Microsoft: No Windows Phone Upgrades from Current Phones

No current generation Windows Mobile 6.5.x phones will be upgradeable to Windows Phone 7, according to Microsoft. This sort of dashes the hopes of some who expected the HTC HD2, at least, to be upgradeable. Sorry, but it ain't happening.

Despite the HD2 meeting many of the criteria laid down in Microsoft’s 'Chassis 1' spec – including a 1GHz Qualcomm processor, high-res capacitive touch display, 5 megapixel camera and 3.5mm headphone jack – the phone will be ruled out for the simple reason that it has five buttons instead of the three mandated for all Windows Phone 7 devices.

That’s the official line from Microsoft, at any rate. Natasha Kwan, General Manager for Microsoft’s Mobile Communications Business in the Asia-Pacific region, told APC that the HD2 "doesn’t qualify because it doesn't have the three buttons."

"Because we have very specific requirements for Windows Phone 7 Series the current phones we have right now will not be upgradable," Kwan explained.

For its part, Microsoft says it will not abandon the current Windows Mobile 6.x platform once Windows Phone 7 arrives. The OS will be rebranded as Windows Phone Classic and retained for budget-minded smartphone buyers as well as business customers with 6.x-based apps.

"We think there are people who will want 6.5, and the 6.x platform has a lot of enterprise and line of business apps," Kwan says.

Microsoft will update Windows Mobile 6.5 to 6.5.3 before the Windows Phone Classic rebadging takes place, and Kwan says this will enhance the experience for 6.5 users.

"A lot of 6.5 applications have been built very much from the old paradigm of the stylus. Those legacy apps will be a lot more compatible on 6.5.3 because we have magnifier technology which lets you use your finger for navigating, even though it has a much bigger surface area."

Discuss this Article 57

Dipsh t Admin
on Mar 2, 2010
As a Norwegian, I'm a little disappointed in the showing during this games, I can't be disappointed in the total medal count for the winter games, nor can I be disappointed with the performance of the US in this games, nor in Canada's performance. And kudos to Canada for a well executed games, outside of the sliding track issues. Regarding OS compatibility, it does depend on where it is installed. There is a much higher expectation that you will be able to upgrade a desktop OS, but the same is not for the handset market. Most people that buy a handset like the HD2 will certainly be upgrading nearly every year, so the depreciation of the asset is much quicker, whereas a desktop OS it is much longer, and is reflected in the price. Where the contention comes up is the typical manner in which Apple fanboys tend to gloat about how old Macs have always run newer versions of OS X better than those before, and that therefore they can keep on upgrading year after year. That of course is not the case.
Waethorn
on Mar 2, 2010
"Its the same socket, it will drop into a server motherboard and if our Cisco Server rep says it will be available in the next 60 days to order then we could run it in a server." And you can fit a Core i7 in the same motherboard, but do you run it as an unvalidated configuration in a server environment? You're clueless pal. BTW: Workstation 5500 CPU's WILL NOT run in many Xeon server boards, sorry to say. The BIOS's/EFI's made by many board manufacturers will prevent unvalidated chips from working, just as they would for desktop Core i7's. The reason is not just a synthetic software lock either (I bet you can't even figure out what the other reason is). Quite frankly, anything you say about IT should be considered outright false.
Dude1313
on Mar 2, 2010
@Wae- If you want to shout scoreboard go ahead, but put it in perspective. All time medals isn't even close, all time winter isn't even a contest. And if you want to focus on just gold (combined): US still has more. If you want to focus on just Gold in Winter, US still has more then Canada. If you want to focus on just Winter gold medals all time US is second to Norway.... In short any way you slice it US has been dominating for years with Norway and its mastery in X-country skiing having a huge edge. Its interesting that the rest of the world chooses to focus on just gold because they know they cannot compete when one looks at all medals awarded. Same thing happened in 2008 for the Summer Games. Boy China was sure great for winning more gold! The even more amusing part is the fact that the US is doing consistently well or now making come backs in winter sports that have zero public support or funding and are barely on people's radars but once every 4 years. Bobsled- 1st gold in 62 years. Alpine- US destroyed here. Hockey- (granted the money is there for the pro game but in the US its perhaps a distant 6th or 7th now in terms of popularity- which is sad as I love hockey). So again congrats to Canada well done, but if you look at two factors: Home field advantage (the host country usually does well). No way thats happening in 2014 in terms of Canada's medal haul. Add to this the fact that the US is narrowing the competition rapidly does not bode well for 2014 for the rest of the world. The US is rapidly gaining in sports that the public doesn't watch but for every 4 years. On top of that the US did only so so in the "X game sports" this year. In short the future is bright. Sure Norway will still dominate in jumps and cross country skiing, Dutch in skating but even there the US is improving in almost everything: Hell, Nordic Combined? Who would have thought that? As far as the Summer Games, do we really need to even go there? Again congrats to Canada, great games (although nothing will top Lillehammer). Great job on the medal haul, great win for Canada in hockey. However enjoy the Hockey gold, you won by 1 goal in OT, the US is closing that gap... rapidly. With the firepower the Canadians have the score should have been a massacre, but it wasn't: one goal... With the youth of the US players, I'm liking our chances 4 years from now.
chuckb84
on Mar 2, 2010
Usual good commentary from Gruber on the WIndows 7 Phones: http://daringfireball.net/2010/03/thoughts_regarding_windows_phone_7 "Just about any new UI would be better than the existing Windows Mobile UI. But basing the new Windows Phone 7 UI on the Zune raises the question of why they think it’s going to fare any better than, well, the Zune." And that is a fair question. "Why name it “Windows” anything? If Microsoft is going for a clean break, why not a new non-“Windows” name? I think it shows just how perverse Microsoft’s obsession with “Windows” is. There’s no good way to leverage their Windows PC OS monopoly to extend it to mobile, other than the name, so they’re sticking with it. " Right again. Dissociating from the "Windows" brand can succeed (Xbox, although it will never make a net profit) or fail (Zune). From a branding perspective, there is some slight leverage from the association with Windows7, but what will they do in a year, rename all the phones the "Windows 8 Phone Series"? The really interesting bit is his analysis of who is really competing with whom? "The big three mobile platforms right now are iPhone, BlackBerry, and Android. (Feel free to add Nokia as a fourth.) I think Windows Phone 7 is most competitive with Android, because that’s the one with the same business model: licensing the OS to OEM hardware makers. They’re even competing for attention from the very same hardware makers, especially HTC. Google’s been undercutting Microsoft with free (or nearly free) services for a few years now: Google Docs against Office, Gmail for Business against Exchange, and soon, Chrome OS against Windows. But this one, Android vs. Windows Mobile, is the first one where Google seems poised to take the lead. Windows Phone 7 doesn’t just have to be better than Android, it has to be better enough to convince handset makers that it’s worth the licensing fees." Very good analysis. The direct competition in the mobile OS space is now Android vs. Windows 7 Phone. Almost a reprise of Windows vs. Linus, but on a more level playing field with both competitors out the gate at the same time. It will be interesting to see how that plays out.
de Silentio
on Mar 2, 2010
@Waethorn: "Quite frankly, anything you say about IT should be considered outright false." Rather, what he says should be considered unjustified, not necessarily false... epistemologically there's a big difference.
lotsamystuff
on Mar 2, 2010
Yes, "Waethorn", the Canada Olympics will be remembered for: • A great Hockey Gold for the Canadian Team • A malfunctioning opening ceremony • Giant Inflatable Beavers The Canadian Cliché Machine was in full force during those closing ceremonies. Seriously, Giant Mounties, Giant Hockey Players and Giant Inflatable Beavers? BWAHAHAHAHA http://media.kansascity.com/smedia/2010/02/28/21/beavers.standalone.prod...
lotsamystuff
on Mar 2, 2010
"Canada didn't settle for second place." Spin, spin, spin. Canada didn't even come close in the total medal count, which is what really matters. Go play with your Giant Inflatable Beaver, "Waethorn". You know you want to.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use