And of course, Windows XP changed all that. Finally, with Windows XP, Microsoft developed an OS that met key customer needs while adhering to a reasonable schedule. It's an amazing story, one detailed here in the Road to Gold...
Neptune: The Windows that wasn't
Before Windows XP was a reality, Microsoft originally designed
a consumer
Windows follow-up to Millennium called Neptune. It would feature an
HTML-based user interface code-named Forms+, Universal
Plug and Play (UPnP) connectivity, Bill Gate's WinTone
vision, and the NT kernel used in Windows 2000 (since
renamed as the Windows Engine).
A purported Neptune user interface study was revealed by
John C. Dvorak in February 1999. Dvorak said that he had
received a slew of screenshots--actually PowerPoint
slides--from a Microsoft developer which supposedly
showed off the interface for the next consumer Windows.
Not Neptune, but an interesting Activity Center
design study
Microsoft finally admitted that the images did come from
within the company but that they were never intended to
be the final UI. Instead, it was just a study to see
what a task-based Windows interface might look like.
"There are hundreds of these types of plans that go
around Microsoft every day," Microsoft Windows Group
Product Manager Rob Bennett said that February. "Nothing
has been decided for the next major consumer version of
Windows based on NT. The thing is more of a disservice
to customers at this point because it doesn't represent
something they can realize the benefits of today."
In April 1999, Millennium was formally announced as the
final product in the 9x family, and Neptune was slated
for release after that, in 2001 or 2002, as the first
NT-based consumer Windows offering.
One Neptune build did make it to testers, 5111. This
build showed off some early work on the new logon screen
("Welcome" in Windows XP") and an activity center-based
User Accounts control panel. But Neptune was never meant
to be: Clashes over previously promised features and a
desire to do something new with the product eventually
doomed this project.
Build 5111 was the only build of Neptune to make it
out to testers
What really killed Neptune, of course, is what killed so
many other Microsoft projects: It had inherited all of
the then-unready baggage from previous OSes--Windows
2000 and Millennium--and didn't have a clear purpose of
its own, aside from collecting all of the features that
didn't make it in previous releases. Microsoft had
originally intended for Millennium to be at the center
of its aborted "EasyPC" initiative, but that 9x-based OS
wasn't up to the task. So Neptune's primary
feature-set--a task-based UI with deep digital media
integration--was in jeopardy.
Instead of trying to make it all work, Microsoft
regrouped. And in late December 1999, they cancelled
Neptune and its business oriented cousin, code-named
Odyssey, and set about to make things right. I was the
first person to reveal this change to the public, though
Microsoft employees returning to work after Christmas
break were told of the plan changes in an internal memo.
The memo outlines an even more basic plan as well, where
products would be developed more quickly, with fewer
features, rather than in massive three-year development
cycles. Not coincidentally, I recommended this very
change to Microsoft when I concluded that the
development of Windows 2000--which stretched from
mid-1996 to late 1999--proves that long-term, monolithic
software development was a thing of the past.
Change of Plans: Enter
Whistler
My blurb about the Neptune cancellation occupied
just a small paragraph at the top of WinInfo Short Takes on Friday,
January 21, 2000. But the ramifications would be felt for months
afterward.
Microsoft has cancelled the
previously separate "Neptune" and "Odyssey" projects, I wrote,
melding the
two into a cohesive strategy for the future of Windows 2000.
"Neptune," as you may know, was to be the next consumer version of
Windows after Millennium, and the first to be based on Windows 2000.
And "Odyssey" was the previous codename for the next version of
Windows 2000 for businesses. My sources tell me that the consumer
version of Neptune became a black hole when all the features that
were cut from Millennium (Windows 98 Third Edition, due this summer)
were simply re-tagged as Neptune features. And since Neptune and
Odyssey would be based on the same code-base anyway, it made sense
to combine them into a single project, in the same way that Windows
2000 Professional and Server were tested together. What's the
codename for this revamped next-generation version of Windows 2000
that will come in business and consumer flavors, you ask? It's
called "Whistler." You heard it here
first.
Whistler Build 2211
Immediately, every major computer news outlet on the planet
picked up the story. I received calls and emails from around the globe,
and spoke about the move on CNET Radio. Microsoft had made sweeping
product changes before, of course, but this was the first one in the
always-on, wired Internet age, and the world wanted to know more. Three
days later, I summed up the changed in an analysis piece called Future
Windows still in flux.
"Sources close to Microsoft expressed their amazement that I had even
found out about the plans to drop Neptune and Odyssey as the internal
communications about replacing these projects with 'Whistler' are marked
as 'Extreme Microsoft Internal,' normally reserved for the company's most
sensitive information," I wrote. "Well, now that the cat's out of the
bag, so to speak, it's time to take a look at where Windows will be
headed now that Microsoft has finally shipped Windows 2000."
At around this time, Microsoft quietly uploaded a related job posting to
its Web site. The company was looking for a software engineer that
[could] design and develop a new "basic [user interface] framework for
[Windows 2000 that will] provide modern UI features." This new user
interface [would] be the foundation for the "next-generation Window
Manager [a.k.a. USER], which will allow easily extensible UI look, feel
and behavior." Additionally, this new UI manager [would] allow for
different user interfaces to be plugged into Windows 2000, interfaces
that are designed separately from the OS. That next-generation user
interface was later incorporated into Whistler under the code-name
"Luna."
In February 2000, ZDNET incorrectly reported that Whistler would ship in
March 2001. But ZDNET did reveal that a future major release of Windows,
code-named "Blackcomb," would follow Whistler a few years later
(Blackcomb was later pushed back for another post-XP interim release
code-named "Longhorn"). I reported that Blackcomb was designed to be
quicker than Windows 2000, as NT 3.5 was when compared to version 3.1. It
would feature a new relational database-based file system dubbed Storage+
and natural language processing. And the basic engine, or kernel, would
be much changed in Blackcomb, though the basic set of functions it
performs would not. Improvements to Active Directory were in the works
for Blackcomb as well.
In early April 2000, Microsoft announced a bizarre corporate
reorganization that saw vice presidents Paul Maritz and Jim Allchin
co-leading a group charged at developing Microsoft's Next Generation
Windows Services (NGWS, soon to be renamed .NET, "Dot Net"). The reorg
was destined to fail, and soon did, but not before Allchin and Maritz
butted heads over strategy. Maritz left the company less than a year
later, with Allchin taking sole control of Windows.
In late April, Microsoft gave its first public preview of Whistler at its
WinHEC (Windows Hardware Engineering Conference). The company said that
Whistler would feature a componentized architecture that would allow
systems makers to strip away various layers of the operating system so
that it would work well on even the smallest handheld devices. That week,
I
previewed Whistler for the first time on the SuperSite for Windows.
Whistler build 2223.1
Whistler build 2223.1
Microsoft chairman Bill Gates revealed a few interesting features in
Whistler at the WinHEC show. "In Whistler we've added support for CD-R
and CD-RW into the operating system so you can drag files over to a CDR,
just like you would any floppy, and burn them for your friends," he said.
"We added
the capability of logging off without quitting all your applications. So
when you log off your applications can still be in the background running
exactly where you left them, and someone else can log on. This allows
people to simultaneously use the same computer."
Gates also talked up the digital media features in Windows XP, noting
that the Scanner and Camera Wizard from Windows Me was being updated
significantly in this new release. A new version of Windows Media Player
was shown off, as was a speech interface.
Windows general manager Carl Stork discussed the Windows roadmap at
WinHEC. "The road map for the following year is that we're actively at
work on a product release, which is code-named Whistler, or Windows
Whistler," Stork said. "And the development work that we're doing on
Windows Whistler is going to yield at least two client operating system
products, one which is optimized for business users, businesses of all
sizes, and you can think of this as logically the successor to Windows
2000 Professional, and a second release that's optimized for the needs of
consumers and entry level users. Both of these products will be built
from the same code base, they'll use the same device drivers; they'll
have the same kinds of application compatibility. This, we think, is an
enormous step forward for the industry, as it lets us all focus our
development investments, our testing investments, our investments in
quality and features in one environment to address both those market
segments."
"As a blanket statement," he continued, "you could say that Windows
Whistler by and large will represent a superset of what's in the Windows
Millennium Edition, and in that sense is a logical progression for
users." He also previewed the notion that the Whistler UI would change
dramatically. "We
do recognize both that a new look appeals to users, and we can make the
system warmer and more friendly. This represents design concepts that
we're working on right now, as to what the user interface of the Whistler
product may look like."
Shortly after WinHEC, I revealed
Microsoft's plans to end "DLL Hell" in Whistler using a technology called
Fusion and the company's work with
task-based
Activity Centers.
On May 24, 2000, Microsoft sent out the first Whistler beta invites, as I
exclusively revealed in WinInfo. "We have a very high bar of
participation for this program," the invitation read. "Our primary
audience is targeted at key FirstWave ISV and IHV developers for improved
application and hardware compatibility-many of which ship in the box, OEM
partners, JDP accounts, committed IT Pros and other corporate deployment
test beds. Given the importance of the consumer market to the Whistler
release, this program also introduces "Whistler Personal" intended for
focused, key consumer testers. We expect everyone in the Technical Beta
to really focus their development and/or testing efforts in a partnership
with us to meet program objectives in a very aggressive timeframe. This
is not an evaluation-based program." Microsoft noted that there were four
beta kits, Whistler Personal (home/consumer focused testing), Whistler32
Tech Beta (Personal, Professional, Server and Advanced Server),
Whistler32 Developer Tech Beta (developers and ISVs only), and Whistler64
for 64-bit Itanium users.
In June, Microsoft was caught up in excitement over its .NET initiative,
which was the new name of NGWS. The company held a late June meeting with
industry analysts to unveil the technology, and noted that future
versions of Windows would be called Windows .NET. Eventually, the company
said, .NET, and not Windows, would be its primary platform. In the
meantime, however, the Whistler beta began with a promise to ship the
first milestone release--Beta 1--later that year. An anonymous tip from
Microsoft revealed that Whistler would feature "an 'awesome' XML/XSL-based
skinning capabilities that far surpass any customizing features in
then-current Windows versions."
At the Professional Developers Conference (PDC) in Florida in mid-July,
Microsoft revealed for the first time that Whistler would ship in the
second half of 2001 (a six month delay from the previously announced
April 2001 release date). The company also released its first build to
testers, build 2250, on July 13. Whistler build 2250 closely resembled
Windows 2000 and Windows Me and didn't appear to offer many new features,
but it did offer the first glimpse at the new UI technology, which went
through a lot of names before its final release. In build 2250, it was
called "Visual Styles," and this build featured what would have been the
"Professional" (later "Watercolor") theme, which was dropped in January
2001. It also featured a task-based Control Panel.
I
previewed Whistler build 2250 on the SuperSite for Windows.
Whistler build
2250 introduced Visual Styles
One of the more intriguing things about Whistler build 2250, however, was
hidden from most users. Microsoft was quietly working on a new Start
Panel that would replace the Start Menu that had been in place since
Windows 95 was released in 1995. In build 2250, this feature was hidden,
but
I revealed its existence to the world on July 20, 2001. "In the
Whistler Preview, the hidden Start Panel is approximately twice as wide
as the Start menu and features two columns of options with 'Log Off' and
'Turn off computer' choices at the top," I wrote. "The first column
features large icons for Internet Explorer and the configured email
application, followed by a list of the most recently accessed
applications. A More Programs option opens a standard Start menu. In the
second column, called My Places, Microsoft has created links for common
system locations and utilities. The first section includes My Documents,
My Pictures, and My Music, while the second one contains My Computer, My
Network Places, and Network and Dial-up Connections. At the bottom of the
second column are Control Panel, Help + Support, Search, and Run. The
Active Desktop Start Page includes similar options, with prominent
buttons for the Internet, Email, and Search. A toolbar along the bottom
provides options for logging off, turning off the computer, and
frequently-accessed locations on the system."
In late July, Microsoft revealed that it had pushed back the first beta
release of Whistler from September to October, but that this would not
effect the final release. "We are really now driving to a single code
base across our entire Windows product line," said Microsoft senior vice
president Brian Valentine, who became responsible for the development of
Windows 2000 in late 1998. Valentine noted that unifying the two
previously-separate Windows projects will save Microsoft money and
development time. "It cost us a lot to have those two code bases in the
company," he said. "By driving to a single core technology, it just makes
the whole industry more efficient." Valentine's comments came at a yearly
financial analysts meeting.
After a month of inactivity, the Whistler beta heated up again in August
with the release of build 2257. This build included the new Start Panel
in the UI, and it was the first to feature the results of Microsoft's
"clean desktop" initiative. Also, the Professional Visual Style was
tweaked with new colors; it look quite spiffy.
Build 2257 was the first to include Microsoft's personal firewall. "The
personal firewall (or stateful packet filter) is designed to offer very
basic protection to home users with no configuration," Kyle Krum of the
Home Networking Team told testers. "By default we are in a 'Deny All'
state once we figure out what your Internet connection is (via the Home
Networking Wizard, for the most part). We are continually working on
adding more configuration functionality to the feature, but we are just
adding simple things like a check box and screen to allow different ICMP
packets to flow through. As for punching holes in the firewall, you will
not have the option to allow/deny subnets or IP ranges, but can instead
just say, "open port 80 to everybody". The firewall is not designed to
compete at all in the normal firewall market, but instead offer basic
protection to customers who are just putting their PC's on the edge of
the network."
In 2257, the IE version number was listed as 5.6. This was later changed
to 6.0.
Whistler build
2257
In September, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer reiterated that .NET, and not
Windows, was the future. But he noted that the full ".NET User
Experience" was still 2-3 years away. ".NET is the future for Microsoft,"
he said. "Windows doesn't go away, the PC doesn't go away. But we needed
a platform to reflect the reality of the Internet. [.NET] is a big change
for us, and it is a lot of work, a lot of effort." Ballmer, who addressed
a crowd at the European IT Forum 2000 in Monaco via a satellite link from
Redmond, said that Microsoft was working as quickly as it could to
deliver a version of Windows that fully supports its new .NET
technologies, but that this would have to be phased in over the next two
versions.
In late September, I revealed that Whistler Beta 1 would slip two weeks
from October 11 or October 25. And then the company released another
interim build on October 3rd. Whistler build 2267 offered small
improvements to the previous alpha build, but no major new features. But
2267 finally allowed the user to modify the look and feel of the system
with a fully fleshed-out Display Properties dialog, making it as
functional as Windows 2000 in this regard. Whistler 2267 also introduced
a Compatibility Center, which would eventually allow users to research
whether particular hardware devices are compatible with this OS.
Compatibility Center was designed to be used to search for compatible
products before purchasing or troubleshoot compatibility issues with
existing products. Like Help and Support itself, Microsoft intended to
open Compatibility Center to hardware makers so that users can gain
access to support information from these companies in a single place; the
feature was later melded into Help and Support.
Whistler build
2267
Less than two weeks later, Microsoft issued the final pre-Beta 1 release,
build 2287. This build featured a redesigned Setup routine (the previous
one was based on the version in Windows Me), a redesigned Help & Support
(again, the previous version was lifted from Windows Me), and some UI
tweaks. It was also the first build to use Dynamic Updates, a new Setup
feature.
Whistler build
2287
The week of October 27, 2000 brought with it incredible news: Microsoft's
internal network had been hacked and, according to early reports, the
hackers had made away with the source code to future versions of Windows
and Office. Microsoft contacted the FBI and though the culprit was never
caught, the company now claims that its source code was never in
jeopardy. Amazingly, the furor over this event died down quickly, and
Microsoft has yet to detail the attack. But one thing remains: A t-shirt
with the slogan, I hacked Microsoft's network and all I got was this
lousy source code.
Continued in Part Two...