Oh, about those iPhone and iPod touch backups ... Yeah, that really is a feature

I've been noticing that every time I connect my iPhone or iPod touch to the PC, it does a very time-consuming backup before any syncing occurs. You can actually stop this backup by clicking the little "x" at the top of the application window but ... geesh. It's really annoying. Turns out it's a feature. Hoo-boy.

Summary
iTunes can create backups of settings and certain other information on iPhone and iPod touch. You can use a backup to restore this information to your iPhone or iPod touch after a software restore or update, or to transfer the information to a different device. Backups can be deleted from iTunes using the steps below.

Syncing vs Backups

You can use iTunes to sync content on your computer (such as music, podcasts, videos, ringtones, photos, email account settings, contacts, calendars, and bookmarks) with your iPhone or iPod touch. Syncing makes sure this content is the same on your iPhone or iPod touch and computer. iTunes will also create a backup of settings and certain other information on your iPhone or iPod touch when you sync to use in case you want to restore the software on your iPhone or iPod touch or transfer this information to a different device. Backup information includes information such as mail settings, text messages, notes, call history, contact favorites, sound settings, widget settings, certain network settings, and other preferences. Applications purchased from the App Store are included in the backup, however they can only be successfully restored to the same device that they were backed up from.

Um. Hmm. So, seriously. iTunes is slow enough, Apple. This pretty much puts it over the top. Or under the bottom. Or however you want to word. It's really, really bad.

And I'm not the only one noticing this problem. BTW: "IBL" is pretty funny. Or it would be if I didn't keep losing it.

Discuss this Article 30

brandon.pope
on Jul 16, 2008
Yeah, I was wondering about that back up thing. I though maybe I just had never noticed it. I mean do we really need a backup of our phone every single time we plug it in? I could see maybe once a month it backs up but what could you loose on your iPhone really. Most of your stuff is stored wherever you sync from, and the rest lives in the cloud (like the sutff in all your 3rd party apps). Worst case you may loose some notes or something, but only if you are still using Apple's notes app (in which case you deserve that anyway.)
johnpapola
on Jul 16, 2008
Indeed. It's crazy and excessive and annoying. Why has this never been necessary until now? They've gotta fix this. On the positive side, I barely have to sync the thing now with all the OTA PIM stuff.
weedmonk
on Jul 16, 2008
That time is meant for you to spend reflecting on how awesome you are for being an iPhone user, Paul.
Snakedoctor1
on Jul 16, 2008
techdribble
on Jul 16, 2008
There should at least be an option to switch it off and/or allow the user to set the schedule for when the backup happens.
DRWAM
on Jul 16, 2008
I don't understand. Doesn't my Palm Treo and Tungsten T3 backup everytime I sync? I thought that backing up was on of the reasons to sync. Why wouldn't you want to do this?
Snakedoctor1
on Jul 16, 2008
Backup probably = full backup of everything, so if you have 5 gigs of music on the device...long wait. Sync = changes only and probably in both directions....delete one song from a play list, only that change syncs, much quicker. In theory you should never have to do a backup. When I flashed my iTouch to 2.0 I did it, but honestly all my stuff, play lists, podcasts all that stuff was in iTunes. I guess it was easier to restore than it was to re-sync it all...not sure really.
rickhuizinga
on Jul 16, 2008
iTunes has always performed the backup step for syncing my iPhone. What has changed is how long it takes to sync since I installed the 2.0 firmware. I believe the reason for this is that it is now backing up the state & stored data for all of the applications installed on the iPhone. For example, I have been using the NetNewsWire application to read all of my feeds whose items are now stored locally on the iPhone. I think that iTunes is now backing up all of the news items stored by NetNewsWire, plus the stored data from every other application installed on my iPhone. Needless to say, the backup step is now taking an extraordinarily long time.
tayme
on Jul 16, 2008
Is this another example of Apple releasing the 2.0 stuff to meet a date and because it was "good enough"? I don't know, since I don't use either device...but I have seen more bugs(features, if you will) listed on this site and others since this release than ever before for an Apple product...except maybe the g1 AppleTV. --tayme
subzerohitman721
on Jul 16, 2008
@ tayme said: Is this another example of Apple releasing the 2.0 stuff to meet a date and because it was "good enough"? I don't know, since I don't use either device...but I have seen more bugs(features, if you will) listed on this site and others since this release than ever before for an Apple product...except maybe the g1 AppleTV. --tayme My Comments: I believe you are right. There was no logical reason to compound their launch weekend with 3 product launches in the same week. It was a recipe for a problematic and disastrous launch. In my opinion, Apple's reputation for products that work out of the box and that they "just work" has been shattered. As I stated before, this was not a good weekend for Apple. Yes they have the money, but at what cost to their reputation?
ggolcher
on Jul 16, 2008
I agree with you guys. Luckily for iPhone owners, this is the time of thing they'll be able to fix with a software update...
dgrisman
on Jul 16, 2008
Blackberry has managed the sync and backup functions very well since they introduced the 950 iPager years ago. Granted, the desktop app isn't sexy but it does the job. How did Apple miss making as easy as the BB? Therein lies my doubt about the iPhone in the enterprise. I've seen RIM switch out devices very rapidly for corporate accounts and their exceptional backup and restore functions make device exchanges a breeze. Will Apple meet RIM's service expectations set in the Enterprise? A disconnect for me is using iTunes in a corporate environment/ on desktop for syncing and backup. iTunes as seems to lack the gravitas required to be taken seriously by IT in the enterprise.
Snakedoctor1
on Jul 16, 2008
@dgrisman in a corporate environment with Exchange the Blackberry desktop manager software manager is not needed once you get to BES 4.0. In the environment I work in we do not allow users to install any software on their desktop, and we dont use the desktop manager. We do push the drivers so the phone can be charged via the USB cable. If your data is on the Exchange server, mail, contacts, calendar then swapping out a blackberry, WM, or iPhone can be easily done and after the first sync the new device is up to date. This is pretty common these days. The desktop app was such a pain to deal with because USERS would change settings with it, then the setting would get re-forced by a policy from the BES server and then users would call in and ask why they cant change this or that. Also the app was mostly a copy of intelesync and RIM just put their GUI wrapper on it.
joe-dokes
on Jul 16, 2008
Gee how dare Apple actually try to protect user data, and do it automatically. Now that being said, WTF? How much time is it taking? 10 Seconds, a minute, ten minutes. Hey Paul how about some FACTS before you bash the product. As a previous poster pointed out the new third party apps might be responsible for the additional back up time that you didn't notice before? Further, Apple actually had a mea culpa. Paul of course didn't mention this because Apple might actually appear humble and actually appear to be trying to provide good customer service. Isn't it funny how when Apple tries to do the right thing, either Paul finds something else to bash Apple about it ignores it entirely. Here is a copy of the letter Apple sent customers. We have recently completed the transition from .Mac to MobileMe. Unfortunately, it was a lot rockier than we had hoped. Although core services such as Mail, iDisk, Sync, Back to My Mac, and Gallery went relatively smoothly, the new MobileMe web applications had lots of problems initially. Fortunately we have worked through those problems and the web apps are now up and running. Another snag we have run into is our use of the word "push" in describing everything under the MobileMe umbrella. While all email, contact or calendar changes on the iPhone and the web apps are immediately synced to and from the MobileMe "cloud," changes made on a PC or Mac take up to 15 minutes to sync with the cloud and your other devices. So even though things are indeed instantly pushed to and from your iPhone and the web apps today, we are going to stop using the word "push" until it is near-instant on PCs and Macs, too. We want to apologize to our loyal customers and express our appreciation for their patience by giving all current subscribers an automatic 30-day extension to their MobileMe subscription free of charge. Your extension will be reflected in your account settings within the next few weeks. We hope you enjoy your new suite of web applications at me.com, in addition to keeping your iPhone and iPod touch wirelessly in sync with these new web applications and your Mac or PC. Thank you, The MobileMe Team So Apple explains that they had problems, now since all you MSTARDS, argue that Apple is arrogant and never listens to criticism than simply through introspection they tried to do what is right. OR They realize that the launch of iPhone 2.0 was a bit of a mess, largely due I would argue to overwhelming demand, noticed that people like Paul et al. were complaing, (so much for Apples free ride) and decided to do something about that. Gee has MS ever given free stuff when the f-upped? Oh yeah it was XP SP2. Regards Joe Dokes
bburzycki
on Jul 16, 2008
I just do not see the need to back up something I am already backing up.. I would assume they are doing this becase they are forcasting for more restores needed now that the APP store is live and from the looks of some of the apps... well lets just say my Ipodtouch has crashed at least twice now.... So maybe its more related to that potential problem. Personally with a NAS and cloud storage I would like a TURN THIS OFF option..
cgdams
on Jul 16, 2008
Jeez, @joe_dokes, we are really lazy today, now aren't we? By just clicking on the link in Pauls post you could have read the fact that Backup took the guy writing about it up 74 minutes to complete. And that a colleague spent more than 2 hours of his precious lifetime waiting. Although i'd bet you'll find that a good thing, too, since the IPhone is certainly charged to the rim afterwards....
Karitku
on Jul 16, 2008
@Joe-dokes: Did you read the article Paul was referring or did your natural Apple fanboyism just instantly wanted you to write something that doesn't even have anything to do with whole article? He said it takes almost 1hr everytime you sync iPhone and some people report even 2hrs backup time! Even with full 16gb it shouldn't take more than 30mins to transfer all data(assuming it gets normal 10MB/sec rate). Clearly there is bug in backup process it's the only way to explain why it difference each time so much on same users. Hope they fix it soon or atleast allow people to take it off.
MLomasIcomm
on Jul 16, 2008
So, you're criticising Apple for giving users backup...? Yes, it's annoying that there are huge variations in the time it takes - but fairs fair - that's gotta be a bug. To call out the whole idea of backing up as a bad idea seems a little overly critical. Surely a device carrying so much data might actually /need/ a backup? Most users aren't going to remember to do this by themselves anyway, making it automatic seems like a good idea.
Dipsh t Admin
on Jul 17, 2008
I also don't use any of these devices, but a backup is much different than a sync. You shouldn't need to a sync AND a backup EVERY time, since that would just duplicate the process. It is one thing if they offered a backup as part of a first time sync, or on a set schedule. Of course that schedule should be able to be changed and totally disabled letting the user decide. So yeah, this is a bug that I'm sure they will fix. You can't have corporate users living with a two hour sync process. Otherwise that "toe in to the enterprise" will be lopped off. ;)
DRWAM
on Jul 17, 2008
Personally, when I sync at the end of the day, my phone stays in tthe cradle/connected for charging overnight, so no big deal. Also, since your info gets sync OTA several times a day, no one really needs to back it up until the end of the day, which is when it would need recharging anyway. So I think that this complaint is irrelevent. Why would you need to sync in the middle of the day, every day? The point is, from all of your comments and what I've read, you won't need to sync in the middle of the day and can wait until day end, when you need a charge anyway, so the backup time of 30 to 74 minutes is irrelevent, IMHO. Also, remember, I don't own it, so it's just what I would do if I did, since that is exactly what I do with my Treo, which has the backup app turned on when I sync, but does not take long for it's 64MB memory.
DRWAM
on Jul 17, 2008
Actually I don't mean that the complaint is irrelevent as is it is really good info to help an iPhone owner. I really meant to post that the fact was not very relevent if you consider when you need to sync, unless you're talking about some auto OTA sync sorta thingy. Sorry for the confusion.
Tpaquette
on Jul 17, 2008
As with many others, the whole 3g iPhone experience has been very frustrating. I've personally have had problems with content not fully transfering over to the new phone, slow email sending and receiving using Yahoo mail, Mobile Me calendar not importing entries correctly and then not working at all and last but not least having to update the most current version of v2.0 software. Apple wants us to trust them with Cloud/Connected computing? I don't thinks so. This performance proved once again that Apple is not ready for the Enterprise or have the ability to provide Enterprise level support. Additionally , what get's me, is if Microsoft was behind such a release they would be getting flamed by every Blogger and Tech writer out there. Where's the articles/blogs holding Apple accountable for such a poor rollout? I'm not seeing it.
Tpaquette
on Jul 17, 2008
In response to Joe-Dokes post. I am a MobileMe subscriber and equally an Apple and Microsoft fan. But Apple response should have been sooner and they should have been in front of these issues communicating with it's customers consistently while they were having these issue. This apology came to late. For those of us who had Mobieme issue, having Apple remove from their support site the problem reporting email form and not posting a reason why was poor customer service. This left those of us hung out there with no clue as to what our next steps should be. I can understand phone and email support must have been overwhelmed with the request for support. But when problems like this happen, the worst thing to do is to pull back and circle the wagons. Communicate, Communicate , Communicate so that your customer know that you care and that you feel their pain is key. Would anyone except this lack of communications from their internal IT support/developement group. I don't think so.
DRWAM
on Jul 17, 2008
Just got a voice mail from my buddy in Florida. He bought or ordered an iPhone. He does not own a Mac. Why can you pre-order from local ATT store but not from the local Apple Store? Does that seem dumb to anyone else? Anyway, that's what he told me. I really need to replace this darn Treo. [And I keep mis-typing on this Dell latop because of the dang trackpad, dang-it!!!]
joe-dokes
on Jul 17, 2008
First off for the posters who said I should have read the linked article you are correct. But Paul the king of "I am the fact man, I only deal in F A C T S, should have included the specific fact in his post. I disagree about the back ups. Many of you seem to be of the opinion that a monthly or weekly or yearly? Backup is appropriate. The reality is that the more frequently you back up, the quicker and more seamless it is, look at time machine it backs up every hour. As a result it happens in the background. Now compare this with a weekly backup in which you are a heavy bit torrent user, these backups might in fact require hours. Thus, hourly backups would be non-intrusive while weekly would be a PIA. As for Tpaquette, how f-ing fast do they need to be? The product came out, a week ago, the problems were largely resolved in 72 hours, and the letter came out two days ago? I mean really, how much more responsive could Apple have been? Gee they could have sent out an email during the first hour, Oh but you couldn't get it. That being said, if your service was down for 48 hours and you received 30 days of free service this seems to be pretty good compensation. Now clearly if you missed a really important email, you might disagree. The FACT is that Paul insists that Apple gets a pass from the Further, yes 72 minutes seems a bit long to me, and thus I would categorize it the backup feature as having a bug. Perhaps they were trying to replicate the back up mechanism in time machine and instead of only backing up changes in information they are backing up the entire phone each time, I don't know. But as others have pointed out there is a distinction between a sync and a backup. Yet, for some stupid reason Paul continues to insist that Apple receives no criticism, Apple gets a pass from the tech media, and Apple ignores the needs of its users. This story and Apple's response to the roll out of iPhone 2.0 proves the OPPOSITE, Apple is routinely criticized often by its most fanboi customers, and second the tech media criticizes Apple, and finally Apple frequently responds to the criticism. Regards Joe Dokes
BrightrevCarl
on Jul 17, 2008
Man, 74 MINUTES! That's a really terrible feature. How about letting YOU decide to backup on a schedule? I mean - that's just ridiculous. By the way, I appreciate the legitimate criticism without the additional "iYouKnowWhat" nonsense.
tayme
on Jul 17, 2008
@joe-dokes - Like I said...I think that this is a case of Apple releasing a product that was just "good enough". In other words, they have become complacent and maybe even a bit lazy and cocky in their development practices. --tayme
Tpaquette
on Jul 17, 2008
@joe-dokes- Pls. keep in mind the people use their iPhone to communicate with their customers, they use it so that they can be contacted if something happens to their kids. Bricking phones and not providing communications as to why and what to do is unacceptable. How would you feel if your phone got bricked and you missed a call that cost you thousands of dollars because of the outage or that your kid was hurt. Apple needs to setup and recongnize the importance of doing these things right and that includes clear communications early on and consistently when their are problems so that people can review their options based on full disclosure.
joe-dokes
on Jul 17, 2008
Explain to me how Apple has "Bricked" peoples iPhones? As far as Apple doing things right the first time I find that hysterical. Considering how good the first iteration of the iPhone was, it is probably the best 1.0 products ever and considering the fact the MS has been trying to get windows CE or is it Windows mobile (MS seems to think that changing the name will make the product better) right for what three, six, eighty seven iterations. It makes Apples real but small problems seem almost trivial. Further, yes I know that when you rely on technology for any reason, when it fails it can be a real pain. That being said, what we are talking about is not being able to get your mail for 1 or 2 days. Real problem? Yes. The end of the world? Hardly. Really how many times in its history has hotmail, gmail, or yahoo mail been down? Was that acceptable? No, but it happens. I think Apple was pretty responsive by offering its customers a month free. Regards Joe Dokes
Tpaquette
on Jul 17, 2008
@joe-dokes We differ in opinion. Past good deeds by Apple does not cut them slack or any vendor for that matter when they have a problem like this. The issue is in their handling of the problem and lack of communications early on. It is not acceptable for people who rely on their phone to loose access to it because the could not sync it with Itunes to register it because the bought a 3g or upgraded their older phone to 2.0. This should never happen. Apple over reached on this one and got burned. Their a great company don't get me wrong but they wrong the customer with this rollout and need to be our in front of this and they failed to do so. Like I said in my first post, I am both an Apple and Microsoft fan. I just feel that Apple is getting a pass to some degree by media and bloggers. If this was Microsoft, there would be much more flaming going on.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use