Windows 8 Pricing Update

If you're looking to upgrade to Windows 8, don't wait until February

As you may know, Microsoft has been offering a terrific early adopter rate for Windows 8 Pro Upgrade. But that offer ends January 31. And after that, the price is going up big-time.

Those who purchase the electronic Upgrade version of Windows 8 Pro via windows.com today can save big: The price is just $39.99 in the U.S. (It’s even less at $14.99 if you buy a Windows 7-based PC, courtesy of the Windows Upgrade Offer.)

But starting February 1, this same electronic upgrade will cost $199.99, a massive $150 price increase. So if you’re on the fence, now’s the time to buy.

Microsoft is also going to offer the Upgrade version of Windows 8 (Core) online for the first time starting on February 1. This base version of Windows 8 will cost $119.99.

No “full” version of Windows 8 is available, ostensibly because virtually every single workable PC on the planet qualifies for the upgrade pricing: If your PC originally ran Windows XP, Windows Vista, or Windows 7, it qualifies.

A few more pricing updates…

The Windows 8 Pro Pack—which can be used to upgrade Windows 8 (Core) to Windows 8 Pro with Windows Media Center—will cost $99.99. This Pack is $69.99 through January 31.

And the Windows Media Center Pack, which requires Windows 8 Pro, will cost $9.99 as previously announced. (It’s currently free.)

It’s unclear to me why Microsoft would price Windows 8 this expensively, but it’s pretty clear that Windows 8 “sales” will return to normal with this move, in that the vast majority will now occur via new PC purchases, not software upgrades.

For more details about the pricing changes, please refer to Update on Windows 8 Pricing on the Blogging Windows blog. And please, direct your ire towards Microsoft, not me. I’m just the messenger here.

Discuss this Article 47

prettyconfusd
on Jan 18, 2013

I think OEMs will be happier that people will be buying new PCs for Windows 8 rather than giving their old ones new life with an upgrade. It is an incredible leap in price though...

sunco
on Jan 18, 2013

About full version.. Wondering how many people with Mac or Windows * pirated (by any reason) version want to buy Windows 8

Bob12Dozen
on Jan 18, 2013

DON'T shoot the messenger, eh? :D. Glad I'm an early adopter

sege122
on Jan 18, 2013

The pricing seems pretty simple to me. If you don't buy a new computer you wont want to upgrade come 1st February 2013.

I am confused though. I thought this was the new age of computing for Microsoft wanting everyone onboard the Windows 8 train. Online pricing would encourage everyone to upgrade. Now it seems old premium pricing MS is back. I guess they want XP to stick around....

brians (not verified)
on Jan 18, 2013

Upgrade Pricing by OS

Android Free
iOS Free
Linux Free
Mountain Lion $19.99
Microsoft $199.99

If so many livelihoods were not at stake here, one would laugh.

pthurrott
on Jan 18, 2013

That's unfair.

The upgrade pricing for Windows 8 is $15 for those who purchased a new PC after midyear and $40 for everyone else, through January 31.

The $200 price is coming after everyone who really wanted it has already upgraded.

And unlike Android or iOS, everyone is qualified for the upgrade: If you have any PC that can run Windows 8, you qualify. Many Android devices don't get any upgrades at all, free or otherwise. And Apple certainly doesn't support iOS upgrades on hardware that's just a few generations (and years) old.

So, keep laughing, I guess. But only crazy people laugh at nothing.

brians (not verified)
on Jan 18, 2013

1) $39.99 is twice what Apple was charging when Windows 8 shipped.
2) Most Android devices do get free upgrades up to the point the device would be too slow, for example, my first-generation Xoom did not get the second Jelly Bean upgrade. Some companies are very slow about getting Android upgrades to their customers. My advice would be to choose a different company.
3) Likewise Apple only upgrades those phones that can handle the new software.
4) I notice Apple did not try to force upgrades to Mountain Lion (or earlier versions) by putting time limits on their upgrade pricing.
5) I do not appreciate your ad hominem attack. If I called you crazy, I'm sure my comment would not make it through moderation.

pthurrott
on Jan 18, 2013

Two things.

1. Get over yourself. You're not above criticism.

2. We can argue specifics all day. It doesn't matter. This is what it is, and the upgrade situation on other platforms doesn't really matter. This is absolutely better than it's ever been on Windows. Time limits and prices vs. OS X included.

Don't bother responding.

WaltC
on Jan 21, 2013

"1) $39.99 is twice what Apple was charging when Windows 8 shipped."

You mean Apple was selling Windows 8 for $19.99? (I know what you mean--watch your syntax. You can't buy Windows from Apple at all.)

Also, like most deluded Mac enthusiasts, you've forgotten that implicit in the deal with Apple for OS X is that you also buy a computer from Apple, too, because OS X won't run on anything else due to Apple's DRM built right into the foundation code for OS X.

So actually, that jacks up the true price of OS X by several hundred/thousand percent--far more than Microsoft was charging. IE, Microsoft doesn't require you to also buy a Microsoft-branded PC simply for the privilege of running Windows.

2) "My advice would be to choose a different company."

It is is difficult to believe you even own an Android device--going by the ill-considered comment I quote above.

3) "Likewise Apple only upgrades those phones that can handle the new software."

So Apple says, of course.

4) "I notice Apple did not try to force upgrades to Mountain Lion (or earlier versions) by putting time limits on their upgrade pricing."

Irrelevant, as Apple requires you to buy an Apple PC simply to run OS X--any version--and this is something Microsoft has never done. Microsoft doesn't even assemble its own PCs. The Microsoft-branded "Signature" boxes available in Microsoft stores are actually made by Microsoft OEMs, like HP or Dell, and are not required for running Windows. Until you can understand this huge difference between the two companies you understand nothing.

qbob
on Jan 19, 2013

Agree on the crazy people line but I'll take issue on the 'everyone who really wanted it has already upgraded'. Its only after someone e.g. buys a Surface RT that they will realize the benefit of updating their year old notebook to be able to run the same apps from Windows store. The folly of $199 pricing will only play out as consumers start to look at buying into the Windows 8 ecosystem and get put off by the picture this pricing model conveys.

pthurrott
on Jan 19, 2013

Obviously, that's just a generality.

But when you announce you're going to have special pricing for a set amount of time and then return to historical normal pricing on that promised date, it's unclear why there's any outrage. Yes, Windows is too expensive. But very few people buy it that way. It's just not how normal people acquire Windows. So the notion that (virtually) everyone who wanted to upgrade already has is, of course, correct.

Yuxie
on Jan 18, 2013

But you can't forget the apple-tax, or the the fact that Windows gets updated once every few years.
Besides, Win8 is a full OS overhaul, not just add in a "launchpad"... we can get those with (free) 3rd party apps anyway.
But I do also agree that $200 is brutal, I hope that the Win9 upgrade from Win8 is either free or very cheap as it is more of an apology for missing stuff in Win8.

baioc
on Jan 18, 2013

For what it's worth, an iOS upgrade was not always free..

Maelstrom
on Jan 18, 2013

Microsoft sells upgrades at a price because it sells a product: software.
Google provides free upgrades because it sells ads and you are the product.
Apple provides cheap upgrades because it sells hardware. And considering said hardware is at least 25% more expensive than the compétition, I would consider that getting free lifetime updates instead of 20-buck ones more adequate, don't you think?

Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2013

Not only that, but sales tracking is different for every company. Microsoft sells most of its software to OEM's. Google tracks phone activations even though that doesn't mean an actual sale. Apple tracks direct sales and sales to distributors, but sales through the channel don't mean that the product is in users hands.

tboggs13
on Jan 19, 2013

Android and iOS are purely mobile upgrades. They should only be compared to Windows Phone OS, which every upgrade has been free.

Linux - I am pretty sure that if enough people started using the product on the desktop and the resellers started getting enough phone calls, they would start charging. Most Linux resellers make their money selling support packages (which includes updates) to businesses.

OSX - They release a version every year and charge for it. Prior to 2009, Apple charged $129 for each release. Since then they dropped the price to $29 and now $19 for upgraders. As others have said, you can only make use of this pricing after purchasing Apple hardware. With MS, they are selling software, not a hardware update. If you bought a Windows XP computer at the same time as the first OSX computer and upgraded both operating systems with every release, you would have paid less for all of the upgrades on Windows.

Windows - MS to date has released a version every three years and charged for it. In between major releases, they released service and feature packs that were free. Most consumer upgraders would have purchased Windows Home Premium for $120. Most consumer upgraders will purchase Windows 8 for $120 after Feb 1st. The pro version which includes business class features, has been $199 for the last couple of releases.

I was surprised at how aggressive they were on PRO pricing for the upgrade. It looked like they were really trying to drive everyone to that product so with the next release they only had one consumer version. I would have thought PRO would be priced at $129 after the introductory pricing and plain 8 would be $69.

xzxzx
on Jan 21, 2013

@brians - I really cannot see how are Android and iOS comparable to Windows 8?? But if we speak about FREE upgrades, lets take a quick look for each of "better than Windows upgrade policy" platforms...

Android upgrades - don`t make me laugh. I have (now laying somewhere in the drawer at home) Samsung Galaxy S I and my younger brother has Motorola Defy+. Both phones are still on Android 2.3 and there are no upgrades for them. So what? Buy a new Android phone/tablet with latest Android because they are cheap (200$). Yes, cheap but with poor screen resolution, underpowered CPU and little RAM - overall user experience - POOR at most. If you want good Android user experience you have to pay for decent hardware and still there is no quarantee that it will (or when it will) support next update. In my experience cheap devices make lousy user experience.

iOS free upgrades. Well, try to upgrade your 3GS to iOS 6 - not possible. Try to upgrade iPhone 4 to iOS 6 - laggish with missing features (hint. Siri) So, if you want latest iOS with all features -> buy a new iPhone (or iPad).

Linux as free OS? I`ll give you just a quick example - I really like Asus N76VZ laptop and I would like to buy it. There is only one problem - there is no support for Linux for that model. No drivers at all. At that is just tip of an iceberg in Linux world. If you are using Linux in business things can get even worse. Linux - free but lacking support and even If you find support -you`re gonna have expensive $$$ experience.

OS X - Well yes, that is nice and cheap 20$ upgrade. I recently looked for replacement for my Macbook White, and since I want Asus N76VZ to be my travel companion, I looked at iMac product line. Here in Europe ( in my country) iMac 21" costs 1600€. At that price upgrades should be free for lifetime. You can get HP Omni 27" (AIO PC) with Win8 for 1200€. So it is 400€ difference.

Windows updates - I agree 200$ for an upgrade is too much, definitely. What I would be ready to pay is 70-100$ at most. 200$ is just not fair to loyal, paying customers. But on the other hand, you are going to use that software for next 5-6 years everyday ( and many business make money on it) with great support community and free updates, sooo... But still I think price should be more reasonable.

The point of my long comment is that nothing is free as brians claims. Every OS has its upgrade and support price.

P.S. Sorry for mistakes - english is not my mother language.

rjv
on Jan 18, 2013

Have previous upgrades of Windows carried $200 price tags? I'm genuinely curious because I don't recall it getting up that high.

At any rate, I suspect the huge price increase is to encourage people to buy entirely new devices/form factors. Keeping it lower for the first few months was to appease the geeks who want to keep their current hardware.

markb
on Jan 18, 2013

I'm wondering how important this really is. I used to build my own PC's but that was only cost effective because I used an unofficial version of Windows. With the cost of PC's now, the move to laptop/touch screen devices and Windows 8 being so integrated with the services it makes much more sense to just buy a PC. Everyone now has had months to upgrade their PC's for a nominal cost so the market for this must be minimal.

InfoDave
on Jan 18, 2013

Perhaps this is really a non-event, much ado about nothing. And Paul is to be congratulated for raising an awareness to the stragglers. If you're remotely thinking about it, get on the stick.

That said, starting February 1, individual license sales are going to virtually dry up. If it's not done by the end of the month, it ain't going to happen. Sales moving forward are going to be to OEMs, at a discounted price. If I have to pay $200 to upgrade my current computer to Windows 8, or I can buy a cheap computer from Best buy for less than $500, I'm probably going to wait until I've got $500 in my pocket.

tagy
on Jan 18, 2013

I was expecting Windows to be moving forward to more regular lower cost updates, but given this pricing it seems we are back to the big update every 3 years.

Also am I missing something, you cannot buy a full non-upgrade version? What if I have just built my own PC? or want to install it on a mac?

prettyconfusd
on Jan 18, 2013

People seem to forget that the X in OSX actually stands for 10. As in Mac OS 10. As in it's the same version for over 10 years now. It hasn't had a major overhaul since 10.5/10.6 and before 10.6 the upgrades cost as much as Windows did!

OSX 10.7+ have cost less because they're upgrades, otherwise it would be called OSXI.

I think the final price for the Win8 upgrade is far too expensive, but it's crazy to compare buying Windows 8 to buying an upgrade to OSX 10.8 or getting an upgrade to a mobile OS (Windows Phone has got free upgrades too, btw.)

P.S. Some clarification in case I get slammed by a bunch of Mac users. I've used Macs since OS9 and until 18 months ago my main laptop had been a top-of-the-range MacBook Pro for six years so I'm not anti-Mac. Just anti-things being compared that aren't really comparable.

developer
on Jan 18, 2013

"The $200 price is coming after everyone who really wanted it has already upgraded".

So, now who will buy the $200 upgrade? Does it make sense?

I do not shoot the messenger. :-)

MistyMuffinDonut
on Jan 18, 2013

I really don't think you should expect things to be free, especially when it comes from Microsoft. Their business model is not to provide a free operating system from the years I have used it. You want to upgrade you have to pay for it.The price seems to be steep, but it also seems to be logical and reasonable from my perspective.

Look at the prices to Previous versions of Windows and you will see that they were more expensive then what the current prics of Windows 8 will be.

PRyan0417
on Jan 18, 2013

I've seen Windows 8 Pro upgrade discs on Amazon and a few other retailers for just under $70. Is that going to go up as well?

I'm building a PC and plan to install Windows XP and then upgrade to Windows 8 Pro so I can get the upgrade price, but I won't have the funds to build the machine until after Feb 1. Can I pay for the online upgrade now and then not use it until I'm ready for it? Otherwise, I guess I need to buy the upgrade disc while it's still cheap.

Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2013

I'm not sure I understand this question:

"Can I pay for the online upgrade now and then not use it until I'm ready for it?"

If you pay for the upgrade, you can use it whenever you like - so long as you BUY it before the end of this month.

You can buy an upgrade on any computer that is not running Windows 8 already. There is no requirement to say that have to install it on the same computer, but the target computer must still have a previous OS on it for the upgrade to be legal.

As of right now, I can tell you that System Builder discs will take an upgrade key that was purchased through the Windows 8 Upgrade Assistant. Those keys will activate too, even if you choose to do a clean install and blow away the previous OS. Just because you CAN do something though, doesn't mean you can ignore the legal requirements to install it on a PC that already has a previous license. I've installed Windows 8 on a few customers' PC's this way because they wanted a clean install. The keys activate with my vanilla copy of Windows 8 Pro for System Builders, but in every case, the customer already had a previous license of Windows, so they qualified for the upgrade anyway. If the key works, I have to say that the bits must be the same as what's on the upgrade media.

When Microsoft starts shipping the more expensive upgrades, they may require that you actually use upgrade media and start your install from within your previous OS. I can't say for certain, since they haven't released those copies yet. They tried this with Windows Vista and Windows 7 in the past though.

PRyan0417
on Jan 19, 2013

After reviewing Microsoft's requirements on this, I discovered that since I want to go from Windows XP 32-bit to Windows 8 64-bit, I can't use the upgrade assistant, but instead must purchase an upgrade DVD.

So, what my question should have been is, "Is the upgrade DVD price going up on February 1." If so, I need to buy it now instead of later when I start purchasing parts.

jimbinct
on Jan 18, 2013

I help people when they want to upgrade their computer and get more life out of it. At $40 I've been able to convince some to upgrade to Windows 8. At $200, there is very little chance I'll convince anyone of upgrading. I'm talking about computers that are perfectly capable of running for several more years. At $200, I don't think I can recommend it.

rypinbubs
on Jan 18, 2013

Is it possible to install the upgrade version from scratch if you have a valid key, or does it have to be installed on top of an existing XP,vista, or 7 install?

baioc
on Jan 19, 2013

No, the upgrade media contains code that is not suited for a clean installation. Also, if this were possible, why would Microsoft offer any other option?

pthurrott
on Jan 20, 2013

The Windows 8 Upgrade media can indeed be used for a clean install.

http://winsupersite.com/article/windows8/clean-install-windows-8-upgrade...

Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2013

It might depend on the media. You can wipe out the existing hard drive partitions when you install though.

npiasecki
on Jan 18, 2013

Clearly, this has been probably the best upgrade offer in the history of Windows. Those of us who still close windows by double-clicking their left corners know this.

But I'm wondering if you have any insight as to what the rationale for this promotion might be. Since I think we can all accept that most users get their copies of Windows by purchasing a new PC, what harm is there in leaving the $40 upgrade around? The $150 jump is incongruous with both the previous offer and what (I presume) any chunk from a new PC sale could possibly give Microsoft. The only two reasons that I can come up with are that (1) it encourages people to simply buy new PCs that are perhaps better suited to the Windows 8 experience, incentivizing a hardware revolution or (2) the current promotion was begrudgingly offered after much internal battles and that some parts of Microsoft are worried about "upgrade piracy", if that makes sense.

I feel that the only types of people who encounter these licenses are the enthusiasts, the builders, the people who actually care about PCs. Everyone else is getting their software via OEMs with their new PCs or through their expensive MSDN or volume licensing through work. The market for this particular kind of license doesn't seem that large to me, and I think that's why Apple has priced its latest upgrades so low: it surely garners good will and doesn't really make much of a dent on the bottom line since lots of people feel good about it but few actually take advantage of it.

So what gives? I think there's a story here somewhere.

SamR
on Jan 18, 2013

I am a bit disappointed at the new Windows 8 upgrade pricing, rumours of a new pricing strategy to mimic Apple have been dashed.

The real question now is, have things changed? Are Microsoft and indeed Intel price makers or price takers now? I have a feeling that it is moving to the latter. Intel are feeling the heat, their share price is in free all. Microsoft are doing better but i feel they have a real chance of following IBM and going corporate and largely abandoning retail.

I have upgraded my two about five year old formerly high desktop systems to Windows 8. They still run like rockets due to a bit care and a few minor upgrades. My Windows 7 laptop I will never upgrade, at $199? Hell would freeze over sooner.

I mentioned in a previous post that in another forum I frequent many many formerly pirated Windows systems have become legit due to the $15 upgrade offer (yes there WAS a loophole). This tells me the main reason for Windows piracy is cost, the new pricing will not solve that problem.

In the meantime I am finding I am using my new iPad 4 more and more for things I usually did on my big desktop in the study. Seriously, if it wasn't for my HTPC my recreational Windows usage would be way down.

The world has changed, it is indeed the start of a post PC world.

WaltC
on Jan 21, 2013

"The world has changed, it is indeed the start of a post PC world."

Maybe that's what you really think, but that just lets me know you haven't been involved in the "PC" side of things for very long...;)

The numb-brain, Apple PR effect is to cause people to think that the outside of the device, and the exterior shape and size of its plasticene case define it, as opposed to the components inside the device and hidden from view. The components that, unlike the device case, have functionality and allow the device to do what it does.

When you come to grips with the reality that it's fairly dumb to judge a book by its cover, you will understand that "post PC" is meaningless marketing talk spawned precisely by *one* company in the computing universe--a company that still *makes and sells PCs* but calls them "Macs." Logic should inform you: how can a company still very much involved with making and selling its own brand of PCs be either sincere or accurate in saying, "We live in a post-PC world"? I mean, when Apple announces it has assembled its last Mac then at least I will know that this is something Apple really believes--misguided and delusional though it may be. But right now, guy, Apple is simply yanking your chain--don't be led around by the blind, is my advice...;)

Personally, I want my terabytes of local storage, and my 27" monitor, my 16GB's of ram, and my 2,000-dpi mouse and my large and exceptionally comfortable keyboard and my powerful, discrete 3d gpu and my powerful, discrete cpu *and* I love being able to upgrade any or all of those components at my whim. The "post PC" cannot begin to compare in terms of value and computational power. It's not even close. Value and power is an intoxicating combination and one that will continue to dominate the markets for decades to come.

raltschwager
on Jan 18, 2013

I'm going to assume traditional Windows pricing means traditional Windows release schedule. I was hoping for something a little more annual.

Waethorn
on Jan 18, 2013

I'm thinking that there is no possible way that Microsoft will be offering a yearly paid (but low-cost) update cycle for Windows if they're increasing the cost to the previous regular price. Otherwise customers will be outraged at paying $200 now, only to pay $40-some dollars every year for updates, starting this year.

....or else Microsoft is planning a carriage fee for service ala Xbox LIVE Gold (a service fee on top of a purchase price, just for basic functionality). They need to do one OR the other. Doing both would spell their demise.

Craig-CT
on Jan 18, 2013

I just got around to upgrading my laptop to Windows 8. Actually, it is just a 45% installed as I write this. Even though this seems to have been a simple upgrade (keeping my fingers crossed), it has taken more time than I thought, and I know will still have to chase down some replacement drivers after I'm done. I'm glad I didn't procrastinate to the point of missing the cheap price window.

As for my desktop machine, I can't do an upgrade right now, because my wife is currently using it for remote work arrangement, and is very much not interested in learning a new OS. I had been planning to create a dual boot setup for now, with the intention of doing a full upgrade later on. But.... in the process of getting ready to upgrade the laptop, I learned that you can't use the upgrade version to create a dual boot system. So I guess I need to get the System Builder version?

Do you know if the price on that is going to go up too?

freeandeasy
on Jan 18, 2013

This article served as a good reminder. It reminded me to purchase two copies of Win 7 64 bit home premium for less than the copy of one non-discounted Win8 upgrade. Our office has no plans to support Win8 for the VPN, and I'd like to have a couple Win7 licenses available if I need/want them.

Win8 is fine on my laptop, but I'd rather have Win7 than have to install Classic Shell and ignore the hotcorner stuff that pops up when I mouse into them. Win7 + new process manager and file-copy dialogue from Win8 would have been an easy upgrade choice for me.

But instead I'm now making sure I have Win7 licenses so I stay legit. I feel like the crazies storing incandescent lightbulbs when there was the fervor about possibly outlawing them in favor of LEDs/Compact-Flourescents :-(

In this case though, I think Microsoft is the crazy one.

BrownieBoy
on Jan 19, 2013

Windows 8's not selling too well at $40 and Microsoft's response is to quadruple the price?

As somebody said on another blog, that's like nailing the coffin shut from the inside!!

Daniel D
on Jan 19, 2013

You have to wonder about a company that thinks the answer to a lacklustre respornse to its new OS from the market and an army of bloggers across the internet, looking for any reason to give Microsoft a bad news day, is to increase its core products price by several hundred percent

I'm remind of Steve Balmers proud proclamation at the WIndows 8 launch "We're all in". As a Windows developer I can tell you Steve, no, no you most certainly are not. You haven't even started to be competitive and I'm sure II'm not the only developer getting increasingly fed up that you're not..

Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2013

As a Windows developer that should be targeting WinRT, you should realize that this move will push more customers to just buy new PC's, meaning that production costs can be cut on volume manufacturing of the WinRT-targeted technologies like touchscreens, more pervasive 3G/4G mobile computing, sensors, and the like.

qbob
on Jan 19, 2013

Windows upgrades in the consumer market has been a negligible business for 25 years so I've been curious what Microsoft would do with Windows 8.

Pricing for us early adoptors has been a good way of kick starting the new release but 99% of consumers will not have considering the upgrade yet, largely because its not something they have done before.

The significance will only start to become visible to consumers when they consider buying a new device such as a tablet or change their setup to switch to office subscription etc. A typical new scenario would be an existing Windows 7 laptop user who buys a Windows tablet. They can then run a Windows store app on tablet and old laptop only if the laptop is upgraded to Windows 8. A valuable and new upgrade incentive that was never there for earlier versions of Windows. However at $199, this is a non-starter for most people who can see this as a strong incentive to make a move from Windows to the Android or iOS space.

A missed opportunity by Microsoft and its hard to see any rationale in trying to maintain the status quo on upgrade pricing. Its going against the whole point of Windows 8 being to try and build more relevance in the modern consumer market.

Mike84
on Jan 19, 2013

Wow! WIndows is shockingly expensive.

Like everyone here I got this software at the $40 price... so am I now going to encourage my friends, my family, my colleagues to hand over $160 more than me because they're a bit late?

No. I like these people.

Waethorn
on Jan 19, 2013

If you like these people, why didn't you do a better job in convincing them to buy it when it was cheap??

chesterdog
on Jan 21, 2013

Paul, Thanks for the reminder, however I had purchased a Dell computer with Windows 8 basic. I tried to do the upgrade online and received a message that the offer was not available. When I contacted Microsoft support, I was told that I needed to buy the Pro Pack at $69.99. The offer did not apply to my situation. I hadn't read that anywhere.

Mac_Ha
on Jan 23, 2013

Is it OK to buy an upgrade (actually, a key) now, but run the actual upgrade after 31 January? Do activation keys time constrained? I still need time to resolve some compatibility issues on my PC...

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use