Surface Pro Overview Video: It’s Better Because It’s a PC

Microsoft makes its case for Surface with Windows 8 Pro

Microsoft has issued an overview video for its upcoming Surface with Windows 8 Pro tablet, which is far more powerful and versatile than the Surface RT unit currently in the market. Of course, it’s also more expensive. So this video highlights the differences, which basically amount to a single premise: Unlike Surface RT, Surface Pro is a real PC.

You can watch the video now on YouTube. It’s under a minute and half.

But here are some highlights:

Stupid new name abbreviation. Since the official name of this product is Surface with Windows 8 Pro, everyone on earth has been abbreviating it to Surface Pro, just as we abbreviate Surface with Windows RT to Surface RT. I will continue doing so. But with this video (and a related press release from the Surface Pro availability announcement), Microsoft has started using a new and lamer abbreviation: Surface Windows 8 Pro (i.e. no “with”). Sigh.

Pen. Unlike its RT-based brother,Surface Pro both supports and includes a pressure-sensitive electromagnetic pen. The video notes that this pen lets you “add a personal touch,” which is ridiculous, but also shows a very good use for the pen: It’s ability to tap tiny onscreen elements in powerful desktop applications like Adobe Photoshop. This is exactly where a pen makes sense, and even Surface RT users would benefit from a capacitive pen, which provides the same basic functionality, albeit without the same precision, pressure sensitivity, or eraser capabilities.

Desktop application compatibility. The video breezes by this point, but it’s worth highlighting: Surface Pro is fully compatible with all desktop applications, browser plug-ins, and hardware devices that everyone uses today. That’s a big deal.

More storage. Surface Pro comes with either 64 GB or 128 GB of storage, compared to 32 GB or 64 GB of storage with Surface RT. It also supports USB 3.0, a bit improvement over Surface RT’s USB 2.0. (Both support microSD).

Dual-purpose charger. Surface Pro’s power brick is significantly bigger than that of Surface RT, and unlike that latter device, the power connector isn’t right there, it’s at the end of a separate cord, as is often the case with PCs. But Surface Pro’s power brick also features a second USB 3.0 port for charging accessories. The device itself has just a single USB (3.0) port, as does Surface RT (which uses USB 2.0).

Mini DisplayPort. I’ve seen some interesting rationales for Microsoft using a different video-out port on the Surface Pro (Mini DisplayPort) than it does with Surface RT (micro-HDMI). The video notes its ability to broadcast video in “high definition” (though Surface RT can easily handle full HD 1920 x 1080). Of course, the Surface RT’s built-in display only handles 1366 x 768, while Surface Pro’s is full HD. This may be problematic, given the tiny size (10.6 inches) of the display.

New and exciting, but also trusted and familiar. This is interesting way to sell Surface Pro, which of course a tablet (new and exciting) but also a real PC (trusted and familiar). The voice over actually says, “Microsoft comes together on Surface with Windows 8 Pro.” I have no idea what that means.

That’s a bunch of stuff for just 1:23 of running time, eh?

Discuss this Article 35

mikesmikes
on Jan 24, 2013

I'll probably buy the Pro, even though I don't really need it. I just want it. But here is how to improve it:

1. Increase the screen size.
2. Stiffen the Type keyboard cover.

With my RT I always carry around a clipboard to set it on because of the flopsy keyboards...which sounds sad, but it just works and is not really inconvenient. I would not set a clamshell directly on my lap either.

Interestingly, I use my RT as a laptop most of the time. I never fold the cover back and use it as a tablet. The only time I remove the cover is to read in portrait mode (which is mostly unknown and highly under-rated.)

BobGeisel
on Jan 24, 2013

This video appears to be directed at business users. It shows Surface Pro being used as a "Creation/Collaboration" device and not just the "Consumption" device that the RT videos showed. I'll be getting a Surface Pro and will be interested to see if my teenagers prefer the RT or the Pro. (Currently they like the RT over the iPad for consumption/games.)

wil3714
on Jan 27, 2013

Pro but battery life. if its for school RT sounds good

eric.alpern@gma...
on Jan 24, 2013

It would be nice to see a pen for the RT as well as a true HD resolution.

Rafyelzz
on Jan 24, 2013

No word about the battery?

Thats why I went for the RT, it feets better my needs, where battery life is really important.

pthurrott
on Jan 24, 2013

Not sure what you mean. I previously (and exclusively) revealed that Surface Pro would get over 5 hours of real world battery life.

http://winsupersite.com/windows-8/microsoft-surface-windows-8-pro-preview

Rallicat
on Jan 24, 2013

One again, my assertion:

Surface / Windows RT: Great for those looking for a tablet as a secondary device (or a primary device if you're not a power user).

Surface / Windows 8 (Pro): Primary device for power and business users.

Why would you go for anything else but RT for a 'pure tablet' device? Even with Clover Trail the temptation will be to go right ahead and install software and plugins that will slow down system startup, consume background CPU cycles and precious battery life, and generally degrade the user experience.

The idea of Windows 8 as a 'superset' of RT really oversimplifies the situation, and I believe jeopardises Windows' future in the Tablet market. If the experience people have of Windows Tablets is as a device that carries over the complexities and headaches of the past, how will that help product perception? Tech blogs doing poor reviews is bad enough ... but poor real world experienced will do much more damage in the longer term.

efjay
on Jan 24, 2013

Personally, with Clovertrail already providing the main benefit of Windows RT, long battery life, I really dont see the point of an RT device. You can use a CT device as a "pure tablet" device as well, and until the Windows store apps can fully replicate the functionality of x86 programs RT will always be found wanting. And Its already apparent that RT just isnt up to the task, made evident by the "jailbreak" that was recently release. And what was the purpose of this hack? To install x86 programs.

There is no "temptation" to install x86 programs on a Clovertrail device just because you can, rather its because you need to, and the same performance issues would apply to core-powered Windows 8 devices as well, so thats not really something to hold against the CT devices. So the question I would ask is, why RT when Clovertrail (& Bay Trail later this year) give you all the benefits of Windows RT and none of the negatives?

Rallicat
on Jan 24, 2013

Again, I would answer that question by stating that the capability of installing desktop software can in itself be a negative. What has been drawing people to devices like the iPad or Android tablets is -amongst other things- the fact that they are easy to use and hard to break. For the most part, apps have to obey a rather strict set of rules, rules desktop software don't have to obey.

For a regular, normal, 'non technical' user, a CT tablet is going to start off delivering a comparable experience to an RT device yes, but with it also having that option to install desktop software, the idea that they simply won't do that doesn't hold up, it's not going to be long before a typical user will have installed all kinds of stuff on their system, sometimes without really understanding what they're doing, and as we all know, even software from well known companies can be pushing all sorts of background agents onto a system that is going to compromise the user experience.

Windows RT? You can't get to that compromised scenario even if you tried, because you can never end up with legacy desktop software running in the background, potentially degrading the experience.

What RT represents is a truer 'appliance style' device. Some people don't want that, and choice is good, but the appliance style model is far more beneficial to the vast majority of users, maybe not in the business world, but for consumers it's a huge win. To me, the 'negative' of not having desktop software, is actually the primary advantage of Windows RT - it makes is significantly harder to break, and personally I feel that should be held up as a hallmark feature of tablet computing, not a drawback.

bdpgmr
on Jan 25, 2013

I agree. That is what RT is all about and the primary reason why (IMHO) MS released Surface RT; before Surface Pro.

There are some 'holes' in the RT OS / ego system that need to be filled. But RT has only been on the market for about 3 months? Paul has said (and I agree) that the desktop will 'eventually' disappear. RT is the new 'NT' (and I do remember the issues created with that system when it first rolled out), there are growing pains with any new OS (which is what RT really is), but (in time) it will get only better.

There where (and still are) several short comings with iPad also. But the iPad device was the new cool 'look what this device does' thingy on the market when it was first released. Because iPad was perceived as a 'new product type', it got a pass with the consuming market. Microsoft will not get that pass. I believe MS knows and understands that (remember xBox?). We techies need to give them a break and have some patience.

thundr35
on Jan 24, 2013

With all of the tablet articles lately, I have to ask if you have anything in the works discussing accessories (cases, styli, screen protectors, etc). I know you did the article on docks but that was more of a "call" to the industry(Microsoft) to create them.

xi1152
on Jan 24, 2013

The biggest issue I find with Surface Pro, is the lack of a dock solution. Even if you connect power, Display Port and USB, you end up having cables coming out of all sides of the device and its not an elegant solution.

According the official V1.2 Display Port spec, the protocol can support USB and Ethernet. Do you think Microsoft (or a 3rd party) would/could make a breakout box that has additional IO options like DVI, USB and Ethernet?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DisplayPort

majortom1981
on Jan 24, 2013

There are ones that exist. They are expensive though. I have the dell 10 point multitouch monitor which works as a dock also. All you need is one usb 3 port. This will supply the video from the tablet , the audio to the monitors speakers, and the data for the Ethernet port on the monitor.

Plus the monitor is 10 point capacitive touch (23 inches 1080p).

Its expensive but if you want the dock plus a bigger monitor it might be worth it.

dalestrauss
on Jan 24, 2013

Where did you see the USB/Ethernet support? I see were they refer to it as a pure digital data standard like USB and Ethernet, but not multiple use capability.

rainking430
on Jan 24, 2013

Hi Paul. How do you right-click in the desktop environment using the pen?

pthurrott
on Jan 24, 2013

Via a button on the pen barrel. (It's the same thing that latched the pen onto the device, in this case.)

rainking430
on Jan 24, 2013

Very cool, thanks.

techru
on Jan 24, 2013

Granted, it's not as easy as using the button on the pen, if you don't have a button on the pointing device, you can also just touch and hold for a full second, and you get a circle indicator and then when you lift, you have the "right click" options.

Craig-CT
on Jan 24, 2013

It will be interesting to see how many people are interested in this kind of hybrid combo - relatively big tablet/smallish laptop.

I haven't played with it yet, but my bias, having had a small laptop (11.6" screen), an iPad, and having used a Kindle Fire a lot, is to lean in the direction of owning a bigger, more capable laptop, plus a 7" tablet.

So is there anything in the wind about a 7 to 8-inch tablet with Windows Phone software on it, something that might pair well with a 13 or 14" ultrabook?

red77star
on Jan 24, 2013

No it is not PC. It is PM, Personal Mobile. That's where MS mixed Apples and Oranges and that's why Windows 8 is not good enough for anything.

Lopan
on Jan 24, 2013

Paul,
Would the new lower power Haswell Intel processor have enabled the connected standby feature had it it been used in the Surface Pro.

bluvg
on Jan 24, 2013

"...even Surface RT users would benefit from a capacitive pen, which provides the same basic functionality, albeit without the same precision, pressure sensitivity, or eraser capabilities."

I have to disagree. While I like the Surface RT for some purposes (as a tablet for basic email and Office functionality, it's superb), pairing it with the capacitive stylus is horrible. I really was interested in the stylus, and the Microsoft Store folks (who didn't have one out of the box) were kind enough to open a box for me to try it. The experience was awful--the input (in OneNote) was very laggy and not smooth. Handwriting looked like a bunch of sides of a polygon rather than curves. You also had to fight with no palm rejection mechanism.

Wacom-style digitizers are the (only) way to go. It's a shame this function isn't part of the RT as well.

nsg1000
on Jan 24, 2013

For all the people that keep mentioning x86 apps, you can't install x86 on ipads and they sell well. Paul doesn't like RT, yes we get it. Please try and be objective.

Waethorn
on Jan 24, 2013

I've often said this too.

Or that consumers that are quick to switch to a Mac or even an iPad, and yet Windows RT "doesn't run 'Windows' software" or "it's not really 'Windows' because it needs a Start Menu". Seriously? We need a better definition for Windows than just "runs legacy software" and "has a Start Menu". Is Windows 1-3 no longer considered Windows because they don't have a Start Menu? And what about 64-bit Windows that doesn't run DOS apps even though 32-bit versions do? Those ARE 'legacy apps' after all....

Windows 8 redefines what Windows is. If you don't understand that change in technology is inevitable, then technology is the wrong business to be in.

BTW: I have the same beef about bloggers thinking it's cool to rap against Microsoft in that they are now using the legacy compatibility beef against Windows 8, even though most a) write their blogs on a Mac anyway, and b) called for killing backwards compatibility before Windows 8 was announced "to get rid of the bloat".

You got what you wanted, and you still gotta b!tch about it?!? (not directed specifically to Paul)

I have a Core 2 Duo desktop machine with 2GB of RAM and no junkware (just Office 2013 and the Windows ADK) and my Surface RT runs circles around it with the same amount of RAM because the C2D frequently runs low on RAM - even when using only Metro apps - due to what I suspect is x86 OS overhead. So in this case, YES!, the Surface is faster than a "real PC".

saqrkh
on Jan 24, 2013

I'll use Surface Pro as my main computer. When on the go, for reading and light work, will use it as is. However, when requiring it for intensive work, I'll connect it to a monitor on my desk. For those on a budget, I prefer they come up with a stronger Clover Trail chip, one with better graphics support (i.e. comparable to Tegra 4).

Waethorn
on Jan 24, 2013

Wait for Vizio's tablet. It's faster than Clover Trail and has far better graphics than the Tegra. ARM chips only use OpenGL ES specifications for graphics, not full OpenGL. ES is not even close to comparable to modern versions of DirectX, and AMD's chips support DX11 while Intel is playing catch-up.

cadrethree
on Jan 24, 2013

Must just be me, because I don't see the benefits of carrying such a powerful device around with me is. I would rather carry a 17" laptop around the building, or a 8" slate with me. I am ready for the future after the next generation whrere the box sits in the building and beams a connection to my dumb terminal. Kinda of like Amazon and it's cloud server which does the heavy lifiting but much faster. No more wires for the mointor, exlcuding the power supply for the main CPU.

jason404
on Jan 25, 2013

I would think that the display port (DisplayPort or HMDI) would have been determined by the chipset/SoC used.

AlexKven
on Jan 24, 2013

"Surface Windows 8 Pro?" Would Microsoft have a lawsuit by apple or something if they called it just "Surface Pro?"

Because in the time it takes to say "Surface Windows 8 Pro," I can say "Surface Pro" twice.

mostlynerd
on Jan 24, 2013

I don't want a PC. I want a tablet.

Avenger30
on Jan 25, 2013

I agree with Paul: Surface Pro is… a PC!
One of the things that made the PC what it is today was its ubiquity: from (mostly idling) personal computers to 24/7 industrial controllers, powerful graphic workstations, or document producing environment using multiple large screens… Surface Pro is just another variant. I wonder however, what is the future of these non-mobile / non-touch-centric PC’s? They will continue to exist tomorrow… but, with which OS? As Microsoft moves from software to mobile & touch-centric devices, do they opening a gap to Linux and Apple? Or maybe the gap is too small and Microsoft does not really care…

Interestingly, Windows 8 underpinnings appear perfectly up to the task: you don’t hear much about its new “blue screen”; and yes, recovering a 50TB storage space pool made of 16 drives can be challenging (see http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/nas/nas-features/31964-data-recovery-tale...)… but a 6TB/2-drive home server is perfectly manageable with Windows 8… if it was not for the less-than-ideal UI for these configurations… And the more I use mobile devices, the more I realize the need headless/backend devices. Is Cloud the right answer? I am not sure… Did Microsoft give up too soon on WHS? Is there a market for a $50-100 “Personal Server Essentials”?

As a user, my recent experience with a VAIO Tap 20 (an almost perfect Family PC BTW) also helped me understand that a large touch screen is far from ideal in a document production mode, where you really need dozens of open “windows”… Should a future Windows offer a “Desktop Essentials” version geared toward a modernized Desktop (Metro being secondary) focusing at document production? By the way, IMHO File Explorer IS the new “Desktop Start Menu”: If Metro is all about Apps, the future Desktop (if it has a future…) should be all about Documents!

red77star
on Jan 25, 2013

No it is not PC. It is Personal Mobile. Tha nature of this device is different to what we called PC infact they have nothing in common. When you try to create OS where nature of this device such as Surface you try to apply to PC and PC to Surface you get horrible experience in form of Windows 8. PC did not evolved, it was it is and it will be what always has been. New devices emerged in the recent years i categorize as PM - Personal Mobile and one of them is Surface Pro. MS had to address the issue of not having OS for such devices and it is good they came up with something but they completely forgot that these new devices such as Tablets, Phones have nothing to do with PC. Let's say i want to buy Surface even i don't have any desire for it, i don't want to see Desktop option on it however if i am on PC at home i don't want to see any Metro Start Screen there and similar things.
Industry is completely confused of what is what, i blame MS and others for it.

Lewk
on Jan 25, 2013

Claims hTC 8x as flagship Windows Phone... continues to use Nokia Lumia phones in promotional material. Good one Microsoft!

Hamranhansenhansen
on Jan 25, 2013

It's better because it has apps. Period.

The most popular PC right now is iPad. Starts at $329. Average sales price of iPad PC's is $475 and average sales price of Windows PC's is $400. Good luck Microsoft selling Windows PC's for $1000.

pthurrott
on Jan 26, 2013

The $329 iPad mini does not compete with PCs, it competes with eBook readers and tiny tablets. It's a toy, not a computer.

To get to an iPad that "competes" with a PC, you'd need to spend $500-$830 plus $100+ for a keyboard, and then you'd need to buy productivity software, have a lot of patience and tolerance for stupidity, plus be somewhat mildly soft yourself.

Go nuts big guy.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use