Secret No More: Revealing Windows XP Mode for Windows 7

Rafael Rivera and Paul Thurrott reveal a new Windows 7 application compatibility feature called Windows XP Mode. Yes, it's that "secret new feature" you've been hearing about ...

Over a month ago, we were briefed about a secret Microsoft technology that we were told would be announced alongside the Windows 7 Release Candidate (RC) and would ship in final form simultaneously with the final version of Windows 7. This technology, dubbed Windows XP Mode (XPM, formerly Virtual Windows XP or Virtual XP, VXP), dramatically changes the compatibility story for Windows 7 and, we believe, has serious implications for Windows development going forward. Here's what's happening.

XPM is built on the next generation Microsoft Virtual PC 7 product line, which requires processor-based virtualization support (Intel and AMD) to be present and enabled on the underlying PC, much like Hyper-V, Microsoft's server-side virtualization platform. However, XPM is not Hyper-V for the client. It is instead a host-based virtualization solution like Virtual PC; the hardware assistance requirement suggests this will be the logical conclusion of this product line from a technological standpoint. That is, we fully expect future client versions of Windows to include a Hyper-V-based hypervisor.


Windows XP Mode running Word 2003 under XP and Word 2007 under Windows 7.

XP Mode consists of the Virtual PC-based virtual environment and a fully licensed copy of Windows XP with Service Pack 3 (SP3). It will be made available, for free, to users of Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate editions via a download from the Microsoft web site. (That is, it will not be included in the box with Windows 7, but is considered an out-of-band update, like Windows Live Essentials.) XPM works much like today's Virtual PC products, but with one important exception: As with the enterprise-based MED-V (Microsoft Enterprise Desktop Virtualization) product, XPM does not require you to run the virtual environment as a separate Windows desktop. Instead, as you install applications inside the virtual XP environment, they are published to the host (Windows 7) OS as well. (With shortcuts placed in the Start Menu.) That way, users can run Windows XP-based applications (like IE 6) alongside Windows 7 applications under a single desktop.

Obviously, XPM has huge ramifications for Windows going forward. By removing the onus of legacy application compatibility from the OS, Microsoft can strip away deadwood technology from future versions of Windows at a speedier clip, because customers who need to run older applications can simply do so with XPM. For Windows 7 specifically, XPM is a huge convenience, especially for Microsoft's corporate customers, who can of course control XPM behavior via standard Microsoft administration and management technologies like Active Directory (AD) and Group Policy (GP). And it significantly recasts the Windows 7 compatibility picture. Before, Microsoft could claim that Windows 7 would be at least as compatible as Windows Vista. Now, they can claim almost complete Windows XP compatibility, or almost 100 percent compatibility with all currently running Windows applications.

We've both been using and testing Virtual XP for over a month and we we've been dying to communicate what we've discovered, as you might imagine. So here's what you can expect. Paul will publish a high-level screenshot gallery on the SuperSite for Windows showing off Windows XP Mode and what it's like to run Windows XP and Windows 7 applications side-by-side. On Within Windows, Rafael will provide a deep technical dive into Windows XP Mode and explain how it works and how you can make it work the way you want. Later, Paul will add a Windows XP Mode article to his Windows 7 Feature Focus series as well. And of course we'll be covering this feature in-depth in "Windows 7 Secrets," which will be published by Wiley & Sons later this year.

Thanks for reading!

Paul and Rafael

UPDATE: My Windows XP Mode for Windows 7 Screenshot Gallery is now available. --Paul

Discuss this Article 67

DavidR91
on Apr 24, 2009
Thank God, I was really hoping they would do this, and they have. Brilliant brilliant idea. I think they will also be able to pull it off in a smoother fashion than Apple managed (With Classic/Rosetta) especially since they don't have to migrate to a hugely different environment + CPU architecture. And news on whether it has scope for supporting, say, DirectDraw via native hardware under it? (For older games, a la AOEII etc. - I assume no D3D obviously, but DDraw would be very useful)
lotsamystuff
on Apr 24, 2009
Smart. Very smart. Bravo, Microsoft. You got one right.
kenmcnamee
on Apr 24, 2009
"(XPM) will be made available, for free, to users of Windows 7 Professional, Enterprise, and Ultimate editions via a download from the Microsoft web site." You mean Windows 7 Home Premium users will have to pay for this?? I'm sure there's some business rational for it that sounds reasonable on paper but that's a pretty crappy decision. It's bad enough that XPM is not being included in every copy of Windows 7 but charging the majority of users for backwards compatibility simply goes too far. Actually I'm assuming that Home Premium users will have to pay for XPM. Another interpretation of Paul's statement is that XPM simply won't be installable on anything other than Pro, Enterprise and Ultimate. That would be an even worse decision in my opinion.
freakyfelt
on Apr 24, 2009
@kenmcnamee I would assume that means it won't be installable for everyone else. But to me it makes sense: corporations move at a slow place and rely on older software that would be costly to upgrade. If a piece of software doesn't work for a consumer they simply go out and buy (or download) a program that *will* work and just transfer the stuff.
trieste
on Apr 24, 2009
Is this a 'new feature' in Windows 7 or a bundled copy of Virtual PC and a copy of XP? Can a copy of 2000 or linux be run as well? Can more than one instance of XP be run? If only there was a way for OS X or Linux to run XP to counter this new feature...
joe-dokes
on Apr 24, 2009
I think this is actually a good product, that will allow MS to ween people off of XP and to the more secure Vista Win 7 architecture. That being said, do you think the post could have been anymore fanboyistic? It was complete with bold, I truly thought I was reading an MS press release. Finally, not including this in the home version is proof that MS is becoming the king of the upsale. Gee, you could run that program if you'd only spend x amount of dollars on Windows 7 super duper home compatibility mode download version. Regards Joe Dokes
kenmcnamee
on Apr 24, 2009
freakyfelt: "corporations move at a slow place and rely on older software that would be costly to upgrade. If a piece of software doesn't work for a consumer they simply go out and buy (or download) a program that *will* work and just transfer the stuff." Absolutely disagree. Consumers who aren't Windows enthusiasts move at just a glacial pace as businesses do in upgrading operated systems and applications. To tell consumers that you have the technology to make their old apps work but you've decided that you're not going to give it to them is just wrong. I'd say the majority of consumers have old XP-compatible applications that work perfectly fine for them and they'd like to use them with Windows 7. They probably have files saved from those apps in a proprietary format too. Now you're going to tell them that they need to find another app that does the same thing, learn how to use it and hope that it can read the file format of the application they used to use? That's just nuts. It would just be so much simpler if Microsoft bundled this technology in every copy of Windows 7 or at least offered it to everyone to download for free.
pthurrott
on Apr 24, 2009
Ken, I don't believe that XP Mode will be made available to users of Windows 7 Home Premium at all; they'd need to purchase Windows XP and install it in Virtual PC (which is free). It's a benefit of the upper-level versions of Windows 7, and is really aimed at businesses and not consumers.
techfan
on Apr 24, 2009
This looks more of a feature for businesses and power-users, which makes sense. I don't know how XPM will benefit me, and looking at the Windows 7 editions in the post, I don't think XPM is targeted to "home" users. I'm done with XP. Bring on 7! :-)
slimshadey
on Apr 24, 2009
"And news on whether it has scope for supporting, say, DirectDraw via native hardware under it? (For older games, a la AOEII etc. - I assume no D3D obviously, but DDraw would be very useful)" Only if that home user is running the pro version. Lots of questions. First one for me would be "at what cost" as in RAM/CPU??? From what I read above you are basically running a VM of XP in 7 and presenting applications like VMware Fusion/Workstation does with its UNITY feature. Unlike Rosetta that intercepts the application calls instead of running virtual copy of an PPC version of OS X. If you are truly running a full copy of XP, hidden so you only see the applications I would imagine it would up the RAM requirements. I can run a XP VM in Fusion with 512megs of RAM and get great performance, but that is 512meg more I need. How they implement this is critical. If its complicated at all, then joe user wont touch it. If it ups the system requirements to much then IT shops will only use if they have to. I can see its use in the corporate world, where an old app must still be used and its holding up the migration. We need more details.
Thunderbuck
on Apr 24, 2009
This is totally AWESOME. I do some development work, and this gives me the opportunity to maintain an Office 03/VS05/VB6 environment with incredible ease. I disagree with Ken that not making this available for home users is a bad idea. I think MS wants to "move consumers along", and I don't blame them. Legacy is messy and expensive; getting consumers off of it is good for everyone in the long run.
kenmcnamee
on Apr 24, 2009
Thanks for the clarification Paul. I still think it's a crappy decision though. ;)
resplendent
on Apr 24, 2009
Somewhat worrying is how this will affect security. Will the copy of XP be just as (in)secure as it is now, or by running it in Virtual PC inside a copy of Windows 7 will that afford it 7's security protections as well?
nutmac
on Apr 24, 2009
So, it's sort of like how Mac OS X was able to move forward with Classic Environment (for running Mac OS 9 apps, which was dropped on 10.5) and Rosetta (for running PowerPC apps on Intel Macs). I think it makes perfect sense, given how complex Windows architecture is (maintaining backward compatibility adds to complexity).
kenmcnamee
on Apr 24, 2009
"By removing the onus of legacy application compatibility from the OS, Microsoft can strip away deadwood technology from future versions of Windows at a speedier clip, because customers who need to run older applications can simply do so with XPM" If one of the goals is to allow Microsoft to remove old legacy code from Windows going forward then why wouldn't they offer XPM in all Windows versions? Are Windows 8 Pro, Enterprise and Ultimate going to be stripped of legacy code but not Windows 8 Home Premium? That doesn't make sense because all Windows version fit on the same DVD image (except Enterprise) and are only differentiated by the product key. It just seems to me that - as a developer who sometimes needs to support legacy code - Microsoft should be chomping at the bit to do everything it can to get out of the backwards compatibility business going forward. For me, that means making XPM a default feature of all Windows versions. It should be as simple as clicking the compatibility button in IE8. "Application not working correctly? Click here to run in compatibility mode." Maybe it's just that XPM is not mature enough for the general consumer audience yet and Microsoft is trying it out on businesses. If that's the case then I'm fine with not offering it to Home Premium users yet. Better to not offer it at all than offer something that's not fully baked enough for grandma and grandpa.
robertsjoe
on Apr 24, 2009
@david: " I think they will also be able to pull it off in a smoother fashion than Apple managed" Smoother? Apple's transition with Rosetta was extremely smooth.
chuckb84
on Apr 24, 2009
This is a smart move, and overdue. It could have changed everything with VIsta. A few specifics: 1. What hardware (cpu) has "processor-based virtualization support"? I'm curious about how much, or how little this will drive sales. 2. How about netbooks? Will it work with netbooks? 3. I concur that failing to put this in Home Premium is a bad idea. Finally, @david: " I think they will also be able to pull it off in a smoother fashion than Apple managed" Uh, Apple pulled this off TWICE, with the 68000 to PowerPC transition and the PowerPC to Intel move. It was utterly seamless both times. Back in the day, I had a 68000-based machine at work and a PowerPC Mac at home. I used to transport the same SCSI between home and work and use it as the boot drive for the Macs with two completely processors. It doesn't get any smoother than that.
johnbaxter
on Apr 24, 2009
1. We still don't know (and won't for some time, probably) the cost for an Anytime upgrade from Win 7 Home Premium to Win 7 Professional. That is the cost (given a reasonably modern machine) for a home user to get XP Mode. (Plus additional RAM, perhaps, which is no longer an arm and a leg, but more like a fingernail clipping.) So who are the home users who might do this? The ones I know around here are Realtors, who last I knew still needed IE 6 for access to stupidly-written MLS and other Realtor-speciality apps (that knowledge is a year old, and the realtor association fossils may have awakened). Most home users won't be interested. As I point out to the local user group now and then, the old machine does not stop working because it sees a fancy new machine in the same house. If you need to run legacy than won't run otherwise, keep the legacy machine for that purpose, and move forward. (What is the eBay value of a low-end 5 year old machine? Probably "small"--not really worth selling.)
shark47
on Apr 24, 2009
@Paul: "I don't believe that XP Mode will be made available to users of Windows 7 Home Premium at all; they'd need to purchase Windows XP and install it in Virtual PC (which is free). It's a benefit of the upper-level versions of Windows 7, and is really aimed at businesses and not consumers." Considering that Windows 7 Business is sold to home users too, this makes sense to me. Those who want to utilize this mode can buy a 7 Professional computer, instead of 7 Home Premium. This is not a big deal. This is just one of those things that you'd have to pay for. Big deal!
johnbaxter
on Apr 24, 2009
I belive Atom does not do the hardware assist virtual stuff, which lets Netbooks out for the most part at the moment if true. Most mainline Intel "Core ..." chips do (some early Mac Intel machines made that "fuzzy" by having the ability disabled in firmware. There was a way to enable it, and Apple fixed the firmware quickly, speeding up virtualized solutions although Parallels ran either way.. So for non-Netbooks with Intel chips, the hardware virtualization requirement should be almost a non-issue. I don't know about AMD, to which I haven't been paying attention. But my guess would be that the ability is there for most chips in machines where it might matter.
yert
on Apr 24, 2009
@kenmcnamee: If it came with every version of Windows, apps makers would fail to update apps for discontinued features, causing much more problems. This is a good thing, because it kills off obscure backwards compatibly that will cause more problems down the road, while giving a good transition.
Bydia
on Apr 24, 2009
After having played with MED-V, I wondered whether they would add that to Win7... I plan to install Win7 on my C drive, I have XP on my D drive. I sure wish I could just migrate my already setup XP into XPM. More than that, I wish that I could boot into Win 2000, XP from a .vhd and run natively like win7... and on top of that run them all at the same time. Then I would be impressed.
Waethorn
on Apr 24, 2009
@ken: consumer apps doln't suffer the same level of compatibility issues as business apps do. Most consumer apps that are unsupported are already out of support by the vendor, or else Microsoft has already worked with them to get it to work on Vista, hence it will work on 7. Since Vista has been out for awhile now, it doesn't make sense to update consumer apps that still aren't compatible with Vista. BTW: Atom Z series CPU's have VT, but the OEM may have disabled it in the BIOS and removed the option to enable it (I know that the Sony VAIO P is like this). The N series, which are the ones that ship with the 945 chipset don't have VT at all. Neither of them is 64-bit either. Paul, this requires VT, but does it require x64? Does it also require a 64-bit version of Windows as does Hyper-V?
slimshadey
on Apr 24, 2009
After seeing the screen shots this look like nothing more than Virtual PC running XP and its now been improved so it can publish apps. This is the same thing as VMware "UNITY" mode in Fusion on OS X and Workstation in Windows and Linux. You can do the samething with Vista and XP today using VMware Workstation and UNITY mode. With that said, its going to require more RAM/CPU so it will kill a netbook. The XP install will require patching and its own Anti-everything, which means legally a license. I think anyone that thinks this is good for joe user is nuts. Its good for a business that wants to move all desktops to 7 but have a few that need to run old applications. You are basically getting, Virtual PC (which is free now) and a FREE copy of XP, and Virtual PC now has a "UNITY" mode.
Waethorn
on Apr 24, 2009
Another question Paul: How does this affect the multi-VM licensing in Enterprise? Also, since Ultimate is supposed to "include everything in Enterprise, but doesn't require a volume license agreement", does that mean that XPM is the only VM licensing option that's included, or does Ultimate include a 4-VM license like Enterprise?
Waethorn
on Apr 24, 2009
This has pricing ramifications too. Now you don't have to pay a separate licensing fee for a VM. With Windows Vista, if you wanted to run a production VM, you had to pay for a second Windows Client license for the VM OS. I had a customer that had to do that for a computer they bought last year. They had a program designed for Windows 95 from a vendor that no longer exists today, so there was no Windows Vista-compatible version. In fact, the app wasn't even guaranteed to work on XP. I tried numerous compatibility tests but the app wouldn't work on Vista. It was a miracle it did on XP too though. They still wanted to use Windows Vista as their main OS. I ran some additional compatibility tests, but it just wasn't compatible with Vista no matter what I tried, so there was no other way but to run it on an older OS. So I came up with the idea to just sell them the OEM license of Vista with the new machine, and then they needed a second license to run Windows XP. XP was hard to obtain from a distributor, so I sold them another Windows Vista Business license and downgraded it to XP Pro from a legitimate CD that I have for these situations. I set up a simple VM in Virtual PC 2007 with XP, and the legacy app in question. It works. They find it easy to use too and they're happy with the results. Now, they would only have to pay for a single Windows 7 Professional license to do the same thing. They like to keep up with technology though, so if they upgrade to Windows 7, they'll be happy that they don't need to buy 2 upgrade licenses. Of course, if they purchased SA like I suggested, they wouldn't pay a dime for the Windows 7 upgrades anyway, but whatever. At least I know that customers that are holding back because of compatibility don't really need to anymore. It's good to see USB mass storage support now (finally!) too.
Waethorn
on Apr 24, 2009
Another question: will the new MED-V stuff for application integration require this new Virtual PC 7 update? Will MED-V require Windows 7?
Waethorn
on Apr 24, 2009
@slim: Don't forget that Morro is free and works on XP. Patching has been automatic for years now too, so that's hardly worth arguing about. The included XP copy already includes SP3, so it's fairly up to date from the start (Microsoft MAY include patches released up to the 7 RTM - I don't know). What you're getting is an entirely free integrated virtualization offering included with the OS. It makes VMware look unnecessary (which I think is the point). This is certainly good for businesses that haven't already gotten stung by VMware. BTW Paul: Was the "nothing to see here" just a ploy to keep someone from stealing your thunder?
Lindy
on Apr 24, 2009
"It makes VMware look unnecessary (which I think is the point). This is certainly good for businesses that haven't already gotten stung by VMware." They dont even compete really. This is purely for application compatibility. If you want more you will run a more full featured VM solution. VMware Workstation blows Virtual PC away, cloning, snap shots, USB, Linux support, ACE images, migration to VMware server or ESX etc. However its not free and totally over kill for what they are trying to achieve here. Stung by VMware?? VMware is a great product that is on fire.
Bydia
on Apr 24, 2009
There may be new problems. One I experienced is that I could not run MED-V and Virtual PC at the same time... too bad.
anonymous
on Apr 24, 2009
There are some significant new benefits to be had in deploying Windows 7 (DirectAccess,  BranchCache,
RobertC
on Apr 24, 2009
kenmcnamee, I think you're missing the point. The primary reason for businesses skipping Vista is because there are a raft of compatibility issues with a lot of legacy software becoming incompatible. XP Mode on the enterprise editions of Windows 7 blows away all those arguments about legacy compatibility. It's now a non-issue and businesses will now be more confident in leaving XP behind. This is a very smart move by Microsoft. It shows that they "get it". It will also, hopefully, turn around their profits which have dropped 32% in the recent quarter.
Anthony Cook
on Apr 24, 2009
This is awesome! As much as i hate IE6, i still have to design websites that are compatible with it. This is a much better way of testing for issues!
mikegalos@msn.com
on Apr 24, 2009
Well, judging from the pingbacks, this story got a fair amount of notice! Congratulations to Paul and Rafael on breaking the story. The official notice on Windows XP Mode and Windows Virtual PC is now up on The Windows Blog at http://windowsteamblog.com/blogs/business/archive/2009/04/24/coming-soon...
trieste
on Apr 24, 2009
I can understand now why Paul did not write an article on Microsoft's financial results. It would have been very impolite to bite the hand that feeds you. Was this 'discovered' or were the two of you chosen to release the news by being good little MS boys.
anonymous
on Apr 25, 2009
No hace mucho tiempo se ha hecho pública una característica enormemente interesante que va a traer el
DRWAM
on Apr 25, 2009
It makes upgrading our business computers to Win 7, a no-brainer. As I posted before, our ancient app for transcription will cost 1 to 2 Million bucks to replace. Hopefully, now we can keep it for a while longer, but not worry about compatibility problems with new computers. [ The software is called Medical Manager and is really old, but meets most of our needs. We are just not ready to spend that much money, especially since PACS cost us 2 to 3 Million and almost 1 MIL for a service contract]. And you wonder why medical services cost so much, there even more expensive software and hardware to buy, especially to meet government requirements, and you need staff for it all too! One group told me that they hire 2.5 FTE's just to get precertifications from insurance companies. Computers and Windows is a drop in the bucket, so I'll pay for the upgraded version.
bettieblu
on Apr 25, 2009
Its funny really how much coverage this is getting and how few really understand what this is. It honestly is no big deal IMHO. Seriously who will use this??? Business and that is why it wont come with the the Home version of 7. It will be used by companies that want to get all of their client PC's to 7 but have a few apps that just wont run. For the users of those few apps, probably a specific department/function the will run this XP VM in 7 to run that problem application. As said by others this is just like VMware, Parallels or Virtual Box, where a full copy of an OS runs in the back ground and you only see running apps. Unity or cohesion are names used for it by other products that have had this ability already. What NEEDS to be said is that this is a copy of XP. So everything you do to XP, update it, protect it, set policies on it, etc still needs to be done. That means there will be more Windows OS's on the network to support unless its blocked from the network. If that XP VM gets a virus it could spread it to the host if sharing is turned on, back door if you will. Being this is a VM it wont be running any kind of serious game beyond solitaire, since Virtual PC had ZERO support for Direct 3D, and VMware only has limited support. So if you have a 3D game that wont run on Vista, it wont run at all or will run like crap in this XP VM. Dual boot to XP will be required if you want to still run that game. I guess the real news here is that its FREE for specific versions of 7 and not that its some NEW feature. Still I bet less than 5% of 7 users (with the right versions) will use it. Had this come with Vista, then it would have seen way more usage as more apps had problems 2.5 years ago. Or if it was like Rosetta (no separate OS) and on the fly emulation it would have been used more. This will never run on a netbook as some have asked, unless that netbook has 2+gigs of RAM and you feel like giving that XP VM 512meg or more of that RAM and part of your Atom CPU.....that would be UGLY.
Waethorn
on Apr 25, 2009
@lindy: Virtual PC 7 supports all of what you mention (including USB) with MED-V, SCVMM, and Hyper-V filling in for VMware Server and ESX. With VMware you have to pay for separate VM OS licenses on top of VMW though, so this will be a godsend. SA customers will get MED-V too, so the only thing they may want to buy is SCVMM, and that's ONLY if they want to migrate/manage VM's with Hyper-V (it also works with ESX, as well as legacy Virtual Server 2005 environments which can be converted from VMware Server - for less money than VMwares own management software). For desktop app virtualization and sandboxing, companies looking at this will save a boatload of money and still get the features they need.
anonymous
on Apr 25, 2009
Microsoft is a victim of its own success in Windows XP. The operating system is so entrenched that the company is having the devil of a time convincing its users to upgrade away from it. Windows Vista has its own...
DRWAM
on Apr 25, 2009
bettie, perhaps that's the reason why it is not included with the home version, because most home users won't need it. But lack of compatibilty held back many business form a Vista upgrade, and as you are aware, replaced new computers with XP, rather than Vista. Now we get free, or at least it gives us the chance to upgrade to 7.
Waethorn
on Apr 25, 2009
@bettie: I ran Virtual PC 2007 on a 2GB Vista-running Atom netbook to test a Server 2008 WDS setup (with AD) and it wasn't that bad. It didn't have VT either (VPC2007 supports hardware VT for extra acceleration, but doesn't require it). Unless the netbook has a Z series Atom, AND the OEM left a way to enable VT, the new VPC7 won't run. Not even the nettop 330 dual-core Atom supports VT.
shark47
on Apr 25, 2009
Wouldn't a stripped out version of XP - the kind that's available on XOs better?
Delmont
on Apr 25, 2009
Personally, I don't get the comments about netbooks here. To me, a netbook is to surf the net, email and Word. Nothing else. Why in the world would someone think you could run a Netbook in a corporate/enterprise configuration? I mean get real people. You people on this Netbook harping, have you ever worked/supported an enterprise enviornment? Engineers? Designers? They do not use Netbooks! They use beefy laptops....like the Dell Precision models. NOT NETBOOKS! Get a clue: enterprise is not home. And, I cannot fathom spending $600 on a "netbook" running 8 year old XP.
anonymous
on Apr 25, 2009
רפאל ריבירה ו פול ת’ורוט חשפו בבלוגים שלהם אתמול שמיקרוסופט נתנו להם גישה מוקדמת לפונקציה חדשה בחלונות
anonymous
on Apr 25, 2009
Windows Mobile 6.5 en mayo : Aunque como comenta la noticia, hasta otoño no veremos teléfonos con él
anonymous
on Apr 26, 2009
Το σημαντικότερο λόγο να αναβαθμιστούν στα επερχόμενα Windows 7 δίνει η Microsoft στους χρήστες των Windows
anonymous
on Apr 26, 2009
Windows 7 e le legacy apps che funzioneranno 'per forza'
anonymous
on Apr 26, 2009
Windows 7 の Windows XP Mode
anonymous
on Apr 26, 2009
Windows 7이 backward compatibility를 유지하는 방법

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use