Supposed Windows Phone Roadmap Leaks, But Is It Real?

WMPowerUser has obtained what it says is an October 2011 rendition of Microsoft's roadmap for Windows Phone. I'm not sure I'm buying the authenticity of this document, however, because it uses calendar year (CY) dates instead of fiscal year (FY) dates like the internal Windows Phone division documents I've recently viewed. And it contradicts other information I've obtained. 

But... what the heck. I know you're curious. And since the site that published this image originally has annoyingly watermarked it for some reason, I've created my own cleaner version:

roadmap

This image conveniently does correspond with some information that's long been rumored. For example, Tango is widely seen as a way to bridge the gap with lower-end smart phones.

But how does this jive with what I've seen?

The documentation I've viewed, which highlights Microsoft's Windows Phone plans for the next six months, never mentions Tango or Apollo. It discusses various upcoming handsets from a variety of companies, as well as LTE compatibility in the first half of 2012, which belies the notion that Tango--supposedly due during this same time frame--is somehow only for low-end handsets. It's possible, of course, that Microsoft's LTE plans exist outside of the OS update schedule. Or that Tango doesn't even exist.

I'd also point out that competing at the low-end of the market only requires handset makers to lower prices. The Samsung Focus Flash, for example, is available now for just $50 and is a fine second-generation Windows Phone handset. This device blows away the years-old iPhone 3GS that AT&T is now selling for 99 cents (i.e. "free"), so it begs the question: What if an incredible device like the Focus Flash was simply subsidized for free? What a tremendous deal that would be. It's unclear how "Tango" improves on that. Assuming it's real.

Discuss this Article 1

arnavd
on Dec 28, 2011
While it is easy to see that why would be need to focus on low end devices, we should remember that most emerging market carriers(which are actually larger by a significant number than the US) have no subsidizing of handsets. They focus solely on providing network. In these markets esp. India & China it is extremely important that they provide low cost alternatives to iPHone. Also, these markets are numerically large & also super important to Nokia. Feature phones still rule the roost & if they can get people hooked to a eco system at low end they can then effectively market newer devices higher up the chain as well. American is almost singular in it's obsession with carriers and their subsidies. It makes moving between carriers extremely difficult if not downright impossible.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use