changing pictures of people seemed a little strange. The animations would take a while to complete, leaving weird composites of images, such as the top and bottom 1/3s of one persons face and middle of another's, or overlapped images which were just not pleasant to look at. However, once you get past that home screen, the UI does not do much for me. You are greeted with a single column of icons, that almost all look the same with a text description. Furthermore, it appears you only get 9 per "screen" so if you had a lot of apps installed, you would have to scroll through quite a few things to find the one you want. Once again, not sure if this is an emulator issue, but I found that quite often as I would scroll down a list, if my motion was not 100% straight, I would get a bounce from the next part of the screen from the side. I do find the UI partially distracting with small slivers of the next screen taking up space on the current one or a large empty portion of the screen on the right in so many cases. I feel like I am only using about 80% of the screen, which makes the overall device feel smaller than it is. MS did a nice job with WP7 and it looks to be a viable smartphone OS. Its too bad they are not going to make it their tablet OS.
twangisKahn
on Nov 30, 2011
A couple of points why I won't buy WP7 despite the nice design. People want to get into their apps as quickly as possible. "Grid of icons" does this faster. Apple realized an interface for interface sake is the wrong approach. The device *becomes* the app. It's not an iphone anymore. It's the Angry Birds game, or Garageband, or the Pages app. Microsoft, not surprisingly, is thinking with the PC in mind and not the future. There are no files systems or save as commands required in the future. Interfaces were important, but no longer. Live tiles are simply not as efficient at identifying the apps, since the tiles, while dynamic, look similar to one another. Sorry but old school is better here. Icons identify apps and require no reading. Now 5 to 10 years ago the dynamic quality of the tiles would of great interest. Unfortunately for Microsoft the *dashboard* aspect of the tiles, where you can get snippets of information more quickly than going into the apps themselves, has utterly failed every time it's been tried. Can you even get gadgets anymore? Widgets are still available, but never reached critical mass and the dashboard in Mac OX X has failed miserably. This is simply another example of a company building to the demo instead of the usefulness. Apple has realize this. Dashboard continues to be de-emphasized, while full screen mode of apps is being embraced on all their products. Lastly and more important: why would I embrace Microsoft? Even if you believe the product is better and better should always win, what about the time lag? iPhone user have been using a modern phone for nearly 5 years. Buying into Microsoft is betting on a horse that is woefully late to the future. I'm not thinking in terms of phones, but the next device that no one has thought of yet. Who is more likely to give it to you? Apple or Microsoft? I thought so. Buying Apple products isn't about being a fanboy, but being onboard for the future and who is more likely to get you there.
glonq
on Nov 30, 2011
In recent months, I picked up Android phones for two of my kids. First thing they did was change their animated wallpapers. Second thing they did was change their ringtone and SMS tone. Third thing they did was install a bunch of apps and widgets and stick them in "just the right place" on the home screen(s). People love to customize/personalize their phones. WP7 is way too limited in that regard. It's no damned fun.
Mustang17
on Dec 1, 2011
I have to question the grid of icons being faster, yes they are if they are not too many of them, but screen after screen of them and you spend a while trying to find something. They don't seem to be sorted in any particular order. Through use yes, you know where the apps are. I can get into apps on the windows phone system quite quickly simply because they are in alphabetical order or if you click on a letter you get an alphabetical grid, which takes you to the right place. Alternatively you can pin your favourite apps to the start screen. I could see a reason for categories in a future update if you have dozens and dozens of them, but at the moment I can flick between the very quickly. One more thing, because of the hub system you dont have to open so many apps, and within the hubs you find related apps. It is a whole new way of looking at things.
Mustang17
on Dec 1, 2011
I have to question the grid of icons being faster, yes they are if they are not too many of them, but screen after screen of them and you spend a while trying to find something. They don't seem to be sorted in any particular order. Through use yes, you know where the apps are. I can get into apps on the windows phone system quite quickly simply because they are in alphabetical order or if you click on a letter you get an alphabetical grid, which takes you to the right place. Alternatively you can pin your favourite apps to the start screen. I could see a reason for categories in a future update if you have dozens and dozens of them, but at the moment I can flick between the very quickly. One more thing, because of the hub system you dont have to open so many apps, and within the hubs you find related apps. It is a whole new way of looking at things.
yoshipod (not verified)
on Dec 1, 2011
@ Mustang17 I think you are fairly spot on, but it works both ways. A grid of icons is not inherently faster than tile or hubs. But neither are tiles and hubs inherently faster than a grid of icons. You can pin a favorite app to the start screen on WP7, and you can also put an app icon the home screen of iOS or even on the dock at the bottom. Is finding an app via its text title quicker than an easily recognizable icon, or vice versa? I bet in most cases the number of clicks/flicks it takes to get to an app is not significantly different in iOS, WP7, or Android. "One more thing, because of the hub system you dont have to open so many apps, and within the hubs you find related apps. It is a whole new way of looking at things." If I was a developer, I would find that unappealing. I want people to think of my App, not a hub. You can't build brand recognition when users don't think of your product, but rather think in terms of a generalization, such as people, or pictures, etc.
chuckb84
on Dec 1, 2011
That's a clever demo, and all done without Flash :). Comments on the live tiles vs. grid of icons: Tiles have more complex notifications than Icon badges, but the iOS 5 notification center and the similar feature in Android makes this less important. Icons are smaller, so you can put more per screen, while the Tiles can provide more info without going into an app. It's a tradeoff, not a revolution. As for finding things, if you press the home button on the iPhone when you're already at the home screen, you can search for apps by name via Spotlight. It's a very fast way to find stuff. Also, press and hold the home button for a list of recent apps, another fast way to get to things. So, it seems credible, but I'm not seeing a vast advantage and I think it's too little, too late for Microsoft to be anything but a distant 3rd in phones. They'll most likely displace RIM, but that's more from RIM's self-immolation than the wild success of WP 7.5. I'd be interested in some 3rd party evaluation of WP vs Android vs iPhone, say Edward Tuffte, Jeff Raskin, etc. Tuffte was -very- impressed with the iPhone but I think he feels is getting a bit complex. http://www.youtube.com/embed/YslQ2625TR4?rel=0&hd=1 http://www.edwardtufte.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00036T&topic_... His tart comments about "computer administrative debris" and pointed criticisms of some of the iPhone apps are just spot on.
pjsercel
on Dec 4, 2011
Tried it. The eye candy is pretty, but beneath the Metro veneer it is just a copy of iOS. Moreover, it offers nothing new that is meaningful to the user experience.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use