Google Shuts Down Dozens of Pointless Products

Before I had serious Google problems to complain about--like Android--I use to complain that the online giant suffered from "throw it at the wall and see what sticks" disease, where it would appear to just release, willy-nilly, any web service or application that some random employee came up with over a weekend.

Apparently this is changing under new CEO Larry Page, and the company announced this week via the Official Google Blog that it is cleaning house and eliminating a bunch of truly silly products.

"Over the next few months we'll be shutting down a number of products and merging others into existing products as features," Google SVP Alan Eustace writes. "This will make things much simpler for our users, improving the overall Google experience. It will also mean we can devote more resources to high impact products—the ones that improve the lives of billions of people. All the Googlers working on these projects will be moved over to higher-impact products."

Among the fallen are such things as Google Desktop and Google Pack, both of which were aimed at Windows users, and both of which I've written about in the past. (I wrote about Google Pack twice--here and here, and about Google Desktop in my Windows Secrets books.)

Much is being made in the tech blogosphere about this change--John C. Dvorak notes that many of these things are "unknown to most people" and argues that Google, like Yahoo before it is "totally clueless about marketing and publicity"--but I think the bigger point here is that Google is finally growing up. I have no idea why it bothered with this cruft in the first place. But getting rid of it all is absolutely the correct decision.

Indeed, this is the type of hard-nosed decision making Microsoft should be making when it comes to removing similarly pointless applications and services from Windows 8. I'm talking about things like Media Center, which even Microsoft admits no one uses, or the reprehensible XPS document platform, which never should have been hatched in the first place.

Just a thought.

Discuss this Article 17

matt.brown
on Sep 6, 2011
Well, I use Media Center and XPS all the time.
leachbrad
on Sep 6, 2011
Paul, Can you explain why you're so against WMC being part of Windows? There are lots of applications that are shipped part of Windows - should WMC be different? Do you think it should be part of the Windows Live suite instead? I ask this, as while it may be not-useful for you, it is the primary reason I continue to use Windows products. Media Center drives my home entertainment. I have an Xbox hooked up to it as an extender. I have a Windows Home Server for storage. I have have various desktops and laptops (all running Win7) in the house that all utilise the content from Media Center. I show friends and family this setup, and they want it too. Now, to the usage stats. As described above, Media Center runs on 1 PC in my household. But I access content on 5 other Windows 7 machines. Even though I am a heavy user of Media Center, I am actually contributing to the "low usage" stats as I am only running WMC on one PC. Additionally, I use Windows professionally. I have a small business which installs and supports small businesses; and I am a .NET developer that builds large windows and web based applications. If I lost Media Center at home, I'd look at alternatives - I'd probably move to an Apple or Linux based solution, and I'd stop tinkering with Windows. Which means I'd probably change the focus of my small business. I'd probably eventually move to different development languages/frameworks. Microsoft would loose money from me from (a) Windows desktop licenses; (b) Windows Server licenses; and (c) Gaming (Xbox). I wouldn't care if WMC was part of a free Live product, but for me, WMC needs to be available. Yes, there are some alternatives available. I've tried them all, and always come back to WMC. It pleases the wife - and a happy wife = a happy life. I know my circumstances aren't the usual consumer case, but before an axe is wielded, these things should be considered. -Brad
mdtiki
on Sep 6, 2011
Funny, I just started using WMC regularly after I hooked up my new HDHomeRun Prime box. Pretty awesome experience actually...
luis3007
on Sep 6, 2011
The point he is making is NOT to eliminate WMC features, but the absurd separation of products with the same aim: Windows Media Center, Windows Media Player and Zune Media Player. The 3 of them targeted different consumers: Zune was for synchronizing and updating the Zune hardware player, WMC was for live and recorded TV and extensions, while WMP was for watching videos and music over the PC. For Windows 8 a merging of the 3 products with its main features included would be the best option.
albose
on Sep 6, 2011
100% of the tv I watch is recorded via media center and viewed either on a pc or using xbox. I never watch live TV anymore. My data usage does not allow for the addition of netflix etc. Having a free solution that so easily records tv series and having the built in inteligence of WMS is not replacable. WMC rocks!!
Waethorn
on Sep 6, 2011
According to Mary Jo, there are new codenames, one of which is a Mediaroom 2.0 extension to Media Center.
cgeier77
on Sep 7, 2011
I agree that WMC is a key application that was/is really relevant now that M cable cards and assocoated tuners are finally available in the US. I have my card and I am waiting for the tuner to really use WMC for my DVR. Since switching to Verizon I have had to put up with inadequate DVRs waiting for the day where cable cards were relevant. It seems that giving up WMC now is a little premature. As with a lot of MS services they want to kill them when they get really useful. Another point to consider is bandwidth. I know everyone wants to go to IPTV, but who does the consumer get their bandwidth from? The companies providing connectivity are not going to sit there and allow IPTV to take away all their business without reprocussions (i.e. caps, throttling, etc.).
Hack-o-holic
on Sep 7, 2011
Paul, Blasphemous, absolutely blasphemous!!!!!! I discovered MCE, WHS, Extenders etc. from reading your posts and you used to be one of the biggest fans. What happened? Did the products get worse? Did you discover something better than MCE as a DVR and TV solution? Media Center is absolutely THE BEST product Microsoft has EVER produced that NOBODY KNOWS ABOUT. Like the previous poster said, I've yet to have a guest come over to see my fully networked TV setup based on MCE, Xbox and Extenders and not say "how do I get one?". The problem is not with the product, the problem is with the morons at a company that produce excellence and don't promote it. That isn't a reason to kill it off; rather it is a reason to advertise it! This type of thinking is like suggesting MS build Windows 8 and then not promote it. Then after it too fails, take it off the market because it is now suddenly irrelevant. Also the same as Apple creating the iPad and then throwing it "up against the wall" to some OEM's and hoping it sticks. Then when it doesn't catch on, take it off the market because it was such a big failure of a product. For Christ's sake, people think Apple INVENTED the idea of tablet computing!!!?? That is because of advertising and promotion! The problem here is the company, not the products, that is a failure and it is becoming more and more apparent with each passing day. I'm one of you biggest fans since the days of Whistler but you dropped down a notch today. I hate signing up just to leave a blog post comment but you really hit a nerve today and I want the world to hear it not just a private e-mail to you... Chris
spivonious
on Sep 7, 2011
XPS can go. It's nice (and human-readable), but PDF is too firmly entrenched for any competitor to challenge. WMC is fantastic. I use it every day. I think this is more a problem of advertising. Friends will come over and ask what kind of DVR we have. When I tell them it's just Windows 7, they are amazed. I see this as a problem with MS on the whole. They have so many amazing products that no one knows about. Then Apple or Google copies them and actually markets them and MS loses. I don't know if this is a Ballmer problem, but MS needs to turn it around or they will continue losing consumer marketshare and become IBM.
bradwestness
on Sep 7, 2011
I'm shocked they aren't closing Orkut, especially now that Google+ is in the wild. Why do they need two social media platforms? Not to mention Google Buzz. So much overlap.
Waethorn
on Sep 7, 2011
Web Security is closing too. They paid Postini $625M to buy them out, and now they're shuttering the doors on it. I guess it figures though: nobody is fooled by Google's attempts to enter the security market.
ABT
on Sep 7, 2011
Paul, I think you're a little out of line with the last paragraph of your post. How does Microsoft develop Windows 8 to be unique and great without all of those applications and services no one uses (zune, windows phone, tablet PC's from nearly a decade ago, live cloud services). Take all of those away, and you have no basis for all of the innovations that MS has been able to incorporate into their upcoming OS. I don't know why WMC can't be merged with Zune or Media Player (probably patent and codec issues that would make it impossible to offer as a free download). If you want it cut out of windows are you suggesting another SKU for Windows 8? Windows 7 Starter doesn't have WMC. I'm sure the licesnse for Starter is probably cheaper. If you cut out all of the applications that make Windows 8 better, OEMs are going to pinch pennies, ship with watered down version, consumers (at least the vast majority), get some handcuffed OS and reasonable conclude its junk. Paul, Windows 8 deserves better. Let Windows (almost any version from the last 10 years) continue to be the most versatile OS in the market. -Alec
mangurian
on Sep 7, 2011
I use Windows Media Center daily as a TIVO substitute. Love it.
georgevreilly
on Sep 7, 2011
"reprehensible XPS document platform": exactly right. If Microsoft had wanted to make life simpler for users, they would have provided a "Save As PDF" or "Print to PDF" feature, just like Mac and Linux have had for years.
Noland
on Sep 8, 2011
There is no Microsoft product that I use more than Media Center. I would be willing to pay a reasonable price to buy it separately.
motchmaster
on Sep 8, 2011
They're getting rid of the Google Pack? It's a shame they didn't do more with it. Three to four years ago, it was the first I download on a new PC/reformat. They should've done more like what ninite.com does. My mom, someone who doesn't know much about computers, uses XP Media Center edition. She uses it to watch and record TV.
MikeM132
on Sep 9, 2011
If Microsoft eliminated all the stuff they have that is used by only a small number of people, they could strip Office programs down to what MS Works was. Some of us use MediaCenter, Zune, etc. even though you may not. Would you be happier if MediCenter became a free add-on, like they did with all the "Live" stuff? That would be fine with me. Should they abandon Windows Home Server because so few of us bought one? MS cuts some stuff now and then. I get notices about "MyPhone" being dropped all the time (stopped using it since I got a WP 7). I was notified they were dropping my "blog" space for months, too, on my "Live" space. I could care less about those, as they either didn't work anymore or there were many other free alternatives. MediaCenter (for TV) is useful. The rest of MediaCenter (music, videos, etc.) duplicates other stuff you have already, and I could agree with getting rid of that.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use