Highlighting the woman behind the Windows 7 user experience

The AP writes about Julie Larson-Green, Microsoft's head of the Windows Experience and the person most directly responsible for the UI changes in Windows 7:

"We want to reduce the amount of thinking about the software that they have to do, so that they can concentrate all their thinking on the task they're trying to get done," Larson-Green said in an interview.

You probably don't know her name, but if you're using Office 2007, the sleeper hit of the Vista era, you're already familiar with Larson-Green's work. She was the one who banished the familiar system of menus on Word, Excel and other programs in favor of a new "ribbon" that shows different options at different times, depending on what a user is working on. It seemed risky, but it was grounded in mountains of data showing how people used the software.

"The primary things that help you create a good user experience are empathy, and being able to put yourself in the place of people who are using the products," she said. "User interface is customer service for the computer."

Larson-Green's team began with centralized planning, in contrast with the old culture that let Windows subgroups set their own agendas. For example, in the past, different groups worked on home networking. One group decided how Windows would share files among multiple computers at home; another group figured out how to get shared printers up and running. As a result, the steps for networking PCs and printers were inconsistent -- and harder for PC users to master.

As she did with Office, Larson-Green sought insights in a daunting mass of data.

Vista was the first version of Windows to include the remote-tracking software that had helped Microsoft hone Office, and nearly 11 million Vista users had let their PC activities be logged. Larson-Green's team also surveyed more than 250,000 people around the world and showed other users prototypes, some as simple as sketches on paper.

And thus they stake their claim to how the Windows 7 user experience was heavily tested before the Beta began. Interesting.

From these billions of data points emerged big ideas that got boiled down into eight design principles.

Many of the principles come back to Larson-Green mantras of "user in control." The team tried to build an operating system people could use without studying first, one that would let them get right to reading the news or sending e-mail without dragging them down a rabbit hole of settings and configurations. A system with manners, not one that constantly interrupts with bubbles, boxes and warnings that, data showed, people ignored or raced to close.

The Windows groups agreed in principle but old habits often reared up. Many Windows teams still wanted to be able to create alert bubbles for their functions.

"We've probably talked to every team in Windows about, 'No no no no, we don't want you to pop your notifications. Windows is not going to use these notifications to tell users things,'" said Linda Averett, a Windows user experience manager.

Larson-Green is already planning Windows 8, though her team continues to tweak the Windows 7 user interface. Signs point to a possible release months ahead of schedule.

"I think people are going to like it," she said. Her voice rose a few notes when she added, "I hope so."

Oh, they're going to love it. But given the discussions we've had here already, it's clear that they'll be plenty to do for Windows 8 as well. :)

Discuss this Article 57

Dipsh t Admin
on Apr 21, 2009
"so why not open up publicly the .doc and .xls file formats" Because the formats are dead, even though they are still being widely used. Creating compatibility for an old format that will probably be deprecated in a future version really makes absolutely no sense. The format war is created by those that hate MS and feel that Office needs to be punished in a way. This conveniently forgets, as RobertC points out, that other FREE office suites have been in existence for quite some time now, and the paid for MS Office is still the king. When the alternative is superior to what is available at the time, ala Firefox, people will switch. When it is not, they won't.
RobertC
on Apr 21, 2009
In addition to what DRWAM said, Microsoft Australia actually thought of an innovative concept to reduce piracy whilst attracting more young users to Microsoft software - called "It's not cheating". It's a promotion which gives tertiary students the ability to purchase Office Ultimate for AU$75 and Vista Ultimate for AU$80. As far as I know, this promotion has since been extended to other international markets.
Dipsh t Admin
on Apr 21, 2009
Vis-a-vis the registry, I'm no expert in this field, and go over and read Robert Chen's blog for more information on why some of the decisions were made, but both types of "registries" if you will have inherent problems. Remember, that the registry was in fact partially a response to the myriad ini files that were scattered by programs all throughout the system, making central management impossible. I'm sure that is one of the key reasons for going with the registry. OS X and Linux variants do not have nearly anywhere near the breadth of management instrumentation that Windows has.
DRWAM
on Apr 21, 2009
In addition to what RobertC posted, many colleges offered Vista Ultimate for $80, although I am not sure if it was an upgrade. I have found my Vista installs as stable as Macs. My experiences with 98, Me and XP were not even close to be as stable, until SP2 for XP arrived, but I can't blame MS for 3rd party driver problems. Can you say "ATI"? Or how about "Creative Labs"? But I hate to point fingers ;)
RobertC
on Apr 21, 2009
DRWAM - correct. I mean, the lampooning of Windows in Mac ads was probably half-accurate back in, say, 1997, but they could not be further from the truth in the present context.
Waethorn
on Apr 21, 2009
"Sun? Sun? The name sounds familiar." There is no such company. Must've been your imagination.
Waethorn
on Apr 21, 2009
"I find it grossly irresponsible that Apple commercials claim that Macs are immune to viruses" Irresponsible? Looking at the users, that term fits them too. I'm sure CanSecWest would also have something to say about the above comment were Apple not threatening them under NDA. Side-note: Apple machines are already being used in a massive bot-net right at this moment ("massive" in Mac user terms), with absolutely no fix in sight by Apple. @doc, rob: My Windows Me experience was far more enjoyable than the experience I had with Windows 98SE and Creative's half-baked WDM drivers at the time. In Windows Me, they finally got the Audigy drivers perfected. I feel sorry for the people that bought SB PCI cards though - those were horrible, with the myriad of chipsets that they used (if anyone remembers having to look at the CT model number of the card to find the right driver, you know what I'm talking about). Dell was no help either, since they used a CT card in many of their systems that didn't support Creative's own drivers. Then you had the SB0050 on-board audio chipsets on some motherboards, and it just brought more fun to the table. :p Whenever I bought a Creative card, I always made sure it was one of the top-of-the-line series, never a "mainstream" sound card. Creative put more focus on the top-end cards. Also, C-Media audio chipsets were a royal PiTA too! When the manufacturers finally released proper WDM drivers that were designed for WinME, a clean install with those WDM's would actually work properly. Windows 98SE would always f* up the kernel streaming audio component installation when you installed WDM's though, so most people fell back to the inferior VxD's. I played most of my PC games on WinME.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use