Blue

Blue sounds great, but we need fixes and improvements now

In what can only be described as a high-tech version of Stockholm syndrome, Windows fans now have all their hopes wrapped up in “Blue,” a set of “year one” updates to Windows 8 and related platforms that will supposedly right all the wrongs of the original releases. I don’t want to rain on this well-intentioned parade, but I think it’s time for a little common sense. Blue will surely be an improvement. But don’t expect a panacea that fixes all of the problems with Microsoft latest platforms.

I’ve not written formally about “Blue” yet, but here’s what we do know. And to be clear, the vast majority of this information comes courtesy of Mary Jo Foley, who’s uncovered a treasure trove of details about Microsoft’s plans for the future.

Blue is the code-name for a wave of updates to Windows 8/RT, Windows Phone 8, Windows Server 2012, and Windows services such as Outlook.com and SkyDrive. These updates will be released roughly one year after the general availability of each of these platforms, at roughly (but not exactly) the same time.

Blue is not the only update that will arrive this year for Windows 8/RT, Windows Phone 8, Windows Server 2012, and Windows services such as Outlook.com and SkyDrive. Other, smaller updates are arriving all the time as well, such as firmware updates for Windows RT, app updates for Windows 8/RT, and so on.

Blue is scheduled for a summer 2013 RTM and Q3/Q4 release. Shipment times will vary by platform, of course.

Blue is a feature-pack/service pack. While Microsoft has formally ended development of service packs for most currently-supported platforms, it’s helpful to think of Blue as a combination feature pack (an update that adds new features) and service pack (and update that fixes bugs). Why? Because that’s exactly what it is. In the past, Windows service packs were released by Windows Sustained Engineering, while the group that created the original OS moved on to the next major release. This is true of Blue as well, Mary Jo reports: WSE is creating Windows Blue, just as they had created releases like Windows 7 Service Pack 1 in the past.

Blue is the start of something new. As alluded to above, with previous versions of Microsoft’s on-premise platforms (Windows, Windows Server), different teams would handle different aspects of the platform’s lifecycle. And while that’s not changing, what is changing is the schedule. Instead of major releases every three years with services packs in-between, Microsoft’s major platforms will be updated like online services, with new releases on much faster time frames, usually quarterly. Blue is a bigger deal, however, because it is the first major release to revolutionary new platforms. So it will be a big-bang release that ships roughly one year later. I expect Microsoft to begin (or continue) pushing smaller updates out to these platforms, more frequently after/aside from Blue.

Windows Blue will include new features for Windows 8/RT. According to a recent job posting, Windows Blue will “build and improve upon the Core Experience features of the OS … including the Start screen, application lifecycle, windowing and personalization … enhancing ease of use and the overall user experience on devices and PCs worldwide.”

Windows Phone Blue will include “reimagined” Office Mobile apps that will share code with coming Office Mobile apps for Windows 8/RT. These apps will have a “consistent experience … across web, tablets, and phones.” Yes, Metro versions of Office are on the way too.

Yes, Windows 9 is coming too. While Blue essentially speeds up development cycles for Windows 8/RT and Windows Server, and aligns them more closely with the existing development cycles for Windows Phone and Microsoft’s online services, this release and the new development plan don’t spell the end of major releases. Windows 9 is of course happening and is under development now, and will ship roughly three years after Windows 8, as you might expect. Microsoft won’t keep a product called Windows 8 in the market for over a decade or whatever. They still need new product versions that partners can advertise alongside new PCs and devices.

So this is all very interesting, of course. It’s also surprisingly obvious when you think about it. There’s nothing in this list of facts about Blue that anyone reading this site hasn’t at least considered. And that’s troubling.

See, the thing is, Windows 8 is broken right now. It’s got a lot of built-in apps that don’t work properly, or well, and they’re connected to a lot of online services—especially the terrible Xbox entertainment services—that are in need of even more work. So while switching from a once-every-three-years to once-a-year schedule sounds great, the truth is that Windows 8/RT and Windows Phone 8, in particular, needs to be fixed before one year. They need to be fixed now.

With Windows Phone 8, we know that Microsoft will deliver a handful of updates before Blue and that one of those updates, “Portico,” has in fact already shipped. But there’s been precious little movement on the Windows 8 front, and the embarrassing nature of those built-in apps is something that Microsoft can and should fix immediately and on an ongoing basis. Are you really telling me we can’t get a unified inbox view in Mail and working music matching in Xbox Music before October 2013? Really?

So, yes, please, look forward to Blue and hope that it fixes problems. But also expect more than that, people. Microsoft just delivered a couple of woeful works-in-progress in order to meet an artificial release schedule. Customers who actually paid for these products should expect more than to wait a year for the fixes.

Discuss this Article 61

John Wolf
on Feb 17, 2013

Paul, I agree that some windows 8 apps are not ready for prime time. But I don't agree that the OS is broken. It is better than 7 and the features are a trend setter for the furture of mobile/PC computing. I believe MS is breaking new ground with this OS.

GoodThings2Life
on Feb 17, 2013

I agree. I feel like the OS itself is just fine, it's the apps that need work. However, I also believe that there is a lot of refinement that can be done in the OS, and Paul has even written about some of the ideas that he thinks should be included/made. I happen to agree with him on those ideas too (particularly the UI changes that would make it just as intuitive as Windows Phone).

heatIesssun
on Feb 18, 2013

"I believe MS is breaking new ground with this OS."

Or digging its own grave.

arrow22
on Feb 19, 2013

I see your point, but Windows 8's Metro side is clearly a v1.0, much like Windows Phone 7 was vs. the refinements of WP8. There's just a lot about it that doesn't work as well as it should. And Paul's right. The built-in apps are almost all terrible. Every app released with "Xbox" in the name should immediately be destroyed. They're insanely bad. I don't know if that's because the development tools are bad, the teams the created them are inexperienced or if that's honestly what they consider adequate, but it's got me thinking of switching platform.

How can a native mail app be worse than the browser version?

M Wagner
on Apr 17, 2013

You are right. Windows 8/RT is truly a hybrid product. Windows RT is a tablet-oriented OS and Windows 8 offers the same "Tablet UI" as Windows RT but also supports the traditional Windows NT environment for running legacy code.

If Microsoft makes a concerted effort to port its most popular apps to the Windows RT environment, so will most software vendors. Everybody wins.

Josh602
on Feb 17, 2013

Sounds like Blue is exactly what I was expecting it to be. But I would hope that they'll still be making feature-releases for the built-in Microsoft apps. Windows 8 is the only OS where the apps aren't baked into the platform; they're normal apps that can be updated independently of the OS. Why aren't Microsoft taking advantage of that?

Also, one thing that hasn't been considered yet is beta versions for the Windows 8 release of Blue. Do you think there will be one?

heatIesssun
on Feb 18, 2013

There's already a beta of Windows Blue. It's called Windows 8.

hillr
on Feb 17, 2013

And I seriously hope they fix the use of a microSD card with Surface RT. I just went through that process yesterday for my daughter's tablet (with the help of the article you posted). What a PITA. How could they possibly expect a non-power user to be able to integrate pictures, music and videos on an microSD card with the corresponding Metro apps. Sheesh.

wbwarren57
on Feb 17, 2013

How much longer does Microsoft have to suffer from bad leadership? How many more opportunities will they squander to take advantage of their market position and resources to deliver good products that people like to use and want to buy? When will Balmer and most of his cronies be cleared out so that competent, thoughtful, relevant and consistent leadership can be restored?

Rishicash
on Feb 18, 2013

MS will perhaps consider handing over the controls to a new pilot and flight crew when they can make out the leaves on the trees they are about to impact.

zikifer
on Feb 17, 2013

"With Windows Phone 8, we know that Microsoft will deliver a handful of updates before Blue and that one of those updates, “Portico,” has in fact already shipped."

Technically, yes, it has shipped. But when is my 8X on Verizon going to get it? We were told last summer that Microsoft was working on getting updates to all phones in a quick manner, yet the first update gets released and VZW is dragging, as per usual.

I totally agree that Microsoft needs to ship many small, incremental updates before Blue. But they also need to make sure us WP users actually see those updates.

tbsteph
on Feb 17, 2013

Does it matter if the WP8 Team releases an update if a carrier, like Verizon, neglects to provide same to its users? Where is the "enthusiasts" Program? Will we ever see it? MSFT has been silent since last June? Pitiful.

rgba32bit
on Mar 25, 2013

Posting with my 8x from Verizon right now with poetic. Try double checking.

thalter
on Feb 17, 2013

Dating myself severely here, but it seems that a good analogy for Blue to Windows 8 might be Windows 95 OSR2 to the original Windows 95 release.

pthurrott
on Feb 17, 2013

That seems about right though these comparisons are never perfect. The OSR releases were for PC makers, but the reasoning was the same: Windows 95 was so new it needed updates/fixes more quickly than in the past.

yuhong
on Feb 17, 2013

Isn't it WinSE, not WSE?

pmbAustin
on Feb 17, 2013

If they can't ship some major fixes/enhancements/updates to basic things like Xbox Music, Video, and the Mail and People apps by June, that's a problem. Having to wait until October for these things is unacceptable.

Skype needs to work as well, as simply, & as easily as FaceTime on iOS/OS X, and Microsoft Instant Messenger, across phones, tablets, PCs, and Xbox. It doesn't.

Xbox Music & Video needs to work much more simply, with functional play-to & continue across phones, tablets, PCs, and Xbox. It doesn't.

Win8/RT's mail client needs to be at least as functional and usable as that on WP8. It isn't even close.

All platforms need vastly improved dedicated Twitter, Facebook, and Google+ clients. Stat.

IE10 needs to be made more stable (I'm having constant issues with it... memory/handle leaks, weird crashes, and sites that simply don't display correctly in it while displaying correctly in both IE9 and Chrome... even if MS has to get help to 3rd party site/app developers, they need to get on it). And ALL versions of IE10 need that great "swipe" gesture to go back and forward... once used on Metro-IE10, it's greatly missed on Desktop IE10 and WP8's IE10.

Win8 Pictures needs to be able to brows through a folder even if it's not in a Library. If I double-tap a picture in a folder of pictures on the desktop, it launches Metro Photo viewer, but then doesn't allow me to swipe to the next or previous... it's obnoxious.

WP8's photo & skydrive apps need to allow me to easily grab pictures from any of my other Win8 devices, just like Win8/RT does.

Basically, there needs to be greater consistency across all the platforms.

And some inconsistencies within Win8 need to be fixed, like why are all apps shown when I go to the search screen without anything typed in the search box... but if I click on settings, I get a blank screen? Why aren't ALL settings shown? And why can't I get to shutdown/restart from the same place I can get to logout (touching my profile on the start screen)?

They need some major fixes and updates, including functionality, before the end of June, or they're going to lose the race. I'd go so far as to say they need something as major as adding a decent notification center to all platforms by then, BEFORE "Blue". With their resources, I can't imagine why they couldn't pull that off.

Updating significantly by June, and then significantly again by the end of October, would demonstrate a commitment to catching up that would certainly help sell more product (especially important in the WP8 case). Waiting an entire year will show them to be too slow, and they'll endlessly be falling behind both Google & Apple if that's all they can muster...

bricko
on Feb 17, 2013

Just find the installation of these Metro apps to be annoying since you can not decide WHERE they are installed. They only install on C drive. What about if you have a SSD and dont want ANY apps installed on C drive. I have 5 drives and only want programs installed on certain drives.

Hope this is resolved in BLUE or whatever. Then they can work on actually getting these horrid Metro apps to actually work.

SvenJ
on Feb 19, 2013

Just curious, why are you bothering with (we don't call it) Metro apps? Doesn't sound like you are dealing with a touch screen portable device running RT, considering the the 5 drives on top of the SSD. I'd be minimalistic in Metro, with just the apps that might make cute Win7 Widget replacements on a second screen. I'd probably have already dumped most of the stock ones right away. Most of my apps would be desktop apps, and those still install where you tell them, dont they?

ian.berg
on Feb 17, 2013

I'm curious to see if Outlook.com Calendar will get the Modern UI look or still be Hotmail Calendar with Blue.

Mike84
on Feb 17, 2013

haha i agree - i can't believe MS hasn't got round to finishing calendar yet. another half-finished product to add to their list

they really should just use the Office365 Exchange format for all - so much better

Zeehunter
on Feb 19, 2013

- A calendar UI upgrade and Skype integration with video calling and messaging "will be coming soon after the 19th" promises Mehta

Taken from TheVerge

Bacchus1976
on Feb 17, 2013

Really liked this article. Calls out Microsoft in a way that too few writers have.

MS really seems to be missing the point of these SaaS offerings they have been packaging with Win8/WP8. Xbox Music is fundamentally a SaaS offering and there's no reason why it's updates should be in any way tied to those of Windows 8 or Windows Phone 8. Updates to this service should be released incrementally and frequently, as often as weekly, and many won't even require updates to the apps. They certainly shouldn't require updates to the OS and firmware.

Mail and Calendar will be a little less agile since they can integrate with several services outside of MS's cloud but updates to Outlook.com should be immediate and quickly reflected in the Mail app.

MS has been quick to leverage the SaaS model to gouge it's customers with the subscription billing model (Xbox Live, Office 2013, Xbox Music Pass) without delivering any of the supposed value to the customer in ever improving experiences.

wss
on Feb 17, 2013

Metro as a UI is ok, but was creating a new programming framework (RT) for it necessary? What can it do that can't be done with Windows NT applications? Why couldn't Microsoft stick with the old one? What's wrong with it?

I'd like to see a table comparing the two.

devilmaster
on Feb 18, 2013

Really ? You're going to try to justify that an API created back in the days of windows 95, is perfect and should never be replaced? Even if it was the perfect API back in the day, 20 years of adding to it would definitely spoil it.

I really think that the BEST thing about Win8 is the new API: modern, clean, truly object oriented, well integrated with managed .NET languages, XAML based UI definitions. Of course you probably could do all this above the Win32 APIs (WPF has a very similar programing model to that of WinRT and is build over Win32) but isn't it much better for these to be build right over the kernel, instead of n layers of abstraction over ..

20 years is a long time, a lot has changed, and at some point I think MS had to draw a line with regards to backward compatibility and start fresh, I think their idea to support both WinRT and Win32 over the NT kernel was the right approach, you want to build apps for tablets you use WinRT, but you still have all the old stuff in there too. (for a while ...)

PS: No way could you build a power efficient OS with apps still using the old programming model, and I think MS has some presentations that explain why this is so...

wss
on Feb 18, 2013

Thanks for your reply.

The capabilities of Win32 have been proven to be sufficient over the decades in countless applications. We have the highest standard professional applications, utilities, services and games with the best possible graphics in the world and also professional audio performance. What's really missing? What can you do with the new one that you can't with the existing one? Why is it absolutely needed - or is it just a convenience?

henador
on Feb 18, 2013

devilmaster, the RT APIs are not low-level APIs. They sit on top of Kernel (the user-mode Kernel, just like any other Win32 program) and Direct3D. About the only thing you can say is that GDI is bypassed in favor of D3D-based rendering.

Of course you can write "power efficient" code in Win32. Most Win32 programs are already "power efficient" because they idle in a message loop waiting for input. The Metro UI is actually less power efficient since it contains plenty of fullscreen animation, a power chugging GPU operation. About the only thing Metro+XAML bring to the table is a scalable interface and there are plenty of other ways to do that.

wss
on Feb 18, 2013

'Sit on top of kernel' So a kludge, not something fundamental.

Regarding power efficiency, message waiting is about as power efficient as you can get and you can suspend NT apps just as well, resuming them intermittently via a service/other process e.g. to check mail. Minimal CPU=energy consumed.

There are plenty scalable interfaces implemented; in fact, every well-written Win32 application since day one scales with display DPI scaling setting.

Touch is another matter, but I see no reason why it couldn't be done in Win32 as well.

So what do you really *need* RT for? For standardized (=constraining developers' UI design options) UI experience? Development speed? Ease of installing/uninstalling? Managing/syncing application configuration data across multiple devices? What?

Since RT, Paul has mentioned, is the future, I'm sure a comprehensive article (or a series) on what RT really brings to the table would be enjoyed by the readership of this site (like 'Why you should make your next app RT' 'Why users should choose RT version of an app over a classic Win32 one'). Paul certainly is up to the task.

henador
on Feb 18, 2013

No, RT isn't a kludge anymore than any other UI framework (User, GDI, and the Win32 shell sit on top of Kernel, too). However, due to the secure nature of the WinRT host environment, Metro apps simply are not capable of matching the power of Win32 programs. WinRT wasn't even designed with that in mind, IMHO. It was designed for quick and dirty "applets".

raphaelsk
on Feb 17, 2013

Given your World War II interest, Paul, I'll note that Blue (Wikipedia says it's "Case Blue") was the Germans' original name for their summer 1942 eastern-front offensive, which effectively ended in the Battle of Stalingrad.

Nothing in common besides the name, obviously...

mikegno
on Feb 17, 2013

Really like my new Lumia 710 that I got as a stopgap til WP8 market settles down. But it's missing features my recently retired Windows Mobile phone had and it looks like those are in WP8 either and likely won't have in an update because the stooges who run WP don't seem to know what business/serious users want. I don't trust Google at all and I'm not a fan of Apple, so I guess I'll pin my hopes on Amazon for a new phone.

SamR
on Feb 17, 2013

I like Windows 8 Pro as it is on the Desktop.

I upgraded two machines to Windows 8 Pro, my home office PC with Vista (yeah yeah) and my Media Center with XP.

Both now run better, faster and have few or no issues. But ... I do not use Metro, I do not log in with a Microsoft account. I use it old school like a desktop OS which, by the way, is what it is.

I am worried a bit about Blue. One thing that Windows 8 did was stop the Dumbing Down of the Desktop OS that was rampant in Vista and 7. In 8 the file manager has lots of visible functions, copying is informative, the Advanced User menu is fantastic, Task Manager is really nice. It starts and shuts down faster than ever.

I hope Blue does does not go back to hiding things, they can do what they like with RT, the Desktop makes no sense on that. OK fix Metro but for the love of God leave the Desktop App alone on in Windows 8.

I will leave Metro and the Blue features to a future purchase of a Surface Tablet with a Haswell or better, no fans and 10 hours battery life.

MarkH
on Feb 17, 2013

I agree with zikifer above, If by "Portico has already shipped" you mean "to the privileged few who use Nokia's and get their carrier's blessing"...then yes. It has already shipped.

Chalk this up to one more screw up on Microsoft's part. Yet another in a LONG list of broken promises. I never would have believed 5 years ago that a company this massive and with this much momentum could screw up SO MONUMENTALLY that they would be in danger of being replaced by someone else...*anyone* else...but here we are. If they don't get their heads out of...wherever they are...and do something right for a change, they're just going to keep spiraling down in one delusional death spin.

I offer my vote of no confidence in Microsoft.

Fleet Command
on Feb 18, 2013

About zikifer's comment, it is as much as Verizon's fault as Microsoft. Nokia, on the other hand, is not carrier-locked, so it has an open hand to distribute whatever it sees fit.

But yes, I offer my vote of no confidence too. Reason are various.

SvenJ
on Feb 19, 2013

Not true. Nokia phones are as carrier locked as any others, unless you buy them unlocked. Witness my T-Mo Lumia 710 that likely will never see WP7.8. It is still in the hands of the carrier, if the carrier sponsored the device. That doesn't even mean subsidized, just that it has the carrier's brand. A full priced AT&T Nokia phone is still subject to AT&Ts whims for updates.

Fleet Command
on Feb 20, 2013

I don't know how can I buy a carrier-locked Nokia, although I don't live in U.S. Here, we buy phones that support our carriers and phone manufacturers that don't produce such phones do not have any market. So, no carrier stands between a vendor to consumer updates.

So, if that is the situation in U.S., I am sorry. Maybe it is time U.S. moved away from carrier lockdown.

Zeehunter
on Feb 19, 2013

In India , we got our 820s and 920s preloaded with Portico .. :P
USA #first world problems

Fleet Command
on Feb 17, 2013

Wait a second! Did yo say Microsoft will not be releasing service packs anymore? Details, please.

Bryan
on Feb 17, 2013

Paul I think that most Microsoft users (supporters) have been feeling frustrated for quite some time. Be it with Phone 7 to Phone 7.5 to Phone 7.8 to Phone 8 or Vista to 7 and now to Windows 8. Yes, the people at MSFT are pretty smart they also have a huge amount of money and talent that they can draw from but I am always left wondering about the, often critical decisions that are made, that are clearly WRONG. I'm almost left wondering if in fact these decisions are bring made to benefit the competition because heaven knows they are not benefitting MSFT.

With all the R&D that is and has been done over the past years is what they present to their customers the realisation of these 10's of billions of dollars? Is what they presented in Surface RT and Surface Pro (not counting the design and the materials science) the best they could do from a software, marketing and timing point of view.

I get frustrated seeing what MSFT often presents thinking that - surely this is not it or that they have somting up their sleeve. But, no - as is often the case there is no plan B and what you see is what you get. MSFT has got learn to UNDER PROMISE and OVER DELIVER. The opposition at Google and Apple are getting better and better and you can see this over the past 5 years in the products and services they have brought to market and the way they have presented themselves. Is it asking for too much for MSFT to be able to come - even - within an inch of this??

Win Factor
on Feb 18, 2013

Microsoft seems to march down the same road as always. They sometimes have moments of brilliance but inevitably can't close all the details in a reasonable way. Conversely, this is Apple's strength.

I agree that the *idea* of a unified OS with certain back-end consistency is a good one. Windows 8 IMHO is very poorly executed example of a good idea. By forcing the users into certain UIs, they are causing the users problems when they should be improving our lives. I heard the analogy that "well we've been driving cars with Steering Wheels for a long time, so we should put Steering Wheels on our bicycles, too." That's what Metro UI is. And it doesn't work across the entire platform.

And the idea of windows 8 being the same OS all the way down to the phone - great idea, but if Win8 uses up 30 or 40GB, that's not so great on a phone.

I really do think Apple has done a better job. They are adding touch UI elements to the MacOS and undoubtedly they will release touchscreen Macs and perhaps tablet Macs. But they aren't forcing people into UIs they don't want.

Let's take Windows RT - great idea in concept. The iPad equivalent. And we have Office on it, too -- except that Office is a *desktop* application! So we keep the desktop around JUST so that we can run office. Where is the Metro version of Office? They should not have rushed Office out on RT with a desktop -- but of course after 2 years with their pants down over tablets, they rush out RT with a desktop since they didn't have time to rewrite Office for a Touch/non-desktop UI.

Their ideas are often brilliant but all the little details take years to straighten out. Like we are seeing right now with Win 8, Win Phone 8, Win RT.

neonspark
on Feb 18, 2013

An operating system that could improve over time is somehow broken today? if so, well then everything is broken!

And I'm not sure what this article's point was. It tells the reader not to put any hopes on blue, but then goes on to say everything needs to be fixed ASAP therefore suggesting we should HOPE for blue?

very confusing writing.

jimbie882
on Feb 18, 2013

Do you really need to warn people that Blue won't fix everything? You're talking about Microsoft. I do think they won't fix Windows 8 until Windows 9, but many have moved on since then. Microsoft is only hurting itself when they had the chance to win new customers.

I think Blue will be perceived a success if they can fix at least 50% of the complaints about Windows 8. So far, I'm disappointed with their slow response and their lackluster feedback.

spsingh1
on Feb 18, 2013

"See, the thing is, Windows 8 is broken right now." So MS wants users to buy a broken OS? Paul, I have to agree with you on this statement, but mainly on the Metro Side. MS's Metro apps are very limited. I don't understand why MS released the RT tablets with the limited Metro app capability.

The bad PR from RT has tarnished Win 8 Pros image.

Seems like MS did not think the Win8 release all the way thru. Should have waited and put out a more solid set of Metro apps.

My 2 cents worth.

amitv
on Feb 18, 2013

Hope Microsoft responds by aquiring a LIMA Syndrome this time!!!

Craig
on Feb 18, 2013

I imagine that Microsoft's apps are in a bit of a holding pattern for some of the consolidating work going on with backend stuff... messaging in Skype, active directory for Microsoft account.

ScubaDog2008
on Feb 18, 2013

What do you mean by "unified inbox view in Mail"? I see all my email in the Mail app. It has other problems, I'll be the first to admit, but I see all my mail there. The key, as I see it, is to stop making the device or platform be the aggregator. I set it all up in Outlook.com, which pulls it all together quite nicely in any manner I wish. Then my Windows 8 device or my Windows Phone device simply accesses it. We have GOT to get people to STOP making the "home" of their data on a specific device.

pmbAustin
on Feb 18, 2013

What would be really nice is some additional Desktop APIs that allow desktop apps to integrate with touch and with Metro a little better... like being able to provide hooks for the search/settings charms maybe. And updates to controls so that if no keyboard is present, moving focus into a text box will pop-up the on-screen keyboard (instead of making you push a button)... configurable, of course. And perhaps some more guidelines for how to provide a 'touchable' UI (control spacing, etc). Reworking some common dialogs to be more Win8/Metro/Touch friendly too.

And obviously, moving more control panel settings over to metro as well. There are a lot of very common settings that you have to dive into desktop and dig into the depths of control panel to locate, that should be far more "front and center", and available in Metro.

And I'd still REALLY like the ability to have the system "know" where a program launch originated, so that I can set "Metro" and "Desktop" versions for a given association (say, JPG)... and if I open a JPG file from the desktop, it opens in a desktop app, and if i open it from Metro, it opens in Metro.

Ditto, I'd like to see "File Explorer" available in Metro. There are some good 3rd party ones out there... I see no reason why one shouldn't be provided by the OS.

JimP
on Feb 18, 2013

Doesn't Code Blue mean that a patient is about to die?

sporei
on Feb 19, 2013

I wonder if blue will give us podcast support on WP8 for non-US users? Will Microsoft provide such an amazing feature with this incredible "blue" wave of updates?

red77star
on Feb 19, 2013

I am interested in SP2 for Windows 7, as far as Windows 8 goes it is DOA for me. I hope MS changes their strategy with Windows 9 but if they conitnue digging their own grave, there will be alternatives i hope :)

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use