Apple forced to drop iPhone ad in the UK

So I got a bunch of email about this this morning, and it’s certainly noteworthy. I’m an iPhone user and I have to say, I really love the device despite some obvious flaws, but it’s also about a million times better than the competition, so it’s unclear what my problem is. Anyway, in usual Apple fashion, the company has exaggerated its product’s capabilities. But this time, finally, someone called them on it.

An Apple iPhone advert has been banned by the advertising standards watchdog for exaggerating the phone's speed.

The advert boasted the new 3G model was "really fast" and showed it loading internet pages in under a second.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) upheld complaints by 17 people who said the TV advert had misled them as to its speed.

Apple UK said it was comparing the 3G model with its 2G predecessor and its claims were "relative not absolute".

The advert repeatedly stated that the phone was "really fast" and showed news pages and the Google maps service taking just fractions of a second to appear.

Text on the screen said: "Network performance will vary by location."

After upholding the viewers' complaints, the ASA said the advert must not appear again in the same form.

It said the advert was likely to lead viewers to believe that the device actually operated at or near to the speeds shown in the advert.

The watchdog concluded: "Because we understood that it did not, we concluded that the ad was likely to mislead."

Bravo.

And before any of you Apple noobs complains, I’ll just point out this video, which, in my own extensive experience, is exactly what using an iPhone is really like. And is thus why this ad is truly deceptive.

Thanks to everyone who wrote in about this.

Discuss this Article 95

gorath
on Nov 26, 2008
At first, I thoguht the ads were obviously speeded up, to show all the featuers in a quick time, and thought most people would think the same. However, a good friend of mine stated recently that he was going to buy an iphone because the add showed it as being much much faster than his current phone (a nokia N95, IIRC) so, some people at least do get the wrong impression.
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
"Apple UK said it was comparing the 3G model with its 2G predecessor and its claims were "relative not absolute". " That's meaningless. "Relative not absolute"?? Of course it's relative. You're comparing it to something else and saying it's 2 times faster.
weedmonk
on Nov 26, 2008
There no RDF across the pond. Actually, it's mostly an US bicoastal thing.
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
"There no RDF across the pond. Actually, it's mostly an US bicoastal thing." Another instance of UK doing it all wrong. It's like a bizarro world over there. Gorath, that was a lame attempt at a joke, based on your driving on the "wrong" side of the road. :)
Lindy
on Nov 26, 2008
I await the sh@t storm this thread will create. I dont own a iPhone, iTouch yes and even on WiFi its not that fast. Let the blood bath commence!!!!!
Waethorn
on Nov 26, 2008
"That's meaningless. "Relative not absolute"?? Of course it's relative. You're comparing it to something else and saying it's 2 times faster." 2 times faster to what? Did the UK even have the original iPhwn?
Lindy
on Nov 26, 2008
The question would be what was the network speed of the network for the original iPhone in the UK? In the US you went from EDGE 128k up/down (about 90k really) to 3G and which I have tested on my old BlackJack at 1meg down and 300 up. So in the US it would easily be double the speed. Still its not as fast as the ad shows. Honestly I dont think it is all network speed, I think the iPhone/iTouch cant get the data and drive Safari that fast. Its not that fast on WiFi which pulls my full DSL speed of 6meg down.
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
I just find it funny that some people believe everything that's shown in ads. But, I guess the ad was specifically about speed, so, I don't know.
subzerohitman721
on Nov 26, 2008
Its about time that somebody held Apple's feet to the fire about their deceptive ads. What Lindy calls it a bloodbath, I call it accountability. The court of public opinion is now in session! Proof yet again for the umteenth time that Apple's ads are clearly deceptive. I own an iPod and I love the quality. The device clearly sells itself. So why does Apple have to lie to sell their stuff? There isn't really any need and just makes the company look like Microsoft. At least with Microsoft, I know their a bunch of greedy bastards. They make no apologies for it. At least the stuff is affordable and you don't need a loan for it. Apple tries to paint itself above the fray but its really just the same thing. Except it keeps trying to sell you the deception, the glitz, and the glamour. Much like a Hollywood agent to the stars, who keeps trying to blow smoke up your behind. Nobody is disputing that Apple makes great products. The computers, the iPods, the Touch, and the iPhone are really really good products. I plan on making more iPod purchases in the future or maybe when the Touch gets more storage capacity. Just quit the deceptive advertising practices and lower the prices. Apple would win real big, as in taking out Microsoft big. Every time they do this, it opens the door for Microsoft to come back in. Thats why the status quo between Microsoft and Apple remains.
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
>>Apple's ads are clearly deceptive<< But once the people are in the store looking at the device...once they buy the device... >>J.D. Power and Associates has conducted research in customer satisfaction of the most popular Smartphone models. Apple Inc. has ranked highest among the smartphone makers...<< http://www.afterdawn.com/news/archive/15921.cfm >>Apple ranked first in the overall customer satisfaction among business wireless smartphone users, the most recent J.D. Power and Associates’ Business Wireless Smartphone Customer Satisfaction Study revealed. This places Apple over rivals such as BlackBerry-maker RIM, or Palm, receiving in four out of five categories the highest number of points compared to other companies.<< http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Apples_iPhone_Overruns_BlackBerry_In_Cons... I'd say that THE ADS DO NOT MATTER. The users response to the device does.
wdowell
on Nov 26, 2008
Finally, something to be proud of being british for! This was totally misleading, and - as an iPhone 3G user myself - it's no where near that fast (even with the firmware updates) - and it's not all network related as the advert suggested with the sub-text. it's just the damn sluggish processor! Yes, I still love my iphone, and it's better than the rest in many ways, but I do think adverts should show products honestly. and that goes for all of them - from cosmetics to toothpaste, from adsl offers to washing-mashine products getting out staines.
nutts
on Nov 26, 2008
And this is relevant to "SuperSite for WIndows" because...?
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
wdowell The problem with the network text in the ad is that it implies that the results show DO occur under certain network conditions. If anything, the disclaimer makes it even more deceptive by even making people think their real-world results not matching the demonstrated speed are due to local network conditions and not Apple's lying and so will think that it will improve as their carrier upgrades or when they're in a different location.
kalewallace
on Nov 26, 2008
@subzero Yeah, it's great that someone actually call out Apple for their usually-ridiculous ads, but let's be honest. If we actually called out everyone who ran a deceptive ad, we would have under a dozen running. Advertising is advertising.
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
THE ADS DO NOT MATTER.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
Yep, we're seeing the usual defenses of the indefensible: Apple defense 1: iPhone is perfect so it's OK to lie because people will be happy they were lied to (the conquistador "It's OK if will kill them since they'll die Christian" defense) Apple defense 2: MicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvil (the change the conversation to anybody else defense) Apple defense 3: You're being mean, everybody does it. Stop picking on me. (the 3rd grader defense)
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@nutts - It is relevant to this site and audience because Paul writes about Windows AND the other things that Windows users use. My guess is that a large percentage of iPhone users are also Windows users. If you haven't learned that yet, then you haven't been reading long. @Waethorn - No reason to drop down to the 3rd grader level that mikegalos talks about above by using the no-longer funny iPhwn tag that you like to try to hang on an obviously good selling and usable, but still needing work, device. --tayme
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
>iPhone is perfect < I missed this comment. What time was it made? >MicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvil< Ditto. Same request.
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@mikegalos - Is this more indefensible(your term) than Microsoft telling people that thye are using the next version of the Windows OS called Mojave, when in fact they are using Vista? It is still deception, right? Don't go back to the comparison of a gunpoint robbery being the same as an honest mistake by a cashier on this one, either...that is just plain stupid. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
Maybe the Mac fans here could just save us all a lot of trouble and just enter in: Excuse 1 or Excuse 1 with a little Excuse 2 thrown in or I'd like to use all 3 excuses, thanks.
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
Mike is trolling now.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
I'm sorry, I really should have posted in UK English as well since this was about UK adverts... Yep, we're seeing the usual defences of the indefensible: Apple defence 1: iPhone is perfect so it's OK to lie because people will be happy they were lied to (the conquistador "It's OK if will kill them since they'll die Christian" defence) Apple defence 2: MicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvilMicrosoftIsEvil (the change the conversation to anybody else defence) Apple defence 3: You're being mean, everybody does it. Stop picking on me. (the Year 3 student’s defence)
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@mikegalos - Those are the same 3 excuses that you and other rebid Microsoft fans have used in the past...including during the Mojave Experiment, which I believe was a fine and effective bit of advertising by Microsoft. --tayme
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
To the UK readers, my apologies. Apple defence 2, which has been the most popular so far, was left if a US/UK hybrid form in the update as I carelessly forgot that in the UK, corporate names are plural. Please substitute the following: Apple defence 2: MicrosoftAreEvilMicrosoftAreEvilMicrosoftAreEvilMicrosoftAreEvil (the change the conversation to anybody else defence)
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
For what its worth - I am glad to see this and any deceptive advertising removed from the airwaves. A company should be able to sell a product on its merits, not lies. If you have been reading long, you'll realize that I also feel the same about the "Switcher" series of ads (I'm a Mac)...Apple should sell OS X on its own merits, not any percieved flaws in Vista. --tayme
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
Typo in my earlier post...rebid = rabid. --tayme
GabeR
on Nov 26, 2008
>>Yes, I still love my iphone, and it's better than the rest in many ways, but I do think adverts should show products honestly. and that goes for all of them - from cosmetics to toothpaste, from adsl offers to washing-mashine products getting out staines.<< But ads almost never tell the truth. In advertising, driving a car turns you into James Bond or Michael Shumacher, a perfume makes you irresistible to the opposite sex, a skin cream makes you twenty years younger, a cleaning product cleans the worst stains without any effort at all, a new Windows version makes the Wow start now, cigarettes (when advertising them was allowed) would transport you to Marlboro country, a chewing gum will freeze the world around you, Santa Claus exists and drinks Coca Cola etc.
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@mikegalos - Can you point us to the posts that you feel are using examples of the 3 defences that you describe above. I think that I found 1 questionable example of number 1...except that the word perfect was never used. --tayme
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
>>A company should be able to sell a product on its merits<< Look at those JD Power rankings.
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@GabeR - What???? You doubt Santa Clause?!?!? How dare you!!! ;-) --tayme
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
>>ads almost never tell the truth. In advertising, driving a car turns you into James Bond or Michael Shumacher, a perfume makes you irresistible to the opposite sex, a skin cream makes you twenty years younger, a cleaning product cleans the worst stains without any effort at all, a new Windows version makes the Wow start now, cigarettes (when advertising them was allowed) would transport you to Marlboro country, a chewing gum will freeze the world around you, Santa Claus exists and drinks Coca Cola etc.<< This is a great post.
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
I don't have any problems with the iPhone ads. Lot of ads lie. Some commentators had indicated that the original ads didn't have the disclaimer. At least, they've fixed that. I do have a problem with the company's Mac ads, though. "Buy our product because our rivals spend too much money on advertising." Kevin Trudeau, if anyone has stayed awake late enough to watch those infomercials on TV, used the exact same tactic to turn his book on natural cures into a national bestseller.
Mum
on Nov 26, 2008
Of course the ad in question is deceptive when you really look at it. I wish a lot more companies got called for it, because everyone actually does it to some extent. If you're involved in making ads you know this. Not that I had a job if they didn't! Mike's probably used all the excuses he lists many times in the past himself, which is hilarious.
Ocean
on Nov 26, 2008
>>I do have a problem with the company's Mac ads<< OT alert! OT alert! (kidding, kidding)
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
"@mikegalos - Can you point us to the posts that you feel are using examples of the 3 defences that you describe above. I think that I found 1 questionable example of number 1...except that the word perfect was never used." I agree. I haven't seen much on this thread, although I've seen it in the past. Of course, robertsjoe is not here yet.
GabeR
on Nov 26, 2008
>>@GabeR - What???? You doubt Santa Clause?!?!? How dare you!!!<< Oops, I just remembered Christmas is coming up! Oh well, no presents for me this year...
Lindy
on Nov 26, 2008
@Subzero "bloodbath" as in this thread will turn into a bloodbath. Mike woke up and the smack talk started. Today I will just watch as I dont have an iPhone.
gorath
on Nov 26, 2008
Ads in the UK are governed by a pretty strict set of rules. Misleading advertising is not allowed, and neither are false claims. What is allowed is humour. However, comparing the "wrigleys ice" add to this is kinda dumb. The wrigley's add makes no claim that the air will actually turn to ice. The over-the top lynx ads fit in with humour. - No-one of sound mind will believe that a can of deodourant will make an entire island of women come running to you. However, where the iPhone add fell is that it really was trying to make people who currently owned phones (and who were not tech-savvy enough to realise it was a mock-up representation) think "damn, that thing's faster than my current phone".
gorath
on Nov 26, 2008
@shark: "Another instance of UK doing it all wrong. It's like a bizarro world over there. Gorath, that was a lame attempt at a joke, based on your driving on the "wrong" side of the road. :)" Yeah, so what if we drive on the wrong side of the road, at least our economy is.... Oh. Hang on. But all our politicians are... Hmm, ok, maybe not. Erm, I know, at lest the cost of living here is..... Dammit. Ah, well, our fuel costs are, er, well... bugger. I know. Our dental care system is way.... no, that won't do either. Hmm, Ok, you win. ;p
WebGuy3000
on Nov 26, 2008
gorath - But the chicks all dig an English accent. You got that going for you.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
gorath And you at least showed a sense of humo(u)r about it with "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister" Mike (Who has two "British" cars, one made in England by a Malaysian owned company and one made in England by a German owned company) :-)
gorath
on Nov 26, 2008
"gorath - But the chicks all dig an English accent. You got that going for you." nope. I haven't even got that! Then only chicks I've met who dig English accents have been american. and most (not all) american women I've met speak in an accent that annoys the hell outta me. Now do you see how bad we have it! lol.
chuckb84
on Nov 26, 2008
Yes, yes, the iPhone, like Democracy, is just awful, except when you compare it to all the others possibilities. Oh, and MIke, MIcrosoft IS evil, to the very depths of its corporate soul, if it had one. I suspect we'll get a tiny view of that when Balmer is deposed....an event I am looking forward to. Not that this has a thing to do with the iPhone, but since you brought it up.... Oh, in the non-bizarro world, there's this about the Blackberry storm. Not an "iPhone killer" after all..... http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/27/technology/personaltech/27pogue.html?_r=1
shark47
on Nov 26, 2008
gorath, you've got James Bond. :p "And you at least showed a sense of humo(u)r about it with "Yes, Minister" and "Yes, Prime Minister"" Ahh, yes. Great shows. I watched all the episodes of Yes, Prime Minister on Netflix.
DRWAM
on Nov 26, 2008
I am not surprised at this. While the Get a Mac ads are satire/parodies, the iPhone ad is deceptive. I think the biggest reason why is that you wll see on most other ads where demo's are shown, that they have a disclaimer stating something like simulated image or video, including virtualized image of phone for some of those verizon ones. While they too are disceptive as you still get the idea that the video is as fast or trouble free, the ads throw in the disclaimer. The iPhone ad is a demo of the iPhone's abilites, and is sped up to show many in the ad time slot, but really does not give a decent disclaimer. Verdict = Guilty. My phone works well and does the jobs I need [Thanks to some of you including Mike, Wae, Dipsh, John, Paul (but not George or Ringo)]....Thanks. OT, Thanks for the component info Wae, I will be asking more when I'm ready to build. Doc.
Dipsh t Admin
on Nov 26, 2008
Chuck, it's funny you call the "non-bizarro world" and bring up Pogue as being a part of that. That is, well, bizarre. Pogue and Mossy have given up all credibility at reviewing non-Apple products a long time ago.
Waethorn
on Nov 26, 2008
"No reason to drop down to the 3rd grader level that mikegalos talks about above by using the no-longer funny iPhwn tag that you like to try to hang on an obviously good selling and usable, but still needing work, device." Tayme, you are not the epitomy of "fair and balanced" yourself. Quit being so high and mighty. Besides, you're just jealous you didn't come up with it sooner. It's at least funnier than "WinJihadist".
mikegalos@msn.com
on Nov 26, 2008
Dipsh "Pogue and Mossy have given up all credibility at reviewing non-Apple products a long time ago." That's not really quite fair, they've also given up all credibility at reviewing Apple products a long time ago, too.
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@Waethorn - Much like Paul, I have never claimed to be "fair and balanced", but I do have the ability to give credit where credit is due. I use and support a variety of operating systems on a daily basis...so single sightedness is not something that I think is funny or even remotely accurate. BTW, it was lotsamystuff that coined WinJihadist, I believe...I try to avoid grouping people based on what OS they use or support. Extremists on both sides irk me... --tayme
tayme
on Nov 26, 2008
@Dip - Especially Pogue. I think that he mentioned the iPhone more than the Storm in his "review". --tayme

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use