
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 6:16 PM
To: Microsoft - All Employees (QBDG)
Subject: Windows Leadership Changes

I think this is not a very good sign for MS, Steven did a fantastic job of taking some bold steps which so far have proven fruitful for MS. Hopefully Green can pickup things where Steven left.
1. About Julie Larson-Green: "ability to effectively collaborate and drive a cross company agenda".
2. About Tami Reller: " her strong talents in working with internal groups and partners"
Based on those two remarks its clear that part of this decision comes from the known fact of Sinofsky's crash with other divisions withing MS.
Steve Ballmer seems to have 9 lives. Executives that receive high praise in the tech press come & go but Ballmer hangs on somehow. I'm far from a stock market geek or tech stock watcher, but it seems to me where other tech companies have had flat revenues the CEOs ultimately fell on the sword. Not Ballmer. The guy just doesn't seem like he'll go away.
Wow. just wow. Not sure what to make of this. It's always good to get some new blood in to float new ideas, but I have to admit it doesn't look good to have the captain jump ship after setting a new coarse. I have a feeling that (and I hope i'm wrong) that this may not be the last of such announcements. Also it's interesting that they keep losing their 'public' faces. First it was Watson and now Sinofsky. I guess the 6 figure salary just isn't enough to deal with apple fanboys, hatemail, etc.
Lets hope Julie Larson-Green will leed windows back to something that can be used in productive enviroments. I am sure Metro (or wathever microsoft wants to call it today) is great on tablets. But on a desktop it is killing for productivity.
Phone is like Tablet
Tablet != Desktop
Yes, yes, yes.
I'm certain that Win8/Metro for desktop (mouse, keyboard) will be prominently featured in future "Worst UI/UX decisions of all time" lists.
It is just terrible. "Shove your mouse into a random corner to see what you can do" is frustratingly non-intuitive.
I just posted on Paul's article on this (not the one with Sinofsky's statement) - I just want to add this:
in that statement I thought of impatience as a low life explanation for Balmer's move. I also said I thought that was *very* short sighted - Sinofsky, from what Paul has taught me, was instrumental in getting Win 8 to happen, though I have no idea how much he was instrumental in its design at a high level.
But good old fashioned jealosy/politics, as bdegrande has said above, gives an even worse prognosis for Ballmer and for Microsoft. And knowing Ballmer's public persona, I think bdegrande is onto something!