Why Surface RT? Part 2: Microsoft Office

Only Surface with Windows RT comes with a fully-functional version of Microsoft Office

While the iPad has certain ecosystem advantages over the recently-released Surface with Windows RT, Microsoft’s entry does of course edge out the Apple device in some key areas as well. And one major advantage of the Surface over iPad is that it comes with a fully functional version of Microsoft Office.

You may have read otherwise. That the Office version included with Surface with Windows RT is in some way hobbled or limited, or available only for “non-commercial” use. None of this is strictly true: Office Home & Student 2013 RT, as this Office version is obtusely named, is the real thing, not some watered down mobile app such as the version Microsoft included with Windows Phone. It’s roughly equivalent to the Office Home & Student 2013 version Microsoft will soon be selling for customers with traditional x86 versions of Windows. (With some differences noted above.)

Here’s what you need to know about Office Home & Student 2013 RT.

Surface RT ships with a Preview version. Over time, Windows RT will automatically update you to the final, shipping version of Office Home & Student 2013 RT. But I wrote about how you can get the upgrade immediately in Microsoft Surface: Upgrade to Final Office 2013 RT. There’s no reason to wait.

There’s no Outlook. And there never will be. Office Home & Student 2013 RT ships with full-featured versions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote 2013, and you can download free Metro-style OneNote and Lync apps from Windows Store. This product does not, and will not, including a version of Microsoft Outlook. Instead, you can use the Mail, Calendar, and People apps that ship with Windows RT.

Non-commercial use. The licensing for Office Home & Student 2013 RT has gotten a lot of press since its “non-commercial” use clause seems to preclude using this suite to get real work done. Individuals can feel free to use Office RT however they want. But businesses that want to deploy Surface (or any other Windows RT device) can purchase a commercial license to cover work usage of Office RT. Ed Bott has written up a nice article, How much do you have to pay to use Office 2013 RT for work?, explaining your options. And I’ve written up a separate article about related work issues in Taking Surface to Work. But the fact remains: You can use Office RT for work.

Missing features. Part of the myth around Office Home & Student 2013 RT is that it’s somehow a watered down version of the “normal” Office suite with many missing features. It’s true that it’s missing some stuff—see Microsoft’s Introducing Office Home & Student 2013 RT Preview for a complete rundown—but I don’t find any to be hugely problematic. And seriously, give Microsoft credit for this port to Windows RT/ARM, which is pretty incredible.

I wrote more about Office RT in Office 2013 Home & Student 2013 RT Preview, so if you’re still unclear about what you’re getting—for free, by the way—be sure to check that out. But the big issue here is that Microsoft will be porting Office to the iPad (and to Android devices) in 2013. So is this inclusion of Office just a temporary advantage?

No. It is not.

As I reported previously, Office for iPad (and other non-Microsoft systems) will only be made available as part of an Office 365 subscription. So where Surface with Windows RT users get Office for free, and perpetually, iPad users will need to pay, monthly, forever. And this is true whether the iPad version of Office is used for work or play. (Again, businesses that roll out Surface RT for work will need to pay for Office there as well.)

That much is a fact, but if I can speculate for a moment, I also suspect that the iPad/Android versions of Office will be very limited compared to Office RT, and that they will be more similar to the Windows Phone version of Office, or perhaps to the Office Web Apps. Assuming this is true, and that Office iPad is no Office RT clone, then that, too, will be a major advantage for Surface with Windows RT. It’s hard to imagine Microsoft doing otherwise.

But regardless, Surface with Windows RT will always have the pricing advantage. Surface for the win.

Discuss this Article 8

garymoncrieff
on Nov 11, 2012

Agreed and I feel this message wasn't communicated well on the last Windows Weekly, I really wish you could arrange one of the Lowdermilk's as your replacement if you cant be on the show.

ryanrpalmer
on Nov 11, 2012

Office is the sole reason I decided to guy with the Surface. I am a writer and need a portable on the go writing solution with access to all of my Word documents.
For this reason, Surface is truly a dream come true.

paebin2s
on Nov 11, 2012

I think that Office or the need for it on a tablet or the need for it on the iPad is overblown.

If it ever comes to iOS I wont get even if it is free. I have read that it will be free for reading only of documents and for editing you will need the subscription. On iOS I can already open and read any office document with the built in preview app....same on the Mac.

You can also use Office web apps on iOS, which works today.

Basically I just do have a real need to do a lot of editing of documents on a tablet, so I dont see Office on RT as any real advantage.

BAMWIN8
on Nov 11, 2012

I too agree that we miss you on WW and you should get better replacements. Also there needs to be a better replacement for Leo than Iyaz.

john729
on Nov 11, 2012

Lyaz is great! Leo seems so bored sometimes ... I bought the surface because of Office. I used the IPad and I had over 50 apps but mainly used it for the internet and light work. With sky drive and freedempop I do not need the laptop when I am in the field.

pthurrott
on Nov 11, 2012

Guys, let's keep the Windows Weekly stuff out of here, please. There'a a Windows Weekly article that makes more sense for that:

http://winsupersite.com/podcasts/windows-weekly-286-i-it-differently

Thanks. --Paul

jedavies
on Nov 12, 2012

Office on the Surface is a big deal. And by the stars, I wanted it to work. When I tried it out at an 'Experience Station', I loaded on a Word document I'd been working on: it had three columns, custom styles, some bitmapped graphics and some math 'equations'. Maybe 9 pages long. It ran like molasses. My powershell script that automated word template creation didn't work either: apparently the COM objects aren't exposed in RT. It's hard to describe how disappointed I was. I'd been waiting for months. Maybe next time?

thereal_entheos
on Nov 12, 2012

I know that outlook isn't well liked by "some", but why this isn't included or even available on Office 2013 RT is puzzling. It seems like the perfect app for a tablet. Maybe it's a little bloated and obtuse, but it works really well with Exchange accounts (a little less so with pop/smtp) and is much better than any web email interface. It also would be an easy and free way to share contacts via sharepoint, and not have to buy a ~$15 app like on the ipad. I might have said the same as Paul about Outlook b4 I had an Exchange account(s), just like it is easy to hate 3D movies / TV until you have seen it done well or see 3D pictures that you took yourself. That's all.

Please or Register to post comments.

IT/Dev Connections

Las Vegas
September 30th - October 4th

Paul ThurottYou'll have the opportunity to experience:
• 120 Technical
Sessions
• Networking with Peers
• Expert Speakers


Come See Paul Thurrott & Mary Jo Foley in Person!

Register Now

Office 365 InfoCenter

Get the latest insight and info from Paul

Read Now!

What I Use