AdDuplex: Surface Still Rules Nascent Windows 8 Devices Market

Surface is still the most frequently used Windows 8 device

Note: This post originally used the word "sales" instead of "usage," which is what AdDuplex measures. I've made the necessary fixes to correct that. --Paul

A new report from AdDuplex says that Microsoft’s Surface with Windows RT continues to be the most often used Windows 8 device about a month and a half after launch. However, Surface has a far less commanding lead than it did a month ago.

Note: Surface with Windows RT obviously runs Windows RT, which is a version of Windows 8.

AdDuplex generated a lot of news when it claimed a month ago that Surface was, by far, the most often used Windows 8 device. At the time, Surface was responsible for 11 percent of Windows 8 device usage, with its closest competitors obtaining just 2 percent or less of this nascent market.

This week, AdDuplex will release a new report showing how usage has shifted.

The highlights:

Surface is still number one. With 6 percent of all Windows 8 device usage, Surface is still the most often used of these device types. But as AdDuplex notes, “its lead is not as stunning as it was last month”: Surface is down a full 5 percentage points and my guess is that it will fall further until the Surface Pro unit is available in very late January.

Some competitors are gaining ground. A few other devices are starting to pick up usage, though the most often used non-Surface devices look like traditional PCs: The HP 2000 (3 percent of sales) and HP Pavillion g6 (2 percent) are both over the 1 percent threshold.

Most devices don’t sell very well at all. The vast majority of surveyed machines, or 79 percent, fall into the “Other devices” category. This category contains an astonishing 5,000+ device types.

The 1 percenters. A number of devices in the top ten picked up about 1 percent of usage: HP Pavilion g7, Samsung Series 3, HP Pavilion dv6, HP ENVY m6, ASUS VivoTab RT, ASUS VivoBook X202E, Dell Inspiron 5520, Dell Inspiron 3520, HP Compaq CQ58, Toshiba Satellite C855D, Samsung ATIV Smart PC, and Acer Aspire V5-571P. This is a weird mix of traditional PCs, new Windows 8 tablets and hybrids, and Windows RT devices.

More devices have come to market. When AdDuplex surveyed Windows 8 devices a month ago, there were a bit over 3,000 different device types in market. Today, there are over 5,500.

Top device makers. The top five Windows 8 device makers by usage are HP (22 percent), Dell (10 percent), Acer and ASUS (9 percent each), Toshiba (7 percent) and … wait for it … Microsoft (6 percent). So Microsoft is outselling Lenovo (which is amazing), Samsung, and Sony.

Interesting stuff as always. AdDuplex will publish its full report tomorrow.

Discuss this Article 21

zorb58
on Dec 10, 2012

The fact that Lenovo isn't up there surprises and disappoints me. Because they have taken the clear lead in innovation with Windows 8 and also marketing it, these stats probably are not helping Microsoft make their point to the other OEMs....

dbuchanan
on Dec 10, 2012

Several people I know are waiting for something like HP Envy 2x that have the extra battery in the keyboard and NFC. The 2x will not be available until January which make a not so great Christmas gift.

Then if what you want is not available until next year anyway maybe one should wait for the next gen lower power processors that are come out, I think, the first half of 2013.

Ratfink88
on Dec 11, 2012

It pains me to say it, but I don't find that surprising. Lenovo may innovate, but if they don't actually sell you their devices, they're not going to get sales. I'm referring to the fact that they don't sell their IdeaPad Yoga in Australia... I know because I tried to buy one, and was rejected. :(

Yuxie
on Dec 10, 2012

You would have thought that the Winners would be Microsoft, Dell, and Lenovo... and the losers would be HP and acer. After its Lenovo is the innovator with the Yoga and HP is the traditionalist

arrow22
on Dec 10, 2012

"Most devices don’t sell very well at all." Maybe I'm misinterpreting the data, but isn't AdDuplex capturing data from any machine running Windows 8/RT? And if so, wouldn't that mean that the "Other" category most likely captures a variety of older PCs that were upgraded to Windows 8?

In that sense, it would be difficult to make any real conclusion on sales, and certainly would explain why over 5000 models are shown here.

saqrkh
on Dec 10, 2012

I think ASUS is 'getting it right' in a number of areas (namely clamshells). For example, the VivoBook X202E is a pretty competitive offering, Core i3-3217, 4GB RAM, Intel HD graphics and 11.6 inch touchscreen for $549.99. Not bad if someone is looking for a light computer.

Personally, I am pretty excited about the Zenbook Touch: 256 GB SSD, Core i7 and 13.3 inch touchscreen... $1100 at the Microsoft Store (Signature?)...

tboggs13
on Dec 10, 2012

Wouldn't the other 5000+ devices be all the Windows 7/Vista/XP desktops that have been upgraded to Windows 8? That would be such a hodge-podge of devices that it's not surprising there would be no significant market share. Perhaps some of them not even identifiable.

I think it might be a positive sign that the "new" hardware has identifiable share.

I am surprised that Lenovo doesn't have a significant presence, but maybe it comes back to availability. They have been sold out in my area and on backorder on the site. Dell is just now starting to ship their devices this week.

dandbj13
on Dec 10, 2012

What does it say about Windows 8 when the best selling Windows 8 device does not actually run Windows 8? Furthermore, if Surface is the sales leader, what does that say about Windows 8 device sales overall?

newyorkcitymale
on Dec 10, 2012

It says that you have no idea how many Surface RTs have been sold, nor do you know how many Windows 8 licenses or devices have been sold... so basically... it says nothing.

All we know it this point is that Microsoft sold 40 million Windows 8 licenses in the first month... which is more than Windows 7 sold in its first month.

Everything else is speculation. Just sayin'...

pthurrott
on Dec 10, 2012

Actually, what Microsoft said was that 40 million licenses in the first month was "in line" -- i.e. "the same" -- as Windows 7, not more. So that's the "fact". But I'd point out that license sales says absolutely nothing about actual usage. Just sayin'.

newyorkcitymale
on Dec 10, 2012

I didn't say anything about "usage." In fact, my point was that we don't know much besides the 40 million number. Not sure why you're being so hostile.

pthurrott
on Dec 10, 2012

It's like soup, you get what you put into it.

newyorkcitymale
on Dec 10, 2012

If Microsoft sold 40 million Windows 8 licenses in the first month... and we assume that all of those licenses are now in use (installed on an old or new device), then the 6% figure for the Surface would mean that 2.4 million have been sold (or are in use). If you cut that 40 million in half to just 20 million, then that's still 1.2 million Surfaces in the first month... which is still pretty impressive.

newyorkcitymale
on Dec 10, 2012

This is purely anecdotal, but in my own family, there are four Windows 8 licenses in use. Two are being used on two Surface RTs. Another was installed on a four-year old HP laptop. And the fourth came pre-installed on a new HP Envy desktop that I bought for myself (with a Dell touch screen monitor).

My point is simply that the reason that the Surface is the best-selling Windows 8 device right now is because (1) there were over 1500 devices included in this survey, and (2) most of the touch screen hybrids & tablets designed for Windows 8 haven't been released yet... and the ones that have been released have been selling out immediately (based on reports I've been reading).

I think all of this is a good sign for Surface RT and Windows 8 hybrids & tablets.

AlexKven
on Dec 10, 2012

I am disappointed with Surface. It looked good when I first heard of it, but my heart was crushed when I found out that the core version only runs Windows RT. Why couldn't they make it run Windows 8 core?

Windows RT as a whole is disappointing. I thought it would be some specialized software that allowed Windows to run on arm, and would make up a very small piece of Windows 8. The reason I was disappointed was obviously because it couldn't run desktop app(lication)s, and as a visual studio person, the fact is simply unacceptable. I can now only buy Windows RT with an ipad mentality, which I guess is kind of the point.

But the pricing is another issue. Microsoft should know better. They know that people are already not liking Windows 8/RT, and that they have never released a tablet like this before. Thus, this is a really hard sell, and that the only way I think it could have succeeded is for them to undercut the iPad. But they charge the same amount! I know that now they are trying to copy apple and stuff (or that's how others see it), but people are not going to buy into this thing unless they have a reason to choose this new thing over the iPad, which has proved itself for almost 3 years. It's stupid, I don't know what MS is thinking. How do they expect this thing to succeed?

henador
on Dec 10, 2012

The Surface Pro, which will be available in a month or two, will be a complete PC based on the Intel i5. It'll run everything, including Visual Studio. I run VS2012 on my Samsung Slate 7, which is similar to the Surface Pro.

Also, note that there are several Intel-based Win8 tablets/transformers available right now.

Harry_Wild
on Dec 10, 2012

I think Microsoft and other PC makers just are a step behind the tablet trend. I think smaller size tablet are the rage. 7" is the king of all tablets it seems. I see more smaller size; then the 10". I only see the 10" from realtors and a the Apple store personnel.

I love the 7" Nexus and will be getting the 8" iPod Mini Retina when it comes out. I use Windows for everything else; but 10" tablet - just to big for my use and most have crappy resolution of 1366 X 768. I do not see Windows tablets coming out with a smaller size with HD resolution quality until fall or possible 2014! Maybe in 2015 Apple Retina quality displays will be the standard for all tablets!

Vinny4
on Dec 10, 2012

I don't see the problem with the RT resolution. I honestly think people are over exaggerating screen resolution specs. Have you held the RT and actually seen it? It's really good, crisp and sharp.

Vinny4
on Dec 10, 2012

I just bought a Surface RT....its amazing and to tell the truth I was waiting out for the Pro. I bought the RT brand new still sealed in the box on Kijiji for 350$.....I really lucked out. I understand the whole RT vs Pro thing.....but have people actually used this thing??? It's awesome , well built, solid, fast, and it comes with Office! I wasn't expecting to like RT at all....but it was love at first sight!

Sent using my Surface RT

Bryan
on Dec 10, 2012

I bought a SurfaceRT when they came out and have been using it regularly. In fact it sits beside my desktop system which is running Windows 8. I don’t know what the feeling is with other SurfaceRT owners but from my point of view, I think it is a welcome addition to my "toolset" and I am loving it more and more!

As far as the WindowsRT and Windows8 "useability" comments that I am reading about from many so called technical journos - I cannot understand the exaggerated and most of the time unfair criticism. One guy ( I think in Forbes) wrote an article on viruses and was relating this to the SurfaceRT and I thought - what the.... Sure the WindowsRT and Windows8 has some version 1 issues but these are minor and are not platform breakers. You can bet your bottom dollar Microsoft will be aware of these issues and will fix them - their existence depends on it.

Think back to iPad and Galaxy Tab version 1 and how long it took them to get to where they are today. Heck - WindowsRT is already equal to and in most cases better than these two laready. With an update (WindowsRT) it will be far out in front.

andrewje
on Dec 11, 2012

Are these figures painting an accurate picture of usage? Doesn't this just apply to machines where people are using metro apps that have adduplex ads? Could it not be that most people running intel machines are not really using metro apps all that much. I know I am only using a small number (mostly the MS ones) of apps on my win 8 laptop. It stands to reason that metro app usage on RT would be much higher because that is pretty much all they can run.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use