Going Pro: Wrapping Up

In the final installment of Going Pro, a look back and a look ahead

When a Surface Pro loaner unit arrived about a month and a half ago from Microsoft, I set out to document my attempt to move to using this device as my sole PC going forward, replacing both a tower desktop PC and my Ultrabook in the process. It’s been an interesting experience, but it’s time to wrap it up.

Because I had received the device a few weeks before I could write about it publicly, I started mapping out this series of “Going Pro” articles. The articles I planned were mostly pragmatically-oriented, focusing on specific aspects of the migration from other hardware to the Surface Pro. But as the time to publish arrived, I had started thinking about Surface Pro a bit more broadly, and the resulting series changed a bit from what I had originally envisioned.

Part of the reason for this is that the Surface with Windows 8 Pro is not ideal for my own needs. This isn’t a refutation of the device, or of my initial review of Surface Pro, and shouldn’t be considered contradictory in any way. I’ve been reviewing computing hardware and software products for about 20 years now, and I learned long ago how to separate my own needs from those of general PC users. Surface Pro, like any other product, has its strengths and its weaknesses.

What it comes down to for me, specifically, is that it’s just too small. I’m 46 years old, I have pretty bad eyesight, and I’m a pretty large guy. (Sorry, girls, I’m taken.) So I prefer a larger screen both at home—where I use a 27-inch 1080p display and would love to go even larger—and on the go, where I use what is still a rare type of product, the 15-inch Samsung Series 9 Ultrabook. This portable machine, inconceivable just a few years ago, combines an ample screen with the perfect resolution for the size (1600 x 900) with amazingly light weight (3.6 pounds). If Samsung made a 17-inch version with a 1080p display I’d buy it in a second.

(Side-note: In the buildup to the release of the 15-inch MacBook Pro Retina last year, everyone assumed this device would be a 15-inch version of a MacBook Air. I had intended to buy that device until I saw the actual product, which is a super-expensive, super-high-res, and surprisingly thick/heavy machine that is not, in fact, a MacBook Air. Samsung came to the rescue just a short time later with its 15-inch Ultrabook, exactly what I was looking for.)

With a 10-inch screen that is overloaded with a (for the size) unacceptably high-resolution screen, the Surface Pro is—again, for me—the wrong combination of specifications. Too, the Type Cover, while excellent, is just a bit too small—yes, again, for me—to use regularly. It’s fine for taking notes in meetings, and for banging out short articles as I did on the plane recently to and from Cancun, and from the hotel room. But even a reasonably-sized keyboard, like the one on the Samsung, or an excellent portable keyboard, like the ones on Lenovo’s ThinkPad and IdeaPad machines, isn’t acceptable for long-term use.

Of course, I’m a writer. I spend most of my time sitting in front of a screen and writing. This is not how most people would use the Surface Pro, but I assume it’s understandable how the size, the screen, and the keyboard all combine to make this device less than ideal. For me.

Now, unsuitable for me doesn’t mean unsuitable, and it certainly doesn’t mean unacceptable. Surface Pro is a fascinating and lust-worthy device, one that wakes up both sides of the brain when examined. It’s beautiful and useful, portable and compatible, and Microsoft’s unique approach to hybrid computing is still new enough to be exciting and fresh. People will continue to be impressed and even awed by this machine for months to come, and it elicits comments and stares whenever it’s out in public. This, more than anything, tells me that Microsoft is onto something with this form factor.

So do I still recommend Surface Pro? Hell yes, assuming you fully understand the compromises that using such a device entails. But then, that’s how I concluded my original review. So in that sense, nothing has changed: Two and a half months with Surface Pro have reinforced my initial impressions of the device, but also confirmed something I was a bit afraid to admit to myself: I just can’t use this kind of device full-time myself.

Looking ahead, I’m still very much convinced that touch-enabled Windows devices are the future and that some form of Surface-like form factor will essentially replace today’s Ultrabooks and laptops. People who haven’t used touch on traditional PCs dismiss it out of hand, but that view is misguided, as anyone who has used such a device can tell you. Hopefully, Microsoft will expand the Surface lineup in the future, both with portable devices and with desktop PCs. I’m ready to ride that wave, but I’m still looking for the right hardware for me.

Discuss this Article 26

Rxdiaz
on Mar 2, 2013

I don't really see the need for touch in Windows myself at all. People use Windows because they need their desktop software. Their desktop software was written for keyboard and mouse usage. What is the advantage of touch? Oh yea, touch lets me use the metro interface. That interface that I don't like at all. Let's all get touch screens (and spend a lot of money in the process) to use that interface. Sounds like a plan to me. Good luck with that MS...

The funny thing is Metro was designed for smart phones, and Metro seems to work quite well on smart phones. Yet it still doesn't sell on smart phones. Why does anyone think this is going to sell on desktops and laptops?

GoodThings2Life
on Mar 2, 2013

Even as a longtime Tablet PC user, I've always said the same thing about touch in Windows... I had an EliteBook 2760p with touch that I hated it and turned off touch (leaving just the pen enabled). But...

Windows 8 gets touch right... and Surface Pro has excellent touch detection when the pen is active and switches gracefully between the two input methods.

I use Surface Pro with a mouse, the TypePad, touch, and pen inputs, and it's just as easy to switch between them. Really... even in the desktop (at least for me).

Rxdiaz
on Mar 3, 2013

Windows 8 may get touch right but it gets the desktop wrong.

If they had left the desktop alone and let use choose to use Metro when ever and how ever we wanted I believe it would have been much more accepted and appreciated by most users.

I certainly think it would not be significantly behind Vista's uptake like it is now.

pmbAustin
on Mar 3, 2013

You don't see the need... yet here I am, after using a Surface Pro for a few hours, reaching out to my laptop screen to touch the "OK" button on a pop-up to dismiss it.

The moment you start using it, it's hard to imagine NOT using it. It's not a "need', per se, but it's just so NATURAL. And for the record, I'm talking about using the Desktop, not Metro.

I think you're being very short-sighted and narrow-minded here, judging something you clearly haven't ever really experienced. I'd suggest keeping a more open mind, and better yet, trying it for yourself.

Touch works great on desktops and laptops. Once you use it somewhere, you're going to want it everywhere.

Rxdiaz
on Mar 4, 2013

Lol, I guess you are right and everyone else is wrong.

We're all stupid, short sighted and narrow minded.

Keep defending MS's biggest flop OS ever by insulting users.

Care for another glass of koolaide?

pthurrott
on Mar 4, 2013

OK guys. I think we can debate/discuss without being insulting to each other.

stumpy1570
on Mar 2, 2013

That's why I love ya big guy. Great insight. I will continue to forward folks to your site and visit everyday myself. After leaving Apple, I was a fanboy for over 12 years, its great to be back with big blue. Its not with some snags... but I really believe they are going in the right direction with windows 8 and the surface line. Now if you will excuse me.. its time to undock my surface pro from this beautiful 27 inch dell monitor and go slay some dragons!!! Signed, 6'1 almost 43

Nickel
on Mar 2, 2013

Paul, thank you for your reviews and insights on the Surface Pro, they have helped me in making my decision (my bank account may not be thanking you however).

Will
on Mar 2, 2013

Seems like a fair summary to me. I'm the opposite though ... I want a 7 inch Windows 8 tablet with a usb port and video out. Something really tough and small with a real file system. I'm hoping Nokia might come up with something like this.

For a portable computer I really don't like anything with a screen bigger than 11 inches, very happy with my Asus ultra book. When it dies though I'd definitely look at the then current surface pro.

mmcpher
on Mar 2, 2013

PT, thanks for the series and for your transparency with respect to what drives your personal view, and your editorial view of the SP. It makes sense. I did take a few things from your personal view. It seems fair to infer that any device of the size of the SP would ultimately pale in comparison to your preference for a mega-sized desktop and very large laptop. As someone even older and with likely poorer eyesight than you, I certainly understand that. But in this sense, right out of the box, the SP didn't really stand a chance because of its small size. I started out back in the late '80's with a Magnovox Videowriter, moved to true mobility with a series of small black and white Laptops from a company called Altima. As I grew older and my already poor eyesight deteriorated somewhat, I eventually moved up through 15, 17 and eventually 20 + inch laptops, the last and largest being a behemoth by Acer that left my desktop maybe 4 or 5 times during its lifetime. So I get the equation between size, weight, screen and keyboard size. And all of my desktops, at home and work, have screen sizes larger than 20 inches. But throughout this progression and regression, my work has been carried out on a parallel succession of Blackberry smartphone devices, and its been the same sort of expansion, contraction, etc. There have also been larger and smaller screens and keyboards, and the tradeoffs that entails. Some phones are not for me, that implies no real criticism of that phone other than it doesn't suit my particular needs. I am not really "in the market" for that size phone. But for your professional interest in MS, the market and this sub-compact/tablet segment, would you care at all about the SP?

For people in my line of work, while we use PCs or Macs every single day, we are not on them and not in our or even someone else's office all day, so perhaps we don't have the same reductive drive toward easy-on-the-eyes-and-fingers that your work produces for you. So we often have used smartphones and more recently tablets to do substantial work. So even for a sore-eyes like myself, I have come to appreciate the mobility of smaller devices like the SP. My direct comparisons to it are the Blackberry Playbook, with its 7 inch size, and the Ipad which is roughly similar in size to the SP. And in this more market-segment focused context, I am very pleased with the SP. The type cover is lighter and better ergonomically than the topline keyboard covers for either the Playbook or the Ipads. Perhaps it is a function of speed and the fluidity of the browser, and my tendency to view the SP primarily in landscape, but the SP is also the best viewing experience so far. The pinch to zoom is also the fastest for me, and I seldom encounter the need, as I do with each of my other portable devices, to readjust so that the text displays within the screen width without needed additional scrolling.

I do get your preference for larger devices, but in your discussion of this, I didn't see you passing on the SP because it lacked sufficient speed and power or storage capacity, although it doubtless pales in comparison to the specs available in larger form devices. It may be that the SP has hit those sweet spots, even for power users.

The SP is hot and heavy and while the concerns about battery life seem somewhat exaggerated to me, they definitely are a concern, but not one that outweighs the many positives of the SP. All in all, worth the weight and the SP is a great device for demonstrating and learning the ways that Windows 8 may allow us to work faster and more efficiently in the future. In just the few days I've had the SP, my Windows 8 knowledge and proficiency has increased, even on my desktops, and I think I have crossed that tipping point where I've gone from pining for Windows 7 on my newer desktops running 8, to wishing my old desktops running Windows 7 had Windows 8, and the same holds true for IE 10. I as iffy on it until I got the SP, but now I've gone ahead and moved my Windows 7 PCs up to IE 10. I don't know if this aspect was or is part of MS's agenda for the SP, but I expect it is. SP has also been the engine for my moving to the Office subscription model. Right now that is confined to 5 personal licenses, but I am the guy where I work that ultimately drives our hardware and software purchases and renewals and within a year or so, we will move everyone over to this model. And the SP was the thin leading edge of that movement. So even if the SP isn't mind-blowingly great enough to cause me to scrap all of my other devices, it is good enough to impact my use of them. I'm sitting within 10 yards of 2 PCs with greater than 20 inch screens and full-sized keyboards and mice, and have no urge to go to them.

pthurrott
on Mar 2, 2013

Thanks everyone.

With regards to whether I'd be interested in Surface Pro if I didn't write about technology and/or Microsoft products ... yes. This is something I've been wrestling with for a long time, the desire for the smallest/lightest possible device to take on the road. My size negates this desire, but over a decade ago I recall seeing journalists from Asia typing away on these tiny PCs that weren't sold in the US and really wanting one. There was the Libretto from Toshiba eventually and of course then a huge wave of netbooks, but I've just never been able to use them effectively. I keep trying. Hoping. But failing. :) Ah well.

studio4llc
on Mar 2, 2013

Paul, I agree that the Surface Pro, and to a lesser degree the Surface RT, are fantastic Windows 8 devices. Shortly I'll be making a decision between the Surface Pro and the Lenovo Helix.

However, as great as these devices are, they simply cannot be used as a desktop replacement for many of us. I spend too many hours each day working on large and complex AutoCAD and BIM projects where real estate is KING. Adobe products, not so much but bigger is still better.

I've gone the route of lugging larger mobile workstations (a $6,500, 17" BOXX at a whopping 13 pounds!) thru airports 3-4 days a week. So, I've since resolved myself to the fact that a mobile device is just what the name implies — a solution to be used on a temporary basis. And for this, the Surface Pro and Helix would fit my needs perfectly in allowing me to both play and work while at remote locations.

And thanks for your intense and detailed analysis on the Surface Pro.

tboggs13
on Mar 2, 2013

As part of mobility project at work, I have had the good fortune to test the Surface Pro and have a budget to test various options.

I first started with the Lenovo USB 3.0 dock since it supports dual DVI output. That would most closely resemble my current desktop configuration. Unfortunately I found the DisplayLink docking solutions (we also tested an HP dock based on DiplayLinks latest chipset) lacking due to degraded video output and erratic mouse behavior. It appeared to handle the resolution, but the image just wasn't as crisp as when using the Displayport connection. Wireless mice were virtually unusable with the Lenovo unless plugged into an external USB hub. A wired mouse worked better, but still would lag from time to time.

Giving up on the usb video option, I purchased a Dell U2913WM monitor and connected it directly to the Surface Pro using the mini-displayport connection. This has several advantage with the 2913. It includes a USB 3.0 hub and audio out. The audio is carried over the displayport cable and sound fine over the AX510 speaker attached to the monitor. Unfortunately, the USB 3.0 does not work over displayport. I heard USB can be carried over a displayport 1.2 connection, but this is not built into the monitor. This is where a Thunderbolt connection would have been preferred on the Surface Pro. Devices could be built to include USB 3 and Ethernet over USB taking us back to a single cable for connectivity.

So, my current solution for using the Surface Pro as a desktop replacement requires a power connection, a USB3 connection and a displayport connection. Unweildy but not horrible as it is easier to connect correctly than some laptop docks but I am concerned about the longevity of the connections. The USB 3.0 is still connected to the Lenovo dock to provide a gigabit Ethernet connection. I hope to replace this with a USB 3 hub with Ethernet or attach a Ethernet over usb adapter to the Dell monitor.

Once connected, the Surface Pro is a great desktop. I don't see any difference running it and my 2nd gen i7. The only difference is that I don't run hyper-v on the Surface Pro.

I picked the Dell U2913WM because it is basically the same size as two 17 inch monitors. The resolution is 2560 by 1080 which matches the vertical resolution of the Surface Pro. The extra width allows me to easily snap windows to the left or right side of the screen and basically have two 1280 x 1080 windows. The only problem app is remote desktop, which does not truly resize when it's windows resizes. It scales the remote video, which makes for a very pixelate image or you have to do a lot of scrolling. If only MS would allow it to dynamically resize the resolution of the remote host. Funny thing is, you can do that with third party tools.

This makes it easier to transition to "undocked" mode. You still have to move windows, but you don't have to resize everything.

I upgraded the OS to Enterprise to support DirectAccess. This started the experiment off on the wrong foot since MS does not publish Surface Pro drivers on the website. They say you can get everything through Windows update, but that doesn't work when the first driver you need is the network driver. Luckily someone on TechNet has posted the crucial drivers missing form Windows Update.

I find Notebook mode to be the most problematic mode to adjust to. The screen resolution is a problem for me. I can do it, but like Paul I am 46 and the eyes are slipping. I love the touch cover, mostly because I don't use it that much, but I do have a problem with "Enter/Shift", the space bar and the letter "A". I need to break out Mavis Beacon and get used to it. I find the biggest problem is a lack of confidence with it.

As a tablet, I love it. I use it for games, browsing and news consumption quite a bit. Whenever I am undocked from the large screen I try to stick with Metro apps as much as possible. I love the fluidity and the functionality brought by the charms. We really need a metro version of Outlook to enable sharing of content via e-mail.

Speaking of e-mail, in order to connect the built in Mail app to Exchange (with policies enforced) you have to be a system administrator. Not use enterprise friendly.

Overall, it is a great device if you are not looking first and foremost for a laptop. If you want a desktop that you can carry with you and use as a tablet it is a very viable solution. In a pinch you can use it as a laptop, but I wouldn't want to be using it that way all day long, mostly due to the screen. If MS can figure out the scaling issues between displays, it will be much better.

GoodThings2Life
on Mar 2, 2013

Honestly, I absolutely love using Surface Pro. The one single point that I agree about is the screen resolution is too damn high on this thing... at least, it is given my perpetual need to use the Desktop. If I didn't need that, it'd be ideal.

Alas, here I am in desktop IE writing this and it's hard on the eyes. I'm only 33, but my eyes have been bad since I was 8. If Windows Desktop scaled to lower/higher resolutions the way Metro did, it would solve the problem.

I feel like this is something Microsoft has to fix for users and should have done years ago as monitors started growing and changing to widescreen formats.

Anyway, aside from resolution, I find the Surface Pro fantastic to use. It's awesome to carry into meetings for note-taking (I'm one of those pen-loving users), and the performance of the device is fantastic. I will point out that I never hear the fans running, and I regularly watch videos on it and have multiple apps open. Maybe I'm just luckier, or maybe some of the apps you run are just more CPU intensive than I've been using.

BrickEngraver
on Mar 2, 2013

Well I got my SP yesterday and am pretty happy with it. I am much like Paul in the fact for most things I do, I really like a large screen, and most of the time I even use it with only one window visible at a time. I have a 27" iMac and love the screen for the graphics stuff I have to do with my part time job. For my real job, I run a medium wastewater plant and have over the years created an Access application to keep up with all the myriad documentation and reports required for compliance and process control. And when entering data there is no doubt that a great keyboard and large screen is great. And in my case an excellent number pad. But I am also kind of intrigued about how touch can be integrated in productivity software. I think that it might just be great, not necessarily for content creation but content presentation and consumption. I mean the goal of most apps is to present data in a meaningful way. So I have been kind of changing my interface with touch in the mix. Might have to have two of them but it is the interface. And must say, it is kind of fun to to be able to simply touch a button and generate graphs, reports, and analyses. For if a button runs the code that creates a document, it really does not make any difference whether that button is activated by a mouse or by a finger. Touch involves thinking about a much cleaner, less cluttered, and simpler interface, and that is probably a really good thing. What I think I am trying to say is that there are a myriad of applications that could be augmented by touch--hybrid apps run on hybrid devices such that the touch part is for the consumption and display of the data, traditional mouse and keyboard for the production of that data. It is going to be interesting to see how can make a traditional app run on a surface. I really think MS is correct that touch can indeed be at home on the desktop and traditional PC and laptop as well as mobile devices. Originally buttons were really created to be "pushed", not clicked. Problem is lately we have gone button crazy and I pine for great knobs.

mtalinm
on Mar 2, 2013

Paul, I came to a different conclusion and am curious as to why. background:

* as a business-school professor I largely write for a living but also do high-end statistical analysis (Stata). I travel every other month or so (not since buying the Surface, but I can't wait as I know it will fit on the airplane tray) and am in and out of meetings/classrooms most days. I commute from Westwood to East Cambridge either on the T or by bike.
* I have two machines: a desktop and laptop both with i7s and 16G memory, driving two 22' 1900x1200 screens and a smaller 1376x766 for email. the smaller screen is native to the laptop, a Lenovo x230 where I swapped the drive for a .5T SSD. I'd say it is faster than the desktop.
* I bought the Surface Pro with both keyboards and a Dell 27" 2560x1440 monitor connected via a $10 DisplayPort cable. I keep separate power supplies at home and at work. I set text scaling to 125%, which is just large enough to see but does not distort like 150%. I also set the Explorer UI to only require one touch to open.
* Files are sugarsynced between all machines.

I thought I would end up using the Surface mostly to grade papers on the way to work and for meetings / teaching but stick to the desktop for heavy-duty work. (And it is true that my 9.5G dataset won't open on the Surface, but I don't use that every day.)

But the Surface has become my go-to machine all day every day. I have barely turned on the x230, and though I thought I would use the desktop on bike-commuting days, I was happy to discover last Friday that the Surface fits in the handlebar bag I used to use to carry an iPad (!), so no worries there.

Again, I have not had a business trip since getting the Surface, but I am rather sure I'll take it instead of the x230 because the HD screen lets me see more than the 12.5" x230 at 1366x766. I had had a 14" t400s with the 1600x900 resolution, but I always had trouble opening it on a plane...and I always needed to work those crucial hours before landing to give a presentation. I ended up carrying a second USB screen (also 1366x766) to work on the road, but that's an ugly solution. I find it just fine working on the Surface screen with smaller text because it is so clear (and now see what the Retina folks have been gushing about for so long).

Importantly, the default 150% text scaling is too big and so I set it to 125%. This turns out to be perfect for a 27" external screen at 2560x1440 resolution; in fact, 100% text scaling on a monitor of that size and resolution would not be enough.

The other pleasant surprise has been the keyboards. I find the TypeCover indistinguishable from other keyboards, i.e., no loss of speed or quality. I bang out 100-120 wpm and am generally picky about keyboards: I still use a Microsoft ergonomic keyboard from 2002 because I prefer the layout (in fact I bought a second one on ebay) and almost returned the x230 for the x220 because I dislike the new Lenovo keyboard so much). Again, no problem with the TypeCover and I use it all day w/o problems. I do plug in a Kensington ExpertMouse trackball with the "spinning ring" for scrolling on the external monitor.

But the TouchCover is my true love. At first I thought it was weird and didn't even use it for a week or so because my hands kept slipping out of place. Then I found that if I looked at the TouchCover (instead of the screen) it would work. That's not ideal, of course, but then I noticed the notches on F and J, and since then it has been my choice on the go because the Surface is just a tad thinner and definitely easier to hold than with the TypeCover folded around the back. (True, you can rip it off and reverse it but that's a pain.) I wrote this entire review with the TouchCover.

Lastly, re: battery life. I tweaked the Battery Saver profile to throttle the CPU @ 75% and be a bit more aggressive all around. I haven't done a run-down test, but I've not yet run out of power in the last three weeks. Of course I often get back to my desk, and that might be different when I take a trip, but I've not been disappointed. Sure, it's not like an iPad you only ever need to charge at night... but that's a silly comparison.

My only real gripe is the lack of storage for the pen. It has fallen off several times, and I almost lost it once or twice. Moreover, I always worry about it falling off and this leads me to treat the Surface a bit more gingerly than I'd like. I've of course learned the tricks of clipping it to the power cord or the keyboard, but there's no good workaround. I've thought of leaving it behind, but I love OneNote too much.

So, I'm sticking with it. I guess my mileage varies...

BillG
on Mar 2, 2013

The Surface Pro 128 was a great machine until it started having Software problems which MS did nit/could not diagnose. Mine is now out for replacement with a new one.

However, despite the software/hardware glitch, "SESSION_HAS_VALID_POOL_ON_EXIT", when Microsoft decided to replace it. It seems like a great tablet/ultrabook. was able to Install/run Visual Studio, Office 365 Home Premium and MS Expression without problem and still had over 60 GB of 128GB Available.

Barlo_Mung
on Mar 3, 2013

Thanks Paul, this has been a very valuable series. I really like my RT but it doesn't quite fill my needs. Your article about the usb3 dock nudged me into deciding that it's worth the upgrade.

deankaltsas
on Mar 3, 2013

As usual very interesting article and comments... I have the surface and here is how I see it. The Acer S7 is what I should have bought but the surface is what I wanted... so I got what I wanted. Now, even though I still would like the larger screen I am finding the daily USE of the tablet style very very convenient... when I am watching media, it is easy to move with me from room to room with it's stand, and speaking of media keep in the back of your head the whole "web only" experience that is growing all the time. I think if they come up with some type of SWYPE like keyboard it would really jump this to another level. Add to it the Haskell chip this fall and an always on pc would really seal the deal!

kristalsoldier
on Mar 3, 2013

I can relate to your point of view - namely, that in terms of your needs, the Surface (Pro and, by extension, the RT) is not suitable for you. In so far as I am concerned, however, my impressions are a bit different. Like you, I have very weak eyes; like you, I am primarily a writer; we (you and I, that is) are also within the same age group. Unlike you, however, I am slightly build (and have normal-sized hands!) and while I do like to play around with the latest consumer technologies (within reason), unlike you, I am certainly no specialist. My kit, compared to yours, is very basic. It consists of a ThinkPad R400 (runs Win 7 Pro and Office 2010; is very robust and runs very well), which is connected to a large-screen monitor. My e-book reading, emails on the fly and media consumption needs are fulfilled by a Nexus 10, and now I have the Surface (RT) to add to this mix. In terms of legacy software, there is little that I am beholden to aside from Office. Aside from Office, the other legacy software that I need is non-critical and resides on the ThinkPad. At work, I have a nondescript desktop which is connected to my employer's network and which runs some dedicated software. The Surface, for me, has been a kind of a liberation. Given that I have the flexibility to work from any location of my choice, prior to my acquiring the Surface, I had to lug my tank-like R400 around just to access Office (2010). Now, the Surface has replaced the R400, which remains deskbound. I use the Type keyboard, which I find quite efficient (remember, I am used to the classic ThinkPad keyboard and thus am quite picky about these things), I access some of my documents via Skydrive and others locally (stored in a 64GB microSD card on the Surface). Thus, when I leave home - whether it be that I am going to the library or the coffee shop - my kit contains just the Nexus and the Surface and my shoulders and back thank me for it. The often-described limitations of the RT have not yet affected me. Nor has the switching between the desktop to the Modern UI modes bothered me. In fact, I quite like it (yes, perverse, I know!). The lack of apps also don't bother me for the most part - well, aside from wishing for a more robust Mail app and an efficient Wordpress app - I circumvent the latter inconvenience by using Word 2013 to write my blogs. So, I'd say, all in all, I have found myself better off using the Surface in recent times. All this is just to suggest that in the same way that you have found various factors - all justified - that limit your experience and efficiency with the Surface (Pro, in your case), I find my experience being richer while being efficient t at the same time. I should also add that I do not us any of the apps on the RT for any commercial work. Aside from my personal writings, I only use the RT to work on drafts, which I finish off on my R400 and/ or on the desktop of my machine at my place of work.

pmbAustin
on Mar 3, 2013

Something I've not seen much of in reviews: the Surface Pro's amazing handwriting recognition.

I use the desktop mostly, and use the pen to input text without the keyboard. I'm amazed how easily and accurately it reads my chicken-scratching (a bizarre combination of cursive and printing). There are times it correctly translates words I've written when I'd have trouble deciphering them myself if shown a day later!

Obviously it's not idea for typing essays or long comments, but it's very useful for short notes, filling out edit boxes, typing brief commands, and entering quick comments. It's very natural to just hold the Surface Pro, and write on it.

And it "just works" in all desktop apps, via the selectable keyboard button. And it's really easy to switch to a full keyboard (with control and alt and other keys), or a touch-screen keyboard (simplified for typing with fingers).

It's the flexibility that's amazing. And with SkyDrive and Win8's syncing abilities, I pick up and use the Surface Pro, and don't miss a beat when moving to and from it and my Laptop. It doesn't really matter which one I pick up, I can just get to work. And that's pretty awesome.

Alex Bowman
on Mar 3, 2013

Great series of articles, Paul. I believe Surface or some other tablet device will get there someday but, as you say, we live in the present not the future.

The tablets, Surface RT/Pro, are excellent tablets, just not great desktop replacements. Thank you for pointing this out so effectively and doing such a thorough review.

mmcpher
on Mar 4, 2013

I have also been impressed by the pen text recognition. There are a few necessary tweaks but for a first-generation device I am not griping. It would be helpful of the home button on the lover bezel would disable when you're inputting and under certain light conditions there is a tendency for some mirroring while causes the text to jump to the lower line. But this feature is nonetheless surprisingly useful tome. Maybe master-typists wouldn't find it so, but ham-handed guys like me do. It picks up "ham-handed" flawlessly.

Skolvikings
on Mar 4, 2013

Sorry Paul, but when you mentioned being too big for the small screen, I thought of fat Homer trying to dial the phone. http://youtu.be/8DtbPOXFk00 Thanks for the chuckle!

dabigeasy
on Mar 4, 2013

I have enjoyed your whole series on going pro and also the wrap up article as well. I must say that I picked up my surface pro on launch day and have been using it as my main computer since. I love it. My only wish is that Microsoft releases a docking station for the surface pro. Hopefully Paul can use some of his influence to convince Microsoft to produce a docking station for the surface pro. Once again thanks for a great series of articles. Well Done!!!

Kevin Whitehead
on Mar 17, 2013

From my perspective, the main reason I didn't get one was the SSD size and perhaps to a lesser extent the lack of an extended battery add-on. I consider a 256GB SSD the smallest acceptable to be able to take all the files with me I need. I could probably change by not having all my files sync, or using Goodsync to sync a separate flash drive. But I don't want to change. I'm hoping for larger SSD options and an expansion battery with the Haswell refresh. My ideal SSD size would be 512.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use