Seven iPhone Disappointments

Brian Caulfield from Forbes obviously didn't get the memo from the iCabal that iPhone criticism is not allowed. That said, he hits most, but misses some:

Imperfections [with the iPhone 3G] still lurk, in spite of Chairman Steve Jobs' maniacal attention to detail. Even before its release, there are some niggling issues--some minor, others major--that make the iPhone a mere gadget, just like any other. Just ask those pesky bloggers:

The Cost

Do the math you find out and the iPhone will cost $160 more over two years than the original iPhone because AT&T put together a pricier data plan for the phone to help it subsidize the up-front cost of the handset.

Two things here. First, don't ever quote the "fiends at Gizmodo" if you're looking for credibility. I cut out the quote to spare you the stupidity.

Second, while the cost is actually closer to $40 more over year years not counting SMS, this is a silly complaint. Virtually anyone who didn't buy an iPhone earlier because of the price will be just fine with this sort-of price increase. The much lower upfront cost helps matters greatly.

No Flash

The iPhone still doesn't support Adobe's Flash technology, which means many multimedia-rich sites remain off limits.

Eh. I agree this is too bad, but it's not a deal breaker.

A more important issue: The iPhone 3G's camera still has no flash either. That's a bigger issue, and one that can't be rectified by a software update.

No Replaceable Batteries

There's no easy way to crack open the new iPhone's sleek case to pop in a battery.

I agree this is a weak spot. That said, the iPhone battery is surprisingly durable. Over the past year, the iPhone's reliance on EDGE has been a much, much bigger problem than the battery.

Video Recording

Please. I mean, please.

Let's get a decent still camera in there first. I'd love to just be able to carry this thing around instead of this and a camera.

No Cut-And-Paste

The inability to copy a chunk of text and paste it into another application has baffled geeks since the iPhone's introduction last year.

Sure. Has it baffled you too? Or are you just gauging the reaction of the blogosphere and relaying it to people who are presumably too busy to do their own research? :)

No Multimedia Messaging Service
This might be the most interesting example of what makes the iPhone quirky

So ... This is a weird one.

If someone sends you an MMS message, the iPhone's SMS application will tell you about a Web site you can go to view it, which would be nice if you could a) click on the link and go there, or b) cut and paste the information to do it manually. You can't do either. Doy.

Bonus: No Voice Dialing

[This is] the one feature makes the BlackBerry, with its nubby little plastic keyboard, usable on the road.

That and the Exchange compatibility and keyboard,I'm guessing. Good call though.

But here's the thing. You're missing the number one problem.

AT&T 3G is Barely Available Anywhere in the US!

Oh well.

Discuss this Article 57

Waethorn
on Jun 24, 2008
"You are a moron." ....don't you mean a "dipsh_t"? "Stating that I don't like Windows or that "We", as in mac users, don't like Windows... is NOT BASHING WINDOWS!" No, but you said you don't like it, and at the same time you want to follow the news on it. One is a lie. "The latest lies about Snow Leopard having "no new APIs" or Open CL just being a rip-off of CUDA are blatant lies on your part. Provable, incontrovertible lies." .....AND?.....where is your proof? I already stated that the API's have already existed before and given you the previous versions (Intel's multi-core SDK's, CUDA, etc.). They are nothing new. Just like the iPod isn't the first MP3 player. Sorry, but that's totally the truth. Methinks you'd rather have Jobs present you with some truthiness instead. BTW: Here is another fact, according to Apple's devs: ZFS support in Snow Leopard WILL NOT be in the client version. "Yeah, having the best reliability, customer service and customer satisfaction is SO BAD FOR CONSUMERS." Ya, just ask the former Mac customers I picked up from the Apple store. "Fighting the RIAA to keep down prices is TERRIBLE FOR CONSUMERS." Uh huh. You know, because alternatively, Amazon is totally in bed with them. "Making the iPhone among the cheapest smartphones + plans is really price gouging." WHAT??!? LOL! WTF are YOU smoking??? "You are just a hater with a personal stake is bashing Apple since they are a competitor for consumer and small business customers with your white-box PC operation." Ya, you know, cuz I totally announce my business name on here and tell people to buy from me.... "Enterprise-ready doesn't have to matter for Apple. And that doesn't make them worthless. Obviously. It makes them worth TRIPLE Dell, actually." ....and it only costs the price of 1 Mac computer to do that too! LOL! Why buy a dozen office desktops when the same budget only gets you about 3 Mac's instead....
johnpapola
on Jun 24, 2008
How can you honestly characterize me wanting to follow the news in the windows world on one website as a "lie" just because I don't use or like windows? That you even think this statement makes sense pretty much says it all. Apple and Microsoft compete. They copy each other and influence each other. If there's a feature added to Windows that looks really good (like fast user switching, which Microsoft did first in XP), I want to know about it so I can ask for it out Mac OS. "I already stated that the API's have already existed before and given you the previous versions" Again you're lying. Open CL is not CUDA. It's something new and it's also cross-platform in terms of GPUs, given that both ATI and nVidia are participating the standards organization that will be working on making this work from Apple open (the same group that administers Open GL). This stuff all boils down to implementation. The fact that you are acting like there's nothing new to be gained in an area just because "something" has been done is pure idiocy. Just because nVidia and Intel have done work in this space doesn't mean they've solved the problem. EVERYONE knows that.... but you. What you're saying is like saying that Windows Presentation Foundation literally IS Quartz Extreme. Actually, that'd be closer to truth than the lies you're pushing here again. "Ya, just ask the former Mac customers I picked up from the Apple store." Yeah... just refer to every single survey conducted by consumer reports and PC magazine for the past three years (or more). Sorry, but your anecdotes of your rinky-dink trolling for business at the Apple store don't compare to the work of these organzations reaching out to thousands of users. ""Making the iPhone among the cheapest smartphones + plans is really price gouging." WHAT??!?  LOL!  WTF are YOU smoking???" http://gizmodo.com/5015540/iphone-3gs-true-price-compared Cold. Hard. Facts. Sorry you're incapable or comprehending them. "....and it only costs the price of 1 Mac computer to do that too!  LOL!  Why buy a dozen office desktops when the same budget only gets you about 3 Mac's instead...." What are you even talking about? I wish we could have the conversation in person because it seems as if you read thing and respond as if the OPPOSITE was written. I'm saying that Apple DOESN'T go after businesses and that has proven to be a very smart move for them, propelling their market cap to triple Dell. You've routinely talking about Apple shareholders getting screwed, which of course is idiocy when you look at the performance of Apple's business and stock since Jobs returned. But that's you, Waethorn. Ignoring the facts and lying through your teeth to smear Apple. And make yourself look like a complete tool.
Dude1313
on Jun 25, 2008
Ahhh the old lets post rebuttals via dissection of previous posts, normally not my favorite but when in Rome... Waethorn said: Actually, when Jobs was brought back in, they wouldn't have survived on their own at the time. They were hurtin' bad! And this has to do with MS buying Apple how as I asserted? 1) MS never bought Apple. 2) Apple was in trouble, but still had billions in the bank. 3) $150 million to a company has billions means what exactly? 4) MS did it for purely legal reasons not because they are anti-trust. 5) Quicktime Code was found in WMP... you figure out what that $150 million was for. "We won't allow your Mac to dial up to our PPP dialup pool. Those AppleTalk packets will flood are network and create a security risk." Waethorn said: - You mean like Safari? "Macs can't go on the corporate network - it's too big of a security risk" You mean like Safari? Let me correct that for you: You mean like Windows and Internet Explorer? Nice try I'm not buying that the OS and browser with the worst track record of the last 10+ years is suddenly the undisputed champ of security? Nice try, again. (Queue specious claims by Waethorn about Macs getting hijacked in 60 seconds or specifically crafted Trojan attacks later revealed as planned stunts... Links should appear in 3,2,1...) And by the way I use Firefox on my Windows, Mac and Linux distros... I win, nice try. Waethorn said: You mean like a friend of mine that works for an IT security firm that has 20+ unclassified OS X remote code exploits and another 50+ that have been privately reported to Apple and never fixed since early OS X betas? You mean like how some of his clients that *used to* use Macs had their corporate firewalls hacked and corporate intellectual property and client data stolen right from under their white plastic monitors? DOOOOONNNNNNN”TTTTTT BELIEVE IT. This is the best you got? Some spurious claims that “once, long ago clients of mine had their Macs hacked”? Are you seriously trying to claim that UNIX based OSes are inferior in terms of security to the swiss cheese “defense” of Windows? Have your friend put his money where his mouth is. NO OS is in invulnerable, however if OSX was as vulnerable as you claim... they should be getting knocked off left and right. Hasn't happened: http://jsuplido.newsvine.com/_news/2006/03/08/125398-mac-os-x-not-hacked... Now queue posts about Maynard at Black Hat, George Ou and latest farce about Trojans affecting Macs. Bottom line: UNIX. No don't rebut. UNIX> then any version of Windows. Waethorn said: For now, they do nothing but create an expensive, elitist, outsider persona to personal computing, and their marketshare demonstrates that. What they do is bad for consumers. What they do for business, is, well, just nothing. Bad for consumers? Heh you are so blinded by your Windows zealotry that that you actually believe Windows is about choice? Methinks its a case of you can't see the forest for the trees. Waethorn said: "You are a moron." ....don't you mean a "dipsh_t"? "Stating that I don't like Windows or that "We", as in mac users, don't like Windows... is NOT BASHING WINDOWS!" No, but you said you don't like it, and at the same time you want to follow the news on it. One is a lie. This statement should be posted in the Ad Hominem Hall of Fame. I don't think I've seen a finer example of it... well.. ever. Kudos. http://www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies/ad-hominem.html Waethorn said: "Yeah, having the best reliability, customer service and customer satisfaction is SO BAD FOR CONSUMERS." Ya, just ask the former Mac customers I picked up from the Apple store. First sounds much like this: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_21/b3733059.htm Amazing. Apple better close up shop because you are siphoning off so much business from them. Plural of Anecdotal is no data. Conversely: http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2007/03/19/8402321/ Waethorn's wonderful world of everything PC results..... Waethorn said: Uh huh. You know, because alternatively, Amazon is totally in bed with them. Ask the records companies on that one. "You are just a hater with a personal stake is bashing Apple since they are a competitor for consumer and small business customers with your white-box PC operation." Ya, you know, cuz I totally announce my business name on here and tell people to buy from me.... Actually John has summarized you quite well there. You are hardly an unbiased observer and seem to be one that has an axe to grind because of the treat Apple is to your business. Waethorn said: ....and it only costs the price of 1 Mac computer to do that too! LOL! Why buy a dozen office desktops when the same budget only gets you about 3 Mac's instead.... Ah the old price logical fallacy. Has been debunked multiple times. However lets use your reasoning: Why would anyone buy MS Office when one can get any number of equivalent apps for free? No one doubts your Windows prowess Waethorn, however you simply are no different then the rabid Mac fanboys you so deride. In other words “Pot meet Kettle”, or as I imagine will happen shortly when you recommence your efforts to shout anyone else down. DipS_it Admin- Sorry Waethorn got me sidetracked. Suffice to say our worlds aren't that far apart. I too work in IT. Many of the same problems many different, no where near the most knowledgable person on the planet, but far from the worst. Some of your points have merit, others are IT old canards. The thing that will truly be ground moving is the generation coming to the fore now. Generation Y will move IT in a direction we never thought possible. I will also counter that a monoculture has inherent advantages yes, but also some devastating negatives as well. Thanks for the links, trolls are trolls.
johnpapola
on Jun 25, 2008
Dude, Get ready to have your mind blown by delusional side-stepping and confounding ignorance. Waethorn is a lying zealot without a shred of intellectual honesty. I mean, he actually tries repeatedly to say that Apple shareholders haven't benefited from the stock going from $15 to a split-adjust $345 in less than five years. Anyone that can ignore making over TWENTY bucks for every ONE you invest in five years is living in another dimension. Too bad for him Apple is so healthy and competitive. His dreams of the death of REAL computing choice will never come.
tayme
on Jun 25, 2008
Wow...this is getting crazy. jp and Waethorn - you both seem to be intelligent. Why the imature arguments? Especially you, Waethorn...you are losing more and more credibility with every post that you make. I understand that you are a fan of MS and that you know your $hit when it comes to Windows...that is an established fact. But, come on...can't you see that each OS has a place and does certain things well? I use them both, along with several other OS's, regularly...do you? At least jp is reasonable enough to admit that he doesn't like Windows, but realizes that it has a place and is not junk...you, on the other hand, are only willing to continue the "Apple/Mac/OS X sucks" rants at any csot...even your reputation. As you said above...you don't announce your business name on here and tell people to buy from you...that is probably a good thing, because I think that you would lose customers, both potential and existing. jp - If I were you, I'd just start ignoring Waethorn and save yourself a few headaches. He is the anti-cesjr, only more incessant. Too bad this site doesn't have a good, old ignore button, so that you could choose to just not see certain members posts...we all need to use a little bit of self control, I guess. --tayme
subzerohitman721
on Jun 25, 2008
As a long time user of both Windows and Mac, I think it boils down to what works with you. While I prefer Windows because of many of my bad experiences with Mac, I can certainly see why people use it. Many consumers don't want to tinker the way I do. Apple's plug and play works much better than Windows, I'll freely concede that. If you do work with photos, digital art, journalism, or movies, Apple is your OS. One thing that MS does clearly well is business applications, PC gaming, greater hardware configurations, and has much larger ecosystem. In terms of entertainment, MS has a greater pool of entertainment applications, sites, and services. Personally, I favor Vista because in terms of actual hardware and ecosystem, the Windows world is very rich. We have built in DVR, Leopard does not. I happen to the like the UAC, others many not. I like the security changes under the hood. Different strokes for different folks. Ultimately I lose no sleep if someone uses Leopard over Vista. The argument gets old and childish. What I can't stand about Apple, is the arrogance of some of their users and the tendancy for mis-statements and hyperbolie. If we were to listen to Jobs, we would be lead to assume that Vista crashed for everyone. Also, fastest computer in the world? Again, IBM's petaflop monster known as Roadrunner blows our toys away. The next versions of Intel's CPU's could bring Windows Vista machines to much greater speeds than what Apple currently uses. Instead of PR hype, I want Apple to stick to the facts. Be honest in your marketing and please, quit insulting the Windows base and Microsoft. We're Apple's biggest customer. Its never good to insult the customer. I do appreciate some of the passion between the different users. But I agree with some of the people here, both Windows and OS-X enthusiast could tone down the rhetoric by a factor of 10. Its nothing personal in here and the personal attacks make you look foolish. Stick to the issues, call people when they are wrong, and compliment them when they are right or you agree with them.
johnpapola
on Jun 25, 2008
@tayme, Indeed, I should ignore Waethorn... because everyone knows he's a blockhead partisan and why waste my time, right? The sad thing is, I kinda enjoy the debate just for the sake of it. I am a geek after all. I like to argue... within reason. But there is some method here. Waethorn is a classic mac-basher. There are TONS of guys like him out there. TONS. They are the root cause of mac user defensiveness. And so I engage Waethorn just to demonstrate to Paul and others how there's two sides here. There's not just some mythical, unnamed "iCabal", but also a Koolaid-drinking, Apple-bashing MicroShill community goading and baiting us at every turn. The way Waethorn tells it, there isn't a single thing Apple or Jobs does right or does first or does better than Microsoft. Not one. That's pretty funny.... because the recent re-releases of Bill Gates own emails about Windows XP troubles and Job's amazing success with iTunes pretty much drive a giant stake through the heart of everything Waethorn says and stands for. http://blog.seattlepi.nwsource.com/microsoft/archives/141821.asp Money quote: "Someone decided to trash the one part of Windows that was usable? The file system is no longer usable. The registry is not usable. This program listing was one sane place but now it is all crapped up." "The lack of attention to usability represented by these experiences blows my mind. I thought we had reached a low with Windows Network places or the messages I get when I try to use 802.11." Then there's his take on Jobs and iTunes in 2003: http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/dayart/PDF/Gates/gatesmail15.pdf Money quotes: "Steve Jobs abilizy to focus in on a few things that count, get people who get user interface right and market things as revolutionary are amazing things" "I think we need some plan to prove that even though Jobs has us a bit flat footed again we move quick and both match and do stuff better." Heh. "has us flat footed AGAIN". Hear that Waethorn? Bill Gates is saying right there in black and white that Apple has beat MS to the punch on more than one occasion. This is obvious fact to everyone but you. Even Bill Gates. You have to admire Bill. He's an honest guy and based on his interview side-by-side with Jobs last year at the D conference, they both get along well and truly respect each other. It reminds me of how Gates joked at the D conference this year about Vista, saying that Microsoft has learned from a lot of mistakes in the system, more so than normal. The undertone along with his laughing really made it clear that Gates thought Vista wasn't up to his expectations. His ongoing references to Windows 7 seem to further that sentiment. Now, I'm not saying "Vista Sucks". What I'm pointing out is that BILL GATES HIMSELF would be called a Mactard troll by Waethorn based on these quotes. Bill Gates. I truly respect Bill Gates. Paul will say that he's out of touch but I don't buy that. He's a smart guy. One of the smartest on earth in fact.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use