Do E-Readers Cause Eye Strain?

The New York Times has an interesting article this morning about eBook readers and upcoming devices like the Apple iPad. Do the screens on these devices cause eye strain? The answer is quite unexpected--put simply, no, they do not--though there are things related to using these screens that cause problems. (I also enjoy that it busts the age-old "don't sit too close to the TV" myth.)

The admonition offered by legions of mothers — "Don't sit so close to the TV" — isn't really an option when it comes to e-reading devices. You have to get close to the screen to use it.

As consumers decide whether to make this jump and which technology to use, one key question is how reading on a screen affects the eyes.

First of all: doctors say that reading on a screen won't cause any harm.

"Most of what our mothers told us about our eyes was wrong," said Dr. Travis Meredith, chair of the ophthalmology department at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. "Sitting close to a television, or computer screen, isn't bad for our eyes. It’s a variety of other factors that can cause physical fatigue" .. the ergonomics of reading screens and the lack of blinking when we stare at them play a big role in eye fatigue.

As an avid Kindle user, I'm interested to see what the eBook/eNewspaper experience is like on the iPad. Certainly, having one device that does it all is a draw, assuming it doesn't hurt my eyes.

Discuss this Article 30

spivonious
on Feb 12, 2010
It's surprising that an e-ink/LCD screen would be no less fatiguing than paper.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
For anyone actually interested in the dynamics of reading and how the User Interface of the book evolved over thousands of years to the highly optimized version we take for granted now, I'd strongly suggest reading Bill Hill's essay, "The Magic of Reading". There are links to it in various formats on his blog at: http://billhillsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/magic-of-reading.html
G5Man
on Feb 12, 2010
I see Paul wants an iPad now. http://www.winsupersite.com/alt/ipad_preview_02.asp I guess that makes him a Lemming? How can you take anything seriously that is written here?
Keleko
on Feb 12, 2010
I applaud Paul for admitting the iPad is a device he wants and will use. I would like to know why the iPad will do what he wants better than the PC tablets he frequently mentions. As for the current topic, I suspected it was really a myth that the Kindle is easier on the eyes. I do feel that the quality of the display matters, though. A crappy LCD is not going to be fun to read for hours a time.
G5Man
on Feb 12, 2010
You applaud him? He trashes and trashes and trashes a product, calls his readers lemmings for considering buying one, then turns around four days later and states how much he wants one, and he gets applause? Sorry the topic was filed under iPad.
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
Ocean It's worth noting that neither the Amazon Kindle nor the Sony Reader nor the B&N Nook nor Apple's iBooks are even within several generations of Microsoft's Reader when it comes to readability. And Microsoft Reader shipped, literally, just over a decade ago. That's an eternity in technology time. Its sad that none of these companies bothered to read and learn from Bill Hill's work on OSPREY (Optical Serial Pattern Recognition) nor his work on how people read. The current generation of book reading software is painfully bad at implementing solutions to problems that Bill and the rest of the Microsoft Reader team solved years ago. Hopefully, in a few years and versions, they'll catch up to where the Microsoft Reader team was in January 2000 and people will be able to get lost in a book as easily as possible.
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
>>people will be able to get lost in a book as easily as possible.<< Functionally, that's possible with today's e-readers. Are we missing out on something? Perhaps, but we can't tell.
goozak
on Feb 12, 2010
I wonder if the fact that the New York Times is looking to implement a paywall - and thus push content to e-readers - has anything to do with that article... ?
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
Ocean "Functionally, that's possible with today's e-readers. Are we missing out on something? " Yes. You're missing out on bunches of things that make ludic reading work. You should actually take the time to read "The Magic of Reading" rather than just looking for Apple related items in Bill's blog and you'll understand. The current software makes reading possible but they all demonstrate a massive lack of understanding of the psychology and neuroscience of how we humans do the trick of turning sooty marks on shredded paper into a process that captures the mind. And that's very, very sad.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
goozak It's worth noting that the original Times Reader software was done using the technology Bill Hill and his team put together for Microsoft Reader. Times Reader isn't new. It's been out now for several generations and several years now.
chipwinter
on Feb 12, 2010
I agree with Mike. Bill Hill's essay is terrific. He seems very smart. It's interesting to read his opinion about the iPad as well.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
chipwinter " He seems very smart." He is. (Of course, you do have to get past his tendency to wear a kilt...)
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
"" He seems very smart." He is." He said: "I predict it will be a huge success. It will cause the same kind of mayhem among TabletPC and eBook manufacturers that the iPod and iPhone did in their respective market categories. It's a great-looking device. It's sleek and elegant - exactly what you'd expect from Apple. But that isn't why it will dominate the Tablet category. It's because Apple understands that computers have made a transition from "computing devices" to "consumer devices".
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
Ocean. So, what did you find interesting in "The Magic of Reading"? (An invitation for you to attempt to stay on topic)
rwalrond
on Feb 12, 2010
To be fair, Paul said from day one he will buy the iPad so he can get hands on experience with it. But the same way that people in the industry can sit around and find nothing good to say about it and then say, "No I won't buy it" why can't Paul voice his dis-like but still state that he will buy it to see if he could find a use case? I'm curious about the eye strain on these things also, personally I'm looking forward to the HP slate, but as an iPhone developer I certainly will order an iPad (through work :) to make sure my apps work on it.
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
"(An invitation for you to attempt to stay on topic)" and an admission that you couldn't come up with a witty rejoinder.
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
"To be fair, Paul said from day one he will buy the iPad so he can get hands on experience with it." Then he said "But you know what? Whatever. I still want one."
Ocean
on Feb 12, 2010
Returning to the topic, I'm aware of what doctors say. I (and many others) are also aware that two hours spent with a Kindle is very different from two hours spent with a laptop screen. I think this is one of those topics where its too subjective to make a over-arching declaration.
anonymous
on Feb 12, 2010
This post was mentioned on Twitter by gretchenglas: Do E-Readers Cause Eye Strain?: The New York Times has an interesting article this morning about eBook readers and... http://bit.ly/aGXqwD
EricoF3
on Feb 12, 2010
Ho!! Here the return of the Jedi ... Mike Galos... Hi! Mike nice to read you again :)
Dipsh t Admin
on Feb 12, 2010
What I find interesting about the Magic of Reading blog is that it utilizes a black background, which really kills my eyes when reading it. Too bad, looked like a lot of good content.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Feb 12, 2010
Dipsh Actually, since "The Magic of Reading" - the document I mentioned - is available for download in .DOC (Microsoft Word) and .LIT (Microsoft Reader) formats, you can view it onscreen in black text on white or print it out in black text on white.
Keleko
on Feb 12, 2010
@G5Man I applaud him because he admitted the device may be useful for him after all. It isn't wrong to change your mind about something.
rr0de74@live.com
on Feb 12, 2010
I have always called BS on the eyestrain issue. I have been in IT for 20 years and my eyes are fine. I feel no different reading a LCD screen or a paper book. eBooks are the future, just like movies and music. Sure some people will still want real books, myself included for somethings. However 90% of what I will read could be electronic. There are good and bad books and computers....as in I am reading a book now that is a paperback and its got tiny text jammed onto the pages. As for Paul, and him admitting he is going to buy an iPad, did we think any different. Pauls mug is in the dictionary next to hypocrite. His part 2 iPad review is the biggest effing joke around. This guy has never even touched one. Every time Paul goes negative with the iPad 1000 more people want one. "It isn't wrong to change your mind about something." Nothing wrong with changing his mind. Had Paul been like "I am not sure I see the appeal but I wont know until I get to try one out". and then changed his mind then NP. However this guy was calling it iDud during the rollout presentation. Has since written about it what 6-7 times and trashed it every time. 5th grade journalism at its best.
BrandanL
on Feb 12, 2010
@Dipsh t Admin Try Readability. It's a bookmarklet that tries to fix all the god-awful typography on the web. http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/
DRWAM
on Feb 12, 2010
"First of all: doctors say that reading on a screen won't cause any harm." That's correct, because it's masterbation that will cause blindness.
DRWAM
on Feb 12, 2010
Actually gents, it's kinda girly to change your mind like a woman, but it takes a manly amount of balls to post it on the web for all to scrutinize and comment. I would have to give to Paul, the Klingon award for that.
rr0de74@live.com
on Feb 12, 2010
@BrandanL that readability app is the shiznitz, thanks! @drwam seriously that is like calling your wife a Bi@tch! and then in your apology you drone on/explain why she is and all the reasons why she is, then you say your sorry. Pathetic. I give him the Mini-Mouse golf clap for his lame attempt.
Logjamming
on Feb 12, 2010
Wow, it looks like Mike got out of the nuthouse earlier than expected. To sum up what he just said about the reader. - Microsoft: we have made square wheels - Apple: we made them round so they actually work - Microsoft: but we were first!

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use