Google Gets Ready to Rumble With Microsoft

Steve Lohr at the New York Times offers up a fairly accurate summary of the coming battle over cloud computing:

The growing confrontation between Google and Microsoft promises to be an epic business battle. It is likely to shape the prosperity and progress of both companies, and also inform how consumers and corporations work, shop, communicate and go about their digital lives. Google sees all of this happening on remote servers in faraway data centers, accessible over the Web by an array of wired and wireless devices — a setup known as cloud computing. Microsoft sees a Web future as well, but one whose center of gravity remains firmly tethered to its desktop PC software. Therein lies the conflict.

“For most people,” he says, “computers are complex and unreliable,” given to crashing and afflicted with viruses. If Google can deliver computing services over the Web, then “it will be a real improvement in people’s lives,” Google CEO Eric E. Schmidt says. So, in Google’s thinking, will 90 percent of computing eventually reside in the cloud? “In our view, yes,” Mr. Schmidt says. “It’s a 90-10 thing.” Inside the cloud resides “almost everything you do in a company, almost everything a knowledge worker does.”

At Microsoft, Mr. Schmidt’s remarks are fighting words. Traditional software installed on personal computers is where Microsoft makes its living, and its executives see the prospect of 90 percent of computing tasks migrating to the Web-based cloud as a fantasy.

“It’s, of course, totally inaccurate compared with where the market is today and where the market is headed,” says Jeff Raikes, president of Microsoft’s business division, which includes the Office products.“I mean, we have more than 500 million people who are using Microsoft Office tools,” he says.

But then the guy responsible for one-half of Microsoft's monopoly products would say that. It's a mistake to believe that the world won't change, however, and arguably it already is. After all, office productivity used to involve dedicated word processors and typewriters, slide projectors, and lots and lots of paper. The world moved on to today's productivity model because software was better. The world will move on in the future as well, assuming that what comes next is better again. It's not yet, but then the first version of Word wasn't all that impressive either. These things get better over time. And to be fair, some of what Google's doing is already better: The company doesn't charge for its Web solutions for the most part, a huge deal for the individuals and small businesses that will be leading the wider business world in the future.

Google is a different competitor from others Microsoft has dispatched in recent years: it is bigger, faster-growing, loaded with cash and a magnet for talent. And the technology of the Google cloud opens doors. Its vast data centers are designed by Google engineers for efficiency, speed and low cost, giving the company an edge in computing firepower and allowing it to add offerings inexpensively.

Conventional software is typically built, tested and shipped in two- or three-year product cycles. Inside Google, Mr. Schmidt says, there are no two-year plans. Its product road maps look ahead only four or five months at most. And, Mr. Schmidt says, the only plans “anybody believes in go through the end of this quarter.”

New features and improvements are made and tested on Google’s computers and constantly sprinkled into the services users tap into online. In the last two months alone, eight new features or improvements have been added to Google’s e-mail system, Gmail, including a tweak to improve the processing speed and code to simplify the handling of e-mail on mobile phones. A similar number of enhancements have been made in the last two months to Google’s online spreadsheet, word processing and presentation software.

Early this month, Google released new cellphone software, with the code-name Grand Prix. A project that took just six weeks to complete, Grand Prix allows for fast and easy access to Google services like search, Gmail and calendars through a stripped-down mobile phone browser. (For now, it is tailored for iPhone browsers, but the plan is to make it work on other mobile browsers as well.)

Fascinating anecdote here: This Grand Prix project was pushed through at Google by a former 15-year Microsoft vet, tired of how slowly the software giant moves. Needless to say, he had an immediate impact on Google and it's users: He joined the company in July.

Cloud computing won’t happen overnight. Big companies change habits slowly, as do older consumers. Clever software is needed — and under development, he says — to overcome other shortcomings like the “airplane issue,” or how users can keep working when they find themselves unable to get online.

Yet small and midsize companies, as well as universities and individuals — in other words, a majority of computer users — could shift toward Web-based cloud computing fairly quickly, Mr. Schmidt contends. Small businesses, he says, could greatly reduce their costs and technology headaches by adopting the Web offerings now available from Google and others.

Yep. Anyone who bets against cloud computing is taking a fool's bet. Things change. And they're changing right now.

Discuss this Article 6

DRWAM
on Dec 16, 2007
I don't know if I agree with the cloud model. We have around 300 employees. Our business class internet service [Comcast] goes down frequently. My employees would be staring at the walls or having a day long coffee break, all on company time, if we relied on these web solutions. The cost of apps on each computer, as well as those that are server based on our intranet, is a small price to pay when compared to the revenue loss due to unreliable internet service. We would need 99.99% uptime guarantee before even considering web based deployment. After that, I would still want my apps local. This model works better than the server based model in the past that we had, which mimicks the 'cloud' [of the clan McCloud]. Also, although MS dominates with Office, I cannot call it a monopoly as there are several alternatives that have been around for a while. Popularity does not equal monopoly. Trust me, I have been sued for it, and the case was dropped.
Waethorn
on Dec 16, 2007
"Anyone who bets against cloud computing is taking a fool's bet." That's a loaded statement if I ever saw one. So basically you're saying that all of the security researchers that are saying that they don't trust Google and other companies that utilize tracker ad technologies are fools? "“computers are complex and unreliable,” given to crashing and afflicted with viruses." And how exactly does cloud-based computing fix that? By taking computers out of the equation, or by replacing viruses with spyware?! Maybe by taking the entire internet out of the equation, which definitely eliminates the possibility of viruses....Ooops, that puts Google out of a job though doesn't it.... Cloud-based computing is just a re-thinking of server-based terminal computing. Although heavy client software is an old way of thinking, it's not going away anytime soon. With virtualization technologies, the next step for enterprises is application virtualization, where security can be kept wrapped up in a trusted environment, but applications can still be centralized. Microsoft already offers that - it's called SoftGrid. Most enterprises just won't trust online identities with private information. As you said about Facebook before Paul: "If you don't want Facebook spreading your personal information, don't put it on there in the first place". Ditto goes for Google. Eventually, OS deployments will be delivered via a network connection from a server to dumb terminal workstations as standard fare, but that time will be long coming. I can imagine it would be something evolved from what we know now as PXE booting into an OS image that's stored on a server. That's already been done many times before, but not with a current, widely-used operating sysem (namely Windows). Consider how much processing power is required for Windows Vista, which even you say is "slower, but offers more functionality than previous versions of Windows, which is really what you want in the end", and then consider what would be required to run that completely over a network pipeline, EVEN IF IT WERE PROCESSED LOCALLY. Network bandwidth just can't keep pace with locally-installed software, let alone locally processed data, so until it can supercede desktop processing power (which is likely never), it's just not going to replace it. Sorry.
Spidubic
on Dec 17, 2007
Cloud computing relies too much on the internet. As DRWAM said employees would be staring at the walls a lot instead of working if you have unreliable internet service. And doesn't relying on the internet that much open the door to hackers and terrorists doing more to cause havoc with the internet? Its like Windows. So many people use Windows based computers that hackers can't help but attack it. So if it gets to a point where so many people rely on an internet connection to work does it not make sense that slowing or stopping the internet would be something a hacker would start trying harder to do?
theCheez
on Dec 17, 2007
I think the main target that might go with cloud computing is the small businesess and home consumers that don't want to have to purchase the expensive office software. Obviously a mid to large size business is going to be very slow if ever to go to cloud computing, but the price point is just right for the home or small business user.
DRWAM
on Dec 18, 2007
Cheez, the apps that are or will be available will be the mainstream bread and butter stuff only, IMO. Specialty apps probably will not have a place in the cloud. So that leaves price. Quicken, MS Office and other money apps are nnot that expensive and would be tax deductible as a business expense, and the cost over 2 to 4 yrs of use is negligible, especially when considering the convenience of having your data and apps on your own drive. This is my opinion, but I am a business owner. IT support costs more, but you would still need them in the cloud. So the potential savings probably should focus on IT support, rather than saving a few dollars on apps.
anonymous
on Jul 4, 2009
Viagra. Cheapest viagra. Generic viagra. Viagra uk. Try viagra for free.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use