And the Number One Reason to Upgrade to Windows 7 is...

With Windows 7 barreling toward an October 22 worldwide launch, pundits, reviewers, and others are weighing in with their opinions, all of which, tellingly, are quite positive. One interesting recent trend is proclaiming why it is that Windows 7 is so great. And in keeping with the simplicity mantra in Windows 7, some are actually trying to push the notion that there is just one reason why you want to upgrade to Windows 7.

For example, Brier Dudley over at The Seattle Times says that that reason is quality.

The software debuting Oct. 22 practically sells itself.

Quality is, thankfully, the biggest selling point for the software that will soon run most of the world's PCs.

Window expert Ed Bott, meanwhile, argues that drivers is the reason.

You want to know why Windows 7 isn’t going to be another Vista? Here’s one big reason: drivers. This time, hardware makers seem to be keeping pace with the operating system and the hardware.

They're both right. And that's the thing with Windows 7. There is no single reason why Windows 7 is awesome, just like there's no single huge feature that will draw in users. Instead, Microsoft has engineered hundreds, perhaps thousands, of meaningful changes and updates into Windows 7. Many are big deals, most are not. But in one of those "seeing the forest for the trees" moments, the sum of all these improvements far outweighs any single change. Windows 7 is a perfect storm of improvements and timing. It is the right product for the right time.

More important, perhaps, Windows 7 is, quite obviously, the most well-conceived version of Windows ever created. I carefully worded that phrase because one might expect that any given version of Windows is "the best version of Windows" ever created. That's absolutely been true of every single previous Windows version, at the time. (Yes, even Windows Me. Really.) But what makes Windows 7 so special isn't any one improvement. It's not that it erases the perceptions (right and wrong) about Vista. It's not just that's it's shipping when it's shipping. It's a combination of things.

I'll elaborate on this in the conclusion to my Windows 7 review later this week. But the long story short is that Windows 7 is the real deal. And as a long-time Windows watcher, it's nice to finally see Microsoft firing on all cylinders in a way they haven't since Windows 95. This is a company full of very smart people that often makes some incredibly bone-headed mistakes. That's not happening with Windows 7. Not at all.

Windows 7 is the perfect storm.

Discuss this Article 87

FalKirk
on Oct 13, 2009
I have conflicting feelings on whether Windows 7 will be a big success. I have no doubt it will be a success - the model Microsoft uses by bundling their software with new computers all but guarantees that. But will it be a big success? To be a big success it's got to move a large percentage of XP and Vista users to it's standard. Pro: Windows 7 will be a big success because there is huge pent up demand. People have been hanging on to their XP software and they are dying to make the switch. Con: Windows 7 will not be a success because no one cares. Windows XP is good enough. Pro: Windows 7 will be a big success because, as Paul said, there is no one great feature, its' just good all over. Con: Windows 7 will not be a big success because there is no one killer "must have" feature that will capture the imagination of the masses (or IT departments) and drive sales. We'll see.
chipwinter
on Oct 13, 2009
I think that bundling it with PC purchases means it will sell well, no matter the quality. That's a great business model.
gfryesc1
on Oct 13, 2009
yeah, I think your credibility took the proverbial core dump with the claim of Windows ME was the best Microsoft OS when it debuted.
JamesNT
on Oct 13, 2009
THIS WILL BE THE YEAR OF LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry Paul, I just wanted to jump that in there before a real linux zealot did. JamesNT
JamesNT
on Oct 13, 2009
MY MAC WILL ALWAYS BE FAR SUPERIOR TO WINBLOWS! YOU GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR!!!!!!!!!! Thought I'd get that one out of the way, too. JamesNT
meason
on Oct 13, 2009
I think windows 7 will be a success because of that little girls slide shows, happy word with happy pictures!
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
"You want to know why Windows 7 isn’t going to be another Vista? Here’s one big reason: drivers. This time, hardware makers seem to be keeping pace with the operating system and the hardware." It's not that they're keeping pace, it's that they've had all kinds of experience with Windows Vista to finally get it right. Most drivers were built well even before Vista SP1, just like most of the performance and compatibility enhancements, yet most people seem to credit a major update rather than one of those automated monthly ones. The same goes for Windows 7. You know what I'd love to see? I'd love to see someone take Vista RTM with all the updates prior to SP1 (turn on the SP1 blocker or something) and then compare it to a fresh SP1 install. I'd bet the performance is the same. Oh, and BTW: the SMBv2 fix is available today, so turn SMBv2 back on (if you turned it off) for those accelerated Server 2008-to-Vista file transfers. I never bothered turning it off though, because someone would have to penetrate your internal network before it becomes a security risk.
whiplash55
on Oct 13, 2009
9 more days and I can blow this Vista install a way and get going. Not that Vista ever treated me bad I never had many problems. I'll just be glad to get on with the new. Okay bring on 8 because 7's been here a while.
Balthazar9
on Oct 13, 2009
The Ferrari Enzo supercar is also great. But, as a small to midsize business do you want to pay an exorbitant upgrade price? Doubtful even big business focused on their bottom line this earnings season will spring M$$$ for enterprise edition. Sure if you’re Paul or Ed and get (FREE) complementary packages from..... SnowLeopard enterprise/ultimate edition for twenty nine smackers – WOW baby.
joe-dokes
on Oct 13, 2009
"Microsoft has engineered hundreds, perhaps thousands, of meaningful changes and updates into Windows 7" I carefully worded that phrase because one might expect that any given version of Windows is "the best version of Windows" ever created. That's absolutely been true of every single previous Windows version, at the time. (Yes, even Windows Me. Really.) These two quotes clear demonstrate Paul's inability to recognize his own bias. Really Paul? EVERY version of windows is superior to the previous version? Then you defend Windows Me? Even in the land of Mac where fanbois celebrate all things Apple, there are genuine consensus about which versions of Mac OS are better and worse than the others. Although all versions of the Mac OS have included some new and often great features, versions lacking stability or versions that change feature implementation can be met with scorn by the Mac faithful. For example, there are those who argue, that Finder is broken in virtually every version of OS X and needs to be taken back to its OS 9 and earlier feature implementation. Various versions of both DOS and Windows gained reputations DOS 4 is widely held to be one of the worst. While DOS 5 is considered to be perhaps the best DOS made. In the land of Windows, Windows 2000 is still considered by many to be one of the best versions of Windows, while Windows 98 SE is considered to be the best of the 9X familiy. Windows 95 at least as shipped in its earliest implementations, is considered almost too buggy to use. Many users stuck with Window 3.11 for at least a year while MS shipped patch after patch, by mid 2006 Window 95 became a more stable useable product, and by the Windows 98 version many used and liked it. So long as you booted and shut down your Windows 98 machine daily, it was a quite good OS. Window Me, while offering some new and perhaps interesting features is considered a dog by the tech community because it was, any version of an OS that introduces stability issues is going to have a poor reputation and rightfully so, because all the new features in the world cannot make up for a product that can't be trusted or used. Finally the first comment, you should right for Apple, and claim thousands of new features. You have ridiculed Apple on numerous occasions for their feature count, dare I say you are a tad bit hypocritical. Regards Joe Dokes
EricoF3
on Oct 13, 2009
Because Windows 7 is the most powerfull OS on te market...
EricoF3
on Oct 13, 2009
JamesNT said: "THIS WILL BE THE YEAR OF LINUX ON THE DESKTOP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" Hahahahaa!!!!! Let me laugh!!! Linux is a crap OS... 1970 kernel with a patch up shell... Linux is like a Dodge Relian K Engine with Pontiac Fiero body... Hahahahahaha ... you make me pi in my pants.... hahahaha An + I am sure peoples wants to use an OS that is controled at 100% by the hackers off the world... I am sure...
pezzonovante
on Oct 13, 2009
Windows 7 is the best thing since sliced bread. Period.
gumby74
on Oct 13, 2009
Interesting that 7 is the OS that delivers and Snow Leopard is the OS that deletes your data.
rr0de74@live.com
on Oct 13, 2009
Drivers? Um it uses the Vista driver model. So if there is a Vista driver for your hardware you are good to go with 7. Sure 7 will have more drivers on the DVD than Vista did, but its almost 3 years later. This is no different than any other OS, from any other company.
rr0de74@live.com
on Oct 13, 2009
@gumby74 if you want some MS data deleting action, purchase a sidekick.
subzerohitman721
on Oct 13, 2009
As much as the haters want to nitpick about Windows 7, the problem is that there really isn't much to hate about Windows 7. The OS is so elegantly designed, even a few Geniuses at the local Mac store praised its elegance. The Dallas Morning News did an article about how local Dallas businesses are planning to adopt Windows 7. Not waiting for SP1 but already transitioning. http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/100609dnbuswindo... But OS-X has a deletion problem. Most importantly, personal data. Ironic that Leopard and Snow Leopard both had major issues discovered prior to launch. I think Apple is losing its lustre. http://www.pcworld.com/article/173502/update_snow_leopard_bug_is_a_doozy... How embarassing. You don't rush a product to launch unless its flawless. Another example of hubris overriding sound judgement. If Apple had stuck to its plan, perhaps this could have been found and avoided. It just reminds me of the tale of the Tortoise and the Hare. Slow and stead wins the race. The buzz is definitely much louder than the trash talk. Can't wait for Oct 22!
Keleko
on Oct 13, 2009
There were those that declared Vista the best Windows ever, too, and look how well that has gone over. I say Windows 7 is not delivered at the right time. It is 3 years late, in fact. However, you could argue it is delivered at the right time NOW because less than 20% of Windows users were willing to use Vista. MS had to get Windows 7 out ASAP to keep the company from losing the OS market completely. They had to do it for the netbook market, too, which completely bypassed Vista. What will determine of Win 7 does well is almost completely with the new computer purchase. Your average user majority is not going to upgrade from XP to 7 on their existing hardware because of the difficulty. Same goes for businesses. So if sales of new computers start to take off, then so will Windows 7. However, in this market, it a big unknown whether sales will take off. Obviously vendors hope it does, and they're putting out a pile of new systems for the launch. So the question is now, "We built it. Will customers come?"
Keleko
on Oct 13, 2009
I should add that Windows Vista is the reason my house has switched to Apple. A year and a half ago I was ready to get a new PC. I was ready to leave XP at the same time, but I did not want Vista. Linux did not meet my needs, either. So I bought a Mac. I like it. My wife now has a Mac, too, which she also likes. I see no reason to go back to Windows for my personal computing needs (games being the only exception, and that's where Bootcamp is useful). If Vista had been a year and a half ago what Windows 7 is now, I would have stayed with Windows. Now my work laptop runs XP. I'd love to replace it with Windows 7. However, I have to wait for my company to finally get around to accepting the OS. Maybe by 2012 I'll get to use Windows 7 on it just before the world ends.
yoshipod
on Oct 13, 2009
Lets wait and see a couple of weeks after launch. Windows 7 does look like a good OS from everything I have read so far, but reviews of Vista were just as positive. I'm sure the numbers of horror stories about problems that happened while upgrading will dwarf the reports of those Mac OS X 10.6 ones. Give it some time and then we can see if it is as good as advertised.
Ocean
on Oct 13, 2009
Anyone care to comment on this: >>The simplest, most cost-effective answer I know of? Don't use Microsoft Windows when accessing your bank account online. << I think it takes some chutzpah for a major paper to print that: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2009/10/avoid_windows_malwa...
lotsamystuff
on Oct 13, 2009
"all of which, tellingly, are quite positive" Better correct that definitive statement: http://louderback.com/2009/windows-7-its-vista-all-over-again/
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
"Drivers? Um it uses the Vista driver model. So if there is a Vista driver for your hardware you are good to go with 7. Sure 7 will have more drivers on the DVD than Vista did, but its almost 3 years later. This is no different than any other OS, from any other company." I had a problem on a new server recently where installing Windows Server 2008 RTM (in actuality, SP1) would need "F6" mass storage drivers for the SAS drive controller. Problem is, I was installing from a USB stick, and it set the USB drive as drive C: without renaming it to a drive letter AFTER the hard drive on reboot (Windows normally does this perfectly, but just not for this hardware, probably because the SAS controller takes a lower priority over USB-connected drives). The hard drive ended up being drive E:, and you can't change drive letters on system drives after the fact. On Server 2008 R2, the SAS controller drivers were in-box, so I never had the same issue. That helped a lot. When you're setting up a VM environment, you don't want to be guessing about where VHD's are stored, and simplicity is the key to keeping your sanity intact. I just wish they had added the Intel ME drivers to the Windows 7 install bits. They have on-board video and audio drivers, but Intel ME drivers are needed on a lot of motherboards.
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
I think that Microsoft has a lot of work to do to assure backwards compatibility with Windows 8. If Windows 8 will be 64-bit only (or 64/128 if there is any truth to that), there should be some kind of built-in virtualization layer for 32-bit compatibility, rather than compatibility shims. Virtualization seems like a more logical approach, and may or may not be a "cleaner" solution for the user, and *maybe* easier for the developers (that's just a guess - IHNI), but there has to be some kind of benefit to using hardware acceleration for all required backwards compatibility. They should require hardware VT for that reason, but I would fear that they wouldn't be able to push the industry hard enough on that requirement, or that the software would come too soon for the feature to be mainstream. Windows 8 is a few years off though, but even Intel has said that not every Core i# chip next year will have VT included. Expect it not to be in Core i3's (the dual-cores) and some of the i5's once they expand the product lineup. XP Mode is pretty good, but I think it's time they strip out the running instance part of the VM so that the application can just be put into a "container" without having to boot up another complete OS in a window, thereby eliminating complexity and security issues inherent in running a complete legacy OS.
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
It's funny that nobody has mentioned the security model of Windows 7 as being a key reason to upgrade [from XP]. Anybody that hasn't migrated to Windows Vista already is missing out on it, but it's strange that they haven't kept that drum beating for Windows 7. I haven't deployed the new Group Policy option for it, but I don't think that any business should have UAC put into the default option. Instead, they should raise it to the Vista-level option. The new default gives so-called Administrators a false sense of confidence which is dangerous when it comes to PC's, and on some types of networks (SBS 2003, I'm looking at you), users have to be Local Admins for deployment and GPO functions to work correctly.
de Silentio
on Oct 13, 2009
"Drivers? Um it uses the Vista driver model. So if there is a Vista driver for your hardware you are good to go with 7." I've seen some odd pieces of hardware that have Vista drivers that don't work with 7. Very few, though.
crankenstein
on Oct 13, 2009
Win 7 is THE best OS ever released... Period. Even the Apple zealots and they're problem riddled Snow Leopard agree.
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
"I've seen some odd pieces of hardware that have Vista drivers that don't work with 7. " If they have EXE installers that do a Windows version check, try using Compatibility Mode in the properties of the main program. That usually works fine. You *shouldn't* need to specify admin rights for the program if it already supports Vista too.
de Silentio
on Oct 13, 2009
@Paul: On the new site layout. All is fine with me except that the "Blog" link now opens a new window, very inconvenient, in my opinion.
hzwei2000
on Oct 13, 2009
Sorry Paul, But as a self-proclaimed Windows lover and defender of Vista and its superior follow-up in Windows 7, I have to disagree. Windows Me was never the best anything. Every system I ever used with Win Me was extremely unstable. I had to run to the land of Windows Xp betas and Release Candidates to get stability. Even my dual boot Win 98 partition was a godsend compared to Me. Vista suffered (unjustly) from a poor reputation, Win Me just made people suffer.
Logjamming
on Oct 13, 2009
Transformation complete. Windows has now become OSX. No wonder you guys are excited. But really, all of this stuff has been available on OSX for years. And, in contrast to Vista, it has also been working for years. Ah well, I'm glad you guys finally get an OS that works, even it is a shameless copy of OSX. Enjoy it!
Balthazar9
on Oct 13, 2009
pezzonovante said: Windows 7 is the best thing since sliced bread. Period. Alright, allow me. Windows control panel is an absolute disaster. Few things are logically categorized. Win-Explorer is a disaster. It takes 77 clicks to do the most basic of chores. i.e. cut, copy, paste or delete. I’m forced to hack the hell out of Win7 registry to make explorer behave. Win-IE8 is freakishly bad. Have to disable ‘DEP’ so that non Micro$haft software works properly. Ejecting Devices Requires far too many clicks. Sleep and hibernation are still difficult to use.
de Silentio
on Oct 13, 2009
"If they have EXE installers that do a Windows version check" That's another issue that ticks me off. Anyways, I tried the direct driver (going through Device Manager), didn't work. I don't know why, but it didn't. One of the problem devices is a Wireless USB/VGA adapter for a project. IOGear recognizes that their Vista driver doesn't work for 7. I think MS changed something in the Graphics model (I really don't know, all I know is that it doesn't work).
trieste
on Oct 13, 2009
It's always puzzling when otherwise sane journalists, who warn about using version 1.0, proclaim their love of a new OS and recommend BUY, BUY, BUY! I guess there is not a great journalism market for apathy i.e who cares. Wait until you buy a new computer. Will your life be shiny and bright when you buy 7? No. You can copy files, play music, write emails just the same as before. I imagine I'll have 7 sometime in the next 2 years.
rr0de74@live.com
on Oct 13, 2009
http://news.cnet.com/8301-27080_3-10374134-245.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesA... "Microsoft released a record number of 13 bulletins for 34 vulnerabilities on Patch Tuesday--and the first critical update for Windows 7--as well as fixes for zero-day flaws involving Server Message Block (SMB) and Internet Information Services (IIS)." Best Windows ever. Great timing on this post.
rr0de74@live.com
on Oct 13, 2009
@subzerohitman, the Snow Leopard Guest account bug does not delete anything, it changes the pointer. The data is still there and you can change the pointer back via CLI. The bug only happens IF..... you upgraded over the top of Leopard. and if on Leopard you had the guest account enabled (default disabled) prior to the Snow Leopard upgrade. and you had to login to the guest account 1 time on Leopard before the Snow Leopard upgrade. Even then it does not always happen. If you did a clean install (duh) of Snow Leopard then you wont see the bug, or if you never had the guest account turned on under Leopard then you wont see it. Or even if you upgraded over the top of Leopard and had the guest account on, and logged into it at least once, you can fix it by disabling and re-enabling guest 1 time to fix it. I am sure it hit some people, but with all of the IF's you need for this to happen its not going to be many. Kind of like the Windows 7 Showstopper bug back in August that did not amount to much.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 13, 2009
Joe-Dokes "DOS 4 is widely held to be one of the worst. While DOS 5 is considered to be perhaps the best DOS made." PC-DOS 4.00 was the only one written by IBM as part of the Microsoft/IBM Joint Development Agreement that also created OS|2. (Microsoft went in and fixed the bigger problems with their initial release of MS-DOS 4.01 - you'll notice that there was NO MS-DOS 4.00) After the problems with PC-DOS 4 Microsoft took back control of MS/PC-DOS starting with version 5.
Dipsh t Admin
on Oct 13, 2009
"Best Windows ever." Kind of like "The world's most advanced operating system. Finely tuned." Unless you use a Guest account. Whoops.
daveinla
on Oct 13, 2009
The main reason to upgrade to 7 is that it's simply better where Vista was bad... BTW Daddy W. Mossberg posted a very positive article about windows 7, I don't know if you guys have read it already or not... http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870329800457445929314119172... But unlike what Paul claims about him, he's both a dual Mac and Windows user and appreciates them both for their respective face value. A good thing about him is that he's not a geek and appreciates the systems for their daily ease of use, annoyances ... and not about the futile details of the innards that nobody cares about or will not make a difference in your life for 99% of users. Anyway I too am eager to upgrade to 7, and have not performed yet the upgrade to Snow Leopard caus' I don't feel the need to. Leopard works just perfectly for me and I don't care about the few GB I'm gonna save but installing it or the speed boost I won't see anyway because I don't have 8 cores and a high-end video card...
EricoF3
on Oct 13, 2009
@daveinla: this is not the point here ... We don't compare OSX to Windows 7 here ... The question is just What are good reasons to upgrade to Windows 7? It is not Why should you prefer Windows 7 over OSX...
daveinla
on Oct 13, 2009
Erico: Excuse me for voicing my opinion on things that people care about here... People like you or MSN Galos might not give a shit about what happens besides MS but it's always good to put things in perspective.... BTW my comment was + for Windows and not so for OSX... just my 2 cts... And if you want to stay on point don't mention Linux with stupid fanbois argument that would make Beck and Hannity blush !
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 13, 2009
Erico Actually, DaveInLa makes an interesting point, although not the one I suspect he intends. That point is how far we moved the bar in what we accept as "journalism". Goatberg effectively said, "The latest version of Windows is almost good enough to be compared with Snow Leopard (a version of OS X that's getting to be known for incompatibility and destroying user data)" That's what DaveInLa thinks is a neutral view. Can you imagine if Paul did a quick "review" of Snow Leopard that said, "Snow Leopard shows that Apple is capable of producing a product that's nearly competitive with Windows ME"? Think DaveInLa would be as quick to say that showed how neutral and unbiased Paul was?
sjaak327
on Oct 13, 2009
"Sleep and hibernation are still difficult to use." Really, what's difficult about it I wonder. Windows 7 has some nicea advancements over Vista, it is therfore slightly better. Having said that, Vista was and is rock solid as well, and I have read somewhere that it's adoption is comparable to that of XP in it's first three years. Seems to me all the Vista woes and disasters are largely due to perception then that they are based on any hard facts.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 13, 2009
Dave Seriously. 94% of the world uses Windows exclusively 4.4% use Mac and of those 85% also use Windows That's, what, about 0.7% who use OS X exclusively? That's about equal to Linux on the desktop. So, yeah, I give Apple about 4% of my attention and "Mac Only - Windoze sux" types less than the 0.7% they deserve.
daveinla
on Oct 13, 2009
"Can you imagine if Paul did a quick "review" of Snow Leopard that said, "Snow Leopard shows that Apple is capable of producing a product that's nearly competitive with Windows ME" Get your pills Mike. Anyway as much as I enjoy reading both Mossberg and Paul, I trust more Mossberg for objectivity when evaluating Apple or MS products for mainstream users rather than Paul...
daveinla
on Oct 13, 2009
Yeah you're right MSN Galos !! :)))) The Mac has a 4.4 % Worldwode marketshare because 95.6 % of the people in the world choose to use to Windows because they now it's the better thing out there... Hence OSX is crap because it has 4.4 % marketshare ! And Lotus and BMW are crap too BTW ! ;)
sjaak327
on Oct 13, 2009
"Anyway as much as I enjoy reading both Mossberg and Paul, I trust more Mossberg for objectivity when evaluating Apple or MS products for mainstrex`xam users rather than Paul..." the sub title of the post you linked: "Microsoft's New Operating System Is Good Enough to Erase Bad Memory of Vista" That is enough for me to disqualify the man's views, as he doesn't really know what he is talking about. End of story really. Maybe less bias, but next to zero actual knowledge. It's a shame that the IT press is of such a low quality.
Waethorn
on Oct 13, 2009
"One of the problem devices is a Wireless USB/VGA adapter for a project. IOGear recognizes that their Vista driver doesn't work for 7. I think MS changed something in the Graphics model (I really don't know, all I know is that it doesn't work)." Yes, video drivers have been updated to WDDM 1.1. There is some new standard for USB-to-VGA, but I don't remember the name for it. It is a standard that multiple companies are attempting to utilize, but it's not used by every one. The standard is governed by a third-party and one of the key pillars to it is to include Windows WHQL certification for the drivers, as well as make them cross-compatible between different types of hardware.
daveinla
on Oct 13, 2009
"Sjakk" What is the % of people around you (non MS Fanbois) do you know who said: " Wow I'm really happy I made the switch to Vista, what a change in my life it has made for daily use !! " ?????????? Well around me none of my friends (who are only Windows users) said they gained something with Vista and most of them complained one way or the other about some sluggishness or annoyances about it... That said they and I are waiting eagerly for the Windows 7 upgrade.
EricoF3
on Oct 13, 2009
daveinla said: "Yeah you're right MSN Galos !! :)))) The Mac has a 4.4 % Worldwode marketshare because 95.6 % of the people in the world choose to use to Windows because they now it's the better thing out there... Hence OSX is crap because it has 4.4 % marketshare ! And Lotus and BMW are crap too BTW ! ;)" Hahah You really compares OSX with Lotus or BMW lol... Lotus and BMW are always broked up!! I assumed you'll compared OSX with a little and fiable car like a Toyota yaris... No thats true... Windows is more like Cadiallac... isn't it?? daveinla is a little frustrated here lol

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use