Traveling with iPods

On my return flight from Denver, I was amused to discover that the guy across the aisle and one row up from me was a proto-geek, and, frankly, kind of a pain in the ass: He placed his laptop in the seat pocket after we were told we couldn't do so, and then he argued with the flight attendant when he was called on it; he was texting with his cell phone both before and during the flight after being asked not to; and then he proceeded to set up a variety of electronics on his tray table that was reminiscent of that old Apple commercial where the kid uses his iBook and about 17 accessories to create a home movie. But none of that is what was noteworthy about this guy. No, it was the fact that he had an iPhone, an iPod touch, and an iPod nano all out at the same time, for God knows what reason, for much of the flight.

The funny thing is, I had him beat: I was traveling with my iPhone, two 16 GB iPod touches, and an iPod classic, in addition to that HP Tablet PC I recently purchased. But this wasn't about conspicuous consumption: In the wake of the recent iPod touch 1.1.3 firmware update and the introduction of a new 32 GB iPod touch model, I thought it would be a good time to reevaluate Apple's first true video iPod. So I loaded up the devices with movies I'd ripped myself as well as some movies and TV shows I'd just purchased and rented from the iTunes Store. Let the games begin.

The flights to and from Denver were 4.5 and 3.5 hours in length, respectively. On the way out, I was originally wedged between two of the more annoying people I'd ever sat with, but the morbidly obese guy on the aisle eventually complained his way to another seat, which I have to say I was OK with. The flight back was much better, as the person who was supposed to be occupying the seat next to me never showed up.

Battery life on the iPod touch is excellent, and I had one running pretty much full time on both trips. The battery meter fell to about half each time, roughly. I'm not a big fan of the finger prints you have to get all over the touch's gorgeous screen just in the process of actually using the thing, and I suspect I'm not the only iPod touch owner who spends a considerable amount of time wiping the thing off. Smudge. Wipe. Repeat.

That said, if you hold the thing at the right angle, you won't see the copious, unavoidable fingerprints and smudges on the screen while you're watching a movie. I wish it had hardware buttons, but I can live with this. The screen quality is excellent and while the iPod touch is obviously a lot smaller than a laptop, I find the viewing to be just fine. And let's face it: You can fit a couple of iPod touches in a much smaller space than any laptop. Though it would be expensive, it would make more sense to buy a few of these things than any portable DVD player or notebook computer from a size and weight perspective. You don't even notice that you're carrying them around.

Everything I watched look great: Movies I ripped, the several episodes of the curiously addicting "Jericho" TV show I purchased, the movies I rented and purchased. Say what you will about Apple, but they do this stuff right.

As for the 1.1.3 update, it was a much bigger deal on the iPhone than it is on the iPod touch. I tend to think of the touch solely as a video player, and while I'm sure the Internet stuff is nice during those few moments where you have free Wi-Fi available (a case, I'm sure of what I call "campusitis," where Apple's engineers seem to have forgotten that the whole world doesn't have the same free Wi-Fi they get at work), it's not as obvious a feature on an MP3 player as it is on a phone. To me iPod = play, while iPhone = work with occasional play. If the connectivity offered by the iPod touch was more pervasive, they could tilt the scales. Right now, it's just a curiosity.

So does the iPod touch warrant a higher score than the 3/5 I awarded it last fall? I think so. Despite Apple's reluctance to lower prices (it instead offered an even higher priced new model this past week) and the irrelevance of the 1.1.3 update to most people (and, yes, the fact that existing iPod touch owners actually have to pay $20 to get the update), I think I may have been a big harsh on the touch. This is something I use fairly regularly at the gym and while traveling and I do like it quite a bit. I'll revise the review soon.

Discuss this Article 13

daveinla
on Feb 8, 2008
Good and funny story. yes i Think the iPod touch (gosh that's long to type, can't we abbreviate it IPT !!?!) would be perfect if it had a lower entry price. I guess it would impact the rest of the iPods and iPhone prices also, but who knows, now that the sales growth of these gadgets is losing steam, St Steve might decide to give up some margin to keep these things moving ! Then i could buy one !
DRWAM
on Feb 8, 2008
I rarely use those players, but take care of the kid's and wife's players. I still do not like iTunes as much as being able to load stuff like a USB drive. I guess that the playlists help when you have multiple players or accounts, but loading music onto my kid's Sansa is just sweet as can be. I dislike iTunes so much, that I use the PC version on a 4 yr old eMachine as I do not want it running on my Pro Tower or my custom [home built] XP Pro PC. I hope that developers will develop some good stuff for the iPhone, but I can wait until 3G comes along. Until then, my Treo will serve me, unless it fails. Then I'll need to make some choices. I think it's easier to buy a car. I'm out-a-here. My B-day present, Vista, will be installed on the Mac Pro Tower soon.
RunTimeError
on Feb 8, 2008
This is why I think your initial reviews of anything are just plain sad: 1) You whine about new hardware when it's announced. 2) Said hardware shows up at your door. 3) You take pics of the box and the contents of the box and post them. 4) You fart around with said hardware device for a week. 5) You declare it as either crap or the second coming (depends on your mood I guess). 6) You use said hardware device for a few months in more real world situations. 7) You post about how you were, maybe, possibly, sort of, kind of wrong in your initial review 8) You revamp your review and either add or remove a Paul head. Yay.
DRWAM
on Feb 8, 2008
I think that some of you are concerned about the ratings and opinions. I visit for the info. I like it here as I like to read facts about what a device or software does or does not do, or it's problems and limitations. I am tired of sites that use pathetic or even unrecognized metaphors to be colorful. Paul gives facts, and opinions of course, but not the stupid metaphors or colorful rhetoric. You gotta remember that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. But good facts can be found right here. You guys must think that I am bipolar, but I am really a cross-platformer.
cesjr
on Feb 8, 2008
"I'm not a big fan of the finger prints you have to get all over the touch's gorgeous screen just in the process of actually using the thing, and I suspect I'm not the only iPod touch owner who spends a considerable amount of time wiping the thing off. Smudge. Wipe. Repeat." Actually I NEVER wipe off my iPhone's screen. It seem to just clean itself in my pocket (I don't use a case either). "I wish it had hardware buttons, but I can live with this." Ha, ha, ha. Whatever Paul. I hope you guys and MS stick to your "hardware buttons" for as long as possible. Because then Apple will have free rein and keep savaging MS in the portable device market. No buttons means bigger screen and more adaptability. And less confusion - so better user experience. "I tend to think of the touch solely as a video player, and while I'm sure the Internet stuff is nice during those few moments where you have free Wi-Fi available (a case, I'm sure of what I call "campusitis," where Apple's engineers seem to have forgotten that the whole world doesn't have the same free Wi-Fi they get at work), it's not as obvious a feature on an MP3 player as it is on a phone. . . . Right now, it's just a curiosity." Umm, most people have wifi at home and many have it at work these days. I know I do. This is hardly unique or unusual. Here's the thing Paul - and you know this as well as I do - the iPod touch isn't just an "MP3 player." It's a portable computer. But the genius thing is that selling it doesn't depend on someone having to justify buying a portable computer. They just need a new iPod. But then they get a whole lot more. And just how much more is about to become very apparent with the SDK.
poothedrew
on Feb 8, 2008
Cheap and good qualtity lcd's make the range of personal devices awesome. From the ultra portable to my personal computer with a 27 inch wide screen we are ever expanding the pervasive computing environment. I just love the fact I can do so much with my media. I really have to hand it to Apple's ability to design technology to really embodies that new freedom to enjoy our passions.
DRWAM
on Feb 9, 2008
These are just the portable lines. There is still plenty of room for non-portable computing. MS is working on Surface for the consumer. Imagine a family room with a coffee table that does all your computing needs, is a media center and portal to the internet as well as can do many other things such as control the lights or HVAC of your home using Insteon or X10. Load your camera pics and make an album, or make DVD of the family, right in the family room. I would love to have that option. I hope that they can do it and keep the price reasonable, so that people other than myself can afford it.
johnpapola
on Feb 9, 2008
Fair update, though the initial score was pretty ridiculous. The touch has no equal as a large-scree/touch screen video player. It deserves a 4 out of 5 loosing one star for not offering a large drive option. I guess, secondarily, the lack of support of piracy formats like divx may be a bummer for the bittorrent crowd. Still, on the main features that matter: Screen quality, User Interface, Software/Service sync and integration, the touch is unequaled by any other brand. Now bring on the 160GB drive-based touch.
DRWAM
on Feb 9, 2008
John, which players support Divx? What about ones that will convert Divx to one of their supported format. Do any of those exist as well? Just curious as I would just bring a laptop to play movies anyway.
daveinla
on Feb 10, 2008
The Archos are great payers that support divx. They have a great UI but look big and outdated compared to iPods. They also are full fledged DVR and your can record TV shows in Divx with them to watch them latter on. And they have real hard-drive (hence the larger size and weight): http://www.archos.com/products/gen_5/archos_605wifi/index.html?country=g...
DRWAM
on Feb 10, 2008
Thanks Dave. When the Zunes had that fire sale, I looked at them, just to bring on trips to pug into a TV for the kids. But since I convert much of their DVD's to Divx, it was a 'no go'. I usually bring the Dell Inspiron 8200 laptop, so if I can get it to play on the TV like it's supposed to do, I'll just stick with it. I have tried twice without success, but I will read the manual again. Typical XP, 'it just doesn't work'. Thousands of software titles, most of which don't work either. Thank God for free trials, otherwise, I would own a lot of useless software.
johnpapola
on Feb 10, 2008
DRWAM, At this point, you should just be ripping with handbrake in iPod compatible h.264, since that'll play on the iPod, the Zune, the Xbox 360 and the PS3. It's the most useful and broad format. As a parent, I love the iPod + iTunes + Apple TV combination. I never have to cart around DVDs on trips with our son, or sit through annoying FBI warnings and disney movie previews. Everything my son likes is just always available, commercial free. It's a great round-trip solution and I'm really surprised that Apple doesn't actively promote this parent-friendly element of the solution (especially for Apple TV). Zune + Xbox 360 probably provides a decent solution, except that it still doesn't have round-trip TV purchases and the Zune software is not even remotely close to iTunes in robustness and features for large libraries. Plus, the Apple TV's syncing is superior to having to stream from a powered PC for everything. I like having access to the media without needing to ensure the computers are awake. (ps. I'm shocked at how awful 2nd monitor output drivers are on most PC laptops. Has Vista improved this?)
DRWAM
on Feb 10, 2008
Thanks John. I was wondering if anyone answers questions here, rather than complain, brag or ridicule. My old G4 was getting old, so I was using my home made PC, but just about none of the software worked. I now have my Pro Tower and will use Handbrake. I was hoping that the next iPhone would be 3G and have Video out, but I guess that's not coming anytime soon. I might as well buy a Video iPod with my Apple gift card. I have $320 on it. Thanks again. I will still try out Vista on the Tower, after I get it for my B'Day next week.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use