Internet Explorer 8 Beta 2 Now Available

The IE Blog reports on the long-awaited Beta 2 release of IE 8:

We’re excited to release IE8 Beta 2 today for public download. You can find it at http://www.microsoft.com/ie8. Please try it out!

You’ll find versions for 32- and 64-bit editions of Windows Vista, Windows XP, Windows Server 2003, and Windows Server 2008. In addition to English, IE8 Beta 2 is available in Japanese, Chinese (Simplified), and German. Additional languages will be available soon.

While Beta 1 was for developers, we think that anyone who browses or works on the web will enjoy IE8 Beta 2. Before the team blogs about our Beta 2 in detail, here’s an overview of what you’ll find in IE8.

We focused our work around three themes: everyday browsing (the things that real people do all the time), safety (the term most people use for what we’ve called ‘trustworthy’ in previous posts), and the platform (the focus of Beta 1, how developers around the world will build the next billion web pages and the next waves of great services).

I've been using the Beta 2 release for a few weeks and my review will be up later tonight.

Discuss this Article 57

Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
Paul, In your review I hope to see why I should or should not migrate to this from FF3. You said this earlier: >>one thing that hasn't changed for Firefox since the first version shipped in November 2004 is that this impressive browser is still the one to beat. Microsoft can make a lot of noise about Internet Explorer 8 (see my preview) and Apple can muddy the waters with its unnecessary (and dishonestly distributed) Safari browser. None of it matters. When it comes to Web browsers, there's Firefox and then there's everything else.<< I only use IE for Internal websites (and *finally* the web developers upstairs are showing signs of shifting away from that). Thanks, Ocean PS. Still waiting on your Mac to Windows migration guide.
WebGuy3000
on Aug 27, 2008
Cool. As a web developer, I've been waiting for a chance to play with 8. Question: Can IE8 be installed without blowing away IE7? And still be able to run IE7 when needed? This would be handy for me, as I'd like to test under IE8 but don't want to set up a separate machine just to do so. (I already run 9 different browsers on three different platforms, so life is confusing enough as it is.) Thanks.
sharp65
on Aug 27, 2008
I just installed it and I can already notice the improvements over beta 1. The performance has greatly improved, it isn't as sluggish for me on my laptop as the first beta was. I like what they did with the search bar; it goes through your history, suggested searches, and feeds on the current webpage. I can still see some minor display issues, but It seems pretty solid so far.
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
>>I like what they did with the search bar; it goes through your history, suggested searches, and feeds on the current webpage. << Sounds like the FF3 'Awesome' bar. I've read that several have wanted to turn the feature off.
ggolcher
on Aug 27, 2008
I, for the life of me, CANNOT believe they did not update the download manager. For crying out loud, how hard do people have to bitch, complain, and whine. Also, compatibility mode, for some reason, cannot be turned on in some sites (like Hotmail). I set it to always be on and I *still* have rendering issues in some pages I used to not have. How f-ed up is that???
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
Of course, going to http://www.me.com with IE 8 Beta 2 still gives: Internet Explorer 7 is not fully supported Internet Explorer 7 has known compatibility issues with modern web standards which affect Web 2.0 applications such as MobileMe. You can use Internet Explorer 7, but you will not have access to all MobileMe features and will experience slower performance. For the best MobileMe experience, please use Firefox 3 or Safari 3.
lotsamystuff
on Aug 27, 2008
@mikegalos: For someone who doesn't do an awful lot of thinking about Apple, you sure comment on them a lot.
adamb1000
on Aug 27, 2008
Hey look, theres Mike bashing Apple like he does in every comment. woo hoo. IE 8 is in BETA and even Paul in his review said things dont work with it yet, give it time.
murdocdv
on Aug 27, 2008
@Mike Did you read Paul's review of IE8 Beta 2? Microsoft's own sites aren't rendering correctly in the default standards compliant mode or compatibility mode, but you choose to bang the Apple drum instead, nice.
johnbaxter
on Aug 27, 2008
OK, I admit I should have known that IE 8 Beta 1 wasn't a program (for removal purposes) but an update. I mean, its obvious, that since IE can't be stripped out per sworn testimony, changing it must mean updating it. Once I got to the right removal place, Beta 1 removed nicely. Then the install was painless (if not swift, but the machine is not swift). And the browser looked good until I visited-- http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx at which point I got an "Internet explorer has stopped working" box in front of a seemingly complete page. Clearly I shouldn't go off visiting suspect sites. ;-)
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
Mike..THAT is what trolling is. Thanks for the demo.
shark47
on Aug 27, 2008
Strange. I had no problems with http://www.microsoft.com/en/us/default.aspx So far, I'm pretty impressed with IE8. It does have minor problems, but it's still in beta so I think I can live with them.
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
Shark...a replacement for FF3?
johnbaxter
on Aug 27, 2008
shark47, I haven't had trouble with the Microsoft top page since that first adventure. A problem I am having is having my wireless connection die between page views (such as between reading this page and trying to post this). This is new behavior, on my home network that I usually have no trouble with. Disconnecting and reconnecting using the icon in the tray fixes it.
shark47
on Aug 27, 2008
Ed Bott has a great write up about IE8: http://blogs.zdnet.com/Bott/?p=518 By the way, I still use FF3. :-)
johnbaxter
on Aug 27, 2008
Fascinating. Firefox produces the same problem of the connection being unusable between page views. (Not stated before: ping given in Command Prompt fails too.) Yet another machine restart in progress. Hard to see how having IE 8 Beta 2 installed would cause that when using Netscape. Restart didn't help. This is almost certainly something here: I can't believe that one of Paul and Ed Bott would not have noticed sudden failures of networking. Meanwhile, note the spacing oddities in my prior post. That was written in IE 8 Beta 2 (with a disconnect/reconnect wireless cycle after trying to post). (This is written in Safari on Mac--I see absolutely zero reason to run Safari on Windows.)
shark47
on Aug 27, 2008
"Fascinating. Firefox produces the same problem of the connection being unusable between page views. " I didn't have any wireless connectivity problem. I think there's something else going on here. BTW, did you have those problems on XP or Vista?
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
Thanks Shark. Its a good read. Bott is a great journalist.
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
I like the additional stuff re: The awesome bar But I don't see much here to make me move on...and if anything, I think we'll see those additions grafted onto FF3.
Ocean
on Aug 27, 2008
Buggy?? >>For those who may have been unable to sleep, tossing and turning, feverishly awaiting the second beta of Internet Explorer 8 -- you can relax now. It's here. Or, depending on how well you tolerate buggy, unfinished software, your anxiety may be just beginning. -- But here's my quick verdict: It has some intriguing features and I generally like it, but unless the final Beta 2 has dramatically improved stability, most users will want to wait for a release candidate or the finished version to try it out. << http://blogs.chron.com/techblog/archives/2008/08/now_available_for_the_b...
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
If you can't handle buggy, unfinished software, participating in a beta is pretty much a bad idea. Of course, some vendors seem to leave their products in beta forever so that might say something, too.
tmgarrison
on Aug 27, 2008
I must be missing something about the recent IE 8 review that was released. When I press Ctrl-F and start entering search terms IE gets busy searching the page and highlighting things that it is finding in yellow. This seems to contradict the review posted which says "This toolbar works much like a similar feature in Mozilla Firefox but does not provide results highlighting." Am I missing something here? Maybe we have a slightly newer version?
johnbaxter
on Aug 27, 2008
Buggy (within reason) is OK for a sandbox machine. At this point I wouldn't recommend IE 8 beta 2 for a non-sandbox.
alamfour
on Aug 27, 2008
I love IE 8. I am writing this comment from IE 8 now. I think I might make IE my default browser instead of Firefox 3.01
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 27, 2008
tmgarrison I get highlighting as well. (But there is a button on the search bar to turn it on and off. Perhaps it wasn't in last week's builds or, more likely, they didn't click the button)
Mum
on Aug 27, 2008
"Of course, some vendors seem to leave their products in beta forever so that might say something, too." Someone's grandpa wouldn't be happy if he knew his pic is has been used in their avatar.
subzerohitman721
on Aug 27, 2008
After reading both Paul's and Ed Bott's review of the I.E. 8 beta, I'm glad to see Microsoft is heading in the right direction to standards. That being said, its also clear that there's some work to be done. The whole point of a beta program is to get it somewhat in the wild, so we can work out the issues with feedback from brave users willing to try. I do like the MS approach because it lets anyone help finish a product. Thats really a lot more than I can say about Apple, since they have no true public beta programs on such a scale. Mobile Me's launch and the subsequent problems was definitely the proof that beta programs are the way to finalize a product. That doesn't mean it will be flawless. However it does put things to the paces, Microsoft gets the feedback and works to tighten up, polish down, and optimise for the final RTM. I'll definitely be keeping an eye on I.E. 8's beta and hope it all comes together. If not, there's always Firefox and Opera. Later.
Anna_T
on Aug 28, 2008
I'm a die-hard Opera user... but I have to say that I'm loving the tab groups and accelerators.
Lindy
on Aug 28, 2008
@mike...Wow you could author this blog. Your first post is so Paul, and pure genius. I mean take a IE8 Beta 2 blog post, that is actually interesting Windows news for once and bash Apple with it???? Dont quit your day job. The IE team should seriously consider porting IE to OS X and Linux. This new version looks promising.
shark47
on Aug 28, 2008
So far, so good. I haven't had any major problems so far. Of course, I've used it only for an hour or so. One thing is clear - Microsoft is taking browser security seriously.
Ocean
on Aug 28, 2008
OK...so it IS buggy.
shark47
on Aug 28, 2008
Just as an FYI, the review in ArsTechnica mentioned that IE8 does not render some Microsoft sites correctly and gave a screenshot of Hotmail Classic as an example. I tried it today and didn't have problems. Microsoft does seem to have worked on this, among other issues during the last few days.
Ocean
on Aug 28, 2008
>>just how well does IE8 Beta 2 perform in the Web browser standards test? The answer, for now, is an unparalleled "not too good." The new beta passed the old Acid2 test with flying colors, rendering the happy face completely, even with the proper radio buttons for eyes. But in its standard mode -- which now supposedly adheres to published Web standards rather than IE6 "best practices" -- IE8 Beta 2 scored only as high as a 21% on the Web Standards Project's Acid3 test. Meanwhile in "Compatibility View," which is supposed to render pages like IE7 and IE6, the new beta scored so low that you couldn't even read the text of the score on the rendered page.<< http://www.betanews.com/article/Deeper_inside_IE8_Beta_2/1219941173
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 28, 2008
Ocean, You probably should also point out that no released browsers pass Acid3 (some special test versions do) and that Acid3 is still under development. (Not exactly "Web browser standards") On the other hand, IE 8 beta 1 and beta 2 both pass the current Acid2 "standards test" Also note that calling any Acid test a "standards test" is a bit silly since there is NO standards body that uses Acid as its offical test suite so what it measures isn't compliance to standards but compliance to the people who write Acid's interpretation of standards. Welcome to the world of "standards" that aren't standard.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 28, 2008
Hmm, IE not passing Acid 3 is an 'unparalleled "not too good." ' Yeesh. Must be some new meaning of the word "unparalleled" of which I was previously unaware. Just to be thorough: Released browsers that don't pass Acid 3 Firefox 3.01 Konqueror 4.1.0 Opera 9.52 Internet Explorer 7.0 Safari 3.1 Pocket IE Opera Mini 4.1.1.11320 Opera Mobile 8.65 NetFront 3.5 iPhone browser firmware 2.0.2 Iris 1.0.10 Released Browsers that DO pass Acid 3 None
DRWAM
on Aug 28, 2008
Good article about a nice feature , a mode called InPrivateBrowsing: http://www.comcast.net/articles/news-technology/20080827/TEC.Microsoft.I...
RunTimeError
on Aug 28, 2008
mike. Seriously dude. The pickle. Remove it from your a$$.
RaaJ
on Aug 28, 2008
RunTimeError: Quit being an a$$. Got anything worthwhile to contribute to the discussion? Would you rather have Ocean and the ilk's uncontested cut and paste BS?
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 28, 2008
RaaJ "Would [RunTimeError] rather have Ocean and the ilk's uncontested cut and paste BS?" I think we all know the answer to that is yes.
Lindy
on Aug 29, 2008
shark47
on Aug 29, 2008
And in response to Lindy's post - IE8 is in beta. MobileMe isn't, I think. :-) Of course, this doesn't mean I approve of the dig at MobileMe. I don't. It was irrelevant.
RaaJ
on Aug 29, 2008
We've done the whole MobileMe bash thing before. Apple pulled the cheeky comment about IE7's "known compatibility issues with standards" after some heat from blogs (Paul's included), but those sneaky fruitheads put that back in.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 29, 2008
RaaJ Not true. As of TODAY the MobileMe still says the same thing I posted above with IE8 in both IE8 mode and IE7 compatibility mode. They're obviously only testing with code that looks like this pseudocode: If IE, check MajorVersion If MajorVersion < 7 Display unsupported version message Else Display snarky message about IE7 You'd think Apple would at least put in the one line of code to test for IE versions so they could say "IE 8 beta is not supported" rather than just show they don't bother updating their code after months of IE8 being available (It did the same thing with Beta 1).
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 29, 2008
RaaJ, Sorry. Missed the point about the fruitheads putting it back in. I, personally, am not sure they ever actually took it out. I suspect they issues a press release with the intent and didn't bother actually doing it since image is everything.
DRWAM
on Aug 29, 2008
Actually Mike, I don't think they need to state that beta software is not supported. Now full release software, well that's different. My PACS browser Active x control still gets a pop up that only up to IE 5.5 or so is supported, but at least IE 6 and 7 works. In fact, Vista SP1, IE7 on this Mac Pro Tower gets images at lightning speeds. I just have the residential Comcast broadband which tops out at 8Mbps, and I can tell you that Bill G and Steve B would have a smile from ear to ear watching it.[ Barring any HIPPA violations for showing patients private records] Also, I have to go off topic and praise that default desktop background. The entire household admires it, even my father-in law, so that's ages 7 to 84. If you know the designer, tell we said kudos times six.
Lindy
on Aug 29, 2008
Why would Apple, put a line of code into MobileMe to support a beta MS browser? I am going to bet that if IE8 will be fully supported by MobileMe soon after it is RTM. Yes IE8 is a beta, and that is why it wont work with lots of stuff, to include Microsoft stuff. MS browser, MS applications....should work there if anywhere. Safari works with MobileMe. Apple browser, Apple product.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 29, 2008
DRWAM It's not that they need to explicitly state that IE8 Beta 2 isn't supported (although, they realisically should), it's that they incorrectly identify it as IE7 even though it's browser ID says that it is IE8. Every browser sends a "UserAgent" string to the server as part of its request. IE 8 sends something like: User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.0; Trident/4.0; SLCC1; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.5.21022) Notice that "MSIE 8.0" in there. That's not being processed correctly. My guess is they're testing for MajorVersion>6 as a test for IE 7 which is a beginner's mistake since you break when a new version comes out. Which happened to them. (BTW: When IE 8 is running in compatibility view it sends MSIE 7.0 instead.) Basically, where they've got If IE, check MajorVersion If MajorVersion < 7 Display unsupported version message Else Display snarky message about IE7 What they should at minimum have is: If IE, check MajorVersion If MajorVersion = 7 Display not fully supported message about IE7 Else Display unsupported version message (Although there are better ways than that)
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 29, 2008
Lindy Supporting a beta is a good idea. It's how you work out the bugs so when the product ships you actually work. I know beta testing your products so they interoperate correctly at ship is a novel idea for Apple but I'd assumed you'd heard of it. And IE 8 has been out for developer testing for several months and I can guarantee that the Microsoft team that works with Apple has repeatedly pointed them to the "How to change your web page to work with IE 8" documents that are freely available both on the MSDN sites and on the partner sites. Now, if your criterion is that Apple services need to only work with Apple products, fine. They'd be giving up most of the potential market but that would be their choice. But they don't do that, they advertise the product as supporting non-Apple products. And that means they actually have to do the work to get interoperability. Having a broken UserAgent string routine is just flat out bush league stuff that's embarassing. It's the kind of mistake I'd expect from an intern at best and something that should never have actually made it out the door. That it did is an indictment of the quality of coding, testing and code review in the product. Seriously, this is one step above misspelling your product's name on the web page.
johnbaxter
on Aug 29, 2008
A page that does an even worse job than MobileMe with IE8 is (it's OK--you won't see much content unless you scroll, although the ads work). My guess is that is the product of something like IE? yes, 7? no, OK must be 6. (And yes, they have been informed.) Works fine in compatibility mode (but if you turn that on you'll see--shudder--Apple-related content). As to MobileMe, even "whatever you're using we don't support it" would be better than claiming IE 8 is IE 7. I do disagree with Mike about one thing, though: that's not the work of an intern--that much carelessness comes later in one's career--possibly just before what the British so nicely call a redundancy.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Aug 29, 2008
johnbaxter Or, as the IBM Jargon Dictionary used to call it, ROJ. (Retired On the Job) Of course, it could still be the work of an intern. I never said an intern programmer. Maybe an intern in Marketing.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use