Intel Execs Dish Dirt on Windows 8 Versions, Microsoft Fires Back


Intel executives this week disclosed some new information about Windows 8, revealing that Microsoft's next desktop OS will ship in multiple versions, each aimed at different chipsets and usage scenarios. The revelations quickly reignited tensions between the companies, with Microsoft denying Intel's claims.

To understand this week's drama, you need to first understand the history. Today, mainstream versions of Windows run on Intel (and Intel-compatible) "x86" microprocessors, which include both 32-bit and 64-bit (or "x64") versions. But Windows 8 will also be ported to the competing ARM platform, which to date has been used only for highly mobile non-PC devices such as smartphones and tablets.

This change means Windows can be used more ubiquitously across new device types. But it also means that Intel could see its first serious competition, from a microprocessor standpoint, for the first time in years. The Microsoft/Intel duopoly in the PC space has often been referred to as "WinTel" (for "Windows + Intel").

So what did Intel say about Windows 8 out of turn?

"The ARM guys are getting a port to Windows, but it's really four ports since every OS has to be written to a chip," Intel CEO Paul Otellini said at his company's annual meeting. "So Microsoft is really doing four ports of Windows to ARM."

While Otellini didn't provide more details about these alleged four versions, an accompanying slide suggested that these versions would each target different versions of the ARM core as well as an ARM system on a chip (SoC) implementation.

Separately, Intel General Manager Renee James said that there would basically be two major versions of Windows, one for Intel chips and one for ARM. This is roughly what Microsoft has described. The Intel version will have a "Windows 7 compatibility mode," however, which is new information, a feature that ARM versions of Windows 8 will lack.

Meanwhile, the ARM SoC version(s) will deliver "a new mobile experience" for tablet devices and ultra-mobile clam shell-type PCs, and won't run backwards-compatible applications. This experience is likely the tiles-based UI that some have likened to the Metro user experience on Windows Phone.

With Intel's revelations getting widespread news coverage this week, Microsoft quickly issued a predictably prickly statement. "Intel's statements during [the] Intel Investor Meeting about Microsoft's plans for the next version of Windows were factually inaccurate and unfortunately misleading," the statement reads. "From the first demonstrations of Windows on SoC, we have been clear about our goals and have emphasized that we are at the technology demonstration stage.  As such, we have no further details or information at this time."

Microsoft will likely wait until September to further disclose its Windows 8 plans. The only announcement the company's made so far regards ARM compatibility, which Microsoft President Steven Sinofsky revealed in January at the Consumer Electronics Show.

Note: This article was originally titled "Intel Execs Dish Dirt on Windows 8 Versions." It's been updated since the original posting to address Microsoft's response.


Discuss this Article 5

JayZeee74
on May 18, 2011
If you think device compatability currently is a mess wait until Windows is available on ARM. Microsoft long ago lost its way. It's still riding on the coat tails of Office monopoly and honestly this is yet another misguided attempt to compete with Apple and Google. They need to face the facts, no one wants Windows on a mobile phone or tablet. If ten years of that being bashed into their skulls is not enough I don't know what is.. Microsoft should focus on Server and Office. Make it more afforadable and MUCH easier to use. It's embarrasing to watch them.
infiniteloop
on May 18, 2011
Utter TURMOIL - but isn't it going to be so much fun to watch Win 8 on Arm fail, like Win Phone 7 has? Ballmer T. Clown and Co. are nothing if not entertaining.
jcwuerfl
on May 18, 2011
ARM gives MS more options and typically more options is good. However, MS has a ton of other things that they should be working on. For example: 1) Windows App Store - everyone will have to play to this really due to apple 2) Applications - Need to get to single executable or where all apps are packaged with something like app-V by default so all app installs and uninstalls are no issues. So you could run Office 2010, 2007, 2003 all at the same time for example. Or say IE6,7,8,9 all at the same time on the same OS. 3) All applications MUST run as a normal user. No more administrator for anything. Any application MUST prompt for additional privileges if required which should be limited as much as possible, if you don't need it, don't do it. AND any applications trying to be installed under Administrator MUST get a FAIL message to make sure they are installing under a normal user account. Its time for developers to do this the right way, its been too long and too many warnings. 4) Registry and backwards compatibility. Really do I need to say more? Registry is a pain! and start deprecating things faster! How long do you have keep things around for people before they must upgrade there code to keep with best coding practices. Back to the Windows App store, update it and get it out there. Back to the simple app install/uninstalls make this all easier and ensure you don't have to sit here and wonder if the app is going to work or not . Stop spending so much time with backwards compatibility. 5) All x64 bit, lets stop with the x32 version and the 3/4gb limits already. Who knows we may be talking x128 at some point. This x32 -> x64 transition has been far far far too long. I'm sure I could go on and on but there is my top 5 I just though of. We'll one more: 6) ONE OS Edition ! keep it simple, simple, simple!! 18 editions of Vista, Windows 7 is 17 editions too many! Less is more! More is ALWAYS MORE!, more complex, more difficult, more problems!
spaul40
on May 19, 2011
One comment for jcwuerfl, what he proposes sounds good for consumers but is NOT what is desired by corporations. Can you imagine the mayhem in IT departments if users could ad hoc install whatever they wanted. A real disaster!
bartwilleman
on May 19, 2011
I am wondering how much Intel was actually lying.... MS already demoed Win8 on an ARM processor as seen on MIX11. Couldnt those 4 ports not just be the 4 Win8 versions that might be launched? Ie Windows Home, Premium, etc etc And not so much aiming at a tablet version, pc version etc etc

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use