Microsoft Delivers Hyper-V Release Candidate

Me, in WinInfo:

This morning, Microsoft announced the availability of a release candidate (RC) version of its Hyper-V virtualization platform, a component of the recently-released Windows Server 2008 operating system. Hyper-V ships in beta form with the shipping version of Windows 2008, and Microsoft has pledged to ship the final version of the technology to customers by August 2008.

The RC version of Hyper-V supports a longer list of supported guest operating systems than previous versions. These include Windows Server 2003 with Service Pack 2 (SP2), Novell SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10, Windows Vista with SP1 and Windows XP with Service Pack 3 (SP3). The Hyper-V RC also supports more hardware configurations, more languages, and offers better performance and scalability.

Customers interested in obtaining the Hyper-V RC must be running the shipping version of Windows 2008. You can download this near-final version of Hyper-V from the Microsoft Web site beginning at 10 am PST today.

Discuss this Article 6

Waethorn
on Mar 19, 2008
Me, in Wininfo: "niiiiice! i may just have to reformat my laptop with Windows Server 2008 when my next Action Pack update ships, as doing test deployments on this notebook locally are much faster than having to build new hardware to do it on (and keeps me out of the way of the "grunts") ;) well....maybe i'll wait until the final Hyper-V Server SKU....(NOT!) btw: the FAQ hasn't been updated on their page - still references the CTP. XP"
anonymous
on Mar 19, 2008
According to several other blogs and the Microsoft web site, Hyper-V Release Candidate is now available
pmcgrath
on Mar 19, 2008
Does anyone know if MS will release a Hyper-V for Vista? Or at least an upgrade to Virtual PC to support x64 VMs?
Waethorn
on Mar 19, 2008
"Does anyone know if MS will release a Hyper-V for Vista? Or at least an upgrade to Virtual PC to support x64 VMs?" Not likely. Not that I'm saying it's impossible and all, but it's just not something that people absolutely need at the desktop level (yet). The best answer that I can say is to wait for Hyper-V Server - the standalone one, not the one that exists as part of Server 2008 - and run all your operating systems under it. You'd be able to migrate and virtualize your Vista install to it, so long as it has SP1 installed. You could, of course, run whatever other OS you want assuming it's supported side-by-side with your Windows installations. Hypervisor technology just wasn't designed to run at the desktop level yet, since the level of use of operating systems running side-by-side with full hardware resources available to them would be very slim, unless you're into OS deployment testing - like me - or something like that. Eventually we'll get there, but for now, it's just not ready for prime time. I'd eventually like to see Virtual PC turning away from emulated environments and just turn into a VM manager that exposes an underlying hypervisor. I Q'd up the same points on this post here: http://windowsitpro.com/article/articleid/98550/microsoft-buys-virtualiz... As or the x64 stuff, it's not integrated yet because at the desktop level it's just not warranted for the performance hit you take on it. I'd expect it on the server level first, but I doubt Microsoft will integrate it into Virtual Server, since Hyper-V already supports it and pretty well all hardware on the market is capable of running Hyper-V now.
pmcgrath
on Mar 20, 2008
Waethorn, Thanks for the reply. That's pretty much what I expected. As an IS manager, I also do OS and app testing, and it has been a little frustrating not being to test MS products on their own virtual servers due to lack of x64 support. A quad core with 8 GB of RAM and vista x64 can be had for less than $1500 and makes a great machine for testing with VMs. But you're stuck in the 32 bit world. With the server side going all x64, it is useless to test using x86 versions, so I'm forced to use non MS virtual servers for testing. I would think MS would want to address this quickly, since I may find I like the other product better, and not go back to the MS solution.
Waethorn
on Mar 20, 2008
"I would think MS would want to address this quickly, since I may find I like the other product better, and not go back to the MS solution." They already did, although the product is not available yet - think RTM timeframe: "Hyper-V Server" (standalone - sans Windows Server 2008) = $28 No need to buy a huge-ass server operating system if all you need is to run VM's. I'm curious to know how it's going to work. I suspect it'll be some kind of limited command-line shell, similar to Windows Server Core, but with only the VM role and commands available. Likely the hypervisor, a "lite" version of the Server Core kernel, and a commandline. Hey, if you're just going to virtualize your OS environments side-by-side, it's all you really need. ....ok, maybe a bit of scripting skillz too ;)

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use