Going Pro: Portrait Mode

Thanks to the widescreen display, Surface Pro doesn't work well in portrait orientation

While a significant number of computer users are moving to tablets because of their superior simplicity, mobility, and usability, there are some key differences between the devices created by the various mobile platform makers. And among those differences is the notion of device orientation: Some are designed to be used in portrait mode by default, while others—like Surface Pro—are designed primarily for landscape use.

Apple’s iPad led the way by offering a 4:3 screen that is used in portrait mode by default. You know this because of the position of the iPad’s Home button, which is found at the bottom middle of the device’s front side when it is held in this default orientation. While I’m sure that Apple investigated going with a landscape orientation instead, it most likely bet on portrait because that’s how its iPhone and iPod touch worked previous to the iPad release, and users were accustomed to it.

But Apple’s decision to use portrait mode by default is aided by the 4:3 aspect ratio of the device’s screen. As it turns out, widescreen devices of a certain size—which is to say, anything bigger than about 7 inches diagonally—start to look elongated and stretched out when viewed in portrait mode. So while it’s OK for a device like the iPhone 5, the latest iPod touch, or the Google Nexus 7 to sport a 16:9 widescreen display, a squarer 4:3 screen makes more sense for devices like the iPad.

Microsoft’s Surface Pro and Surface RT—indeed, pretty much all Windows 8 devices—utilize widescreen displays, however. When Microsoft decided to get into the tablet business, and to support tablet devices with Windows 8, it was of course basing this system on the PC, which settled on widescreen, landscape-oriented displays almost a full decade ago.

So when you look at the front of a Surface or other Windows 8 device, you’ll see that the Start button—our version of Apple’s Home button on iOS devices—can be found in the bottom middle of the device’s front side when it is held in this default landscape orientation.

You can, of course, hold Surface Pro—or any other Windows 8 device—in portrait mode. Windows 8/RT will switch the display instantly to support the new orientation and the reversed resolution (now 1080 x 1920 on Surface Pro), and Metro-style apps will adjust on the fly as well.

What doesn’t work so well, of course, is the desktop. A decade ago, when Microsoft was pushing its first Tablet PC system on customers, I probably spent more time using virtually every Tablet PC on the market than most. And while I recall finding the portrait orientation of these PCs useful, and more “paper-like” than the landscape orientation, and thus better for writing with a pen, there were also some oddities. These oddities persist today with Surface. Windows resize and reposition. It’s ugly.

But this new generation of Windows 8 devices suffers doubly because of the widescreen displays. And while a widescreen display looks perfectly normal—even preferable—in landscape, it looks perfectly horrible in portrait. Stretched. Thin. Weird. And that’s now true in both Metro and the desktop.

Some Metro apps adapt to this orientation better than others. In Mail, you can view your email list or the current email body, but not both at the same time, for example. But the Weather app is nice looking enough that you could almost imagine it being used in an interactive display.

And while I love the Kindle platform, Amazon’s Windows 8 app for Kindle is an abomination in some ways. It looks terrible in portrait, as you’d expect, all stretched out and weird.

But when you use this app in landscape mode, it inexplicably doesn’t offer a two column view. So the screen is wasted either way.

By the way, here’s how this is supposed to look. This is the Kindle app on the 8.9-inch Kindle Fire HD, in landscape mode. Beautiful.

I can’t blame Microsoft for the Kindle app. But oh, the Windows desktop.  Here is where everything really falls apart, so much so that I’ve taken to locking the screen orientation to prevent windows from resizing/repositioning in the event of an inadvertent twist of the devices. (Charms, Settings, Screen.) I just can’t stand how it looks, and how switching to this mode changes all the onscreen windows.

Ultimately, I think that widescreen displays make too much sense in Windows to overthink this, but then they also make portrait mode a lot less usable. I’ll be keeping mine in landscape. And crossing my fingers that Amazon wakes up and fixes the Kindle app.

Discuss this Article 42

TrackZ
on Feb 11, 2013

I so wish they had settled on a 16:10 aspect ratio. I think would have made both orientations much more usable.

abw1987
on Feb 11, 2013

I wish 16:10 had emerged as the standard for PCs in general, not just the Surface.

Make62
on Feb 11, 2013

I agree, I miss the 1920X1200 monitors and laptops and think it would be the perfect tablet resolution.

Waethorn
on Feb 11, 2013

16:9 was already a well-established video standard in Europe even before HD. Making it the format for PC's only makes sense due to the amount of media consumption that occurs on it.

wp7mango
on Feb 12, 2013

16:10 is available in the new Kupa Ultranote X15 tablet, available with Core i7 and 8GB RAM.

bluvg
on Feb 11, 2013

I still look for 4:3 monitors for our desktops. All our users have dual monitors, and they often have one in landscape and the other in portrait. Whereas 4:3 works well in both orientations, widescreen monitors do not. I think they don't work that well in landscape, either--a lot of that vertical space gets eaten up by application UI.

It works better for video. It's also cheaper to manufacture for a given diagonal dimension. But that's about it.

Waethorn
on Feb 11, 2013

I have a customer that bought one of those AMD Radeon HD 5870 cards with Eyefinity-6 (6x DisplayPort) a couple years back. He has 6x 22" 16:9 LCD's hooked up with 3 Ergotron 2-high LCD stands. He loves it. It takes up all his desk space, but he thinks it's awesome too. I could just imagine playing some games on that....he just does a lot of heavy multitasking though, being an accountant.

jetsafl
on Feb 11, 2013

I agree about the vertical space eaten up by the UI but that is less of an issue in Windows 8. I have had my RT rotation locked from almost day one, just doesn't look right in portrait.
Good point about the Kindle App, the lack of a two column view has me scratching my head too.

EricEric
on Feb 11, 2013

I find widescreen portrait mode on the desktop and tablet to be great for browsing websites and reading web articles. Most websites are designed for 1024 pixel width, so as long as my portrait mode monitor or tablet is at least 1024 pixels across, there's no horizontal scrolling necessary and much less vertical scrolling than in landscape mode. I don't care that the desktop looks funny in portrait mode since maybe 1% of my time is spent there and 99% of my time is spent browsing the web, using Office and Visual Studio, all of which adapt well to portrait mode. My second monitor is in landscape mode for stuff that doesn't involve much reading.

GoodThings2Life
on Feb 11, 2013

Yeah, I'm a landscape, widescreen mode king of guy... I much prefer to view documents snapped side-by-side than view something vertically.

Plus, let's face it... more people WATCH content on a screen than READ on these, so the 16:9 widescreen means better HD video watching.

TraderGary
on Feb 11, 2013

I too was dismayed with the Windows 8 version of Kindle. So I immediately loaded the desktop version and it works just as it should with double columns. Notice too that the Windows 8 version doesn't have Search and I use that a lot with my reference books. Desktop Kindle, of course, has search capabilities.

jhoff80
on Feb 11, 2013

I'm sorry, but I have zero idea what you're talking about with the Kindle app.

1. The default setting is to give you a two-column view in landscape, though you can disable that with the view options.
2. You can change the margin settings in view options.

multiplatform
on Feb 12, 2013

My landscape for Kindle also appears to have a 2 column landscape view by default.

digitaldadindy
on Feb 11, 2013

I could see the legal profession on board with a Windows Tablet in portrait mode. 9 x 16 is close enough to 8.5 x 14 that "Legal Size" documents could be palatable. And as you rightly pointed out, why would Amazon want aps for competing devices to function as well as its' own brand.

InfoDave
on Feb 11, 2013

There's that candor thing again, much appreciated Paul.

You may have touched on something that I am going to give you credit for. It's that there's a size where wide screen gives way to standard definition. I can't put an exact actual number on it, but it's in the area of 16:x vs 4:3. On a smartphone, wide screen definition works, but as the size of the screen increases, standard definition (4:3) is better suited. The seven to ten inch screens may be better suited for the 4:3 aspect ratio. Allow me to add that at a certain size (17 inch?), wide screen begins to work again.

I remember, back in the olden days, a company by the name of Radius had a monitor with a mercury switch, that switched from landscape to portrait mode. Landscape for spreadsheets, portrait for word processing. You could see a physical page of printed text in portrait mode. Truly revolutionary at the time.

turnma
on Feb 11, 2013

I thought the comment about Kindle was odd as well. Maybe Amazon changed something at some point, because I don't recall changing this particular setting but I'm sitting here looking at two pages side by side. It can be changed in the View menu - "One Column Only" on or off.

bit101
on Feb 11, 2013

Windows 8 Kindle App: Top app bar, view icon. last option is "One Column Only" On/Off.

Linden
on Feb 11, 2013

The help for the Windows 8 Kindle app says "Some small screen devices may not support multiple columns." It seems that the Surface RT is one of these "small screen devices".

michaelljones
on Feb 11, 2013

Couldn't disagree more myself. When I'm reading a book in Nook or Kindle apps I crank up the font size to fairly high and vey much enjoy reading in portrait.

Until the Kindle changes for 2 column, you're right that it sucked in landscape however.

Try Pinball FX in portrait. Hard to play in landscape after when you can see the whole board with no scrolling.

dfey
on Feb 11, 2013

16x10 would have made all the difference 1920x1200.

Wonder how long till we see Surface Pro 2 with Haswell?

Waethorn
on Feb 12, 2013

A Haswell-equipped Surface won't likely be out until MUCH later in the year. Final silicon has to actually be produced, AND THEN Microsoft has to engineer the tablet with the right kind of cooling solution, which can often take several months of prototyping and testing. The Surface Pro JUST launched, so they're not going to come out with a new model to replace it in a couple months time.

Nickel
on Feb 11, 2013

It would be nice if the start screen would flip from a "left to right" to a "top to bottom" flow when switching to portrait, would make it look, and probably function much better... perhaps in win 9? or maybe an update to 8.... As for Kindle, as other have mentioned there is a multi column setting in view, and also margin adjust, which might make it look better in portrait for you... experiment here, when I fliped my monitor to portrait the app auto-switched from 2 column to 1 column and then back again when it returned to landscape mode, and adjusting to min margins it seemed to leave space, but not as much space on the sides as your pic shows..

ciscog33k
on Feb 12, 2013

Paul, I'm using the surface pro heavily for kindle books. I'm reading cisco press books in the kindle app for 3 hours a day while I prep for my CCIE exam. When it's in landscape mode, I do get two columns of text. Maybe it's something to do with the type of books you're reading? Having said that, I MUCH prefer portrait mode for reading textbooks. This was something that I was genuinely concerned about before it released. It looks weird if you're used to an ipad or paper books, but there are benefits too. The cisco books in particular often have explanatory text followed by detailed diagrams, configuration text from network devices (which is shown as an image and not text), tables, router output, etc. I find portrait much better for this kind of reading because it means less flipping back and forth between the text and the images. It really makes a big difference. Also, the complaint people have about the weight and holding it for a long period of time? Portrait mode negates that. I read for an hour and a half (45min each way) standing up on the subway/streetcar to/from work today. No strain at all. All you have to do is rest the bottom of the surface in portrait mode on your stomach at an angle and it takes all the tension off hands and wrists. Again, I thought weight would be an issue for what I wanted to do with it, but it turns out it's a total non-issue.

Also, the kindle app does kind of suck, especially for highlighting. I don't understand why they don't make it the same on every platform. On a kindle or ipad you just run your finger over the text you want to highlight, but on the windows app you have to select and hold, and then drag the highlighting markers to the end of the text you want to highlight, and then you have to click a highlight button. It's needlessly difficult. Even more frustrating is that you can't drag the highlight from one page to the next as far as I can tell, which I could do no problem on my actual kindle. They need to change that. Overeall reading technical books on the surface is far superior to on the kindle itself. It's kind of a draw with the ipad but VIEWING notes/highlights on ipad is a pain because they only give you a stupid little screen to see them in. Also, they should give you control over the margins. No reason the two columns of text couldn't be wider, ditto in portrait mode. Lots of wasted space on sides of text. FYI portrait mode is awesome for many websites too.

multiplatform
on Feb 12, 2013

National Geographic on the Nook software looks fantastic in either portrait or landscape mode. Most of my books are on the Kindle, but since I've read them all I didn't really have reason to check. Maybe Microsoft's work with B&N is paying off in performance (though w/o marketing nobody will ever know it).

I think the reason the Start menu looks bad is that it is limited to 5 tiles high with what appears to be a fixed maximum height. That leaves a lot of space with nothing but background showing on portrait settings.

The desktop is largely irrelevant because, in my opinion, it was never designed for portrait use and desktop applications are not made for it. I don't think heavy desktop users really care if it looks good in portrait and, as you did, will lock the screen into landscape if they depend on it.

Aside: the 1920x1080 on the Dell XPS 12 matches what I was already using on my Mac Mini on my 27" monitor, so my transition wasn't nearly as brutal as yours as it pertains to handling an external monitor. (Sadly my X/Y switch could not detect my monitor, so I have to physically plug in the VGA input to the display port adapter on the XPS to get the full resolution. I guess you can't have everything.)

Ian Ray
on Feb 12, 2013

I am curious as to how this is if you were to use the Surface Pro in portrait orientation and an external 2560x1600 monitor in landscape. Panos Panay explained some of this on reddit with the fact that the Surface Pro defaults nicely to 150% scaling which I have used with a 2560 monitor, but I am looking for more of a subjective viewpoint of is this worth the effort or does it offer no advantage over having both in landscape.

pthurrott
on Feb 12, 2013

I don't have such a display, sorry.

Greho
on Feb 12, 2013

I find the portrait orientation to be sort of like a folded newspaper, especially if the column layout is good.

icwhatudidthere
on Feb 12, 2013

I'm actually coming around to 16:9 for specific tasks. In landscape, it's turned out to be incredibly handy to have a calculator on one side and I can go through emails and tally up receipts on the other. And since it's metro you don't have to bother with window focus.

And surprisingly, I've found portrait to be useful for onscreen typing of comments and emails. Because the display is not as wide, it's easier to reach all the keys. And since the display is tall the remaining screen is very close to the dimensions of a sheet of paper.

wp7mango
on Feb 12, 2013

There is one advantage to having 16:9 in portrait mode.

Run MS Word without the attached keyboard and use the on-screen keyboard instead. When you are in portrait mode, you now have tons of space above it allowing you to see much more of the document you are writing, unlike landscape mode where the on-screen keyboard takes up half the screen.

So, whilst 16:9 portrait mode might look weird at first, it can actually be very useful.

Silversee
on Feb 12, 2013

Checked Kindle for Windows 8 on my 23" desktop display and it does offer a 2-column view:

From the app, swipe or right-click to bring up the app commands. Tap or click on 'View', then set 'One Column Only' to 'OFF'.

However, on my Surface RT this command is missing, as Paul reports.

This is clearly Amazon's issue, and Kindle users should give them appropriate feedback.

jhoff80
on Feb 12, 2013

But this article is about the Pro, which very much does have two columns.

xdapao3
on Feb 12, 2013

The ONLY thing that I like about the ONLY Apple product that is worth a little more than zero to me (the iPad) is its screen aspect ratio: 4:3.
I am really disappointed about the lack of 4:3 offerings in the Android camp (the only mobile OS I am interested in as IMO is as far superior to every other mobile OS as Windows is to every other PC OS).

Anyway, the Nexus 7, as practically all Android tablets, is 16:10.
Despite the apparent small difference 16:10 is a huge improvement over 16:9, I have toyed with a couple of 10" Android tablets and they were actually usable in portrait.

I also have recently upgraded my 15 month old Galaxy Note to a Note II and found it to be improved in literally EVERYTHING BUT the screen size and aspect ratio (the other screen's specs are improved as well). 5.3" 16:10 is IMO way better than 5.5" 16:9.

I have always found 16:9 to be a very stupid format and 16:10 to be at least bearable (much better anyway).

The monitor I use with my laptop, when docked, is an EIZO 24" 16:10 1920x1200 and would only swap it for another 16:10 one...

gcosro
on Feb 12, 2013

At my work place I'm using a dual monitor system (primary portrait, secondary landscape). I totally agree with your observations, Windows8 is very unfriendly with portrait monitors. Metro interface is build to landscape as landscape as possible. Love the desktop interface but the Metro is just as ugly and broken as the DOS.

ciscog33k
on Feb 12, 2013

One feature I'd like would be for windows 8 to remember separate tile layours in both landscape and portrait mode. I can see the pattern they rearrange by when you go to portrait mode, but it's like an excercise in optimization modeling to get the best of both worlds. I guess it's not really the end of the world that this isn't handled better but it would be nice.

anthonyfear
on Feb 12, 2013

I agree that regular apps look 'weird' in portrait mode on a Windows tablet, but try using a desktop app with on-screen keyboard and portrait makes sense! I find myself using portrait a lot when in desktop mode (and no external keyboard handy).

loonerBot
on Feb 12, 2013

Pehaps I am alone, but I don't mind using Surface in portrait mode in most cases. I find it easier to hold in one hand while reading, and the taller display means I don't have to scroll as often. I often use portrait mode with Word in order to get a bigger overview of my document. While I agree that a widescreen display looks unusual in portrait orientation, I don't think that it is as bad as you claim.

Sterling
on Feb 12, 2013

One thing that attracts me to Windows 8 is that it's mostly a landscape OS. I seldom use my Nexus 10 in portrait mode.

eboyhan
on Feb 12, 2013

I wonder if our discomfort with 16:9 in portrait mode is an issue of culture/habit? Here in the US, the standard ANSI "A" paper size of 8.5x11 is exactly the same aspect ration as the old NTSC TV standard, and the movie standard in use before 1952 (4:3 or 1.33:1). Today all movies are made with a 1.85:1 aspect ratio which is close to 16:9 (1.78:1). Europe's standard paper size is ISO A4 (8.3x11.7 or 1.4:1) which is a little bit closer to 16:9. I wonder, if after a while, we won't get comfortable with 16:9 in portrait mode -- certainly you'll get more text on a page (which is good for speed readers), and (as you point out) 16:9 in landscape mode is quite good as a 2 column folio view display modality which approximates the reading experience of a paperback.

On the issue of reading Kindle books on the S/Pro, there are in fact 3 ways to do this. There is the metro/modern app that you wrote about in this posting (which several commenters here have stated can display in folio view on the S/Pro but not the S/RT). If you go into desktop mode on the S/Pro, you can also install the Kindle for PC desktop program which offers a very nice 2-column (or 3 column if the font size is small enough) reading experience in landscape orientation. It has a very useful slider to set the # words/line which can be used to scale the book's page to whatever size you desire in either portrait or landscape. Finally, also in desktop mode, there is the Amazon Cloud Reader which is a web app which lets you read Amazon books from within a browser (actually this is two methods as there is a Metro/Modern version of the browser as well as a desktop version). The Cloud reader is a bit like the Kindle for PC app in layout, but without as much configuration sugar as in Kindle for PC.

Given the size of the S/Pro compared with my Kindle Touch and Kindle Fire 8.9, I will be looking at the reading experience in a lot more detail on my S/Pro going forward -- it's an interesting use case that I hadn't contemplated until I started to play around with my Surface a bit.

Mortarm
on Feb 13, 2013

Since you make a point about the desktop, more than once, I'm surprised you didn't include a screenshot to demonstrate how it "falls apart".

As for the kindle app, I see this as an aesthetic preference. I like the single column of text in landscape mode; For me, it's easier to read and is, in fact, more space efficient, since there's no gutter space, which is pointless in the digital realm.

auser
on Feb 14, 2013

Thank you for raising the issue for aspect ratio - 16:9 really do feel quite awkward in portrait mode when going beyond phone-size. Maybe 16:10 as suggested in comments above could be a reasonably compromise without going total iPad-style with a 4:3 radio.

Hope you will review a Windows 8 tablet with a 16:10 aspect ratio ( for example the HP elitepad 900 - which is the only 16:10 Windows 8 tablet I currently know off).

inTEGraTOR
on May 11, 2013

But Kindle DOES have a two column mode. And if you adjusted your characters-per-line setting you would have full-width columns instead of the ones you have. I admit that the setting is very poorly named but there are a total of about 8 settings on the Kindle for PC, so you should have been able to try a few before declaring it impossible.

And there then are all your critiques of my Surface, I mean the Surface Pro. I use mine in portrait all the time (even for Kindle) and it works fine and looks great. There are a few websites that don't look so good, so I rotate the device when I view them.

pthurrott
on May 11, 2013

Yeah, now it does. It didn't when I wrote this.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use