Review: Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9

Shocker: It's a big Kindle Fire HD

The Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 is—wait for it—an 8.9 inch version of the Kindle Fire HD. I know, I know. You were looking for something more profound than that. Sorry, but it really is that simple.

This device has triggered more introspection than actual usage, so bear with me for a moment. It’s not that there’s anything wrong with it—far from it, in fact—but rather that the Kindle Fire HD 8.9 speaks volumes about the content ecosystem for which it is a front-end.

Let me explain.

Where a typical Android tablet—like the Google Nexus 10, which I’ve not reviewed—or an Apple iPad (the full-sized version, not the iPad mini, both of which I did review)—can be considered a true hybrid device, or what we may call the general purpose computing device of the near-future, the Kindle Fire HD is no such thing, at least not yet. Instead, the Kindle Fire HD—both the 7-inch and 8.9-inch version—is a consumption device, something you’ll use for entertainment: Rented movies, TV shows, Kindle and Audible books, and digital music.

Nothing is truly that black or white, of course, and, yes, there are productivity apps that run on the Kindle Fire HD 8.9. Yes, you can connect a Bluetooth keyboard. And yes, you could use that keyboard to enter text into a word processor, web-based blog entry form, or whatever. Theoretically. And while it’s not fair to say that no one is ever going to do that, let’s be honest here. No one is going to do that.

(For the record, yes, I did do both of those things.)

So what we’re left with, then, is a basically 9-inch device, a full-sized tablet, that is a front-end to Amazon’s extensive and worthwhile collection of digital content. It’s the 8.9-inch version of the Kindle Fire HD.

Depending on your perspective, that’s either good or bad.

As I noted in my most recent What I Use post, from November 2012, the (7-inch) Kindle Fire HD, which I reviewed back in September, is now my daily-use tablet. I use this at home to read two newspapers (through the Kindle software) each day and on the road to watch rented movies and purchased TV shows. I also do some light web browsing, listen to audiobooks and music, and other tasks. Whatever you call it, this is all consumption stuff, not creation. It’s a media tablet.

I happen to prefer the 7-inch size for such tablets, which doesn’t surprise me since I mused about this possibility the moment that I started using Apple’s first 10-inch iPad. The reason I like the iPad mini so much, and other 7-inch-ish tablets like the Google Nexus 7, is that the size is right … for what I do. And what I do on such tablets is, again, consumption not creation.

Now, there are those people who will do a little bit of both. And for those people, an iPad is decidedly a better choice, even when you factor in the enormous price differential, for two reasons. First, Apple’s iPad app ecosystem is bigger and more mature than Amazon’s, and that ecosystem includes a lot productivity apps, not just games. Second, Amazon’s ecosystem is tilted very heavily towards consumable content: Games, apps, Kindle and audio books and periodicals, music, and TV shows and movies, all of which get pumped directly to the device from Amazon. Not surprisingly, there’s also a native shopping experience for finding and buying physical goods from Amazon’s store. That’s what the Kindle Fire HD is: A front-end to Amazon’s many services.

There is nothing wrong with that.

That said, when it comes to consumption devices—“media tablets”—I just prefer the smaller sized devices. So I actually prefer using the smaller Kindle Fire HD to the larger Kindle Fire HD 8.9. It’s just a size thing.

Still with me? Good, let’s talk specifics.

The Kindle Fire HD 8.9 is literally just a bigger version of the Kindle Fire HD, with the same body, the same materials, the same basic features. I can’t explain it, but one thing I do like better about the 8.9 is that the bezel, which looks so large on the smaller device and contributes to a weird squatness, looks better on the larger unit.

The 8.9 features the same stereo speakers as its smaller sibling, and they still sound surprisingly good. It has both a micro USB port and micro HDMI (for video-out) as the smaller unit. The device uses the same carousel-based Kindle Fire HD UI as the smaller device, and while some have complained about this, it works great in the context of its mission as a consumption device. Amazon’s content ecosystem is excellent and only rivaled by Apple’s. This is all up front and center.

Very few people will ever pick an Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 over an iPad for any reason other than price. It’s a good one, though: At just $299, the 8.9 is a full $200 less expensive than Apple’s cheapest iPad, and the version equipped with 4G/LTE capabilities for $499 is an even better deal (assuming you need/want such a thing): It’s fully $229 less expensive than the comparable iPad, but that’s before you factor in the wireless plans. Apple’s, at $15 per month for 250 MB per month, costs $180 a year. Amazon’s, for the same amount of data, is $50 per year. So that iPad is actually $360 more expensive than the comparable Kindle Fire HD 8.9 in just the first year. That’s a lot of money.

That said, my recommendation is to skip the 4G/LTE option and save enough more money. If you’re going to get a Kindle Fire HD 8.9, do so knowing that it’s primarily a content consumption device and that Wi-Fi is your friend. Yes, you could try to push this device outside its comfort zone, but I don’t recommend it. Email, web browsing and possibly Facebook. But the rest of it is all entertainment, at which it excels.

I’ll be sticking the 7-inch Kindle Fire HD. I just prefer the smaller size. But if you prefer larger tablets, the Kindle Fire HD 8.9 is recommended.

 

Note: If you can swing it, I do recommend the Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9" Standing Leather Case (or, for the smaller unit, the Amazon Kindle Fire HD 7" Standing Leather Case). It adds a bit of bulk and is decidedly less elegant—but more usable—than Apple’s iPad Smart Case, and it performs the same function: Open the case and, thanks to hidden magnets, the device turns on instantly. It also works as a decent stand and of course protects the Kindle when closed. It’s a bit pricy at $55 ($45 for the 7-inch version), but I was able to get half off thanks to one of those Special Offers that Amazon haters are so quick to criticize.

Discuss this Article 6

Alcarnor
on Dec 2, 2012

Great review. I got one and the screen is great. From what I've seen in reviews of the Nexus 10: wait till the next gen. It suffers from the same issue as the iPad 3: too many pixels, not quite enough CPU/GPU.

For the Fire HD 8.9, I picked up the "Marware Revolve Portrait and Landscape Standing Case for Kindle Fire HD 8.9", Charcoal". No complaints so far and being able to rotate it to portrait orientation has actually been useful.

rsquaric
on Dec 3, 2012

I think tablets are more for consumption so the Kindle Fire HD 8.9 is my Christmas present this year. However, I can still stay in personal and business email contact with this device and do some web browsing. It supports Exchange ActiveSync and with the OfficeSuite app you can view Office files. If you browse to the Kindle at Work page you can see all the options, e.g., Cisco AnyConnect VPN and Cisco WebEx. For me, this is the best tablet. Not a productivity tool but while I am having my Akita groomed and I'm at Mustard Seed Market for a gourmet dinner, I can watch videos, listen to music, read or listen to my growing list of Kindle books and check my personal and Exchange IT support email. I don't travel too far from home base so this is all I need. If I did, I have an excellent Asus 15.6 notebook for serious road work, i.e., Office 2010 Pro, LogMeIn Central and Microsoft TechNet.

geeko
on Dec 3, 2012

"Instead, the Kindle Fire HD—both the 7-inch and 8.9-inch version—is a consumption device, something you’ll use for entertainment: Rented movies, TV shows, Kindle and Audible books, and digital music."

In other words, it is used for the very same (and only) purpose iPads are (suitable for) yet costs less.

iSRS
on Dec 3, 2012

Excellent article. I completely agree on the wifi only version. For this device, 4G doesn't make a whole lot of sense, especially the teaser plan.

But a few details on that data plan for your readers. That $50/year plan is for the first year only. It is not "per year" but one time only. After that, you have the same $15/month charge as all other tablets.

Secondly, with that 250mb plan, you would absolutely not want to watch video over cellular, would likely not even want to download an album. 250 mb is not enough for all that. Plus, the moment you hit 251 mb? You're hit for another $15/month for an additional 250 mb, and every 250 mb there after. A that point, you are better off with the $30/month 3 GB plan (with $10/ 1 GB overage).

Just wanted to elaborate.

eboyhan
on Dec 3, 2012

I have the KF89 with 32GB. I agree that for me the LTE option is not worth it. When I'm out and about, there's always a WiFi hotspot somewhere near.

I got the KF89 to read large sized or complex layout PDFs (like your W8 book e.g.:D ). I had been using a KDX and a KF1 for this previously with mixed results. The KF89 is much better. I find reading large format magazines like Scientific American, Communications of the ACM, and the Economist on the KF89 to be very nice.

The screen is very nice -- I particularly like the better than full HD resolution for watching videos. I am a prime member, and this is my 4th kindle. I read about 140 mass market e-books per year, and get maybe a like number of professional computer books (mostly as PDFs) as well -- so I am a pretty good fit with your Amazon consumer model.

However, as a computer professional, I have found a sufficient number of technical apps in the Amazon and 3rd party app stores to let me use the KF1 and KF89 as a more general tablet. It may not be as good as the iPad, Nexus, or Galaxy Tab/Note, but it's good enough for me, and as you say, you do save $$.

mickworker
on Dec 14, 2012

There is no doubt that Kindle Fire HD is great. However,Kindle Fire HD also has a few drawbacks,like the storage space is not expandable. Why not try Ainol Novo 7 Venus? Ainol Novo 7 Venus is a great alternative in my opinion. It is also powered by Quad Core CPU ACT-ATM7029 based on Cortex A9 that runs up to 1.5GHz,it has dual cameras,features the same 7 inch 1280X800 IPS screen as Kindle Fire HD. One drawback of Ainol Novo 7 Venus is that it has 8GB Nand Flash,but expandable to 32GB - this is very important and matters,I like this.It's sold at $149.99 only from JSXL Technology. I share this just because I think the more choices of Tablet PCs,the better for us.

http://www.jsxltech.com/products/ainol-novo-7-venus-quad-core-cpu-act-at...

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use