Top Tech Service of 2010: Facebook

Apple will sell somewhere around 12 million iPads in 2010, and hardware makers will ship about 350 million PCs to users around the world. But both of these newsworthy markets are dwarfed by the user base of a single online service, Facebook, which counts more than 500 million members and emerged in 2010 as the single most important online destination in the world. Of course, Facebook is famous—perhaps infamous—for other reasons: It's emerged as the single biggest personal-privacy hole online as well.

How the service balances the not-so-subtle difference between serving the needs of its users while simultaneously working explicitly to share their private data with advertisers and other third parties is what makes Facebook so intriguing. In fact, aside from Apple's antagonistic relationship with its biggest customer base (i.e., Windows users), there's little precedence for a company like Facebook.

Facebook was in the news many times in 2010, but rarely for positive reasons. Early in the year, the company's then-new privacy settings raised questions about the company's motives, which involved an (again) Apple-esque "technological lock in." In fact, privacy was a constant concern for Facebook users throughout 2010. And when the company overhauled its privacy settings yet again in October in the face of rampant criticism, privacy advocates were quick to point out the many remaining shortcomings.

There was some good news, however. Facebook partnered with Microsoft on the Office Web Apps-based Facebook Docs in April, for example, and its Microsoft partnership extended to Bing search results integration in October. In November, the company announced a revamped Messaging service that I think sets the stage for the next generation of communications, in which email will be de-emphasized for more immediate forms of electronic communication. Here, Facebook makes even Google look old-fashioned.

Facebook cofounders Mark Zuckerberg and Dustin Moskovitz also announced in January that they would be giving away half of their fortunes as part of a philanthropic campaign started by activist billionaires Bill Gates and Warren Buffett. That this money came, in part, from allegedly stealing intellectual property from the individuals who actually started the original Facebook service, and then from routinely harvesting the private data of its users does, of course, somewhat diminish the gift.

But again, this is why Facebook is so fascinating, and why this company—and not Apple, Google or Microsoft—was the subject of a 2010 blockbuster Hollywood movie, The Social Network. As its eager users will tell you, no other service provides a way for them to so seamlessly and easily keep up with their friends, family, and other loved ones. And it is this essential service that makes Facebook so compelling, even with its inscrutable and user-antagonistic privacy settings. And that's really how we know that Facebook is so important: If it wasn't, few would put up with its rampant and obvious breaches of trust.

For myself, Facebook has emerged as an essential online service, one that is as important to my personal life as Gmail, Google Calendar, and Microsoft Word are to my professional life. You may not like it; you may in fact loathe it. But chances are you do want it. Facebook is here to stay.

Discuss this Article 4

djdatadude
on Dec 28, 2010
The notion that this is a necessary service is laughable. Nobody needs to be in touch with any individual or group to this level. I tried it for a while and have concluded that it is a collosal waste of time. That fact, combined with the loss of control over your private data, leads me to the conclusion that nobody thinking clearly would value facebook.

I have read articles about employers using information about an individual gleened from facebook to make hiring decisions. How many people would want their private life, which is what facebook is ostensibly about, brought into that kind of discussion. "We'd like to hire this guy based on his experience, but HR did some diging and we don't like the kind of information we find on facebook.". Further, how far off can criminal or civil litigation use of facebook data be, if it isn't there already. Imagine being hauled into court to testify based on your being in the background of a photo posted on facebook, or simply being someones facebook friend.

Giving up the level of privacy required to be on facebook is not worth my friends having a common source to find out that I'm in Botswana this week or that I like tuna fish.
guruguru
on Dec 28, 2010
facebook is now more popular than google, which has fallen from people's minds just like microsoft did. you can barrely find a company that doesn't heavily advertise it's facebook whreas google is scrambling to get started in their wave 2.0, google me....which like wave, it is too little too late.
Christopher
on Dec 28, 2010
Facebook is a great thing, and privacy isn't bad, but you need to waste an inordinate amount of time to lock things down... The defaults should be super-strict and let you go down from there, instead of the opposite.

Seriously though, it has made keeping in touch with my cousins, family, friends, etc, vastly easier. My phone has seamless integration with Facebook (HTC TouchFlo 3D). Whenever any of my friends update their mailing address, mobile number, etc, it trickles down to my phone, and then my phone updates Exchange - I literally never waste a minute on contact management anymore.

This makes it great if I need to call someone, or send Christmas cards since I don't need to call half my relatives and ask for addresses.

Frankly I'd say the theory of facebook is better than the actual implementation... They could go a long way, but they're one of the first dot comes I've seen that reinvented communication.

For example Google might be a search icon, but are they really any better than Alta Vista from 15 years ago? Not really.

Facebook deserves the recognition... Now they need to get their acts together and treat their customer's private data as if they were a bank...
Christopher
on Dec 28, 2010
blah. Dot Coms. Darn spell-check. Sometimes it's worse than flubbing a letter. :)

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use