Microsoft Offers Outlook.com and Office 365 in Wake of Google Decision

Microsoft should do the right thing and fix the harm Google is doing to customers

In the wake of Google’s decision to “Scroogle” Windows 8 and Windows Phone users by removing support for standard Exchange ActiveSync (EAS) from free versions of Gmail and Google Calendar starting in early 2013, Microsoft is offering up its own Outlook.com and Office 365 accounts as alternatives. Both offerings have advantages: Outlook.com is free and easy to use, while Office 365 is powerful and enterprise-ready, and will soon come in versions that offer Office 2013 applications. But Microsoft still needs to address this issue with a real solution.

To recap: In a post bizarrely titled “Winter cleaning,” Google revealed that it would no longer support Microsoft’s industry standard EAS push/sync technology for free users of Gmail and Google Calendar. (Oddly, EAS will still work for those who configured this capability on mobile devices already, and Google will continue supporting EAS on paid Google Apps accounts and for government and education customers.)

Since Microsoft connects to Gmail-based email and contacts and Google Calendar using EAS in Windows 8 and Windows Phone 8, and Google has said that it will never support these platforms with native Gmail and Google Calendar apps as it does on Android and iPhone, this move was clearly done to harm Microsoft. (And its own users, of course. Let’s not forget those guys.) I wrote about this recently in Google Throws Down the Gauntlet, Kills EAS Support, noting that Google just declared war on Microsoft. Because it did.

Microsoft was caught by surprise by this unexpected announcement and since there’s not much time to implement a fix—Google is cutting off EAS access on January 30, 2013, and most of Microsoft is missing in action for much of December—it’s response—responses now—has been interesting. (And I have a hard time seeing Microsoft implementing the CardDAV or CalDAV protocols that Google is supporting for contacts and calendar sync, respectively.)

Three days after the Google announcement, Microsoft’s Dharmesh M. Mehta offered up switching to Outlook.com as an alternative in Really want to do some winter cleaning? Switch to Outlook.com for the best email experience across all your devices. I wrote about how one might accomplish this over the summer in a series of Outlook.com tips, but the gist involves forwarding your Gmail email to Outlook.com (which I do, and recommend) and linking contacts from Gmail to your new Outlook.com account via the People web interface. There’s no advice in there for Google Calendar, but as I found when I did my own transition from Gmail to Hotmail a while back, that’s because there’s no good way to do that. So I just kept linking to my old Google Calendar on Windows Phone until the schedule “ran out”; I put new calendar items only in Hotmail.

Outlook.com makes a lot of sense because it’s free and uses a modern sync protocol (EAS) that actually works across the board, and not just for email, and it can be set up with a custom domain if you want, just like Gmail. I’ve been using it since the summer full-time, just the web interface (and on the phone of course), and it’s fantastic.

But then there’s Office 365.

This week, Tony Tai announced that Microsoft would be extending the trial offer for Office 365 from 30 days to 90 days in A Great Time for Small Businesses to Try Office 365 on the Why Microsoft blog. This extension is partially a response to a related Google decision to kill off free Office Apps accounts going forward, which occurred a week or so before the EAS/Winter cleaning silliness. (Previously, Google offered a free version of Google Apps, while Office 365 has always been paid only.)

Of course, Microsoft being Microsoft, the 90 day offer—which represents a savings of about $18 per user, or up to $90 overall—is tied to small businesses purchasing Microsoft Office. “Small businesses that purchase and activate a copy of Microsoft Office Home & Business 2010 or Microsoft Office Professional 2010 will receive a 90-day free trial of Office 365 Small Business Premium for up to five users,” Tai wrote. “Office 365 Small Business Premium combines the power of Office 365 small business services with Office software for your users’ PCs or Macs.”

Office 365 is about to get a lot more interesting, thanks to a coming rev to the cloud services and of course the Office 2013 suites which will be bundled with most subscriptions. But then Office 365 has always been better than Google Apps. The only advantage the latter had, now gone, was that free version.

So.

I keep coming back to the notion that Microsoft still needs to do something for those users of Windows 8 and Windows Phone who also use Google services. After all, these people are paying Microsoft, but they’re not paying Google. Think about it.

Going forward, new Gmail users will be able to sync email to both systems using the legacy IMAP protocol, but they will not be able to sync contacts or calendar. They can move to a Microsoft system—Outlook.com or Office 365—but while both are desirable, and I’ve personally done so, that’s a bit of a stretch for many people. Short of just supporting CardDAV and CalDAV, which again, I don’t see happening, let alone in some short period of time, I don’t see what else can be done.

But this is a moment for Microsoft to shine. A moment for Microsoft to prove that, even if Google is willing to Scroogle its own users for no good reason, it can do the right thing and not leave them hanging. I’d love to see an announcement, and then an effort, aimed at making that so.

Discuss this Article 33

shmuelie
on Dec 19, 2012

Another option is that a 3rd Party developer will create apps that are compatible with CardDAV and CalDAV so yours can sync their stuff

GoodThings2Life
on Dec 19, 2012

Precisely what I think could/should happen. There's already "gMaps", "MetroTube" and "MetroTalk" by third parties on Windows Phone... I don't see what would be bad about this as a possibility.

BRSQUIRRL
on Dec 20, 2012

But doesn't this go against the very concept that supposedly differentiates Windows Phone (i.e. hubs, not apps) from the competition? If I have multiple e-mail accounts, why should I have to play "whack-a-mole" (as Paul likes to call it), going in and out of separate vendor-specific e-mail apps?

sharpsone
on Dec 20, 2012

I don't know how you can even prefer Gmail over Outlook.com. When compared side by side gmail's UI is dated. As Paul mentioned forwarding the email would work for most but there's no solution to the calendar. Maybe someone can develop a process to export the calendar data?

abw1987
on Dec 19, 2012

Sadly I predict the average consumer will see this as another instance of Microsoft falling short, with its smartphone platform unable to support even an email service as common as Google. (Even though we know the real reason behind this.)

zorb58
on Dec 19, 2012

I agree. Microsoft is essentially being framed by Google. What is the end user going to think when they can't even sync what may be the only comprehensive contact list they have? I'm quite anxious to watch this play out... and I'm hopeful that there will be a solution in which Microsoft will win out.

BRSQUIRRL
on Dec 19, 2012

While I agree that Google's move was almost certainly conceived as a direct attack on Microsoft, I would quibble on a few points:

First of all, I wouldn't call EAS an "industry standard"; it is a Microsoft standard, which it in turn licenses (for a fee) to the industry. This is in contrast to CalDAV and CardDAV which were developed by standards bodies (using an RFC process) and are unencumbered by any proprietary licensing.

I'm also not sure I would call EAS "modern" as it predates both CalDAV and CardDAV (though not IMAP, which is admittedly getting a bit creaky). It does have more features, so I guess it could be considered "modern" in that sense.

It also rolls all three services (email, calendar, and contacts) into one protocol, which has some value. But I could easily see individual platform vendors (e.g. Apple with iOS) improving the experience of connecting devices to Google services. For example, if you choose to setup a Google account, the credentials for your Google account would be collected once and the software would be smart enough to use that information to connect to mail, calendar, and contacts in one go.

GoodThings2Life
on Dec 19, 2012

I would certainly call it modern, precisely because it offers more features and is kept up to date based on the needs of businesses today.

I would call it an industry standard, precisely because it is something that pretty much everyone supports.

The so-called "open" solutions would be fine... if Google actually used the standard implementations. They don't. They mangle the formats to their own variations. That's fine, but don't call it a "standard" and don't call it "open" if you're not going to offer it to every platform.

ian.aldrighetti
on Dec 19, 2012

Isn't an industry standard something that everybody uses? Microsoft Office, I don't believe, is actually a standard per se, but it is certainly treated as such when it comes to exchanging documents, spreadsheets, etc. I mean, what productivity suite doesn't support Office file formats to some extent? The same could be said for EAS.

Just because something wasn't made yesterday doesn't mean it isn't modern. EAS is updated on a regular basis to add new features to be sure it meets "modern" expectations of email, calendar and contacts. When was the last time CalDAV was updated?

As to your last point, that seems a bit backwards. That would mean every platform would need to recognize the address as part of this setup. It would have to see, "Oh, that's a Gmail address, so we use IMAP for email, CalDAV for calendar and CardDAV for contacts." This would need to be done for every type of address, unless there was some sort of way to look this up. However, with EAS, it just knows there is support for those three things through one protocol. The idea is to consolidate technologies into one easy to use system, not to spread it across multiple service types.

SEMW
on Dec 20, 2012

> I mean, what productivity suite doesn't support Office file formats to some extent? The same could be said for EAS.

This is ignoring the very obvious difference between the OOXML and EAS. Yes, both are made by Microsoft. Yes, both are arguably standard in their areas.

But OOXML is free. The spec and patents are released under MS's "open specification" patent license. How open in the sense of properly-documented it actually is debatable, but what is clear is that anyone can implement OOXML without paying Microsoft any money.

If you want to implement EAS, on the other hand, you pay Microsoft money.

Example for perspective: Apple's new lighting connector is arguably superior to microUSB in several ways. But no-one gets pissed at Microsoft or Google for using microUSB instead, because no reasonable person could criticise Microsoft or Google for choosing not to pay squintillions of dollars to Apple in license fees when there's a free and open (albeit possibly technically inferior) standard they could use instead: microUSB.

But that seems to be exactly what everyone here is getting angry about Google for choosing not to do any more.

pthurrott
on Dec 20, 2012

Don't confuse "open standard" with "standard." A standard is something everyone uses, thus it's implicitly superior. An open standard is something else. (In fact, many are never/rarely used.) EAS is a standard, and THE standard for push-based email/contacts/calendar data on mobile devices. Google dropping this standard is a purely competitive move that harms Microsoft and its own customers.

BRSQUIRRL
on Dec 20, 2012

I agree that EAS is superior from a feature standpoint (although I'm far from an expert on its technical details; I've heard complaints that it is a bit of a battery drain on smartphones, for example).

Like I said...just quibbling. :) I guess when I think of "industry standard", I think of something that has gone through a standards process and is free to implement. If Microsoft wanted to earn some goodwill in this situation, a great response would be to do so with EAS. That would eliminate one of Google's objections to it and make them look even more petty.

As to your last point, I don't think it would be a herculean task for the top mobile platform vendors to put some account setup smarts into their operating systems. In fact, I think iOS and Android already do. We aren't talking about parsing out every possible e-mail provider here, just the top 4-5 (Google, Yahoo, MS Hotmail/Outlook...is there even anyone else in the picture, really?).

DaveHelps
on Dec 19, 2012

If you want to move all your calendar data from Gmail to Outlook.com, you can do it if you have access to a PC with Microsoft Outlook 2013.
Set up your GMail account in Outlook using EAS whilst you still can, and also add your Outlook.com account.
Now go to the Folder list panel and select your Gmail calendar folder.
Change the view to "All Appointments", you should now see a simple list of entries rather than a Calendar. Press CTRL+A to select all, then drag & drop the appointments to the Outlook.com Calendar folder.
I've never used Gmail, but if there is some kind of plugin to access the Calendar in Outlook 2003-2010 then this would also work in older versions via Outlook Hotmail Connector.

GoodThings2Life
on Dec 19, 2012

Great tip!

LemonSaucy
on Dec 19, 2012

Google is too big for me. I use their search and YouTube but am rather reluctant to go beyond that.

I read a book about Google that gives me the shivers.

rondavis
on Dec 19, 2012

There is an option in Hotmail Calendar to import an ICS file, which you can export from Google Calendar. It's hidden as an option under the "Share" tab. Seemed to work ok for me.

rondavis
on Dec 19, 2012

Small edit on my ICS import comment, it's actually under Subscribe, not Share.

GoodThings2Life
on Dec 19, 2012

I actually believe that Microsoft *WILL* alter Windows Mail and Windows Phone to support CardDAV and CalDAV. It wouldn't be difficult nor resource intensive to do. Time consuming, perhaps, so it may not happen by Jan. 30, but I believe it will happen.

Microsoft has nothing to lose by doing it, but they can gain a lot of good will and show that they're looking out for customers on this matter.

Personally, I would implement it but then steal a page from open source communities and offer a disclaimer on the matter (like how they did against IE) along with an option to help "migrate" to Outlook.com.

ian.aldrighetti
on Dec 19, 2012

Well, except to show Google that they will bend to their will...

But with Windows 8, you're likely to sign up using a Microsoft account and will probably have an Outlook or Hotmail email account... People then might just use that instead.

I could be wrong though. It's not always easy to switch email addresses.

Albion
on Dec 19, 2012

You know what.... all Microsoft has to do is call Google and waive any EAS licensing fees for people who hook into Google's services via Windows platforms.

I really don't get why Google should pay Microsoft for allowing Windows users to access their services. At the very least Microsoft should waive that fee for users of Windows platforms.

If you want to see MSFT do right by their users, that's the way to do it.

BRSQUIRRL
on Dec 20, 2012

"I really don't get why Google should pay Microsoft for allowing Windows users to access their services."

If you think about it, it is even stranger than that: currently, Google and Apple are both required to pay Microsoft so that Apple devices can connect to Google's services, when Microsoft's own services aren't even involved (beyond the EAS protocol).

It makes me wonder why they haven't tried to start nudging folks away from EAS before now...

Albion
on Dec 20, 2012

I'm sure that's why Google provided native iOS applications.

If only MSFT would pony up and pay the fees involved, I'm sure google would work with them. There's irony involved with this, I'm quite sure.

roncerr
on Dec 19, 2012

Paul said: "After all, these people are paying Microsoft, but they’re not paying Google. Think about it." I thought about it but don't understand. We pay for the phone and the phone service. We can choose to use free apps or paid apps from either software or cloud source (Microsoft or Google).

roncerr
on Dec 19, 2012

Microsoft editorial said "By removing Exchange ActiveSync support from Gmail, Google is essentially saying that after January 30, 2013, you better not buy any new phone that doesn’t run Android or iOS because your account data won’t sync." But that makes me wonder why should Google support Microsoft's competing phones for free. They've already got all the major smartphones covered. It seems it's up to Microsoft to make a deal with Google or just force their own users to use Outlook.com. It looks like Microsoft has chosen the latter.

pmbAustin
on Dec 20, 2012

The reality is that Microsoft is in a distant 3rd place in a lot of ways in a lot of areas. The best (and only) way they can hope to catch up is to make it as easy as possible to switch to them. That means robust import support for starters... point it at the data you already have, and let it either work with it natively there (when possible) or copy it over to the Microsoft equivalent.

I was shocked at how difficult it was for a friend of mine who was switching from Mac to Windows 8 to get their iCloud contacts into Windows Live Mail, for instance.

That sort of stuff should "just work".

aras
on Dec 20, 2012

Ditching Gmail and switching to Outlook.com as an alternative is a pathetic solution. People won’t do that and will see all this simply as “Windows Phone doesn't support Google”. Just another reason for them to ignore Windows Phone.

Of course Google is attacking Microsoft and not doing any favors to its own users. But Microsoft must realize that they still miles behind Google mobile space. With Android market share Google can let itself act little arrogant, but that’s just not the case for Windows Phone.

comprocomputers
on Dec 20, 2012

Did you know that Google has an add-on for outlook called Google Sync that allows you to synchronize your Google mail, calendars, and contacts providing you similar functionality as an exchange server. It also allows you to use shared calendars and import your existing email into the google service.

Did you also know that they are only removing this EAS functionality that the Google Sync add-on uses from their FREE services and that if you do google apps for business, you can still use this.

When they talk about using CalDAV and CardDAV to sync instead of EAS they are just suggesting an alternative if you want to continue to use their FREE service and sync your information.

After discovering this, I don't see what all the fuss is about. Google is no longer going to let you use a competitors product to connect your information in a complete and easy way for FREE. Either pay them $5.00 a month, switch to Outlook.com, or use the methods they describe to continue to sync your information.

BIGZIPZ
on Dec 20, 2012

"Google has said that it will never support these platforms with native Gmail and Google Calendar apps as it does on Android and iPhone, "

That is simply not true. Google stated they will support those platforms if they are successful. They never said "never".

zorb58
on Dec 20, 2012

I'd just like to add that although I see this as an all around negative, people that I know (They aren't interested in technology like myself), don't use any sort of online calender and could care less whether or not their contacts are synced... most would be from Facebook anyhow. Oh yeah, and they're all interested in Windows Phone. This may all just blow over for the average consumer.

rth314
on Dec 22, 2012

Some of the commenters here are forgetting that Google wants go keep their Gmail users, hoping they will occasionally visit the website and view some of those targeted ads. Google is putting up a roadblock for their own users who have chosen Windows Phone or Windows 8. It's not a matter of paying Microsoft for EAS so that Microsoft customers are happy. For Google, it should be about paying Microsoft for EAS to maximize their own ad revenue.

Jig1056
on Jan 2, 2013

I disagree!!! I'm a non Android Google user and CalDav and CardDav works great on my iPhone. See my post below for a few examples. Why would they care so much about blocking Windows Phone 8 when their real competition is the iPhone? They are doing their to push open standards. Also, I'm not bothered by any ads when using CalDav or CardDav

Jig1056
on Jan 2, 2013

I was a little upset when I first heard the news because I use the Exchange option on my iPhone to sync my contacts and calendar. I really considered using my live account to manage my data which sucks for me because I really like everything about Gmail and wouldn't switch if I hand any other choice. Luckily I did a little research on CardDav and CalDav and it turns out it ROCKS and it actually fixed some of the sync issues I was experiencing with Exchange.
1) custom labels I setup on my iPhone get synced to my Gmail address book
2) I can now sync multiple numbers with the same phone type. In the past if one of my contacts had two mobile phones I had to list one as a fax or work phone because Exchange wouldn't sync both. I no longer have to do that, I can list both numbers as a mobile phone and they sync seamlessly
3) I have a friend that runs a business and has 7 different email address and with exchange I had to list him in address book multiple time in order for all of email address to be synced. This is no longer an issues all 7 of his email address now sync under on contact entry.

It is a d-bag move for Google to drop support so quickly but in the grand scheme of things this shouldn't be a big deal. For the consumer market CardDav and CalDav is a worthy if not superior alternative

It's up to Microsoft to get on board and support open standards.

aosman
on Jan 9, 2013

Has there been any progress on this matter? Has anyone heard anything from Microsoft and if they are going to address this? The clock is ticking!

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use