It's Official: Apple Jumps the Shark

After Microsoft released its wonderful “I’m a PC” advertisements, I wondered what was next for Apple. After all, it’s ingenuous and libelous “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” ads were instantly rendered moot by Microsoft’s more human and humble ads. How could Apple respond and not look like a bunch of arrogant jerks.

Answer: They can’t. And they won’t. It’s in their DNA.

So they’ve responded with a new “I’m a Mac, I’m a PC” ad that is both ingenuous and libelous, and once again they come off looking like a bunch of arrogant jerks. And get this: The ad is about … Microsoft advertising. This ad says so much about Apple (and so little about Microsoft) that I actually laughed out loud the first time I saw it online (and not for the reasons Apple was hoping).

It’s official. Apple has jumped the shark.

Here’s why. In this pathetic ad, Apple is actually criticizing Microsoft for spending dramatically more money on advertising than on “fixing problems with Vista.” That this is demonstrably untrue never bothers Apple, so we can just skip over that nicety immediately. The charge, obviously, is that Microsoft can make Windows Vista look good by advertising it, not fixing it.

Irony/hypocrisy alert: For the past two years, Apple has been spending money on advertising designed to make Windows Vista look bad, while not spending money fixing the many problems in their own products. I’m looking at you Leopard, MobileMe, and iPhone 3G. And don’t get me started on the style over substance of the new Macbooks.

Irony/hypocrisy alert 2: The ad comes less than a week after Apple introduced its incredibly expensive new laptops into the worst economic conditions in almost 100 years. And as the Wall Street Journal noted this morning, they did so even though the “average price [of a Mac was already] more than twice as high as computers based on Microsoft’s Windows operating system.” So much for the computer for the rest of us.

Why is this a problem? Apple fans will argue that Apple makes better products and doesn’t compete with low-end Windows machines. Fair enough, if true. But then why is Apple advertising incessantly into the consumer market? Why don’t its ads just rise above the garbage out there as their products supposedly do? It’s because Apple can’t help themselves. They want it both ways: To be arrogant jerks and schoolyard bullies and then, when confronted, claim, hey, it’s OK. Because we’re the little guy. See, it’s cute. It’s all in good fun.

Uh-huh.

Put more simply, after being exposed as the charlatans they are, Apple responded, as always, in their usual arrogant and libelous fashion. I can see why so many people look up to these guys.

And before anyone complains about the use of the word libelous, look it up. That’s exactly what these ads are.

You can see the new ad here.

Discuss this Article 256

scoobyclub
on Oct 20, 2008
Democracy is so undemocratic these days....
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
scooby Democracy may be undemocratic but for a change it's Democratic.
lotsamystuff
on Oct 20, 2008
"They look like poorly educated kids, very unsecure [sic] about their products." "unsecure"? Oh, the stunning irony. "Poorly educated" indeed.
lotsamystuff
on Oct 20, 2008
"Democracy may be undemocratic but for a change it's Democratic." Point of clarification, "mikegalos"...you don't live under a Democracy, you live in a Republic. http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/AmericanIdeal/aspects/demrep.html
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
(Merging religion and politics) The Apple ads use the same methodology as the political "jokes" that right-wing associates send me. They both attempt to spread a false meme by using it as the premise for humor on the hope that if you laugh at the joke you'll assume that the premise is true. In the case of the right-wing smear jokes it's things like "Obama's a muslim" or "Obama's a terrorist" or, back in the 2000 primaries, "McCain has an illegitimate mixed-race child". In the case of Apple's smear jokes it's things like "Vista is unusable" or "If you want to run Vista you'll need to replace all your hardware" or "If you use Windows you'll be flooded with viruses" But, as I said earlier, the latest Apple attack ads have the panicked feel of a second rate student of Karl Rove charged with selling Sarah Palin's competence and are a sad end for a company that used to be known for innovation.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
lotsa Actually, I live in a hybrid of several systems, a Federal Republic, a State Republic, a County Republic, a Local Republic and a Neighborhood Democracy. Along with several Non-Governmental and Quasi-Governmental authorities...
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>Again... The prioritized order of advertising strategies:<< Again: You're not a marketing guy, and you're making stuff up.
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>Really Paul, just reading this blog as I occasionally do pretty much convinces me that you and your regular readers don't mind being arrogant jerks, why should Apple?<< Post of the year. +10
scoobyclub
on Oct 20, 2008
In a stunning volte face Mike Galos wrote :- "Vista is unusable" "If you want to run Vista you'll need to replace all your hardware" "If you use Windows you'll be flooded with viruses" Politics, it's a dirty game :-)
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
scooby And, your reply shows you're as honest as Apple. :-)
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>Actually, I live in a hybrid of several systems<< Theres a Borg joke in there somewhere.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Ocean "Again: You're not a marketing guy, and you're making stuff up." Acutally, I spent a year as "a marketing guy" when I was a Developer Evangelist. Anything else you care to make up out of blind guesswork and present as fact?
DRWAM
on Oct 20, 2008
Mike, if you share the Lipitor, I can eat even MORE pizza and potato chips [or potatoe chips if you're Republican]. Sorry to hear that the wormhole didn't work out. I was looking forward [or backward] to telling my 12th grade Research teacher to go get bent! She's probably dead by now, so it's too late. My prom date died last February.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Ocean "Theres a Borg joke in there somewhere" But since you're such a fan of Apple's ads, first you'd want to figure out what lie you want to push as the premise of the joke.
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>Acutally, I spent a year as "a marketing guy" when I was a Developer Evangelist.<< LOL
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>since you're such a fan of Apple's ads, first you'd want to figure out what lie you want to push as the premise of the joke.<< All I can say is that your reaction shows that they are working.
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
Gruber says: >>they’re no longer mentioning “Vista” by name but talking only about “Windows” generically. The “Windows 7” moniker fits in with this. “Vista” has turned into such poison, marketing-wise, that even Microsoft is dropping it.<< Then he drops a funny one: >>Microsoft Patents Automatic Audio Censoring Maybe they can put this technology to use on their “V word” problem.<<
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
DRWAM Tsk, tsk. You should know that there's no correlation between intake of pizza and potato(e) chips and serum cholesterol...
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Ocean Yep. I'm pissed at both Apple and the RNC for selling their products with slander. If having people pissed at you is the goal, then the tactic is working for both of them.
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
What exactly do you see as slander in the Apple campaign? It's about MS wanting to coerce people to use Vista (through ads) instead of them wanting to use it --- because it works.
DRWAM
on Oct 20, 2008
Yeah you're correct, so I'm going for the remainder of the bag of barbecue. I did lower my cholesterol by going nearly fat free, but not by much. The transcriptionists told me that I was starting to stutter and the techs though I was dying as I dropped a lot of weight. Since my bench dropped more than my cholesterol, I went back to my 'see food' diet. I don't really over eat and I work it off too, so hopefully the ASA will work. After the new year, I'm planning to build a new tower. I'll get the wife to give me the CPU for XMAS. She just wants diamonds in return. My prom date was less expensive. She was my High school sweetheart. I gotta PM you a story.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Ocean I'd list some of the lies but scooby would claim I was endorsing them. :-)
johnpapola
on Oct 20, 2008
@Mike, Anyone that gets "pissed" at these ads clearly aren't worth paying attention to by Apple. Why? Because such people, like yourself, must not only be satisfied with Windows, but have enough of an emotional investment in their PC that an ad campaign insulting it and Microsoft pisses them off. This is the simple point. If you love Windows and the PC system, you aren't going to buy a Mac. Period. And that's fine. If you are a former Microsoft employee that spends hours a day defending the company in online forums moderated by Microsoft shills... well, you're DEFINITELY not in the target demo for a campaign about the mac. If you are having trouble with your PC, though... you are the target of the ads. People struggling with the various problems in the PC ecosystem from buggy drivers to horrible support run-arounds are going to be receptive to this campaign. They certainly aren't going to be "pissed". I think it's very likely that there are enough people genuinely dissatisfied with their PC experience to double Apple's market share. Given :30 seconds and such a rich target, it would be foolish NOT to go after disaffected PC users. But what the hell do I know? I only work in network promotions. You, on the other hand, appear to have an iron-clad marketing rulebook already in place. ...and again, Microsoft's dishonest chart that attempts to demonstrate the "apple tax" is worse than these ads. Why? Because it's not a funny little brand-building vignette, it's a collection of lies shrouded in the trappings of objective facts... kinda like The Mojave Experiment.
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
You'd list some of them...if only they existed?
trieste
on Oct 20, 2008
Mike While I generally agree with your political analogy the difference is the use of the phrase false meme. The memes that Apple plays with, exaggerates and sometimes, let us say, bends a little are neither false nor of Apples making (the right-wing memes are not worth discussing). When Vista came out some hardware would not work with it. With Windows the probability of a virus is higher. As for Vista being unusable I never saw that ad, which one were you were referring to. The perception that Apples are 'easier' than Windows is long-standing. XP and Vista are very stable but the 'blue screen' meme is another example of long standing that the ads use. As for the Rovian 'panicked feel' I would say that this ad merely continues the 3-year old campaign. The weight I attach to these ads is as much I did as to whether Coke was the real thing or was Pepsi the choice of a generation. The market share for Apple has increased so the ad company will get their Christmas bonuses again this year. Advertising not being completely truthful? I'm shocked I tell you! Shocked! They should put warnings at the bottom of the screen though in fairness, Viagra, it does work!!!. I look forward to Windows Weekly, as always, and hope Paul takes his blood pressure medicine - I'm sure Leo has the paddles already charged just in case. We should run a book on what color Paul will turn. If Paul doesn't stop sucking at the teat of Microsoft he may open his eyes one day and find it is not the teat he is sucking on but some other anatomical part .
Ocean
on Oct 20, 2008
>>If you are a former Microsoft employee that spends hours a day defending the company in online forums moderated by Microsoft shills... well, you're DEFINITELY not in the target demo for a campaign about the mac.<< ++10
arosania
on Oct 20, 2008
>>If Paul doesn't stop sucking at the teat of Microsoft he may open his eyes one day and find it is not the teat he is sucking on but some other anatomical part .<< This made my day... :D
Delmont
on Oct 20, 2008
Uh Mike, I think you need to take a look at your DNC. Acorn? In every election how many dead people have voted in Chicago via the Daley machine? What about the slander by the Democrats to raise taxes over and over and never do anything about controlling/cutting government spending? How about here in Michigan, we have a single state recession. Nation's highest unemployment, nations lowest job growth. We have a Governor with a D next to her name. A State House with a D majority. What do they do? They ram thru the largest TAX INCREASE in the history of Michigan a year ago. And lets not forget the tax increase they passed for small business. Gee, small business here in Michigan 12 months later is just going gang busters you can well imagine. What's happened since? Our unemployment went from 7% to almost 10%. Locally for me, unemployment is about 12%. SO PLEASE DON'T TALK FRICKING SLANDER to me. Your liberal party slanders me everytime they vote for more taxes and more govt. spending. Michigan lay in ruins and your party said again here in MI 2 months ago they need to raise taxes again to help feed the State budget. FRICK ME! How about cutting spending, and cutting taxes? Odd that in the 1st 2 years of Gov. Granholm being office Michigan went from the nations leader in low unemployment and highest job growth to just the opposite. I come here to read about technology, not to read snide comments people people that follow Pelosi's creed of socialism.
ibarskiy
on Oct 20, 2008
To all those saying that advertising is not truthful - you are dumber than I gave you credit for (not that I'm the ultimate authority...) What Paul, and Mike, and I (sharing their opinion) are incensed about is the slander - using lies to slander a competitor. Everyone knows that advertising is not often truthful, but being slanderous is crossing the line.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Delmont Government size/spending increases under the GOP much more than under the Democrats. Size of government under Clinton's last year (He shrank government size every year he was in office for a total of 16% smaller government when he left than what Bush Sr left him) was the same size (18.4% of the GDP) that it had been under Eisenhower and the lowest it had been since the Johnson Administration. The largest government since World War II (23.5% of the GDP) was in 1983 under Reagan who never had a government smaller than 21.2% of GDP. (And, before you assume it, he didn't inherit it from Carter) So, again, do your homework before you spout out fairytales you've been told and want to believe.
MaryW
on Oct 20, 2008
It's really just not worth it anymore. Sigh! To summarise: Apple lies. They cheat too Steve's surname is Soprano Get-a-Mac ads features and benefits (listed above) never happened Mac sales have not increased Market share has not increased Mac users are lemmings Switchers are lemmings too Oops forgot. There are no switchers Vista is the most popular and beloved OS in history There is no need for "The Mojave" experiment Apple is a convicted monopolist.... with links to terrorism Microsoft invented the Zune ;) XBox 360s work Paul is impartial
Nickelgreen
on Oct 20, 2008
These ads have crossed the line. Maybe the past ads could look funny to some people or even to most people (this has not been measured scientifically so it's pure irrelevant discorpse/speculation saying something about that) but these ones have really crossed the line. These are exagerated (they are too uncovered in their assumptions which are objectively untruen) even in the perspective of who's annoyed by pc world or Microsoft more in general. Mikegalos is basically right. When people spend most of their time bashing others it means they have nothing to say about themselves. Making fun is ok once, maybe twice. Then, if you don't change strategy, you may discover that the real world has left you behind your own laughs (alone). There are two kinds of people: one who understand when enough is enough and one who doesn't. I'm afraid Apple (and its fanboys) belongs to the second. Seriously out of reality.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Ah Another old trick. Mix a bunch of true and false statements together and people will assume (especially if you feign outrage that all of them belong together. Here's a pass at telling the truth. Apple DOES lie Apple DOES cheat Steve's surname is Jobs The receng get a mac ads concentrate on lying about Microsoft Mac sales HAVE increased Mac market share of Laptops in the US has increased Mac users are a mix of lemmings and not People who switch to Mac are a mix of lemmings and not People switch to Windows and people switch to Mac (but not many) Vista has sold more than all Mac operating systems in history The "Mojave Experiment" is needed due to years of Apple lies presented as fact by people who should know better Apple is currently involved in monopoly violation charges but, as far as I know has no links to terrorism Microsoft invented the Zune XBox 360s do work Paul has biases including quite a few in favor of Apple products.
arosania
on Oct 20, 2008
Ibarskly I have seen (at least twice) EVERY single windows woe those ads depict, in average Joe's PCs. Those things do happen. For me, they don't count as lies... I can't vouch for the latest 2 ads though, since I don't really know Apple's marketing budget or MS reason for drop the vista name :-) On a side note, and I think I said this before, Apple's ads have always (since '84) attacked windows PCs. Makes me wonder why now they are suddenly so important that everybody feels the need to "get incensed"... And BTW, if you read carefully the blog post, its written in a very emotional way. I can't say if its due to "hate of Apple" as some others suggest or due to the Red Sox losing in game 7. Since this post is obviously biased, I treated it as just another rant. Oh, and Nickelgreen: there is also 10 kinds of people. Those who understand binary and those who don't. Give me a break.
techntools
on Oct 20, 2008
I am starting to believe that Apple users are fueling this campaign. I've never met a more self-righteous group. Although many of tech's luminaries preach the gospel of Apple even better than Steve. You'd think all of these folks would push open non-proprietary systems. I find it all quite puzzling.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Arosania I have seen almost EVERY single computer woe those ads depict, in average Joe's Mac. And quite a few of them more often than on the average Joe's Windows Vista PC and quite a few others that don't show up in ads. So, what was your point?
arosania
on Oct 20, 2008
Techntools said: >> I've never met a more self-righteous group.<< Have you checked the regulars here?
Delmont
on Oct 20, 2008
Mike, 12% unemployment locally and 10% state wide average....no, that is not a fairy tale I think any person wants to live. Funny I remember the GOP forcing a govt. shut down to get ol Billy to reign in spending and deal logically with the budget. We all know ol Billy didn't have a war to fight and budget during his tenure either. Oh that's right, he was too busy getting his you know what sucked instead of going after Bid Laden and those attacking us. Hmm...how many times was the WTC attacked during Clinton's tenure? How many US Embassies were bombed during his tenure, I also believe the USS Cole was attacked during his tenure. What was Bill's response to all this? Bomb a pill factory. How many times have we been attacked since 9/11? I think the answer is: ZERO I think it is quite easy to sit out there next door to Redmond with your multi-multi billion dollar Microsoft and all of her suppliers/vendors to keep pumping up your economy and job market. But maybe if you come back to the real world, the rest of the USA...you'll see we all don't have a Microsoft sitting next door to us to keep our economy's propped up. What is your unemployment out there Mike by the way? I'm curious. 5%? 4%? 6%? Tell me, how many thousands of people are losing their jobs, homes and health care in your neighborhood in the past 12 months? Heck Mike even our hospitals are doing poorly here in MI due to the economy. That reminds me another little bill the Dems and the Gov pushed thru 3 years ago: more regulations on the health care industry. Yes yes by all means lets just regulate ourselves to death and keep on raising taxes. Yes, Yes, cause we all know we can tax ourselves in prosperity!
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Delmont Actually, the GOP (under Newt Gingrich) shut down the government when Clinton refused to sign their pork-laden budget. The facts are the facts. The GOP in power means big government. The Democrats in power mean small government. The speeches from the GOP have lied about it so often that nobody bothers to look up the data. Feel free to look it up. I'm pretty sure you won't believe it otherwise and I know that if you DO bother you'll see who has been lying to you.
arosania
on Oct 20, 2008
Mike: That everybody is suddenly making out a VERY big fuss about ads that have been EXACTLY that way since '84, so Apple lies but NOW its a big deal? Mac OS is not the perfect thing Apple makes it to be, but fact over fact, Vista is not much better either. For me is not much of a burden. I just make them work. Its what I do, but I'm not average Joe. If I say Apple lies, I have to say Microsoft lies too.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Arosania Back it up. Show us where Microsoft ads lied about Macintosh or retract it.
johnpapola
on Oct 20, 2008
Election season sucks. Even this little site is becoming a forum for the pitter patter of partisan politics. Jesus people. If you're gonna talk about what's going on the world, at least touch on what REALLY matters... the federal reserve and the perils of a now failed Keynesian economic experiment. Parroting campaign talking points is an exercise in shutting your brain off. Wanna expand you mind? Try picking up The Black Swan. Or perhaps more fitting for our current situation, "The Forgotten Man". It's a great example of how FDR screwed our country, caused a stock market crash and recession to become a deep depression and somehow managed to come out smelling like a rose in the history books. Seriously, that authoritarian socialist anti-semite really damaged our union. Just google Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States. Price and wage fixing nearly ended America, people. Anyone talking about propping up prices, be it McCain with this mortgage bailout plan or Obama with his Farm Bill fascism, hasn't learned a damn thing from the depression. Keynes was wrong. We're paying the price now. We need less partisan hackery and more study in economics. There. I've said my piece.
DRWAM
on Oct 20, 2008
I think both party's have flaws, and are driven by greed and the hunger for power. Oh well, back to my burgers. It''s 53 out and I'm using the grill. Heck, it could be snowing and I'll grill. Chow, baby!
Nickelgreen
on Oct 20, 2008
You appleanians simply cry out louder. This doesn't make what you're saying true. And, in fact, it isn't. You lost the link with reality, and the appreciation for these objectively untrue an libelous ads, demonstrates. These are getting simply boring and dangerous (for yourselves). I'm tired of posting links who demonstrates you, little Alices, live in wonderland, it's like beating about the bush. Go on behave childishly like this. But when you'll decide to get back on earth from the Nexus, just let us know...
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
John The 28 year experiment in Reaganomics and self-regulation of industry and commerce has paid off in spades. The GINI is now looking like we're a banana republic, infrastructure has collapsed, safety of the food supply is critically bad and corporate theft has crippled both the financial and manufacturing sectors of the economy possibly beyond repair. But, the top 1/2 of 1% is living better than they ever did with socialization of risk and deregulation of profit. Tell you what, let's agree to go back to 1956 and the Eisenhower Republican model that gave a huge middle class, a vastly stronger and more resiliant economy and seems to be the "ideal" for even the most conservative. Of course, that means a minimum wage of 20% of the median household income, executive pay at only single digit multipliers over average workers, a 90% tax bracket for the richest of the rich and 80% of workers unionized. Do that, and we go back to an achievable American Dream. Keep optimizing the economy to minimize risks for the top 1/2 of 1% and we'll end up looking like Nicaragua under the Somoza family.
arosania
on Oct 20, 2008
Mike: I never said Microsoft lie about the Macintosh. I said Microsoft lies about Vista being the (next) great big thing. One example? "Improved" networking experience. I'm out for the day (wife's birthday)... See ya.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Vista has a new and vastly improved networking stack. That's factual. Thanks for playing.
MaryW
on Oct 20, 2008
@mikegalos. Honestly. No trickery intended. I am just fed up with all the rhetoric and vitriol I read on these pages (and others). As someone who occasionally steps in with a fact or two that people may have missed, I try to be fair but it's difficult when everyone is simply branded with the Cabal stick or worse a liar. My list was an honest yet sarcastic summary of some of the views on this forum. I can sympathise with Microsoft. I really can. Vista wasn't right straight out of the box. They get a ton of bad press. The fixes took too long. They get more bad press. Apple's ads take their pound of flesh. The Vista brand is irreversibly tarnished. So as I said, it's so much simpler to just give up..... and blame everything on Apple.
aemarques
on Oct 20, 2008
More than ever, I'm a PC - and I *don't* sell fish! ;-)
mikegalos@msn.com
on Oct 20, 2008
Mary Vista had less fixes than OS X. So, why aren't you suggesting that you're just taking the simple route and giving up by blaming everything on Microsoft. I prefer working from facts. Even when that isn't easy.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use