Microsoft: There Can Be Only One … Browser

Forrester claims that businesses should rally around a single web browser to save money

Microsoft is touting the findings of a Forrester study which claims that 96 percent of businesses standardize on a single web browser to save costs related to support. Guess which browser they’d like that to be?

“Forrester evaluated several items that IT managers consider when deciding on a browser and the findings confirm that Internet Explorer continues to be a great browser for your business,” a Microsoft representative told me. “Among the results, Forrester found that 96 percent of firms today standardize on a single browser for company-issued PC and that there are increased costs associated with supporting or allowing other browsers within the enterprise.”

You can find out more about this report and Microsoft’s reaction to it in Ten Reasons Why Internet Explorer 10 is Best for Business on the Exploring IE Blog, and the full Forrester report is available for download as well.

According to Microsoft, “there are increased costs associated with supporting or allowing nonstandard browsers within the enterprise. For example, Forrester found that firms spend an extra $4,200 per web app annually to support multiple browsers. For a large corporation, that translates to almost $400,000 per year just for web apps. Any potential benefits were clearly outweighed by support, maintenance, and other costs - as most firms with multiple browsers experienced cost increases in excess of 20% overall. This is in line with conventional wisdom, which says to pick one browser but develop sites to common web standards.”

It then goes on to explain why it believes IE 10 should be that browser. But that assumes you’re running Windows 8 or, soon, Windows 7. (IE 10 for Windows 7 is currently in beta.)

But I’m most curious about that 96 percent claim, as that’s not what I’m seeing out in the real world. My understanding is that multiple browsers are in fact quite common on business PCs. In October, I spoke with the folks from Browsium who told me that while IE was still dominant in the enterprise, a second browser is “increasingly common”. And many of IE’s competitors have pretty significant share even in enterprises.

Part of the reason for this, ironically, is Microsoft’s fault: With many businesses still locked on Windows XP (which can only upgrade to IE 8, though many actually stick with the horrible and out of date IE 6), many users are turning to Google Chrome in order to get a modern browser that actually works. Not coincidentally, Browsium is currently offering a beta version of a multi-browser management tool for businesses called Catalyst that automates which browsers are used for which sites.

In fact, the most recently Browsium blog post notes that the multi-browser enterprise is here to stay. That’s certainly what I’m seeing.

Internet Explorer 10 is great, and I use it all the time. But I also use Chrome. And I believe this type of multi-browser usage is the case in many businesses as well.

Discuss this Article 20

billreiss
on Dec 13, 2012

This is very likely a case of IT not knowing what their users are actually doing. Also even though they "standardize" on one browser and will only support that one most companies I've been at don't actually block the install of another one.

JeffFattic
on Dec 13, 2012

Most companies I work in formally only support one browser. For internal applications, why not?
The web development teams loaded up several browsers to test public-facing sites. And that's the group I typically see using other browsers. I think most regular users could care less what browser they were using as long as it rendered HTML.

rx78
on Dec 13, 2012

I'm actually running "pocket" version of FireFox right now, which is the only workaround. Only IE installed, and users don't have admin privileges to install other browsers. Over 2,000 computers in the company. And it is rather common practice. Not sure it is as high as 96%, but probably majority of large companies doing similar things. No support person wants to start call by asking "what browser are you using?", and then go "if it is chrome v24 and up, use option x"...

aras
on Dec 13, 2012

I think Chrome doesn't require admin privileges as it can install itself in AppData folder rather than Program Files.

rx78
on Dec 13, 2012

May be there is a trick, but not only standard install detected by security check, even pocket chrome would not run because it requires to touch some local files. May not be only install issue but also protection that company runs on top. FF though has no problems for some reason, go figure...

plantagenet
on Dec 13, 2012

Same here we only support one browser for internal applications. I would also say that about a year ago it was fairly common for a user to want an additional browser but in our organization doesn't seem to be the case anymore. People just in general seem to be happy with just i.e. Even with home users whereas before people would show open revoltion to the fact you used i.e. and not firefox or chrome again that doesn't seem to be the case. People just in my experience seem much happier using I.e. than they were year ago.

NarcoSleepy
on Dec 13, 2012

For personal use, I use firefox on my windows 7 pc, and internet explorer 10 on my windows 8 tablet. All work related stuff is Internet Explorer 9, since many of the tools we use, are not compatible with firefox or chrome.

aras
on Dec 13, 2012

Yes, that's the case in our business too. Officially supported browser for internal web apps is IE, but people often install Chrome themselves and we don't fight this.

comprocomputers
on Dec 13, 2012

I used to be a big supporter and user of IE but I got tired of it being so slow at everything I was doing. Although this most likely was related to plugins and add-on's in IE, I experience great speed in Chrome even with all the plugins and add-on's I use.

The other thing that pisses me off about an IE centric world of Line of Business apps is that when a new version of IE comes out it typically is not compatible with the existing Line of Business apps and you have to stick with the older IE version until the company updates their app.

Unfortunately they probably spent a ton of money to make their app compatible with that now old version of IE and are sick of upgrades breaking their app and causing them to re-write it.

I'm not saying that Chrome or Firefox are any better necessarily for not breaking apps (actually most of the apps that require IE don't work with chrome unless you use IE tab or some other IE emulator under Chrome) but I would love to see a web apps move to something that supports multiple browsers so users have a choice and are not pinned to one browser.

Rabble Rabble Rabble!

Morris
on Dec 13, 2012

More and more third party products utilized in the enterprise have web interfaces. Surprisingly a lot of the companies that develop these interfaces don't even test on IE and focus on Firefox and Chrome for testing. In my opinion, IE 9 is the only version of IE I would use but I can't install it on my company XP machines. Sorry Microsoft, but I only fire up IE for old legacy corporate websites.

saqrkh
on Dec 13, 2012

I got IE10 beta for Windows 7 on my work PC, before that I used Chrome (came pre-installed on my machine). But IE10 is pretty good.

LemonSaucy
on Dec 13, 2012

I use IE 9, and will use 10 when it RTM's. It's the the best browser for me.

It's the safest browser (Protected Mode is on by default, sandboxing the thing), and is quick and feature rich enough to enable me to well enjoy the web.

SamR
on Dec 13, 2012

The sensation you are feeling is the quickening Paul. Too much coffee?

Since moving to Windows 8 on all my systems I am using IE10 a little more but only on Flash sites, i have not loaded Flash for Firefox.

IE10 seems pretty speedy but has the annoying habit of throwing up little dialog boxes at the bottom of the browser which never go away, you need to close them. What is the deal with that? Plus it is too dumbed down for my liking, it can do most or all things Firefox can but in a dumb way.

Plus changing the default search provider from Bing to Google in IE is surprisingly difficult until you know the trick. Microsoft have not done Google any favours here, many people will not be able to do it.

scuttlemonkey
on Dec 13, 2012

This is so transparently disingenuous. Does anyone want to take a stab at squaring this with the IE blog begging people to not code to webkit for mobile, because standards?

( http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2012/11/microsoft-begs-web... )

The smart web developer is coding first to Chrome, fixing for Firefox, and then shimming for IE.

For many years now the best predictor for the next version of IE has been last years version of Chrome.

ShaneMichelon
on Dec 14, 2012

As an IT Consultant, I regularly work with a number of large organisations. In most cases, these businesses officially only support IE6 on XP. Almost all are in the process of upgrading to Windows 7, and have been doing so for years. Since IE6 is worse than useless on modern websites, most companies have support for a second browser, which is usually Firefox. Surprisingly, Chrome is frowned upon because it updates too often. I'm sure this will change over the next few years as Windows 7 (and occasionally W8) is slowly rolled out. Unfortunately, the tech press often forget the glacial rate of change that is required in business due to the LOB app support requirement, and the focus on profit and complete lack of corporate interest in the 'toy' factor.

hwangeruk
on Dec 30, 2012

@ ShaneMichelon Finally someone with real experience.
I too have had the same pleasure as you. In fact, one place I work at has just moved to IE8 from 6 on XP. And are slowly moving to Windows 7 (now contemplating Win8 LOL). 2nd browsers are not common there (2000 seats). Its only IT geeks and "fiddlers" who have alternate browsers, very few "normal people" have more than 1. Its a shame we can't just get a standardised HTML 5 standard that browsers can render the same perplexes me - but there we are.

ScottJ
on Dec 14, 2012

SInce using IE9 on Win7 on our machines we have noticed much faster browsing, which was the main reason for using chrome on javascript heavy sites as IE8 just wasn't fast enough, looking further ahead it is good to see Microsoft supporting cross browser technologies in suites like CRM 2011 (December update) as you can't always dictate the spec of your visiting users equipment ( No IE on OSX for example)

Harry_Wild
on Dec 14, 2012

I been using IE10 Preview on Windows 7 Ultimate and it been very stable and fast. Of course I upgraded my desktop with a SSD too. I like the transparent borders and other new looks that I think they got from the Mac OS. Microsoft is doing well in continuing to upgrade IE.

nim81
on Dec 14, 2012

Not too sure who they spoke to about this. For all the improvements Microsoft have made to IE since IE6, it's still garbage compared to other alternatives.

Whichever your preference, it makes no sense to go back to a position of one dominant browser, otherwise we just end up with the same stagnant situation as IE6 again for several years.

markb
on Dec 14, 2012

IE10 on Windows 8 is unusable to me because of the font rendering. Apparently because of performance reasons on RT it does not use any color in the font smoothing. It also does this on the IE10 desktop which results in soft looking text compared to other browsers like Firefox.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use