Is PC World for losers too?

In the same vein as "false indignation" let's add the term "false misunderstanding" to the lexicon. In this bizarre and silly editorial/blog post, PC World's Nick Mediati (whoever that is), pretends he doesn't "get' Microsoft's latest ad:

With this latest ad, I'm confused. While the meat of the ad focuses on how Windows PCs come in more shapes and sizes than Macs do and can be had at lower prices, Lauren, the woman portrayed in the ad, quips at one point, "I'm just not cool enough to be a Mac person."

So, Microsoft, if this is the message you're pushing--that your prospective customers "aren't cool enough" to own a Mac, what does this make your users? Losers?

No, Nick. That's not what it means. And no, that's not what you believe either. Duh.

First, watch the ad.

It's about a girl who (artificially) has $1000 to spend on laptop with a 17-inch screen. She traipses into the Apple Store (called "The Mac Store" in the ad) first and then encounters sticker shock: Apple only has a single $1000 laptop and it has a woefully small screen. "I would have to double my budget, which isn't feasible. I'm just not cool enough to be a Mac person," she says.

Controversial, eh?

The message, obviously, is that by "cool enough" she means "rich enough."

OBVIOUSLY.

Case closed. End of discussion. Anyone who claims pretends otherwise is doing so for show.

PS: Most people, of course, do get it. Here's a good example. Someone who goes by the humorous moniker "CheeseMan42" apparently has more common sense than Nick here, noting in an Overclockers Club post that the new ad "points out what everyone already knows: Macs cost more than PCs ... This commercial should help Microsoft at a time when most people are trying to cut spending across the board." If PC World is ever hiring again, maybe they could look the CheeseMan up.

Discuss this Article 73

chipwinter
on Mar 27, 2009
I'm not so sure it's a particularly good use of ad money highlighting "what everyone already knows." I would have liked to see a commercial highlighting all those areas where the PC is better than the Mac.
williamk
on Mar 27, 2009
This is the same thing I've run into everytime I get a new laptop. I'd like to pick up a Mac just to mess around with but since I want a 17" screen I've gotta start with a Mac Book Pro which means over $2k just to start, let alone get the upgrades. So instead most recently I picked up a Sony with an 18.5" screen (which is ridiculously big but I love it), blu-ray, 4gb of RAM, all the bells and whistles for $1700. Not cheap but pretty much half of what a MacBook Pro would have cost. I also picked up an Acer mini desktop for my media center for $350 and that included HDMI out. Again, I was looking at getting a Mac Mini but once I started really shopping around... I like the OS and they make nice hardware but I just cant justify the price difference getting a Mac.
tayme
on Mar 27, 2009
Does anybody understand that "I'm just not cool enough to be a Mac person." a snide comment? It was easy for me to understand that the first time I saw the ad and I chuckled. Whatever, though...the like of Bobbi Jo will have fun with this. You have to wonder what has made those people so insecure that they feel the need to troll sites like this and post about their unhealthy hatred of a company. That goes for both sides of the "Mac vs PC war". Move on already. --tayme
lotsamystuff
on Mar 27, 2009
Wow. For a company that *cough, mikegalos, cough* spends virtually no time thinking about Apple, Microsoft sure spends a lot of ad dollars talking about Apple. "I would have liked to see a commercial highlighting all those areas where the PC is better than the Mac." Networks don't generally sell 2-second ad slots. ;-)
Dipsh t Admin
on Mar 27, 2009
"spends virtually no time thinking about Apple, Microsoft sure spends a lot of ad dollars talking about Apple." True enough. However, Apple, which apparently has more taste and a superior OS, supposedly, spends a LOT of time ragging on the supposed inferior choice, and lot's of ad dollars. "Networks don't generally sell 2-second ad slots." True. But when highlighting the areas in which PCs are better than Macs, you only need 2-seconds to say "At everything." Zing. ;) <-- wink, wink
chuckb84
on Mar 27, 2009
A couple of points on this ad. 1. The "real person" is a member of the Screen Actors Guild. But, sure, she's a "real person". 2. The HP notebook, while 17 inch, has the same pixel count as Apple's 15 inch screen. It also lacks 802.11n, fast Gigabit Ethernet, digital audio inputs and outputs, weighs 7.75 pounds to the Apple under 5 lbs. Of course, Microsoft says NOTHING about the features of their product, Vista is not even mentioned by name. Good luck with that race to the bottom, it's working out so nicely for Dell.
chipwinter
on Mar 27, 2009
These Microsoft ads are getting better all the time. That last one with Seinfeld and Gates was just excellent. You have to be a special sort of curmudgeon not to see that.
mikegalos@msn.com
on Mar 27, 2009
lotsa " *cough, mikegalos, cough*" If you're feeling sick perhaps you should have just stayed home?
WebGuy3000
on Mar 27, 2009
chuckb84: 1. The "real person" is a member of the Screen Actors Guild. But, sure, she's a "real person". The respondents were all from LA, recruited through a Craigs List ad. You can't find ten people in LA who aren't SAG members. Seriously, Microsoft has apparently chosen purchase price as THE differentiating factor on which they choose to pin their ad campaigns vs. Apple. It will be interesting to see how it all plays out.
yert
on Mar 27, 2009
@chuckb64 - For $600 you won't match spec for spec vs. an Apple machine that costs $2800 (probably fair, Firewire and screen quality are among the specs Apple usually tacks on that others don't). The Apple laptop in this case, based on the single spec of a 17 inch screen, vs. the 17 inch HP, is about 4.67 times more in price. If screen price was the only spec one cared about, this would be fair, but I'm assuming in most cases it isn't. But let us assume that the person buys a laptop with decent specs, and doesn't mind a gigabyte of RAM less, or the lack of 802.11n (which one can easily procure an expansion card, or USB dongle), a few extra pounds, etc. In this scenario, the average person doesn't care (and believe me, they don't!) about a few extra features in exchange for the savings. Furthermore, in two-three years, they can buy a new one and still come out on top, even with the initially lower specs, and even assuming a lower lifespan for the laptop, and can now give the spare laptop to a child. This is the majority of people, especially in this economy. Now to spec match, $1500 for pretty similar specs (and I could match better, but I'm on a time budget), but probably not Firewire, or any Apple specific ports, and probably not some super fancy TFT LCD that few would notice; I didn't look *that* closely. (http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16834117886).
techfan
on Mar 27, 2009
Out of all the recent 'I'm a PC" ads, I liked this new ad and very much could related to it.
wattsvilleblues
on Mar 27, 2009
PC World should really be called We Hate PCs World. Some of their advice columns are absolutely ridiculous and, in a lot of Vista articles, actually counter-productive, for instance they advise you to disable Aero and the Indexing Service. Morons.
dallasmay
on Mar 27, 2009
Paul, you are ignoring one glaring fact. The PC she got sucks. The "17 inch" screen has a much lower resolution than the 17 in macbook pro, the viewing angles are very poor, and it doesn't have wireless 802.11n, fast Gigabit Ethernet, digital audio inputs and outputs, has a 2.5 hour battery, weighs in at close to 8 lbs, and is nearly 2 inches thick! The point of the commercial is moot to me. If you want to buy a cheep crappy computer go ahead. But if you want a good computer you are going to have to put some money down, and it is going to cost more that $1000 whether its a Mac or a PC.
whiplash55
on Mar 27, 2009
MS has been calling themselves uncool for a while. When I still had a Mac I wondered over to the Photosynth page and was told, "Sorry we're not cool enough to work on a Mac yet but try us again later" or something like that. I had to laugh, and by the way yes PC World now that you dumped your best writers ie Steve Bass for one, you are a bunch of losers.
whiplash55
on Mar 27, 2009
@dallasmay Not everyone can afford a grand for a computer, and though I'm no HP laptop fan there are plenty of good computers for under $1000.
holybrother
on Mar 27, 2009
Microsoft's point is easy to see... PC's are a better value. Many of those that post here and the author of the article don't agree with that point... but Paul is right. Whether or not you agree with the claim, it's silly to say that the spot is confusing.
lotsamystuff
on Mar 27, 2009
@dallasmay: If you want to buy a cheep crappy computer go ahead. But if you want a good computer you are going to have to put some money down, and it is going to cost more that $1000 whether its a Mac or a PC. Then she would have to say: "I would have to double my budget to buy an Adamo, which isn't feasible. I'm just not cool enough to be a DELL Dude." Look, the point of the ad is to point out that (at least when you choose within the Microsoft Ecosystem) choice is good. WinJihadists don't like it when you choose outside that system, but whatever. If you want to choose on price alone, you'll always find a better deal with a Windows PC. It's a very narrow focus, but it's undeniably true. What kind of car does she drive, by the way? Did she base her decision on "I can only spend $5,000. I guess I'm not cool enough to afford anything other than a used Escort."?
SPiotr
on Mar 27, 2009
""points out what everyone already knows: Macs cost more than PCs ... " Well he is right. Pretty much everyone does know that. So what's the point of the ad again? I don't think people who spend $700 on a 17" laptop are typical Mac switchers.
beaker
on Mar 27, 2009
oh great.. she got a turd for her $699. I guess for those who don't know better - it is a cute ad. But that laptop selection sucks.
Master3
on Mar 27, 2009
Well I guess the Apple fanboy blowback/rage-a-thon is in full swing! Why is it that even something so minor as this just elicits such a negative response from Apple fanatics, but ads that were completely false from Apple didnt raise a peep from them?
Master3
on Mar 27, 2009
"oh great.. she got a turd for her $699. I guess for those who don't know better - it is a cute ad. But that laptop selection sucks." That is what is known as your opinion. If she's happy with it, what's it to you other than she had the nerve not to go with an Apple computer?
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
I've always questioned PC World's lack of credibility. When they fudged up (and then tried to cover up) the results on the "MacBook is the fasted Windows Vista computer" test, it removed all remaining doubt.
jeffsters
on Mar 27, 2009
I think this does nothing but show the desperation on MS part! I mean at long last is all they have is our OS runs of cheaper hardware? I mean is that it? Please tell me there is more?!?! Please tell me that MS hasn't hitched its future to poorly made, lowest common denominator hardware, as the basis for their success! Gawd help PC users! BTW, if you look up the spec for the 17" laptop she bought it has the same screen resolution as the 13" MacBook!
dmccall
on Mar 27, 2009
I didn't think it was smart to say the "cool enough" line like she did. The sarcasm was WAY too subtle. If she is going to under-act like that, they should have changed the script to something like,"I can't believe how much money people THROW AROUND at Macs" The best anti-cool ad out there is the McDonald's switcher ad on radio. The guy grew a goatee, quit bathing, and started watching foreign films. Now he's happy because he didn't have to try to be such an "indie" lemming.
SPiotr
on Mar 27, 2009
@Master3 "Why is it that even something so minor as this just elicits such a negative response from Apple fanatics" Let's not turn this into a fanboy thing, but aren't you a little curious as to what Microsoft are trying to achieve with this particular campaign? I am. Are they trying to persuade EVERYONE to buy more computers? Are they trying to stop SWITCHERS paying $2000 for a Mac and buy a PC instead for $1500? Or are they trying to encourage PC BUYERS to spend $1000 on a PC instead of $1500 for a ... PC.
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
"I would have to double my budget to buy an Adamo, which isn't feasible." Ditto on the MacBook Air. "I'm just not cool enough to be a DELL Dude." The difference is that Dell sells low-cost systems too. Apple doesn't. What could she buy at the Apple store for $700? An iPhone off contract? or a Mac Mini? Don't make me laugh. Off-topic, but related: Did she hear about the massive recall on HP laptops?
subzerohitman721
on Mar 27, 2009
This was very humorous indeed. Why should computing be the playground for the rich and the famous? Wouldn't Jobs or Gates not be the rich men that they are without the help of guys buying less than stellar computers? Didn't Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak build Apple computer from the Jobs' garage? They started out just like the average computer hobbyists of the time, building stuff that the elite IBM and Hewitt Packard would consider toys or garbage. It was only after "Mike" Markula of was a former marketing manager for Fairchild Semiconductor and Intel fronted the $250,000 to incorporate Apple and then came the Apple II. So these guys started making the same "junk" that the guys at MITS were making that the young Bill Gates and Paul Allen were making Altair Basic for. Different processors, parts, and standards, but they basically did the same thing. Now that Jobs become huge at Apple, he doesn't want to make the same "junk" anymore. From Lisa we go to the Macintosh and the rest is PC history. Yet if he wasn't playing around with the lowest class of build it yourself hobby kit computer's of the 1970's and early 1980's, he'd never get the understanding to build the Macintosh. Yet Bill Gates did just fine with it, becoming the worlds richest man and creating the largest number of billionaires in one company. I just think the best people who come up in the world have respect from where they started. It was a lot of little guys that help get Jobs and Gates to where they are today. Bill Gates stays pretty humble about that. I'm not so sure about Jobs though. Woz on the otherhand is a pretty humble guy. I guess thats why Windows and Mac guys really like Woz and keeping him on Dancing with the Stars. A good attitude can get you a long way in life.
SPiotr
on Mar 27, 2009
@subzero Maybe you forgot he prefix, "off-topic"?
Ocean
on Mar 27, 2009
It won't work.
tayme
on Mar 27, 2009
@jeffsters - "I mean at long last is all they have is our OS runs of cheaper hardware? I mean is that it? " No, their OS will also run on more expensive hardware. What they have is that the choice is up to the customer. If you want to run it on less expensive hardware, you are supported...if you want to run it on higher quality hardware, you are supported. With OS X, and I am not saying it is bad, you only have Apple's hardware in order to be supported. Sure Pystar is out there, but is it really a valid choice? Choice is good...whether you choose an HP running Vista or a MBP running OS X. I have both and I like both. --tayme
Dipsh t Admin
on Mar 27, 2009
"Please tell me there is more?!?!" There is. However, this is ONE ad out of many, making ONE point. They have plenty of ads and a YouTube channel and other places dedicated to plenty of ads and user generated videos all pointing out the very salient pro points for the Windows platform. Really, the reason that these ads are effective, is that they are the anti-Apple. When I hear this that she isn't cool enough, I pick up that she isn't a smug, annoying, tragic hipster like Justin Long in the Apple ads. REAL people using products, not some exaggerated representations.
Ocean
on Mar 27, 2009
>>Odd new Microsoft commercial, which purports to show a real person named Lauren trying to find a new 17-inch laptop for under $1000. She goes into “the Mac store” and comes out disappointed, because — and this is true — the only sub-$1000 laptop comes with a 13-inch display. But then she says, “I’m just not cool enough to be a Mac person.” One can only assume that it’s intended as an anti-elitist insult, but the bottom line is that Microsoft is explicitly reinforcing the idea that Macs are cool, which strikes me as a very odd tactic. The theme of the commercial seems to be “PCs: Computers for Losers”.<< daringfireball
Ocean
on Mar 27, 2009
>>With inspiration from this Twitter user, I asked Microsoft for the precise PC shown in the ad, then compiled the chart below. This isn't an exhaustive list of specs, but here's how Lauren's prized HP Pavilion dv7-1245dx stacks up against Apple's 17-inch MacBook Pro.<< http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/Mac_vs_PC_Did_Microsoft_ad_star_Laure...
cesjr
on Mar 27, 2009
It's an effective ad, but of course it leaves out lots of things and could be called misleading. Just like Apple's ads. That's why it's ADVERTISING. Thing is, people know it's an ad and only presents part of the story. That's why Paul's repeated indignation over Apple's marketing is so beyond silly. Paul lambasts apple for things that are part and parcel of marketing, and furthermore are not harmful because people aren't stupid.
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
She was looking for a 17" screen on a budget. Apple doesn't have choices that fit into her budget. PC's offer better choices at varying prices. She got what she was looking for within her price. That's the point in a nutshell. You can argue about comparing this or that until you're blue in the face, but Mackies can't dispute the above points.
stevejobs
on Mar 27, 2009
You get what you pay for. Take Waethorn's mother, for example. Sure, you can have her for five bucks and maybe a loose piece of string or a button. But you could also get a delicious ham sandwich (and a bag of chips!) for that price, and come way disease-free. Comparing the two side-by-side, both Waethorn's mother and the sandwich feel like cold meat. A classy broad (the Mac model, if you will) may cost more, but the features, like the Mac model's habits of toothbrushing and showering, are superior to Wae's mom. Or if you only have five bucks, the ham sandwich will taste yummy.
Ocean
on Mar 27, 2009
OK, I'm going to ask the mod to put an end to this.
johnpapola
on Mar 27, 2009
The campaign is desperate and makes Microsoft and the PC look like sloppy seconds. Everyone knows how much this stuff costs. People aren't stupid. And, yes, as a brand person, I think it's pretty strange to disparage your own product's coolness in your ad the way this spot does. Obviously it's meant to be sarcastic, but it reinforces the Mac brand position which is a really stupid way to advertise. People like to feel like they can afford cool stuff. It's aspirational. Calling attention to that in this way was a poor choice. We'll see how the sales numbers play out. As of the last financial report, Apple's laptop line did great despite global depression and a pricier product line. That may change. It's pretty funny (and sad) to think that the only way to slow the growth of the Mac is to have global depression.
tayme
on Mar 27, 2009
@Ocean - Go for it...Paul is the mod. We have been trying to get him to block a certain person who likes to hijack this blog instead of creating their own in order to repost other people's work. --tayme
subzerohitman721
on Mar 27, 2009
@SPiotr, Actually, my post has a lot of relevance to the commercial. The personal influence of Jobs and Apple along with the personal influences of Gates and Microsoft are being reflected in the commercials. While Apple seeks to turn a profit at every turn, at least Microsoft is looking out for guys who don't have a grand to spare. Why should computing be restricted to rich and the wealthy? Why should it be for a grand or more? Microsoft and its industry partners have proven you don't need a grand to have a great computing experience. Apple is showing that it cannot technically make a better computer on cheaper hardware. So we wonder why there's 1.1 billion Windows machines out there? The commercial doesn't look down at Mac users. However, the Apple commercials do everything to disparage and insult users of Windows. Yet Apple's number one customer for iPods, iPhones, and Macs are Windows users. Its not a very good business model to insult your own customers. The commercials and marketing from Apple reflects Jobs pursuit of artistry and perfection. Jobs speaks of culture. Yet if Jobs really understood American culture, the vast majority of Americans believe in spending the least to do the most. Jobs belief in perfection and that value is determine by cost, is fundamentally flawed. Take for example the MSi notebooks. You can get the similar hardware specs as the Macbook for less. Then using many of the tools available, you can put OS-X on the computer. So why is it that Apple increases the price of the same hardware, if I can get the same hardware experience from a lower costing unit? For personal profit and gain. Pure and simple. Gates simply wants to grant an experience that everyone can share. Even though Bill Gates isn't there full time anymore, as chairman of Microsoft his influence shapes and molds the company's philosophy. Yes he makes money, but the billion people he's allowed to share the experience are more than greatful for it. Remember, no Gates, no Apple. Macworld 1997. $150 Million dollars of Microsoft money that saved Apple. Millions of PC users paying for Microsoft products that was used to save Apple. Microsoft hasn't directly attacked Mac users in any advertisements. Yet Microsoft is being criticised for defending its business and vicariously its customers? It just makes Apple look bad. Picking on what Apple percieved as inferior products and people who don't think different. Well, maybe I'm just not cool enough to spend that kind of money. Then again I don't let a company or a logo define my life for me. Anyone who lets a corporation or some guy in a turtleneck determine what cool is, really has some self esteem issues.
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
"People like to feel like they can afford cool stuff. It's aspirational." ....and that's why Capitalism is somehow better than Communism.... While you're at it, keep killing your kid's financial future the way you do their environment. Because, you know, if you keep spending, the terrorists were right about you all along!
chuckb84
on Mar 27, 2009
@master3 "Well I guess the Apple fanboy blowback/rage-a-thon is in full swing! Why is it that even something so minor as this just elicits such a negative response from Apple fanatics" Because PAUL made an issue of it. The blowback is a response to that. Of course, Paul loves any Microsoft ads and hates all those from Apple. Obviously. He makes money off of Windows, not Apple. Obviously. The ad itself is pretty sad. Microsoft no longer has anything to say about innovation, quality, pushing the envelope, and the complete omission of the operating system that runs on that HP---Vista---is striking. Funny that, since Microsoft doesn't make that computer, they make the OS that runs on it, and they don't even mention their own product. Other than "We're the cheapest game in town", they have no brand message at all. I don't think this ad is going to be any more effective than the inscrutable Gates/Seinfeld ads were.
Dipsh t Admin
on Mar 27, 2009
"It's pretty funny (and sad) to think that the only way to slow the growth of the Mac is to have global depression." Three things. First, it ain't no global depression. You must have been drinking more Kool-Aid than normal. Second, suddenly marketshare and sales matter? Thirdly, and still most importantly, even with a slowing PC market, which is still showing gains, the increase in unit sales are still way above that of the Mac, even if the percentage is much higher. We've had this discussion before, and Paul has backed this up with real data before.. The person who thinks a Mac is aspirational and cool is not the intended audience. What it does intend to do is break up the FUD that is spread from Cupertino, which has infected the "normals". Those that read this blog or those that think a Mac is cool or aspirational and cool have already made up their minds. Further proof of this is when we see the 4 year old do stuff with her computer. Obviously, all of us blog reading technically inclined people already know how to do that stuff. But those people that know nothing about computers have heard, unabated, that Windows sucks. By bringing in normal people, it aims to change that tide. There has been a vibe of smugness out of the Apple camp, that is where the comment is directed. Of course MS should have been doing this a long time ago, there is no doubt about that.
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
"So why is it that Apple increases the price of the same hardware, if I can get the same hardware experience from a lower costing unit? For personal profit and gain. Pure and simple." Don't forget that you get to brag about how it's manufactured from a a single block of aluminum without seams, like that's somehow impressive to anyone. "Anyone who lets a corporation or some guy in a turtleneck determine what cool is, really has some self esteem issues." Not to mention, fashion issues.
Dipsh t Admin
on Mar 27, 2009
"operating system that runs on that HP---Vista---is striking" Not really, they are concentrating on the Windows brand, not an operating system version. Apple doesn't mention Leopard or Tiger or Snow Leopard do they? "Microsoft no longer has anything to say about innovation" Once again, they have plenty of ads they have made, not just this one. Concentrating that this is the only message is simply short sighted. "and that's why Capitalism is somehow better than Communism" It's about choice, my Canadian neighbor. Something that you espouse frequently with your ability to give your users choice. Just because I dislike Apple doesn't mean that I think that the choice in the market is not a good thing. The more choice the better. Of course, you lack the proper choice when it comes to your shoddy healthcare, but I digress. ;) "While you're at it, keep killing your kid's financial future" Hey, I actually agree with you on this. But hey, I didn't vote for them, a big group of Changerade drinkers did. But don't you worry, we'll still come out on top and give you Canadians someone to mooch off on. I'm sure Canada is a great place, but what do you make that the world uses? What are those Canadian products I can purchase on the market? Let's face it, you and the rest of the world live off the teats of the US.
bettieblu
on Mar 27, 2009
Micrsoft PLEASE HIRE ME!!!!!! I could make better adds with Windows XP Movie Maker and 30min of time. WHAT is this suppose to tell us? Show your competitors store, then say your not cool enough to use the competitors product, then walk into a wharehouse type enviroment and buy a $700 hunk of grey plastic that is shinny. I am not getting it??? Compare this to an iPhone add that shows off cool abilities with some hip music in a short consise sound bite. Or make it funny like the Mac adds, and run them more than twice for 30 days. Honestly I will take half the money you are paying these people. Bring back Bill and Jerry, at least they were somewhat entertaining even with out a message.
Ocean
on Mar 27, 2009
MS is taking it on the chin for this ad: >> Microsoft says the situation shown in the ad was authentic, but it turned down my request for an interview with Lauren this morning, giving the same response to the Houston Chronicle's Dwight Silverman. And I haven't been able to find any other information online that would help me get in touch with her independently. If anyone has any suggestions, please let me know. In the meantime, as long as Microsoft features "real people" in its ads, the company should be prepared for an extra dose of skepticism if it doesn't also make those people available to talk about their experiences.<< http://www.techflash.com/microsoft/Microsoft_keeps_Lauren_incognito_4199...
Waethorn
on Mar 27, 2009
"you lack the proper choice when it comes to your shoddy healthcare, but I digress." Say that to me when you're broke and can't afford it. I should have you bite your tongue, but then you wouldn't be able to afford the medical expenses when nobody can afford your services. "I'm sure Canada is a great place, but what do you make that the world uses?" If you're talking about just the US: wood, fresh water, oil, and hydro come to mind. Not to mention, beer. (did I mention beer?) "Let's face it, you and the rest of the world live off the teats of the US." Ya, that's why Canada's banks are rated as the most secure in the world right now. It's actually the other way around. The majority of our economy comes from our exports, and then mostly to the US. So have a dozenth beer. You think you can manage to scribble your name on that blank cheque? LOL!
ivymike
on Mar 27, 2009
Whether or not "cool" means loser or not hip/chic, Poor Lauren's a total sucker because she bought 4GB of RAM that will never be used running 32-bit Vista. Doh!
daveinla
on Mar 27, 2009
A friend of mine got that same HP laptop from Costco. He kept having right from the start crashes and windows messages of hardware failures... Now he gave it back. Apparently that laptop is a big piece of junk according to the reviews on the web...

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use